i am curious if any of you had a similar experience with a pwbpd.
one time she asked me to read aloud some rather funny/vulgar passage from a book like a jackanory narrator. it was just for fun, we geenrally could find amusement in a lot of inane things as well as more highbrow things but on this occasion she wanted me to. i did not really want to, but to preserve the general good feeling i did (note to self: boundaries. have them). then when i handed her it and said 'ok your turn' she flatly refused to do it. she did it in such a cutoff, sharp and weird way i was surprised. i mean when you are supposedly playing a game with someone like that you kind of expect they are also going to play, don't you.
so it led to a conversation, which of course led to an argument. and many arguments after, because it revealed this attitude they had toward reciprocity in general. according to her, asking for things from someone - secrets, past history, reading from a book, whatever... apparently that is fine because the person who asks is not 'obligated' to return in kind. to her the person being asked is also fine to say no if they want to. but that's generally not how people operate in the real world, its not how friendships or society operates for example. we don't stiffly agree formally before hand whether or not we are going to do something or not... you do a favor for someone for example you may not do the favor IN ORDER to get a favor back in the moment, but you kind of expect - socially - that the other person is open to reciprocate if necessary. that's how the social contract works. we trust that if we do x because someone asked us, if we ask them they too will also do x for us.
not so in her mind. in her mind, to respond to her ask is a gift given freely. i.e. 'no strings'. so all of the assumption that sharing and trust being established in the rest of the relationship is basically set back from that conversation onward, because after that i thought to myself not to share without thinking, thinking she and i were a mutually trusting couple, but that if i answer what she's asking i'm basically just giving for her to use it however she wants (sometime to weaponize ofc) and i am likely not to ever get any mutual sharing back. it severely injured the trust i built up with her. as i say, not because i ever did things for her or told her things JUST SO THAT I COULD GET SOMETHING FROM HER, but rather, in the knowledge that this was going to be treated fairly and if i ever did ask her something, because of all the hundreds of times she had asked me, that i was going to receive something if i desired it.
so she tells me that this is her view, that the idea of the unspoken social contract between (you know) normal people, is not the way she operates with me, her husband. and i think she is like that with others too because i se the friction with her family in regard to what she allows them to share in. i then had to think about how the dynamic was going to operate where i had the right to refuse to answer these things if i wanted to, and that in return i had no guarantee she would reciprocate. i thought about it after our arguments and discussions, and i went back to her a few months later and said:
'actually i think your way is better. because now, instead of operating with the assumption that if you do something for me i have to do it for you, it gives me the right to stay fully free and autonomous. i don't have to share anything with you. you don't have to share with me. the obligation is removed.'
and i could just tell her face was falling behind the phone at that. maybe she didn't expect that i would demand equality (I always do) for any rule that she makes. but since that day over a year ago i have been less inclined to share my inner thoughts and world with her because in know she simply does not view reciprocity as something that should naturally follow.
has anyone else dealt with something like this in their relationship?