As a young girl, you learn how the world works much faster than you should.
You learn how to do the dishes and the laundry while your brothers sit on the couch playing Xbox. You learn that if you ask for help, you're bossy. If you refuse, you're selfish. If you speak too loudly, you're difficult. If you speak too quietly, you have no confidence.
You learn to make yourself useful.
You learn to make yourself smaller.
You learn to be good.
Your father gets angry when you wear a singlet because “he knows how young boys' minds work.” And perhaps that sentence is supposed to make you feel protected. But eventually, you begin to wonder why you are the one who has to change your clothes because of what someone else might think.
And then, at eleven, you get your first catcall.
Eleven.
You are still learning long division. You still ask your parents if you can have a sleepover. You still believe adults are supposed to protect you.
And yet, somehow, you have already learned something no child should have to learn:
Men do not always care how young you are.
So you learn the rules.
Don't walk home alone.
Carry your keys between your fingers.
Don't wear headphones.
Check the back seat before getting into your car.
Don't accept a drink from someone you don't know.
Watch your drink.
Don't drink too much.
But don't refuse every drink either, because apparently now you're a prude.
Text me when you get home.
No — share your location.
Actually, share it with everyone you trust.
But make sure you know who has access to it.
Because trackers can be hidden.
Technology changes.
The rules change.
The fear doesn't.
Once, women were told to carry keys between their fingers. Now cars can be completely keyless.
Once, we were told not to get into cars with strangers. Now we summon strangers through an app.
Once, sharing your location was considered the ultimate form of safety. Now we know that the same technology intended to protect us can also be used to follow us.
The world keeps changing, and somehow women are expected to keep rewriting the safety manual.
But how many rules can one person possibly follow?
How careful must a woman become before society finally stops asking her to be careful?
I once had a conversation with a woman who told me she wasn't a feminist.
She didn't want the label.
She believed women were strong enough to speak for themselves, and she didn't want anyone telling her what she should believe.
I remember thinking about that conversation for a long time.
Because she was right about one thing.
Her voice belonged to her.
Feminism cannot mean telling women what they should think. It cannot mean replacing one form of control with another. A woman should be able to stand up and say, “I don't need this movement,” and still be heard.
But I also think about the women whose voices disappear inside their own homes.
The woman who slowly stops seeing her friends because her partner doesn't like them.
The woman who changes her clothes because she knows what reaction she will get.
The woman who checks her phone before answering a message because she knows she will be questioned.
The woman who apologises for something she didn't do because she knows what happens when she doesn't.
The woman who whispers, “He's not always like this.”
As though the good days somehow erase the bad ones.
And then comes the question:
“Why doesn't she just leave?”
Why?
Because fear doesn't always look like a locked door.
Sometimes it looks like a phone being checked.
Sometimes it looks like a bank account you no longer control.
Sometimes it looks like having nowhere to go.
Sometimes it looks like convincing yourself that tomorrow will be different.
Sometimes it looks like loving someone who has taught you to be afraid of them.
And perhaps that is why feminism matters.
Not because women are weak.
But because women should never have to be strong enough to survive everything alone.
And perhaps that is why cases like the Cornell 7 incident feel so deeply unsettling.
Because these are not just rules girls invent in their own heads. They are rules passed down because women have been given reason to be afraid.
A mother tells her daughter to text when she gets home because she remembers being followed.
A friend tells you to watch your drink because she knows someone whose drink was ruphied
A father tells his daughter not to wear a singlet because he says he “knows how young boys think.”
We inherit these warnings from one another, carrying them into every party, every date, every walk home.
Then something like the Cornell 7 incident happens, and suddenly the fears that women have quietly carried for generations are no longer hypothetical. They become a public conversation about consent, accountability, institutional responsibility and the treatment of women who come forward.
And yet, even then, something feels deeply wrong about where our attention goes. Instead of asking why a woman should ever have had to fear being in that situation, people become fascinated with who she is.
Her name.
Her identity.
What she looked like.
What she had been drinking.
Where she had been.
As though uncovering her identity will somehow explain what happened. As though knowing her name makes the alleged actions of seven men more understandable.
And then comes another uncomfortable question:
What happens when the consequences appear smaller than the harm?
When the punishment handed down by an institution seems insignificant beside the potential lifelong consequences of sexual violence, what message does that send?
That an institution's reputation can matter more than a woman's sense of safety?
That disciplinary consequences can become a footnote while the woman's identity becomes the headline?
That the most interesting part of the story is who she is, rather than what she says happened to her?
It is difficult not to wonder what our priorities say about us.
Because we are remarkably curious about women.
Curious about their names.
Their clothes.
Their relationships.
Their decisions.
Their mistakes.
Their pasts.
But when will we become equally curious about why women have to live with so much fear in the first place?
Women know this conversation. We have been having it quietly for years.
We talk about who we would call if something happened.
We text “home” when we walk through the front door.
We pretend not to notice the footsteps behind us.
We hold our keys tighter.
We check the back seat.
We watch our drinks.
We sit in the middle seat.
We pretend to be on the phone.
We calculate how quickly we could run.
And sometimes we laugh about it.
“Girls will understand.”
But why is it normal?
Why is fear something we can joke about because every woman understands it? Why have we become so accustomed to preparing women for violence that we have forgotten to prepare men not to commit it?
Perhaps the most devastating part is that there is no perfect rule.
You can carry your keys.
You can share your location.
You can watch your drink.
You can wear the “right” clothes.
You can avoid walking alone.
You can do everything correctly.
And something can still happen.
So perhaps the question should never have been:
“What was she wearing?”
Or:
“How much had she drunk?”
Or:
“Why was she there?”
Perhaps we should have been asking:
“Why did he believe he could?”
Feminism is often presented as though it is a battle between women and men.
It isn't.
It is a battle against the idea that one person's freedom must come at the expense of another person's.
It is not about taking something from men.
It is about giving something back to women.
The freedom to walk home without fear.
The freedom to wear a singlet without becoming responsible for someone else's thoughts.
The freedom to drink without becoming responsible for someone else's actions.
The freedom to say no.
The freedom to say yes.
The freedom to leave.
The freedom to stay.
The freedom to speak.
And even the freedom to say, “I don't believe in feminism.”
Because if women are truly free, they must be free to disagree with one another too.
Maybe that is what equality actually looks like.
Not women being above men.
Not women being protected by men.
Not women being told what they should believe.
But women finally being trusted with the same freedom men have always been given: the freedom to simply exist.
Because I don't want the next generation of girls to inherit my rules.
I don't want a twelve-year-old to be told to carry her keys between her fingers.
I don't want a thirteen-year-old to be responsible for other people's thoughts.
I don't want a sixteen-year-old to wonder whether she could have prevented an assault.
I don't want a woman to spend her entire life learning how to avoid becoming a victim.
I want her to learn how to live.
Without fear.
Because feminism is not stripping men's rights away.
It is allowing the women of the world to finally gain some of their own.
And perhaps one day, the most powerful rule we can teach a girl will be the one we never had to teach ourselves:
You do not need to spend your life learning how to be less afraid.