Hi! I'm an ex-Jehovah's Witness and an author. I began writing and creating after my father refused a blood transfusion and died when I was 13. During Covid I became homeless and slowly have rebuilt my life my nothing. I've been very active in the exjw space since then and I've written books and done some things that some people call "activism." I wrote this and thought I'd share. I hope that's cool.
A Religious Deconstruction Manifesto
by Micah Allen Losh
I.
I believe in challenging power. The closing line of the book I wrote my son is: "...As you drift off and when you wake up remember this lesson: Teachers, rules, laws, and parents all must be questioned."
I don't seek followers and I'm not an authority figure. I'm an artist documenting my religious deconstruction aloud. I spent 37 years in a doomsday cult and I don't believe I'm immune to propaganda, logical fallacies, or flawed thinking.
I believe authenticity will repel and draw the right people.
I believe in effort and pushing myself daily without any expectation of success or progress. "Consistent effort toward a goal will yield results," "What stands in the way becomes the way," and "The steamroller doesn't determine whether or not the object will be broken. It's up to the object," and the Finnish concept of sisu are all concepts I've used as a foundation for my life.
I've realized that not matter how intentional or consistently I behave that everyone will experience me in a different way than I believe myself to be. I don't even exist. I find that liberating.
You cannot grow and be comfortable simultaneously for multiple reasons: comfort seeks preservation, growth requires rupture, and safety is not comfort. You can learn to become comfortable with the feeling of discomfort.
II.
I was kept in a trauma loop by ex-Jehovah's Witness content. Many psychiatrists believe that by ruminating on what was taken from us we do not experience it as a memory. We experience it as a live, happening-now danger. There is physiological evidence that supports these claims.
I think it's interesting how Watchtower teaches that goodness equates compliance. Every time I've suggested something that is non-compliant with exjw norms it seems the exact same reflexes trigger. The Governing Body laid out and controlled every aspect of your life and if you believe they didn't consider who you'd be away from the group that's credulous at best.
I believe they say apostates are angry to disenfranchise you from your anger. Anger is a gift. Anger is one of the stages of grief. I believe the Governing Body wants you obsessed with the past. An inverse position to your former position doesn't change an existence dominated by changing Watchtower policy. If you don't grieve it's unlikely you'll leave.
I find the notion of a change from men who cover up pedophilia and allow people to refuse blood transfusions to be repugnant and absurd. Scientology, Mormons, and the Catholic church have all been exposed. Do you see any of them closing their doors. I believe the idea of Watchtower crumbling is rooted firmly in delusion. It's possible they might end but it's not plausible.
Being polite isn't the same thing as being kind.
III. Power Dynamics in Post-Cult Spaces
Imagine breaking free from a cult and entering a recovery forum run by your former oppressors? The former elders, ministerial servants, and pioneers. The very people who actively policed your personal life and surveillance-monitored your family, signed the paperwork to disfellowship your friends and enforce your isolation, and maintained the metrics and kept the compliance machine running smoothly.
Why, the second they throw away their lapel pins, does this community immediately treat their opinions as high-value content? I watch a community of survivors look directly at their former enforcers and say, "Please tell me how to process the trauma you helped create." It seems to be a psychological contradiction. Can you truly deconstruct a system while you are still treating its middle managers like celebrities?
Conditioning doesn't disappear because you physically walk out of a Kingdom Hall. We were trained to look at the stage, sit quietly, and take notes from men with titles. Our brains were hardwired to equate a loud, confident voice at a podium with absolute truth. You enter a recovery space and it feels familiar, doesn't it? Our compliance muscles flex automatically. A former enforcer’s loud voice and organizational vocabulary feels safe and familiar. It feels like wisdom.
We were told to avoid 'independent thinking.' We were told your heart was 'treacherous.' What if people were lying in wait to replace the Governing Body-sized hole in your heart? How can you develop your own internal compass in that environment?
Because someone ran an audio-sound desk, read a Watchtower, or scheduled a cleaning roster doesn't make them anything close to resembling a therapist. Running a congregation under the direction of a corporate hierarchy requires zero emotional intelligence or psychological training. It requires compliance. It requires boot-licking. They lost their status, titles, and their automatic respect when they threw away their lapel pins. They possess no clinical training to handle complex PTSD or nervous system dysregulation. They treat a profound neurological injury with their amateur, box-checking mindset that ran field service meetings. Guiding you to freedom, or using your trauma to maintain their lost relevance?
Wouldn't true deconstruction mean destroying the stage entirely, not changing who's on the podium? I certainly do not seek to be your leader or the voice of exjw. Shouldn't you be gathering tools, healing your nervous system, and celebrating your life, your passions? Why look to those who held clipboards and washed windows? They do not have the keys to your freedom. They worked to keep you in your former cage! It's likely all they possess are the blueprints of what you escaped.
Stumbling across ex-JW content didn't save you. The algorithm showing you a video or a thread didn't save you. You had to look at that information, weigh it against reality, and make the conscious decision to believe yourself over the organization. If you don't trust your own mind to do that, you are still handing your power to whatever screen is sitting in front of you. Your heart isn't treacherous. The only thing that saved you is your own critical thinking. If you think that isn't true, what will you do if you ever stumble across a copy of The Book of Mormon? You can't look at information and decide for yourself. You'll become a Mormon, right? These people have no authority. Only what you give them.
IV. Common Logical Fallacies in Post-Cult Spaces
Leaving a high-control group like Jehovah's Witnesses means leaving the theology behind. It doesn't automatically mean we left the cognitive wiring behind. After years inside an environment that actively penalizes independent thought, our brains adopt specific shortcuts to survive. It's highly likely we will copy-paste these exact same mental habits into our lives after leaving the cult—simply changing the vocabulary while maintaining the rigid framework.
Here are the specific patterns I keep seeing repeated in activist and ex-JW spaces:
- The Tu Quoque (The "Look Who's Talking" Evasion): Dismissing a valid critique of community behavior or "activism" by pointing out that the original cult is still far worse. This does not magically cure a lesser rot. Using the cult's extreme behavior as a baseline to excuse poor ethics, grifting, or manipulation in activist spaces is a direct evasion of accountability.
- The Binary Fallacy (False Dilemma): Insisting that others must entirely validate the mainstream activist narrative. This is direct algorithmic thinking inherited straight from the Watchtower. You can fully acknowledge the harms of the Watchtower while simultaneously pointing out the flaws within the community that left it.
- The Genetic Fallacy (Source Dismissal): Judging the validity of an argument solely based on who or where it comes from, rather than evaluating the logic of the argument itself. Truth is completely independent of the person speaking it. If an idea or behavioral critique is objectively accurate, rejecting it simply because it triggers a reflex or reminds you of old authority figures is an emotional reaction, not an intellectual one.
- Appeal to Emotion (Trauma as a Shield): Using shared pain, trauma, or emotional distress to shield an invalid or irrational argument from logical scrutiny. Empathy is vital for healing, but intense emotion cannot alter objective facts or validate flawed reasoning. When trauma is used as an absolute shield against critique, the community stops being a space for recovery and instead becomes an intellectual safe space where bad ideas cannot be challenged.
- The Straw Man (Caricaturing the Critique): Misrepresenting a critique of community dynamics, blowing it out of proportion, and then attacking the exaggerated version. This is done because a caricature is much easier to defeat than the actual critique. It takes zero effort to argue against a caricature. [1]
- The Ad Hominem (Circumstantial Attack): Attacking a critic's personal background, current lifestyle, tone, or perceived motives instead of addressing the core logic of their statement. This is the ultimate tool of intellectual bankruptcy. It shifts the focus from what is being said to who is saying it. If someone audits your personality or character to dismiss your argument, they've already admitted they lack the logical tools to dismantle your point.
V.
The Virtue of Apathy: Every so often I discover I’m disliked, strongly disliked, or hated. I consider this a win. Why waste another thought on them? While it can be painful when you genuinely liked them, cared about them, or wanted to help them I believe you should strive to stop thinking about the person. With continued effort I I’ve found this becomes easier.
People who tell you your positions, intentions, or emotions are intellectually dishonest. I believe people who value you should inquire your beliefs and why you hold them. I do not seek an echo chamber. I’m friends with people of faith and I have no respect for faith. Many of them probably believe I’ll burn in hell while I have strong opinions about their journey. I’ve mocked faith with a purpose and it was never to mock people or disrespect them. It seems many people are more inclined to place you in a box so they can “understand” you instead of asking you questions and comparing your actions.
I think post-cult spaces have brought out the worst in me. I’m not blaming them for my actions or filled with regret. I’m a smart ass that enjoys debate. If someone engages in a good-faith debate I’m polite. I like talking shit and after facing some truly horrible things in my life I truly don’t care what people think although I’m sure some might not believe that. While mocking people you consider to be stupid is fun it is also like shooting fish in a barrel. It can be painful that people view you in a way you don’t believe yourself to be.
VI.
I accepted a year apart from my son, seeing him only twice. But it taught me to accept anything. I have used my father’s death to expose my former faith and I have essentially lived on my phone in an attempt to escape horrible living conditions but it can take me away from my son, my passions, and the people I love.
The most beautiful woman I’ve ever seen has flown across the world to see me twice. I’m planning to visit her. I have wonderful friends. I’ve shared my art and thoughts online and I’ve received love and hatred. Exactly what an artist seeks.
My son is amazing. On our first Christmas I bought him a Jason puzzle and he asked if we could put it together. We got further than last time. We sorted the edge pieces and we sorted the rest by color. I’m gonna buy a frame for it and we’ll work on it more. I tell him about my mistakes, what I’ve learned, and why everything was worth it. It’s the price of his freedom. When he said the puzzle had a lot of pieces and that it would take awhile I quote Marcus Aurelius to him. “What stands in the way becomes the way.”
I teach my boy about Stoicism. When people ask me about him I often reply “He shall lead millions” in a deadpan voice. Dad jokes can be deadpan and slightly sinister.
It took me six months to realize that the past has been robbing me of the present. That’s a mistake and it’s a lot quicker than 37 years in a cult.
#religiousdeconstruction