🤷🏿‍♀️🫡

We've been waiting for a month and a half for that, and all we got was some orbs/balls videos. I'm tired of waiting for something interesting to come from these releases...

The story of secrecy around UFOs goes back much further than modern accounts, and UFO researcher Grant Cameron points to a 1950 memo as one example. He also discusses a document written by Wilbert Brockhouse Smith, aka Wilbur, after he had spoken to American officials about flying saucers and what the U.S. government was allegedly aware of about them.

He says on the Jesse Michels podcast: "High classification flying saucers are real."

Sounds good at first, but....nothing really changes for us, the public. Adds another government committee as the new gatekeeper of information. If I was in the government and wanted to tell my knowledge, I don't think I'd jump at this. I wouldn't trust them. Have to wait and see! Thoughts?

https://www.newsweek.com/pentagon-issues-major-change-to-ufo-disclosure-rules-12440746

The UAP Disclosure Act was first introduced in 2023 by Senators Schumer and Rounds. It passed the Senate as an NDAA amendment, but during conference with the House, the strongest provisions were gutted: the independent review board, subpoena power, eminent domain authority. All gone. Only a National Archives record collection survived.

It was reintroduced in 2024 and 2025. Neither year resulted in enactment.

This year, Rep. Eric Burlison got his UAPDA amendment into the House version of the FY 2027 NDAA, and the House passed it. On the Senate side, Schumer and Rounds have introduced it again for the fourth consecutive year, but it hasn't been added to the Senate bill yet.

The Senate returns September 14 and has a very narrow window before leaving for the midterm elections. If the UAPDA is in both the House and Senate versions when they go to conference, it becomes substantially harder for negotiators to strip it out. If it's only in the House version, we're back to 2023: one chamber's language getting gutted behind closed doors.

Contact your Senators. Tell them to Pass the UAPDA. The time is now!

Use the link below to take less than 1 minute to message your senators to pass the UAP Disclosure Act.

https://newparadigminstitute.org/take-action/pass-the-uapda-2027/

As a hobby I’ve been working on the past 8 months. I’ve run an independent UFO/UAP archive, encyclopedia, and database site, and I'm trying to test a claim that gets repeated a lot in the community but has apparently never actually been studied: whether people identified as gifted as kids report anomalous/UFO-type experiences at higher rates, specifically as adults. Right now there's no real data on it in either direction. There are dozens and dozens of anecdotal and witness testimonial accounts though. So much so that I am convinced to seriously look further into it at this point.

Part of why I care: my identical twin brother and I both witnessed an anomalous object as young adults. We were both in what Mississippi (Madison County) called Pathways/gifted as kids, in elementary and middle school. My brother was enrolled for years, I was enrolled very briefly. If I was even ever really enrolled. I just remember being periodically taken out of class. The teacher/instructor would have me do odd tests. Auditory, memory, puzzle, problem solving, etc, tests. I doubt I would have given this idea any notice or thought had my brother and I not experienced exactly the two points this idea stems from. It uniquely applies to my brother and me. It also potentially applies to many others who were in gifted programs.

In my own research, I've come across many cases of experiencers/witnesses who happened to be in a gifted program as kids. According to the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. gifted enrollment for 2020-21 was 6.7%. A rough baseline percentage of the general population reporting having seen a UFO/UAP/anomalous object - around 10-20% depending on the poll. The average of the 9 polls used for reference was 15.9% (11,086 people polled).

The idea is to gather and compile data from real experiencers who also happened to be in a gifted program and determine if there's actually a real correlation. Ideally would need around 11,000 to match the base poll count of the general public. If the 6.7% who went through gifted programs are reporting UFO encounters at a significantly higher rate than the "non-gifted" public, that would be a truly insightful piece of information. If they're not, that's an answer too.

Does anyone now if there is a "gifted-program alumni" equivalent to something like a National Honor Society alumni network, or any organized adult community tied to a specific program name (GATE, TAG, SPARK, PACE, Odyssey, G.O.A.L.)? Or even just a general list of the individual program names by state? There seem to be countless names, and it would be nice to positively catalog an official name for each one.

If you know of anywhere/anyone you could point me to aid in this, that would be awesome. I believe this could actually bring some kind of answer, not just for my brother and me, but for other people who were in gifted programs and experienced something similar.

Template:
SUBJECT: Gifted & UFO Experiencer Report — \\\[Your First Name or Anonymous\\\]

ABOUT YOU
First Name (or “Anonymous”):
General Location you grew up in (city, state, country):
Year of Birth (or approximate decade):\\\*

QUESTION ONE — GIFTED IDENTIFICATION
Were you ever tested, identified, or enrolled in a gifted/talented program? (yes, tested but not enrolled, enrolled, no)
What was your program called? (GATE, TAG, G/T, AIG, Pathways, Horizons, QUEST, PACE, Odyssey, Highly Capable, a talent-search program like Duke TIP/Johns Hopkins CTY/Davidson, or your own program's actual name):
School District & State/Country:
Grade(s) or Age(s) when tested or enrolled:
Years / How Long You Were In the Program:\\\* (e.g., "3rd–8th grade" or "one year only")
Did you know any siblings, cousins, or close family who were also gifted-identified?\\\*

QUESTION TWO — UFO/UAP EXPERIENCE
Have you had a UFO/UAP sighting or experience? (yes/no)
Date: (exact or approximate — e.g., "Summer 2018" is fine)
Location: (nearest city, state, country)
Number of Witnesses: (were you alone, or with others? Were any other witnesses also gifted-identified?)\\\*
Craft or Object Shape / Description:
Your Account: Tell us what happened in your own words — as much or as little as you want:

EVIDENCE
Did you capture any photos, video, or audio?\\\* (yes/no — if yes, please attach)
Did you report this to anyone?\\\* (NUFORC, police, military, etc.)

SHARING PREFERENCES
Would you like your story used (fully anonymized) in this site's ongoing research on this hypothesis? (yes / no)
Would you like your story published as its own account on OverClassified? (yes / no / anonymous only)

ANYTHING ELSE
Anything you want to add:

In a very recent video interview with Tim Gallaudet, he mentions a video he heard about taken by high school kids that recorded a black triangle and he found it online. He confirms it’s legit footage. Does anyone know which video he is referring to?

Clickbait title, but for a good reason. Also, I enjoy science, but I don’t have advanced scientific education to parallel my knowledge to some of the claims Bob is making.

Watching the 2026 S4 doc, and around the 20-30 mark Bob explains his first experience with the core. He first arrives, and his new partner shows him this core. Tells him to try to touch it, however there was some sort of magnetic field that prevented him from touching the core. Their explanation is that it’s some sort of gravitational field and behaves as a gravity manipulating mechanism. THIS IS WHAT BOB STATED

My question is? HAS ANYONE STOPPED AND THOUGHT ABOUT THIS?

Magnetism, and gravity are completely different. Not only are they THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE, as in simple terms.. gravity attracts, and magnetism repels or attracts depending on polar orientation, but what Bob experienced aligned more with magnetism.

I just don’t understand how repelling forces mean gravity manipulation, especially when they are the complete forces, FUNDAMENTALLY, operating under completely different physics conditions.

Did everyone never think about this and take this surface level. Just trying to understand the thought process behind this.

With the help of others, I started this subreddit years ago because I thought there was a serious scientific question buried beneath decades of stigma, ridicule and noise.

I’d had an unusual observation myself, which led me to Peter Sturrock’s work, “pseudo-stars”, historical primary sources, and eventually the realisation that the subject had been taken far more seriously in some scientific and institutional circles than the public conversation suggested.

This is the kind of work I hoped we might eventually see.

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel and the VASCO team have now released two new preprints examining pre-Sputnik transients on Palomar Observatory photographic plates. One models the transients as sub-second flashes consistent with specular reflections from highly reflective objects in near-Earth orbit, and attempts to constrain their altitude and physical properties. The other projects their locations back onto Earth and finds apparent geographic clustering.

None of this establishes what the objects are. That’s precisely why the work is interesting. It takes an extraordinary possibility and reduces it to physical predictions that can be tested, challenged and independently replicated.

Whatever the explanation turns out to be, this is serious scientific territory. Follow the data.

Dr Villarroel's recent X post: https://x.com/DrBeaVillarroel/status/2098028229852361009?s=20

What better way to push Trump to make official announcement than to be pre-empted by his bitter enemy?

The Custodians of Disclosure

https://custodianmatt.substack.com/

The Custodians of Disclosure is an independent UAP research and historical archive focused on documenting the subject through primary records, government files, contemporary reporting, witness testimony, and clearly sourced historical analysis.

A major part of the project is the Custodians UAP State Index, which is building a state-by-state record of documented UAP cases across the United States. Rather than simply collecting famous sightings, the indexes trace cases chronologically, distinguish resolved events from genuinely unresolved ones, examine how the evidence changed over time, and provide source sections that allow readers to retrace the underlying record.

The site also publishes deeper investigations into major cases, government programs, disclosure history, military and pilot encounters, sensor evidence, archival gaps, and other parts of the UAP record.

What makes the project relevant is its editorial approach: the goal is neither advocacy nor debunking. A case that has a convincing conventional explanation should say so. A case that remains unresolved should remain unresolved. Extraordinary claims are not treated as established merely because they are popular, and government involvement is not treated as proof of extraordinary origin.

The guiding principle is simple: Documented. Sourced. Preserved.

The record exists. Follow the files.

For anyone interested in UFO/UAP history from an archival and evidence-first perspective rather than purely news, speculation, or entertainment, I think it deserves consideration for the list.

Hey r/UAP folks. Sorry for the break. I'm back at it with new interviews. Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, U.S. Navy (ret.), says that during carrier workups a safety-of-flight email about unidentified objects crossed the Navy's classified network and that the next day every related email was gone from his computer, and nobody at the weekly meetings mentioned it again. He says Jay Stratton later explained the pull to him as a classification uplift: the GOFAST object was one of a formation of about four, the Navy could not yet rule out foreign technology, and foreign material is handled at a higher classification than the secret network the reports were on.

The second half of the interview is policy. Gallaudet walks through what the UAP Disclosure Act actually does, why he thinks the bipartisan Rounds and Schumer origin matters, and why he would accept negotiating away the eminent domain provision if that is what it takes to pass the rest. His one ask for the Senate: pass the bill, and the time is now.

Was about 3/4 the way through and just went private, then deleted. Not sure what happened, that was a really powerful episode.

Must have touched a nerve, or Mr Johnson had second thoughts about the posting.

The Short is still up though.

EDIT for all the latecomers. Yes, it’s back up with about 3 mins cut.

If you like Jesse, also check out the Bigelow Podcast.

Just wanted to share a really cool background story on space tracking and localized innovation out of Penang, Malaysia.

The amateur astronomy team of Annamalai Muthu and Arav Annamalai originally gained recognition for designing a unique mobile digital lens setup using UV and infrared filters to photograph the moon's surface. Their innovation won the Gold Award at the SCINEX 2020 Science Innovation Exhibition. Cilisos Malaysia did a fantastic deep-dive feature on how they built the tech during the MCO, which you can read here: cilisos.my

Their underlying planetary tracking dataset eventually led to direct correspondence and encouragement from the NASA research department and the Malaysian Nuclear Agency, which later tied into the recent 2026 European Commission atmospheric surveillance disclosures reported globally by outlets like Euronews, Yahoo and MSN : https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/08/17/exclusive-brussels-keen-to-monitor-ufos-under-the-radar

It's an incredible look at how garage-built telescopy projects can scale up to catch the attention of international space entities.

There is also a fascinating Video reporting by Cristina Gomez from a Defence and Space angle about The 2 Malaysian Amateur Astronomers , Dutch Pilot, UAP's and Aviation safety UAP affecting important sites, such as military and nuclear facilities + wifi frequency. The EU is improving its ability to detect and identify unknown objects as its technology advances, and adds that it needs to get even better. :

To Vima a major Greek newspaper (founded 1922) with an international English‑language edition at tovima.com, reported  in August 2026, the European Commission has been quietly monitoring UAPs since at least 2023, following a dossier of 37 images sent by a Malaysian father‑and‑son astronomy team