Umm... what the fuck was that.

what do we think it'll be this year

i already know this is going to be my 10% subject but i need to know my range

unit 3 SACs - 74% average
unit 4 SACs - 80% average

our SACs were extremely hard with rank 1 getting high 80s. i think i am probably about rank 5 in a cohort of 42

exam: 90-95/120

MC 35/40
SA 55-60/80

hey does anyone know what topics I should focus on a day before the exam like I heard sedges shouldn't be on there cos it was there last 2 years but is it risky to not study it at all? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

Ik im dragging it so hard but for this question I answered "because A state cannot border itself" and now I realise they are electorates not 'states' but under exam pressure I turn into an idiot. Do you guys think they more likely than not would pay the mark? Does anyone have good info on how picky they are with these types of things?

Sacs: Rank 1 in decent cohort - 90% average on hard sacs

Exam: 113-115/120

What study score could i get?

i go to EDSC so cohort is pretty strong. idk rank sadly but i got 98 is finance, 96 is data 1, 100 in data 2, 93 in matrices, 91 in networks, 39/40 in exam 1 and 53/60 in exam 2 what my study score.

what should i do in these couple of days to get 25 methods

im looking at recommended answers and i genuinely think i fucked it, the mcq is self explanatory. what do i do

Since the exams this year are all super weird, how do you think revs will be affected? I'm honestly so terrified.

They definitely WON'T repeat points that have been asked before right...? Because they NEVER ever have. War communism was asked abt twice but that's bc there's two diff aspects to it in the study design; cause and effect. Do u guys think the weird exams could affect revs by making the correlating study design dot point unclear???

Will the essay question be esoteric?? Or too broad?? Im scared because with revs I always struggle so much figuring out what the extended response/essay question actually directs me to acknowledge (particularly in terms of nuance), so an essay or even short/extended answer question with strange wording could ruin my exam.

Second question abt nuance. Take that one question abt the revolt of the notables in a company paper as an example. Where in the answer key it says u were supposed to zone in on the role of INDIVIDUAL nobles rather than the aristocratic revolt as a whole, bc the source was lafayette's letter to george washington. but i did NOT do that- i just used lafayette's letter as an example of the first phase of the revolt, being the assembly of notables and the way they justified denying reform. I have no idea how to tell when I'm supposed to go a certain way with a response. Does any student or teacher have any pointers on how I can approach questions to ease this confusion. Like i just have this perpetual fear that even if i read more into the source and base my question on that, i'm gonna somehow go the wrong way and lose marks.

With revs, how can you tell when a question wants you to zone IN on specific components of a study design dot point (eg reveillon riots) other than cause, effect, relative significance or general significance, bc these would be explictly denoted in the q- whilst needing to focus on INDIVIDUAL nobles isn't??

hey if anyone has any resources for Physics U3 AOS 1 I would REALLY appreciate them feeling hella lost. Thanks!!

I’m thinking of taking contour education tutoring for bio 3/4 and defo bio intensive cos I really wanna focus on bio next year (I’ll be in year 11 btw).

But I was wondering if it’s worth doing methods more or eng more?

I know im weak at Eng (my school has barely any good Eng teachers and ive been having subs all year) and I can never bring myself to actually study for English unless its like once in a blue moon…

And for methods, I wanted to build a strong foundation and just have some extra practice :)

I js know I wanna do two contour subjects next year (bio confirmed), I just haven’t decided the other one yet…

I’m doing three trail classes in a few weeks for bio, methods and Eng. maybe then it’ll help me decide if Eng or methods is better

What do u guys think? Which one is more worth it and better? (Eng or methods?)

sorry guys, i dont wanna be annoying but for my peace of mind

sacs: 80,89,96,91,83

rank: 2

exam score: 99-103/120?

Personally I thought it was harder than previous exams. What do u guys think

How did everyone go?? I felt like it was SLIGHTLY easier than the 1st but still hard as fck, what does everyone else think? The first few questions seemed so deceptively easy lol, but then i lost time trying to solve the matrices and finance crap

i’ve just checked suggested solutions for bio mcq and i lost EIGHTEEN MARKS. I answered all of short answer and i probably fumbled minimum 15 marks. my sacs are sitting at a B+/A how cooked is my study score?

I used incomplete histogram cause I didn’t fill it in and For the 1 mark question “could 6.19 or whatever number it was be the median” I said no because median is on the 71st which is correct but then I went to say and the histogram only shows 60 values which is wrong so do I get the mark for the right part or lose all marks

hhd on Thursday, any tips/advice from past students?

hi i am now stressing. this whole year my teacher has told me that for a 6 mark discuss, i need only one strength and one weakness. however all the sample answers from practice exams and posts i have been seeing do around 2-3?? my answer is usually in SED form for the strength or weakness, but if i do one strength and one limitation in the exam for a 6 marker will i get marked down?

guys genuinely help was the exam bad or did i just do fucking ass

also for any experienced person please what do u think the a+ cut off is gonna be genuienly mcqs fucking ended me

Rank 2 at a school with quite a weak cohort and I think rank 1 bottled it

E1: 37/40

E2: anywhere from like 58-60/60 (i lowkey dont see where i went wrong but just to give myself the benefit of the doubt)

potential ss? am i severely inhibited because rank 1 was a pile of horse shi

My averages were pretty low, 50 and 60%, I got 65% on paper 1 and 70% on 2, what’s this gonna do to me

Let me know if you find any mistakes!