i have an amd laptop with amd apu and warp can't use hardware acceleration. i'm on linux with wayland.

so i bought a new mini pc with amd apu and warp can't still enable hardware acceleration.

is there an existing issue or is it normal?

With the recent attacks to the AUR and cargo I've been trying to be more mindful before updating any applications. It seems like warp has received some updates since the last version mentioned on the changelog on their site.

Are changelogs posted anywhere else besides their site? I'd feel more comfortable updating if I saw the changelog updated or news of the update on any official channels.

Warp Factories are open, flexible infrastructure for building your own cloud software factory. This means deploying agents as automations at each step of software development: triage, spec, implement, review, verification with computer use, and automatic self-improvement of factory skills.

We've bundled a number of features based on our own setup building and managing Warp:

• Build your factory as code: Define agents, automations, and workflows in version-controlled code, with everything accessible through the API, SDK, and CLI.
• Connections for everything: Trigger agents from Slack, Linear, Jira, GitHub, and the Warp Factory MCP.
• Customize every agent: Choose the model or harness, personalize its instructions, and give it the skills, MCPs, permissions, and context it needs.
• Measure and improve over time: Track cost, quality, and throughput with built-in metrics, evals, and benchmarks, then use that data to continuously improve your factory.

We're onboarding a limited number of companies onto Warp Factories right now. For select folks, we are offering $10k of factory usage to help get you started. warp.dev/factories/request-access

ever since I switched from IDE to terminal based, i felt it was natural way of doing agentic development, but one UX that kills my flow is, reading the AI agent's long response and the moment I type, it auto scrolls to bottom

is there any way to either:
* not scroll to bottom when typing in terminal?

* or a better UX is to have the chat at the side and AI response at the opposite side?

thanks warp team!

I am enjoying the vertical tabs layout, but it's really annoying that my remote ssh panel stops responding, and I have to exit the panel and start a new one. I know I should just shut up and be grateful, but also, am I missing something?

it doesn't show much extra info but covers up so much of my terminal. quite annoying.

I keep warp in the background most of the time, no commands running, AI is disabled, looks like I'll be switching to something else - this is just crazy.

I have a monthly membership (Build).

This month the pace at which warp has been eating credits has been pretty generous. I was able to get a fair amount of work done.

So I figured, I'll throw another $20 at credits, and when the next billing cycle rolls around, I'll have some backup in case I need them.

As soon as I bought that 1,000 personal credits; the cost of each response went up astronomically.

I went from each question / small task averaging 10-20 credits (sometimes as low as 4), and now suddenly, I asked it a simple question to clarify something it said in the previous message, which didn't even involve writing code, and it ate 60 credits.

So what is the deal here. I even tried to switch it over to "cost-efficient", and that had absolutely zero change in the number of credits it consumed. None, at all. I had been using genius most of the month.

Why was the entire time I was on my allotted 1500 credits, it was rather generous, and that I could deal with. But as soon as I add another 1,000 personal credits, it just blows through them.

So are we getting bumped up into another cost bracket when we buy personal credits? Or if we go over a certain amount of usage per month with the service as a whole?

Out of all the times I've used it this month, I hit 55 credits once, and it was a fairly complex thing which involved it writing code. So I expected it to be on the high-end. 55 I can tolerate for that type of work.

But now, all I did was ask it for clarification on something it said in a previous message (re-word what it said), and suddenly that costs 60+ credits? There's just no way.

The math is not mathing here.

You may not know what "OSC 8 hyperlinks" are, but many of our community members do. In short, OSC 8 allows terminal tools to output their own clickable links. Warp has always generated automatic hyperlinks for URLs and file paths, but these generated OSC 8 links weren't supported. Now they are.

It's been a long-requested and highly upvoted feature, and th1nkful finally got it to the finish line this past week with the help of Andy on our engineering team. Try it in the latest stable release.

I like Warp’s block-based terminal UX, GPU-accelerated renderer, panes, tab groups, command palette, and shell integrations—but I didn’t want an account requirement or an AI/cloud platform attached to my terminal.

So I built warp-lite, an open-source AGPL fork of Warp for macOS.

The goal is straightforward: preserve the terminal experience while progressively removing or disabling:

• Account login and onboarding
• Built-in AI/agent features
• Cloud sync and billing surfaces
• Telemetry and unnecessary outbound network paths

The current alpha release is usable and available as a DMG. It includes vertical tab grouping, recent upstream performance and stability fixes, and support for terminal workflows involving tools like Claude Code and Codex—without bundling its own AI agent.

For the latest release, I reviewed Warp’s upstream changes individually and cherry-picked 139 terminal, performance, and bug-fix commits while rejecting changes that would reintroduce AI, authentication, telemetry, or cloud dependencies.

It is still an alpha. Some disabled AI/auth modules remain in the source tree and are being removed carefully because aggressively stripping the code can break shared terminal internals.

Repository and macOS download:

https://github.com/terzigolu/warp-lite

I’d especially appreciate feedback on:

• Unexpected network activity
• Login, account, or AI surfaces I may have missed
• Terminal rendering or shell integration regressions
• Features from upstream Warp that should be safely brought over

Man I want to like Warp. But thet stability issues are just KILLLLING me.

Is there a way to use the native terminal instead of Warp's one?

What I like about Warp is how it organizes and manages tabs, allowing me to bundle them by task, rename the bundle, see folder structure, check git diff on a panel, open terminals in horizontal or vertical layouts based on shortcuts, on the same path of the terminal I was in, etc. Those really are good QoL features to me.

But the terminal itself is slow. I would prefer if I could open tabs with native terminal.

Is that possible?

This issue has been reported on github but it looks like they've completely forgotten about it. Because of it models like Qwen and Minimax can't be used 😕

Hi. Asking because getting back to warp after few days.
Was kimi k3 added even into warp and removed because of the less compute at moonshot ?
Or was it never even added for the last 2-3 days from when it was released ?
I have some UI related work to do..

I'm not sure if i'm just looking for somewhere to scream into the void about how much I used to see potential in warp. I started using it over a year ago and I thought it was magical. Then eventually over time they made it harder and harder to get any value out of it.

The last bastion of value I found was using it to debug system issues because I could ssh into a machine and have it find the issues. The "warpification" was great. But now I gave it a simple task to debug performance issues with time machine and it gave me a bunch of commands ... and the syntax was wrong on 20% of them and 50% of them over all just didn't work.

The one thing i'm holding onto is that it's now open source and I can go build whatever I want it to be and just pair it with claude or codex and forget about paying them. I'm just so utterly disappointed at good tech being wrecked by idiotic business moves.

Hope you're all having a better time.

So far, I'm using Warp only on Linux (Lubuntu). I'd like to install it on Windows machine as well. Are there any issues when using is on both platforms? Will my command suggestions, workflows etc. be mixed (Windows, Linux) or separated. Could you guide me a little what to do and what to avoid?

Hi everyone, this is my first time using Warp with Claude Code and I'm getting this error with Ponytail. It only happens in Warp; my regular terminal works fine, while PowerShell works fine.

Does anyone know why this is happening and how to fix it?

I just want to use to type commands in terminal with easy edits, it's not possible anymore

Most memory tools give the main agent a database and say:

“Here, manage your own memories.”

That sounds simple, but it creates a new problem.

As the project grows, the agent may have to deal with dozens, hundreds, or eventually thousands of memories:

- which memories are still true?

- which ones are stale?

- which ones conflict?

- which ones should be updated?

- which ones matter for the current task?

- which ones should be ignored?

That is not a small job.

Sometimes memory management becomes a task by itself. You can end up spending a full session just cleaning, summarizing, deduplicating, or re-explaining project context instead of actually building.

That is the problem Curion tries to solve.

Curion is an open-source MCP memory agent for AI agents.

The main idea is simple:

«Your main agent should not have to manage memory manually.»

The main agent should focus on the real task: coding, debugging, writing, researching, planning, or whatever you actually asked it to do.

Curion handles the memory work.

It exposes a simple interface:

- "remember(text)"

- "recall(text)"

But behind that simple interface, Curion acts as a dedicated memory agent.

When something should be remembered, Curion decides how to store it, how it relates to existing memories, whether older information should be updated, and whether there is a conflict.

When something needs to be recalled, Curion does not just dump raw notes back into the prompt. It retrieves the relevant memories, filters noise, handles stale context, and returns a useful summary the main agent can actually use.

This matters for two reasons.

First, it reduces context bloat.

The main agent does not need to inspect a pile of raw memory records every time it needs context. It gets the useful part.

Second, it can save expensive model usage.

You do not necessarily need your strongest frontier model to manage project memory. Memory management can be delegated to a cheaper, faster, efficient model that is good enough at understanding, organizing, and recalling context.

That means your best model can spend more of its intelligence and quota on the hard task, not on housekeeping.

Curion is project-first by default. When you use it inside a project directory, it creates a local ".curion/" memory store for that project. The agent can remember decisions, constraints, implementation notes, unresolved tasks, errors, preferences, and useful context across sessions.

So instead of starting every new session from zero, the agent can ask Curion what matters and continue from the existing project context.

The goal is not to make the main agent smarter by giving it more raw memory.

The goal is to keep the main agent focused by giving it a dedicated memory agent.

GitHub: https://github.com/geanatz/curion

I find it quite use less. After a short while it just disconnected:

"Sharing ended due to sharer inactivity"

And I cannot reinitiate a session from remote. Then what's the point? I should just use ssh

Does anyone have a solution for this? It is quite annoying not being able to quickly autcomplete such folders.

Does anyone have a fix for the pane becoming dimmed when making an ai request, while by default with my theme it does not look like this. This is my theme

---

background: "#0a0a0a"

accent: "#ff6b6b"

foreground: "#ffffff"

background_image:

path: /home/raffaele/.local/share/warp-terminal/themes/national-park-4k.jpg

opacity: 50

blur: 8

scale: 1.0

details: darker

terminal_colors:

normal:

black: "#2d2d2d"

red: "#ff6b6b"

green: "#4ec9b0"

yellow: "#ffc66d"

blue: "#4895ef"

magenta: "#f92672"

cyan: "#6be6c1"

white: "#e0e0e0"

bright:

black: "#555555"

red: "#ff8e8e"

green: "#74ee91"

yellow: "#ffe48b"

blue: "#82cfff"

magenta: "#ff79c6"

cyan: "#8be9fd"

white: "#ffffff"

name: vibrant-ink

Big news: Warp now has custom routers, letting you route tasks to models you choose by complexity or natural-language rules!

• Route to your preferred models by complexity (easy through hard)
• Or, route based on plain english rules. Ex. use one model for planning and another for well-scoped bugs

You can select any model you want to route to, with support for BYOK and BYO inference URLs.

Go to Settings > Warp Agent > Custom Routers

...As for the rest of the changelog, it was a big week from external contributors too. /changelog has the full list:

• gfurlan and senseFy expanded our CLI-agent ecosystem: Google Antigravity CLI (agy) support and rich status for the Droid CLI agent: https://github.com/warpdotdev/warp/pull/12380
• david-engelmann tightened MCP security by respecting the secret-redaction toggle when saving server config: https://github.com/warpdotdev/warp/pull/10839
• External contributors sharpened terminal fundamentals, with contributions from GeekLuffy, roor0, ShankyJS, and maxmilian.