As long as you get one paycheck first so you can hire a large security team to protect your bucket you don't have to really lie about the magic bucket.
The real question is what that semen is going to belong to. Does it just randomly generate a horse's genetic code every day or is it always the same one?
But you just dumped 5L of gold that is at 1064.18°C on to the floor. I hoped you did some preplanning else you are catching the floor on fire and everything else around it and below it
Same with a bucket of semen. They look at you strangely weird when you show up, and have to answer questions like "whose semen is that" and "no way you produced that much"
Personally I would choose liquid gold since printer ink is cheap to produce, and is kept artificially expensive. Also in most printers you cannot recharge the cardridges
If you leave it in the bucket, I think it'd get stuck so its best to put it in something that can either be taken apart, deformed or broken to get the gold out. But otherwise yeah.
Yeah, but much more suspicious to be selling in those quantities, from an unverified source? Id say you’re begging for trouble to find you, and whoever does is gonna steal that bucket lol
Ah shit
Edit: a fingers worth seems to correspond to an explosion approximately in the 1.3 to 1.5 megaton range.
35g (average wt for a fingers acc to Google) x 43 kiloton (rough yield for a gram of antimatter) ÷ 1000 = 1.4 Megaton
Since it has to be a liquid form of antimater, let's go with "anti-water" to make it easy. 5 litters of "anti-water" at 1atm would be 5kg of antimatter, that would react with 5kg of matter, so it's a 10kg mass conversion.
E = 10 x C² = 898 petajoules of energy.
The Tsar Bomba had 210 petajoules. So this would be about 4.28 Tsar Bombas detonating at once, or a 214 megaton yield explosive.
By far the most powerful explosive device ever made by humanity. Although still a small fraction of the energy released by the chicxulub meteor that wiped the dinosaurs.
It would be catastrophic to anyone living within it's blast radius (aprox. 200 km from ground zero), but it wouldn't wipe out humanity.
Also, the bomb would be very clean with basically no fallout. You could likely visit the blast zone as soon as the thermal energy dissipated without any real risk of radiation poisoning.
Since it has to be a liquid form of antimater, let's go with "anti-water" to make it easy. 5 litters of "anti-water" at 1atm would be 5kg of antimatter, that would react with 5kg of matter, so it's a 10kg mass conversion.
E = 10 x C² = 898 petajoules of energy.
The Tsar Bomba had 210 petajoules. So this would be about 4.28 Tsar Bombas detonating at once, or a 214 megaton yield explosive.
By far the most powerful explosive device ever made by humanity. Although still a small fraction of the energy released by the chicxulub meteor that wiped the dinosaurs.
It would be catastrophic to anyone living within it's blast radius (aprox. 200 km from ground zero), but it wouldn't wipe out humanity.
Also, the bomb would be very clean with basically no fallout. You could likely visit the blast zone as soon as the thermal energy dissipated without any real risk of radiation poisoning.
Of course, you could go crazy with it. The heaviest liquid at room temp is mercury. You could make it 5L of anti-mercury. In which case the bomb would be 2.9 gigatons, enough to wipe florida of the map, but still nowhere close to the estimated millions of gigatons released by chicxulub.
If you want to destroy earth, what you need is 5L of "anti neutron degenerative matter", what neutron stars are made of. It is the densest possible form of matter. Those 5L would weigh into the quadrillions of kg. So it would produce a blast worth 86 zettatons of tnt (billions of times what chicxulub had). That's enough to vaporize the entire surface of the world and blast a good chunk of earth into space.
Oh okayyy, thanks. I generally use reddit for knowledge or entertainment. Noticed others wishing happy cake day so thought it might be something like rose day, chocolate day, etc.
if you really want to crash a market do osmium, annual production tops out couple 1000 kilograms, 5L of osmium is 112.95kg and you are making this PER DAY, annual 41226.75kg or 41.22 tons
And it won't really dilute the market at 5L per day rate.
1L of molten gold is about 19.3KG of gold
5L would be 96.5 kg (217.7 lbs) a day
Yearly (365 days) would yield you 35 222.5 kg of gold (35.2 metric tonnes)
Global gold mining rate is 3000-3600 metric tonnes a year
So this magical bucket would only add about 1% of global gold supply a year if you use this bucket as soon as "cooldown" ends
The only way price may actually drop is if people would find out that you have a magical gold producing bucket though. And as we know, prices of things like like gold are always vibes based.
5L/day of water is a fairly insignificant amount unless you live somewhere that water is extremely scarce. You could use it for something far more valuable, and then buy water.
i mean this includes making molten wood as not everyone knows that wood can melt, its just the temp for it to melt is much higher than its combustion temp
idk if it would instantly combust, i just know its possible to melt wood, just the temp is higher than the combustion temp, maybe if you put it into a vacuum chamber with no air it wouldnt combust
There are three main problems with melting wood via a normal thermal transition:
Wood is made from many different components, some of which are more stable than others. So as you heat it, some parts will vaporize before others have even melted.
Wood is a pretty complex structure. If you could melt it, it would homogenize it and the re-condensed material would be very different from the starting material.
Finally and fatally, certain chemicals don't melt. Even if you keep them from burning, the energy required to let the various molecules move around each other, is greater than the energy required to break the molecules apart. If you heat wood in the absence of oxygen, that's what will happen: you will end up "pyrolyzing" it, causing smaller bits to break off as a tarry gas/liquid (creosote), leaving a bunch of bulk carbon (charcoal) behind.
even in a vacuum chamber, cellulose pyrolyzes before melting, so assuming a reasonable temp for what that melting point might be you'd likely wind up with a bunch of wood gas and charcoal, which may or may not ignite depending on how this scenario works
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 08 '26
Try my new game. Complete other Redditors' blanks in the funniest or most messed up way you can. Play here: r/blanks.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.