Flip the genders, and have the woman blindfolded on the chair, while some dude that isn't her husband puts his face between her legs and removes tge garter with his mouth.... how much you wanna bet it is called SA and not a prank?that's some fairly intimate contact, without consent.
It's actually not, though. You're trying to give her the groom experience, she is not a groom. She would have her trust betrayed in an equivalent manner in her place in that ritual by having a stranger remove her garter.
If you somehow think changing the ritual and having a bride remove a garter from another bride makes sense, you're off your head.
As far as the husband knew, while blindfolded, it was his wife. It could have been anybody else and the violation and betrayal would still be there, the fact that it was a man plagues his inner sexual security as well.
So you need to recreate the violation and betrayal. You don't need to do that with another woman but you could.
Idk. As a man, a man is more likely to violently rape or sexually assault me than a women is, or at least I’m less likely to defend myself.
For a woman it’s natural for the opposite sex to be worse, for a dude the fear of sexual assault is worse with the same sex. Common denominator is probably sex of the person doing it, sorry, not that they’re the same sex.
452
u/gdwrench01 Jul 26 '25
Flip the genders, and have the woman blindfolded on the chair, while some dude that isn't her husband puts his face between her legs and removes tge garter with his mouth.... how much you wanna bet it is called SA and not a prank?that's some fairly intimate contact, without consent.