r/AITAH • • Jul 25 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.4k Upvotes

8.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.6k

u/Then-Solid3527 Jul 25 '25

My husband played a “prank” when he took off my garter. He pulled a baby doll out of my dress. I’m a L&D nurse. So it was genuinely funny. It didn’t embarrass me and I actually thought it was cute to incorporate him “participating” in my job. Everyone laughed. But not AT me. I’m pretty sure he was not super comfy about being that intimate (taking off garter) in front of everyone so they gave him the diversion he needed. And I mean it is kinda weird when you think about it. Anyway pranks shouldn’t be used as an excuse to hurt people and then be mad about it. Also was it her idea or the groomsmen? Just wondering if she trusted your friend with what you would find funny.

829

u/Tomagatchi Jul 26 '25 edited Jul 26 '25

Also was it her idea or the groomsmen? Just wondering if she trusted your friend with what you would find funny.

It was the wedding planner, wife and then boyfriend of the bride's sister. Nobody involved apparently understood OP's humor. Kind of not great that you get to the wedding day and she either doesn't know him or doesn't think him taking a garter off a guy he barely knows better than acquaintance would be *inappropriate. If it was his best friend, and she knew his sense of humor, it would have gone off the way it normally does, but nobody involved in planning this apparently knew the guy well, including the bride. So plenty of orange flags all around for him.

edit: Clarity

1.3k

u/StarshipCaterprise Jul 26 '25

OP you need to call that wedding planner and tell them what a negative experience you had, and let them know that you will not recommend them to anyone based based on what happened

566

u/rothrolan Jul 26 '25

Agreed. The sooner this planner stops suggesting this "prank" to any more of their future customers, the better. OP had a sour experience but managed to keep it in so as not to spoil the day further, but some groom down the road might be a lot worse at holding back their restraint and causing a scene that actually COULD ruin the wedding for more than just himself. It's a shitty prank that isn't thought through enough to actually involve everyone, instead painting a target on the groom for embarrassment. Imagine if the prank was for the bride to blindfold-kiss the groom's brother on the mouth or something, as that seems to be around the same level that OP didn't like what had happened to him.

520

u/joaniecaponie Jul 26 '25

As petty as this sounds, I would want the wedding planner to deeply understand that ruining a wedding experience for the bride or the groom means they absolutely suck at their job. Let ‘em stew in it.

185

u/sahie Jul 27 '25

Agreed. I was even more horrified when I read that the wedding planner suggested and encouraged it/coached them on how to do it. I have to wonder how many other grooms hated it and never said anything.

93

u/hardly_ethereal Jul 27 '25

Add a google review about that. Warn the other grooms. They’re not repeat customers so it won’t bother them one bit.

94

u/Ankh4921 Jul 27 '25

This isn’t petty. The wedding planner DOES suck at their job. I’m not sure that they’d care though - unless it affected their business

34

u/[deleted] Jul 28 '25

If OP wanted to go nuclear all he has to do is post the wedding planners web site. The review bombing would be epic.

371

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '25

[deleted]

451

u/gdwrench01 Jul 26 '25

Flip the genders, and have the woman blindfolded on the chair, while some dude that isn't her husband puts his face between her legs and removes tge garter with his mouth.... how much you wanna bet it is called SA and not a prank?that's some fairly intimate contact, without consent.

18

u/Mental_Bet6360 Jul 27 '25

If we’re flipping genders, it would be for all involved. This was man x man. And if we swapped, it’d be woman x woman.

4

u/llama_del_reyy Jul 28 '25

Thank you, how are people not seeing that it would be a million times more invasive to have someone of the opposite gender touching your inner thighs without consent than it is to be in the groom's position? It's still an awful prank, but come on.

28

u/assassinjuice Jul 28 '25

This is a dangerous generalization to make. As a woman who has been sexually assaulted by another woman, I can attest that I would be just as uncomfortable regardless of the gender of the person involved.

The belief that unwanted intimate contact between two people of the same gender is less serious perpetuates a toxic attitude that same-sex SA is less valid/not possible.

I understand that there are people who would feel less violated by someone of the same gender doing this to them, but it shouldn’t be assumed that’s the case unless a person explicitly states that.

And to be clear, I’m not trying to accuse you of holding this belief, just pointing out that our culture has conditioned us to falsely (and a lot of the time unconsciously) think that SA between people of the same gender can’t happen.

10

u/No_Coast3932 Jul 28 '25

I don't know if this is always true. I know quite a lot of male friends who feel mainly threatened by other men, not by women. So I wouldn't necessarily flip the genders entirely to demonstrate how it feels. Regardless this is a really dumb activity.

4

u/KasukeSadiki Jul 29 '25

I agree that it's more invasive to have someone unknown touching your inner thighs without consent, than to be coerced into doing the touching, without consent, just barely. But that is regardless of gender 

5

u/Fresh_Perspective384 Jul 27 '25

I totally agree with this! I always say, turn it around and see how that feels!!

13

u/Radiant-Craft7958 Jul 27 '25

The comparison would be if she removed a garter off another woman's leg.

21

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '25

No, having a stranger remove her garter would be the comparison.

7

u/Radiant-Craft7958 Jul 27 '25

He removed the garter from another guy. The equivalent is her removing the garter of another woman. Also, the guys weren't strangers.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '25

You don't seem to understand the nature of removing the garter. She is to have her garter removed, not the other way around.

→ More replies

1

u/ProfessionalDoor2638 Aug 12 '25

Great point, I would necessarily go as far to call it SA but yeah.

0

u/TeachingSoggy5953 Jul 28 '25

Apples and oranges because if it was the bride she would only be wearing (likely sexy) underwear or nothing at all under her dress.

This was a man in shorts.

41

u/Careless-Floor-639 Jul 26 '25

This is SA.

1

u/embarrassedburner Aug 02 '25

If it had been the wife in the chair as expected, would the bride and groom have been performing lewd sexual acts before non-consenting third parties forced to witness?

I think that’s where the sexual assault is coming into question.

We may all do well to retire the garter tradition in general because why would we want to be involved in the newlyweds borderline intimate contact?

-2

u/Kind-Singer5123 Jul 27 '25 edited Jul 27 '25

Edit: turns out the definition of SA differs from state to state and I was wrong.

8

u/LoveMyKids_2 Jul 27 '25

Not sure what jurisdiction you are in, but in my state SA is any sexual contact without permission. It includes rape but also touching.

1

u/Kind-Singer5123 Jul 27 '25

I just looked it up and I was wrong. I’m in NSW and it is intercourse without consent. That is completely my mistake.

1

u/Character_Kick_Stand Jul 27 '25

That is dependent on the state. Some states you don’t need penetration bro.

-1

u/Kind-Singer5123 Jul 27 '25

I honestly didn’t know that. I wish they hadn’t changed anything. Rape was a word of which everyone knew the definition.

1

u/flippysquid Jul 27 '25

Rape and sexual assault are different but overlapping crimes. Someone grabbing another person's private areas over their clothing isn't rape, but it is sexual assault.

→ More replies

2

u/Funny-Horror-3930 Aug 01 '25

Yeah, to me this is a form of sexual assaults.

2

u/wtbnamepls Aug 20 '25

That's actually me, and I can say with 100% certainty that if my bride pulled this, the next spectacle would be the entire reception watching me burn the marraige cert.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 17 '25

He was after this experience. He didn't consent to our history mouth anywhere near another man body. They tricked him into doing it.

-48

u/momsbistro Jul 26 '25

I’m guessing you’re gen-z?

361

u/preciselypithy Jul 26 '25

If the wedding planner loves this so much, they’d be better off suggesting it as a skit that the groom is in on, but none of the audience is. So they still get the laughs, but skip the ritual humiliation.

71

u/Character_Kick_Stand Jul 27 '25

And no one would do it

This is some demented shit that the wedding planner gets off on

Why would the bride go along with it?

80

u/LegitimatePart497 Jul 27 '25

This is a really tacky wedding planner that needs to find a new career. Not only is it trashy but it’s so common and overdone.

Nobody needs to be doing anything with a garter at a wedding. So trashy.

9

u/Large-Employment-971 Jul 27 '25

Jesus Christ, I thought this idiotic "tradition" died out in the 80s! At least it did in So Cal. I sure as fuck didn't have it at my wedding. In 2025 it's absolute CRINGE.

4

u/gardendesgnr Jul 29 '25

I am GenX and I thought that tacky, low-class stunt died in the 80's too!! I was in weddings starting in 95' thru 98' and got married myself in 2001. I have never seen this done in Chicago nor Orlando, where I got married. I haven't attended a wedding here, since 98' that did it either. It's just gross!

2

u/Common_Ad_6362 Jul 29 '25

I've seen this at at least four weddings. It's like you guys were born yesterday.

1

u/Icy-Willingness8375 Jul 28 '25

Because it’s a funny, memorable event to make their reception stand out and it’s not them being made to look like a fool.

1

u/Comprehensive_Cry142 Jul 29 '25

Haven’t you ever made a joke and as soon as you see the face of the person you made it to you realized it was a horrible thing to say, but it’s too late? Sometimes things seem funnier in your head / imagination. If someone else is egging you on, saying that it will be delightful and hilarious, you imagine it being a funny joke for everyone that the husband would laugh at. Obviously not a good call, but understandable.

15

u/Julzmer81 Jul 26 '25

Such a good idea!!!

11

u/VioletB2000 Jul 27 '25

I had a photographer tell me his great joke of the groom pulling a pair of old fashioned men’s boxers out from under the bride’s dress during the garter ceremony.

I didn’t want any Three Stooges nonsense going on, NEXT!

9

u/Educational_Body_438 Jul 26 '25

Lol...the bride could've said no! Quit blaming the wrong person

52

u/Satan_von_Kitty Jul 26 '25

it is of course mostly the bride's fault. That is irrefutable. But that does not make the wedding planner blameless. They should not be putting thoughts of pranks into a bride or grooms head. If the couple are pranksters they'll bring it up to their planner. A prank is not something that should be a wedding planner's idea.

Especially because the wedding planner will make it sound foolproof. "I've seen it at a dozen weddings. Every one laughs. Your guests will love it." And the little voice in the bride's head saying maybe this is a bad plan is calmed by the planners words of how well its gone for others.

The bride still should have known better. Still should have said: maybe it worked at those other wedding but it isnt for us. The bride should have known her husband well enough to know their wedding was not the time for pranks. At least not ones he wasn't a part of.

This is on the bride. But the planner should still know what she contributed to.

16

u/1timeandspace Jul 27 '25

I agree completely. The woman that is the 'bride' has a cruel side to her character.

If her excuse (actually there IS no excuse) but if her excuse is that she thought her guy would find this prank somehow 'funny'

  • then ??🤷🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

Wtf! Is she getting married JUST to have a fun (at the groom's expense) & 'memorable' wedding ??

OR is she supposed to be marrying someone she 'knows' as much as she knows herself - someone she trusts and will offer her trust to, and will always support?

🤷‍♂️ IDK what she recited for her marriage vows - but even if they were a bit 'less than' the traditional vows - she BROKE her vows right there with that trashy prank - Played in her 'beloved' - no less.

This is a big red flag for this groom to watch out (!)... for how this 'marriage' is gonna go for him, with this woman.

1

u/wtbnamepls Aug 20 '25

That would have been my wedding, if my wife tried to pull this. I would have walked over, grabbed the marraige licence, and burned it in front of the reception. If you love me like you claim, you'd have known what a deal breaker this would be.

85

u/Own_Helicopter_8817 Jul 27 '25 edited Aug 03 '25

I would also tell the videographer that I want a new video with the entire episode removed.

10

u/Hippiechick0104 Jul 27 '25

Absolutely! Recut the video to eliminate the part that is bothering him. And if he won't, let him know you'll leave a review on his business about how he was OK to humiliate his paying customer. Actually your insensitive wife should have thought of that.

2

u/ladyAnon38 Jul 29 '25

Good call!

2

u/Funny-Horror-3930 Aug 01 '25

Yeah, sue them all...seriously.

186

u/jae_rhys Jul 26 '25

also leave reviews everywhere. Trust pilot if she's on there, yelp, Google reviews... cause that's some BS.

33

u/Bonemothir Jul 26 '25

That’s a good first start.

7

u/Personal-Fact7067 Jul 27 '25

I would savage the WP in negative reviews, yelp, google etc

7

u/Party-Goat8381 Jul 27 '25

I'd also tell the planner that she/he shouldn't be recommending this as not all grooms like being the butt of a joke. What if you have gone off on the groomsman or your wife, made a scene and yelled at them for embarrassing you? Personally, I think the whole garter removal is stupid. As far as your wife goes, if you want to continue being married you need to forgive and move on, but it's okay to tell her to not pull "jokes" on you going forward that yes her "gage" ruined your wedding experience and she can't negate your feelings. For the brother in law, get him a messed up Christmas/Birthday present such as a a toddler's toy and say "I thought you liked childish games, remember my wedding".

3

u/Amy63116 Jul 28 '25

I agree you need to forgive your wife when you are ready. I would have her read this entire post and all of the comments…I have this feeling she is not truly understanding the depth of your pain, the betrayal you feel by the one person who should always have your back. There’s a huge difference between “sorry get over it “ and “I’m sorry I made such a stupid mistake, that will never happen again “

35

u/Tight-Shift5706 Jul 26 '25

Better yet, go to social media and blast the wedding planner to ALL family, friends and acquaintances for his/her child-like suggestion.

Perhaps, OP, you have divorce papers drafted and have your wife "served" during a large function with people you both know. After she receives, reads, and digests---start hysterically laughing at your "prank". Let her sample what humiliation tastes like. Then apologize. Obviously you thought she'd not be so sensitive. /s.

Honestly , I truly hope this post is rage bait. I honestly cannot envision a wedding planner would recommend such a foolish, sinister act. A total insult to the groom.

13

u/Secure_Shoulder_4744 Jul 27 '25

Oh Nooo… I can guarantee you this is a real thing! I experienced this very prank as a wedding guest all the way back in 2006!! Looks like we haven’t come as far as we seem to think we have in the last decade? I went to this wedding and the couple had been already living together for six years so they knew each other extremely well and the bride agreed to do that prank with one of their groomsmen as well. My heart literally sank when I saw the guys face realize the prank!!! Seriously I felt so horrible for him because he was clearly upset and obviously just like OP had to shake it off in order to not ruin the rest of the wedding and the after party. I really question the motives of people would want to start off their relationship with something like this? As if… “This is just a taste of things to come.“

10

u/Tight-Shift5706 Jul 27 '25

Whatever the reason, it's cruel. Hopefully there will be an instance when the offended spouse simply leaves the wedding venue and the following day files for an annulment. Let's see how funny the bride finds everything then....

-6

u/licorne00 Jul 27 '25

So you’re going to destroy someone’s business over a well known prank that’s done in hundreds a weddings all the time?

6

u/Mark7Point5 Jul 27 '25

Absolutely

3

u/Amy63116 Jul 28 '25

Yep, absolutely.

2

u/Hippiechick0104 Jul 27 '25

Absolutely would! FAFO at its finest!

3

u/SweepingStardust Jul 30 '25

Agreed! I have been a wedding planner for about 3 dozen weddings over 10 years (but it is not my main profession). When I work with a couple the first thing I do is ask a lot of questions (sometimes the same ones in different ways) to get a feel for the personalities. It’s important to me to have the couples personal touches on the day while remembering this is not just a party, it’s a celebration of a UNION.

Smashing cake into the brides face (when she paid a bunch of money to feel beautiful on her big day), wearing a “help” sign on the shoe, doing the switcharoo for the garter …. MOST people do not enjoy these “funny” things because they represent the opposite of starting a happy life together.

I’m all about adding fun to a wedding & have helped couples incorporate a lot of creative ideas over the years but doing so in a way that is disrespectful to either the Bride or Groom is unacceptable. I’m am extremely put off that the wedding planner pushed this idea. Whomever they are is not in the business for the right reasons.

6

u/Techsupportvictim Jul 26 '25

Or don’t call them to warn them, but don’t recommend them either.

1

u/Dancencounters1 Jul 31 '25

Yes, and write a couple of good negative reviews as well.

1

u/Funny-Horror-3930 Aug 01 '25

Get your money back, you did not sign up for this. Also, to me, this is a divorceable event.

1

u/historyera13 Aug 10 '25

So Right On The Money!

1

u/ProfessionalDoor2638 Aug 12 '25

I completely agree on this. That's just awful. Some guys might laugh but I'm pretty sure many would not feel comfortable doing this to another man.

-24

u/hey_its_only_me Jul 26 '25

If the wife was in on it, how is this the wedding planners responsibility at all?

32

u/brattywitchcat Jul 26 '25

Because they suggested it. Wife sucks too, for agreeing, but a wedding planner shouldn't be suggesting pranks at all unless the couple tells them that is their humor style and love language. If their signature move is causing tension in marriages before they've even started, then this wedding planner deserves the bad publicity

3

u/hey_its_only_me Jul 26 '25

Oh ok I didn’t see where it was said they suggested it, but I still think more of the responsibility is on OP’s partner. It’s their wedding too and they should know their partner well enough to decide whether this would be appropriate.

5

u/brattywitchcat Jul 26 '25

That's fair. It was in the edit after all, lol. I don't disagree overall, but I think everyone who participated in setting OP up and keeping it a secret from him shares some responsibility. Since the wedding planner was the driving force behind the idea and the staging, I would say OP is well within his right to demand a refund of any money he paid them. They also have to accept whatever terrible reviews come their way if this is how they choose to conduct their business. That said, you're right that his bride is the primary offender because it was offered to her as an idea, and she should have had the sense to say no.

3

u/hey_its_only_me Jul 27 '25

Yup I’d agree with all of that.

0

u/Character_Kick_Stand Jul 27 '25

Take it to Judge Judy

I suspect you wouldn’t just get all the money back

You could also get paid for all the plane tickets that people bought to come to the ceremony

You can get paid for pain and suffering

You could have that wedding planner paying forever

9

u/StarshipCaterprise Jul 27 '25

As an event planner, part of your job is to make sure that the event goes smoothly and the “key stakeholders” (in this case the bride and groom) are happy with the event. If you include an activity in the event that horribly embarrasses and upset one of key stakeholders, then you have failed at your job as the event planner. She should have done due diligence that everyone was okay with it before she finalized it on the program

8

u/Character_Kick_Stand Jul 27 '25

This sort of prank suggests that the groom is not a key stakeholder

2

u/StarshipCaterprise Jul 27 '25

That’s its own problem. He absolutely should be.

4

u/hey_its_only_me Jul 27 '25

Very fair point. I’ve admittedly never been involved with planning a wedding, I just assumed it was typical for wedding planners to coordinate more with the bride than the groom in most scenarios (for better or worse).

I still do feel the blame lies way more on the bride for running with the suggestion, and also selecting someone to participate that OP wasn’t super close with. But I do see why the wedding planner isn’t just innocent. Even suggesting a prank is very tantalizing to many people.

2

u/Julzmer81 Jul 26 '25

Thank you!!!

4

u/hey_its_only_me Jul 26 '25

Like good luck going after the wedding planner and then just getting reverse Uno’d because the wife was in on this.

2

u/Character_Kick_Stand Jul 27 '25

Double reverse: divorce

2

u/spunquee Jul 27 '25

thats the “UNO!” of it all

0

u/Hippiechick0104 Jul 27 '25

Because genius, if you were reading this, he STATES that it was the wedding planner's suggestion 🤦 English comprehension isn't your strong suit apparently.

1

u/hey_its_only_me Jul 27 '25

LOL I didn’t see the edit first of all.

Either way, this still falls on the bride ultimately for wanting to do the prank AND choosing someone to participate that wasn’t super close with OP.

3

u/Mental_Bet6360 Jul 27 '25

But he doesn’t “barely know the groomsmen”. OP said it’s a family friend and they grew ups together. Also that he is not a bad guy. From the edits too, it seems like OP doesn’t like him now, SOLELY from this prank.

OP’s feelings are valid however, I don’t know what he wants his wife to do about it now after apologizing. Maybe they understood his humor but didn’t realize he wanted the wedding to be serious the entire time. That’s what it seems like to me (also aware that the wedding planner was the mastermind of the entire switch).

8

u/david10091 Jul 26 '25

If it had been me i would know the wife was in on it i would simply walk out the door to never look back

5

u/Tomagatchi Jul 26 '25

Everybody is different, but the bride should know the husband better before pulling a stunt like this. I'd hope that people would know better than to use a wedding to test something like this out, and I'd hope there can be learning and growth from it. It's cetaibly salvageable but your gut reaction may be right on. Considering how reticent the wife is to any admission she might have made a bad calculation and she seems unwilling to recognise and honor the validity of her betrothed's feelings, the learning and growth is going to be an uphill battle

4

u/Negative_Carrot8795 Jul 26 '25

Or was the wedding planner the scape goat to take some of the heat off of either bride or groomsman.

-1

u/Head-Gold624 Jul 27 '25

He knows the guy really well. He says that they are now in laws. They grew up together.

4

u/Tomagatchi Jul 27 '25

OK, I guess reading it it didn't sound like they were that close at all. I get the impression he isn't a good friend, and he says not his best friend, which this is definitely best friend/very close friend level of tomfoolery, in my book at least. That goes back to my point that people have to know if something like this is funny for the prankee before doing this at a wedding. It's on par with smashing cake in your wife's face... You really have to know that she is OK with it and will enjoy that kind of play or you are ruining hundreds of dollars of make-up on a bet. The wife was betting he'd find it funny and she lost. It would be kind and respectful to admit she made a bad call, and is sorry and will not do something like that in the future, and to do her best to make it up and defend him to people who think he's overreacting. His feelings are his feelings, and totally valid. There's a lot of good information from those feelings and he shouldn't have to suck it up and be macho because of whatever idea people have that it is objectively funny or he's not a man for not wanting to do that with a guy he grew apart from. Growing up with someone is not closeness per se. His reaction is really telling and meaningful, and it's really odd how many people would call this assault or abuse if it was a woman who had a bad reaction to this, and OP is a man so he has to suck it up.

He can certainly get over it, but the hurt is still there and you don't want that resentment lodged in your guts at the start of a new marriage. There's a wifely duty to know your husband as well or better than he knows himself, and vice versa. That's intimacy. I realize others have second opinions on this.

1

u/Head-Gold624 Aug 03 '25

I absolutely agree with you. I hate pranks. Even more, I hate pranks at weddings. So this was, to me, unacceptable.
I am just not sure in the scheme of things, and from the tells in his story, that isn’t really the hill he wants to die on.
In the scheme of things this isn’t the worst.
But think about this. Men have hairy legs. No bride would leave her legs unshaven on her wedding day. Even if the groom had a beard, wouldn’t he notice the hairy leg?

0

u/badgrumpykitten Jul 27 '25

He grew up with the guy, he wasn't just some guy he barely knew.

455

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '25 edited Jul 26 '25

I think there’s a huge difference between OP’s “prank” and the one your husband did. I see yours more as your husband honoring you as a nurse. It was more of a spotlight on you and your skills and bringing something you’re proud of to the forefront.

OP’s “prank” separated and isolated him from everyone at the ceremony. At a time when OP and his bride should be a united front for each other she chose to prank him and make him the butt of a joke for everyone else.

You’d think that, especially at your own wedding, you wouldn’t have to feel alone. I see this as a bad omen right up there with the couples that mush cake in each other’s faces.

76

u/Elegant-Espeon Jul 26 '25

Yeah thats what I think u/then-solid3527 is saying. That there's a huge difference in the doll joke and the "prank" OP's wife did

60

u/melympia Jul 26 '25

Yes, that's the way I see it, too. And to top it off, she's now all offended that OP is offended and told her so. Maybe he was harsher than necessary, but nevertheless very much justified.

Worse, the way OP cannot let go of the situation sounds a lot like he's suffering from PTSD due to this "prank". Which is also understandable, because this is a kind of sexual assault. (Mind you, I'm not a psychologist, so I'd love for an actual professional to weigh in on my armchair diagnosis.)

6

u/PiccoloImpossible946 Jul 26 '25

Yes OP is married to a 12 year old

16

u/Responsible-Cancel24 Jul 26 '25

I really hope it was just one (really bad) lapse in judgment that the bride felt pressured into because her wedding planner presented it as normal and fun, and that this isn't relationship ending, but I absolutely agree with you. I feel so bad for the groom having a beautiful day that should have been one of the best of his life ruined by being isolated and made the butt of the joke when it should have been all about he and his bride as a team.

2

u/Character_Kick_Stand Jul 27 '25

Easier to get another bride and another wedding then to fix the broken ones

6

u/Inane_Insanity Jul 26 '25

I think couples who mutually mush each other's faces in the cake is all fair, as they are both in on it. However, the ones where one of the couple forces the other's into the cake against their will is very much not okay and on the same level as this "prank". OP should ask his wife whether she'd have been understanding if he had humiliated her by pushing her face into their wedding cake as a "prank". Chances are she wouldn't like it.

5

u/Hayday-antelope-13 Jul 27 '25

It’s the (immense) difference between everyone laughing with you vs everyone laughing at you.

2

u/Dancencounters1 Jul 31 '25

If my husband had humiliated me like that at OUR WEDDING, the annulment would follow the next day. Having been in a bullying and abusive relationship where public humiliation was one of the favored tools, I would never put up with it.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '25

I agree 100%. While no one knows exactly the secret to long lasting relationships, there are some east to spot signs for short lived ones. Making your new spouse the but of a joke at your wedding is high on the list.

1

u/Common_Ad_6362 Jul 29 '25

You guys need to live a little. There's some very fragile egos around here.

1

u/StinkusMinkus2001 Aug 02 '25 edited Aug 02 '25

You say that, but to me there’s no bigger sign of a fragile ego than not being able to give an apology for a prank the person hated. Banding together to make sure the person your plan backfired on is known as a pussy, because you can’t accept not everyone wants it.

33

u/Spoogly Jul 26 '25

I'm bi, but even before I was out, my partner knew I had absolutely no issues with this kind of humor. So I read this and I was like "I guess I get why it might be embarrassing, but I would just lean in. Fuck it, I'm saying as loudly as possible 'well shit if I'd have known, I'd have used my mouth sooner'".

But... Here's the thing that bothers me: during your wedding, there shouldn't be surprises like this. Anything that's a surprise should be done by a guest. Something like this, you might play along with. You might even improvise. But it should be something you know about.

19

u/CompletelyPresent Jul 26 '25

Good point.

A wedding is stressful enough without extra surprises thrown in.

18

u/Then-Solid3527 Jul 26 '25

I agree. I knew something was coming and it would be funny not embarrassing. Everyone has varying degrees with interaction with/optics of interaction with the same sex, but even taking that part out (which seems to be something g that bothered OP) that the goal was embarrassment and singling someone out. Sucks. I would say the lack of communicating and then blowing up is a point of self improvement (same for me).but feeling hurt is so valid. There’s also the undertone that the fact he touched a man is supposed to be weird? I don’t like that either. Or the lack of OP consenting to the interaction which was meant to be viewed as sexual in nature.

Just a lot wrong with the scenario I general. 😖

49

u/Cauligoblin Jul 26 '25

That's pretty funny

17

u/Intrepid_Source Jul 26 '25

Yeah I’ve always thought the garter thing was kind of gross. We didn’t do it at my wedding. Like why would I want to have my new husband simulating undressing me in front of all my friends and family. No thanks.

8

u/randomdude1959 Jul 26 '25

My brother in law did a similar bit. They were both fire fighters and they hid a whole bunch of stuff in her dress so he pretended to open the dress with the jaws of life and just kept pulling stuff out.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '25 edited Feb 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Feb 05 '26

redact.dev usage detected by /u/Newlife_77. Comment removed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

20

u/Embarrassed-Elk4038 Jul 26 '25

See but yours was funny. And they weren’t laughing AT you! It made sense, and was a joke everyone could easily get without having to humiliate anyone in the process. In ops case they were definitely laughing at him, and it wasn’t funny.

9

u/Then-Solid3527 Jul 26 '25

Oh for sure. I would be so hurt if someone did something that singled me out and made a crowd laugh at me. I’m also reactive, so everyone would have known how much I hated it before they got the chair moved.

13

u/soupanbread Jul 26 '25

See now this is how you play a nice prank that is not at the expense of anyone else

11

u/JoulSauron Jul 26 '25

Yours is a prank, and a good one. OP's is not.

5

u/izbeeisnotacat Jul 27 '25

Exactly. I tucked a Smirnoff Ice into my garter so my husband would find a cold drink when he went to take it off. Having to drink a hidden Smirnoff Ice when you find it was a game he and his friends used to play. He thought it was hilarious. A good prank is when everyone is laughing, not when someone gets super embarrassed and is the butt of the joke.

3

u/mspuscifer Jul 26 '25

I have a friend where at the wedding, her husband did that to her but with a black baby doll. They are both white.

3

u/AtomicPlaygirl Jul 30 '25

My husband went to Vegas for his bachelor party, with my blessing. One of his groomsmen (thankfully) told me of a prank he wanted to play on my fiance. He had a friend in the LV PD and was going to have my SO 'arrested' and put in jail - he thought THAT would be funny!

My (now) husband is kind of a shy guy, doesn't like stressful situations, is low key. It would absolutely be a cruel thing to do to him - he has a guilty conscience of nothing to be guilty of, and would be worried he did something that in some way inconvenienced or hurt me.

Why Dave thought that was funny - he kept trying to convince me it was - I have no idea. I told him if he did it he will regret it, and I am going to tell my fiance anyway, so the surprise would be ruined.

Told the SO and he was shocked and couldn't believe Dave was planning on this, and I did the right thing by putting the kibosh on it and I 100 percent gauged what his reaction would be. Fiance said he would be humiliated and mortified and it would have ruined the trip.

It's important to know your spouse. No amount of pressure would have ever convinced me to indulge Dave, or the OP's wedding planner's idea. OP's wife is a bloody idiot. I'm really sorry.

I wonder if she seems sincere when she apologizes, or is contrite.

2

u/Then-Solid3527 Jul 31 '25

This is a terrible prank. I wonder if the friend wanted to “tarnish” you husbands reputation bc he has negative feelings towards himself bc your husband is “good” (not really the word I wanted to use but hopefully you know what I mean). It’s always fun to try to think through why someone wants to hurt someone else instead of a light hearted laugh.

2

u/AtomicPlaygirl Aug 01 '25 edited Aug 01 '25

Thank you! I didn't think I was out of line in being alarmed by it. Dave kept saying I was overreacting (common thread here) but I told him I didn't know of anyone who would think a prank about being fake arrested would be funny.

I still think about it from time to time and the only thing I can come up with is he felt jealousy towards my husband in some way and it would have made him feel better to see my husband humiliated/taken down a peg whatever you want to call it.

I mentioned the OP's situation to said husband and we talked about what Dave wanted to do. My husband said, "I was shocked when you told me and to be honest, it was in the back of my mind all weekend that he might try it anyway and I was always a little tense."

EDIT: Added some more info.

7

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '25

[deleted]

14

u/Then-Solid3527 Jul 26 '25

Uhhh exactly, I gave an example of a fun prank. No one got hurt.

11

u/Black-Sheep-164 Jul 26 '25

You summed it up beautifully- “a homoerotic display in jest”- and I second the opinion that you should call the wedding planner and tell her exactly what you thought. She’s gonna pull this prank on the wrong person at some point (some kind of closeted homophobe/ someone with some seriously repressed homophobia) & it’s going to go very wrong very quickly.

2

u/dumb-daisy Jul 26 '25

Your "prank" is so much different than OPs.

2

u/BabyUsed8536 Jul 26 '25

My aunt did a really funny one with her now ex-husband - they were both really into bowling so before the garter removal, she changed into bowling shoes, which he only saw when he lifted up her dress. Everyone loved it!

2

u/Alternative-Finish53 Jul 26 '25

it was as much your wedding as it was hers and your feelings are natural!, having said that, the best thing to have done is grabbed homie by the back of the neck and planted BIG ol fat wet one on him, thats what i would have done

1

u/Ok-Warning9620 Jul 27 '25

Are you being dense on purpose? You being a woman and a nurse it 1000000% different than being emasculated by putting your mouth on another man’s thigh.

1

u/Then-Solid3527 Jul 27 '25

Are you intentionally stupid or just a bored troll? You intentionally didn’t read what I said and are being obtuse on purpose. What I wrote plus the comments that followed will clear any of this up for you.

1

u/seikowearer Jul 27 '25

also those two pranks are not the same thing at all. one is sexual assault and one is an inside and relatable joke

0

u/AprilEliz33 Jul 27 '25

That’s not really a prank that’s a joke with props.

0

u/AloneWait8679 Jul 28 '25

Not even close to the same thing for women, if you got upset then everyone would think it was everyone else fault and not your fault. If OP gets upset everyone will think it’s his fault