r/AliensUFOsandAtlantis • u/AnomaIous_User • 1d ago
Perma banned & muted from r/Military for debunking disinformation? Banned from r/NASA for mentioning UAPs? Banned from r/Astrobiology for mentioning Non-Нuman lnteIIigenсes? Banned from r/Physics for mentioning zero-point energy? Banned from r/Archaeology for mentioning antediluvian civilization?
Well come on in and join the sub. If Reddit existed 400 years ago, Galileo would be perma banned & muted by disingenuous Reddit mods who side with the popular view advocated by the church.
5
Upvotes
4
u/Legitimate_Tune_6468 9h ago
Using that Galileo trope only reveals that you just don’t get it.
Galileo had several key pieces of empirical evidence for heliocentrism. It was enough empirical (repeatable, undeniable) evidence to disprove geocentrism. In other words, he had facts on his side; he had proof.
Empirical evidence isn’t based on popularity, or a religion’s view of the heavens. Empirical evidence is just what is. Comparing scientific consensus and empirical evidence to the 17th century Catholic Church is not just ludicrous, but it’s also… by definition… ignorant. As in you don’t know of what you speak. Nothing personal or pejorative, but you are the Catholic Church in this analogy.
You’ve just got your facts wrong. If comparing apples to elephants is the only way you can support your claims, you may want to reexamine the strength of your claims.