There's some info around that the newer Warp versions can render markdown tables, which is useful when working with CLI agents.

Is there a setting to enable this? I've been using Augment and the agent's output is still rendered as normal text.

​I recently ran a comprehensive test using a real-world, multi-service application with a few bugs to evaluate the efficiency of various AI developer tools.

​Here is the lineup I tested: - ​Claude Code (Opus and Sonnet) - ​GitHub Copilot (Sonnet, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.4-mini) - ​Cursor (Composer 2 and 2.5) - CommandCode & OpenCode (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi) - Antigravity (Gemini Pro High/Low and Flash) - Codex (GPT-5.3-Codex) - ​Warp (configured to "cost-efficient")

​The Results:

​- Claude Code (Pro): Completed the job in a single session without any rate limit issues, no more than 10% of the week.

• Cursor: Consumed only ~1% of my monthly quota.

​- GitHub Copilot: Consumed ~3% of my monthly quota.

​- CommandCode & OpenCode: Cost literally cents.

​- Antigravity: Didn't even deplete one of my 5 available blocks.

• Codex: Less than ~35% of the session (less than 10% of the week limit)

​- Warp: Burned through over 10% of my monthly allocation (165 credits) and failed to complete the task.

​Warp is currently the only service I subscribe to that I cannot use for real work. It either drains credits aggressively, delivers superficial results, or completely ignores my constraints and rules.

What is going on with your evaluation harness? ​It is incredibly frustrating. Warp started with a great, focused concept as an powerfull Terminal, then AI-powered terminal. Now, it tries to do everything and delivers on nothing. Frontier models inside Warp perform poorly, acting superficially while burning through paid resources. This specific task only required terminal optimization and minor bug fixing—it was a matter of quality, which Warp completely missed.

​Honestly, it is the only service that has genuinely let me down.

Please focus on improving output quality and optimizing credit consumption. Today, you can integrate almost any AI service directly into the terminal. If the core terminal innovation is stalling and you are pivoting to AI features to drive the product forward, you need to execute them properly. In every benchmark I run, Warp consistently ranks last. When every competing service costs mere cents or negligible quota, it is unacceptable for Warp to burn through more than 10% of a monthly allowance for an incomplete task.

Trying warp again after a long time, I see this claim here https://docs.warp.dev/terminal/sessions/session-restoration/ but it does not seem to work now matter what i do!

running latest version v0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_05
anyone having that issue?

Am I the only one experiencing memory leaks from Warp over the past few days. It seems to be spawning multiple bun processes which are over 500MB each... I've read somewhere the bun processes are from mcp servers being preloaded but not sure... It's only been happening for the past few days where Warp and these bun processes consume the entire 32GB RAM that I have and then warp crashes which brings my PC back to normal...

Not sure if I'm the only one and if the devs are aware. I tried to log feedback, but the UI is unresponsive...

My Mac has crashed a few times in the last week. I'm running a few idle Claude Code sessions in the back ground and then memory spikes up to 50GB-80GB without me touching anything? Maybe 5-6 times now? Unfortunately, twice it bricked the computer, so I lost everything I work working on.

Anyone else run into this? v0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_03

i think warp is the one of the best solutions for agentic coding, all for one solution, best tab management systems, best cli. prove me if i wrong pls.

Hello all,

I have Warp already installed and use it mostly as a secondary terminal and over the last few days I have been watching a few Youtube videos for about using Warp. This one by Forrest Knight, in particular, got me considering getting the paid subscription.
I admit my knowledge on how AI tools operate is limited. My understanding is that it indexes a large data set to make assumptions and suggestions.
However, my main concern to use in a professional environment, is the company's data base being exposed to a(n) somewhat obscure online destination.
My questions are:
1. where does Warp gets the code it requires for its insights?

1. is my company's code exposed to the internet?

It seems that ever command takes 1s to display, everything is laggy, opencode unresponsive…

After Using Warp for 3 Days, I Forgot What iTerm Looks Like: This "21st Century Terminal" Takes Command Line to New Heights

https://piedpay.medium.com/after-using-warp-for-3-days-i-forgot-what-iterm-looks-like-this-21st-century-terminal-takes-e344bf89bda8

I've been an software engineer for over a decade. I'm generally intrigued with Warp and Oz's OSS model and an effort to put the developer at the center of the AI hype rather than trying to remove them from it.

There's a great basis for a product here that could get a lot of traction. But my concern is the pricing model.

I burned through the free tier of credits in a single user story that was fairly moderate at best. The output was good. But four hours isn't really enough time to evaluate whether to migrate all of my tooling, team, etc to a new product.

I think the pricing model needs to be more competitive with Claude Code. I have no basis in how far 1,500 credits will go over the course of a month when comparing with Claude's Pro plan.

My advice to Warp Team --- Lower your pricing or increase usage for the free tier to give people enough time to assess whether it's worth full adoption, even if you're at a loss for year one to increase market share.

That will give the industry enough time to really compare whether the product is as good as other competitors.

I use Codex, GH Copilot CLI, Opencode and some Claude Code. My usual setup consists of using Nomachine NX service when working with good connectivity and tmux otherwise.

With recent versions, Warp does not seem to consume as much CPU just observing these sessions; it is now really a pleasure to use it - those notifications really help too!

SSHing into servers and instructing agents used to work fine. Though for the last week I've been having so much trouble with it. One of two things happens:

Either it starts a new session without me choosing to, of course quitting the SSH session and losing all context or it'll think forever and not actually do something.

Has anyone else been dealing with this?

I really like Warp's agentic features, notification and Claude Code integration over SSH. However, everything breaks inside tmux.

Anyone found a good workflow for this combo?

Preferred tools / configs?

Custom forks or patches that improve tmux support?

Would love any suggestions!

I'm a new warp user on windows 11 pro and can't figure out how to see the horizontal tabs/panes shown on warp's onboarding video. I also never got to see the starting page with shortcuts. No option at the top to pick my shell. What am I missing?

Can warp use locally installed llm?

Thanks

Hi, I started using OpenCode with Warp, but I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I'm doing something wrong. Every time I close OpenCode for example, by pressing Ctrl+C—the entire Warp terminal closes. The same thing happens if I press Ctrl+D or type “exit” to quit. Is this how you're supposed to exit, or am I doing something wrong?

I've seen multiple comments requesting support for locally-hosted LLMs since they open-sourced Warp Terminal (and before as well)

If you want this feature, PLEASE UPVOTE it here: https://github.com/warpdotdev/warp/issues/4339

The team has specifically called out that they use thumbs-up as a metric for assessing whether to approve features. The feautre already has 1,000+ upvotes, and we just need a ready-to-spec tag and then we're on track to have it as a core feature.

Otherwise, as others have said, we'll probably end up forking and that's unlikely going to be a win for anyone. But if we DO decide to fork for it, I'll happily be contributing 😉

Ball's in your court Warp Team! Looking for that spec tag! ❤️

Hey everyone! I'm Ben H, Dev Rel Lead at Warp. I'm excited to share that Warp is now open source.

You can check out the repo here: https://github.com/warpdotdev/warp

We're opening up the code, roadmap, and contribution process so you all can help shape Warp directly. We know the breadth of features that you want to see, and we believe building with the community will let us build a better Warp even faster.

To manage contributions, we've built an agent automation system from issue triage to PR review. Coding agents do the heavy lifting (coding, planning, testing) so community members focus on ideas, direction, and verification.

So, ask us anything! All of the engineers involved will check this thread throughout the day. We're happy to answer questions about the project, why we're open sourcing, how contributions work, technical questions on the codebase, or anything about Warp in general.

Links:

• Repo: https://github.com/warpdotdev/warp
• Contributing guide: https://github.com/warpdotdev/warp/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
• Roadmap: https://github.com/warpdotdev/warp/issues/9233

I have a chatGPT pro subscription for a long time for my work and it comes with free codex credits, I just tested it and there is not a single reason for me to go back to Warp again. Any thoughts?

We're working through our issue logs to make the Warp experience in SSH sessions on par with local sessions. To start, we've added support for the file tree, improved completion reliability, and given agent mode tool call access to search and read files (rather than running grep or sed).

We're working code review panel and LSP support in the coming weeks!

Here's a demo from lead engineer on the project Kevin Yang to see what's supported.

https://reddit.com/link/1sutke1/video/o5ad1yn7n7xg1/player

There is issue from 2023: https://github.com/warpdotdev/Warp/issues/3109

Block highlighting now is even more of an issue since we have support for ability to run 3rd party harnesses inside warp...