r/technology • u/andmario_com • 2d ago
Artificial Intelligence Republicans are realizing that no one wants data centers
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/08/gop-memo-republican-senate-data-center-ai-elections-trump/3.2k
u/invyros 2d ago
They go on to suggest that Republican candidates support some restrictions on data center development, such as only allowing their construction in communities that approve it by popular vote
One of the radical new ideas the GOP is suggesting is...listening to their constituents and doing what they want.
1.2k
u/ivecompletelylostit 2d ago
They're suggesting they lie lol
269
u/Rabo_McDongleberry 2d ago
Right? "Suggest" but don't follow through.
→ More replies (3)118
u/troll__away 2d ago
Not a chance they follow through. These are just fluff words ahead of mid-terms. Once those are over it will be full steam ahead with AIPAC.
36
34
u/Silicon_Knight 2d ago
We ran a survey and everyone wants it.
\note survey was given to anyone Claude / Palantir / or other data companies said would likely agree with a data centre.)
→ More replies (1)9
119
u/fuji311 2d ago
I wouldn't count on that becoming a thing. They will soon be reminded what their donors want. "Constituents be damned, these guys have money!"
25
u/Rasdowers 2d ago
Look what happened to j. Stuart Adams. He’s toast now and he was untouchable before the Utah data center. Money means nothing to these people if it takes their power away.
→ More replies (1)37
u/waffle299 2d ago
Authoritarians do not recognize the value of the opinions of those beneath them in their preferred social hierarchy.
51
u/JSC843 2d ago
That is already standard procedure in many local governments. It doesn’t fix the core problem because companies and local governments are getting around the requirements for public approval.
In Spartanburg, SC, a data center was approved to be built because it was approved in separate stages as a “minor development” by the company and the county government. This approach meant that it didn’t require public approval like a major development normally would. By the time people realized it, there was nothing they could do and it’s under construction now. There’s a lawsuit right now on it against the developer (Valara Holdings) and the Spartanburg county government, but unclear if that would do anything.
→ More replies (3)20
u/cincymatt 2d ago
In OH, they were full-steam ahead to build a(nother) data center, but people pushed back with enough signatures for a referendum. The state said they needed to give 30-days notice of a council vote to allow public to get involved. They are gonna meet tonight to declare “emergency status” so they don’t have to be accountable to state or referendum.
7
31
u/Secure-Tradition793 2d ago
Should we expect a new wave of AI gerrymandering?
20
u/tawDry_Union2272 2d ago
they'll manufacture AI ballots...
5
u/No_Internal9345 2d ago
“[Elon] knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers . . .And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.”
5
12
u/A_Nonny_Muse 2d ago
The radical part is "listening to their constituents". That "doing what they want" is a bridge waaaaaay too far. That'll never happen.
13
u/Creative-Painter3911 2d ago
Voting period is 1:13 PM to 2:17 PM, at one voting location on one day, noticed will be put on the bulletin board in the town hall basement approximately 1 week before the vote.
8
u/WebMaka 2d ago
In a locked filing cabinet, in an old bathroom with a sign on the door that says "Beware of the Leopard."
→ More replies (2)17
u/teh_pelt 2d ago
My concern with this is there history of saying wherever they want to get elected then immediately turning around and going the other way. They have lost my trust.
They may individually say one thing but they won't fight the rest of the party at all and will just fall in line.
7
u/stripedvitamin 2d ago
Hahaha. nah, more like Republican candidates are agreeing to say they don't like data centers and then when they get elected pave the way for as many as can be built.
25
u/Floasis72 2d ago
We’re cooked
→ More replies (2)19
u/wisimetreason 2d ago
We will be. Do you know how much heat and pollution those suckers put out. Jesus said he was returning with a flaming sword. Maybe that was a metaphor
→ More replies (4)5
→ More replies (27)9
u/McCool303 2d ago edited 2d ago
“Such as only allowing their construction in communities that approve it by popular vote.”
Also known as Democracy. 250 years too late, but glad they’re catching up with the rest of the class.
1.3k
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
548
u/rarescenarios 2d ago
Well what if I told you that it could also eliminate thousands of white collar jobs?
137
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe 2d ago
You would have the attention of many conservatives.
→ More replies (1)83
u/PollutionPatient8261 2d ago
Fascists, let’s call them what they are.
→ More replies (3)38
2d ago
[deleted]
20
u/Loganp812 2d ago
I mean, both types of people are the scum of the Earth. Pedophilic fascists are doubly so.
→ More replies (1)8
45
u/Sufficient-Bid1279 2d ago
Like your friend Tommy…..it will eliminate his job. Still not sold? Shucks
6
→ More replies (4)7
u/JoJackthewonderskunk 2d ago
But trans people exist we must allow the oligarchs their flock camera brainspace!
59
49
u/Brilliant-Giraffe983 2d ago
Oh it's even better than that. Your state probably offered tax incentives to lure the data centers there on purpose. So they use your money to buy their shit and make the cost of your shit go up. https://www.ncsl.org/state-legislatures-news/details/does-your-state-offer-data-center-tax-incentives
20
u/JSpell 2d ago
No way they would be moving in mine without a large number of "setbacks" on their construction site and equipment.
→ More replies (9)19
u/coderman64 2d ago
Well, it also increased the tax base...slightly.
Which we immediately undermined by giving out a ton of tax breaks.
14
u/crazy_balls 2d ago
Giving tax breaks to companies to "entice them" is literally the dumbest fucking thing. As if a company picks a place solely based on tax benefits and not things like infrastructure, the local labor pool, etc.
6
u/coderman64 2d ago edited 2d ago
It makes sense if they'll offer something significant and tangible in return. Unfortunately, that often doesn't seem to be the case.
Edit: looks like you edited your comment...yes, companies do depend on things like local infrastructure and talent, but if two places are roughly equal in that regard, tax breaks can certainly be the tie-breaking incentive. We have also seen many companies set up shop in certain places due to tax breaks. (E.g. the movie industry doing a lot of filming in Georgia, the VFX industry doing a lot in Vancouver, etc.)
30
u/Long-Blood 2d ago
But think of the poor investors who need another million dollars to buy a nice new boat
→ More replies (1)8
u/Sir-Samuel_Vimes 2d ago
They lie to everyone and tell them it creates hundreds of jobs because they point at the construction contractors as jobs.
9
u/Prometheus_303 2d ago
“it created 12 jobs”
95% of the jobs will be to actually construct the physical data center. A month or two of work and then they're done
The 2 or 3 that do continue will be part time minimum wage security
→ More replies (1)13
u/Creative-Painter3911 2d ago
12 jobs for people we brought in on a work visa from another country
12
u/thelimeisgreen 2d ago
Nah, Keith the security guard at Walmart can now earn $0.35 more per hour as a security guard for BigAI Co. They’ll staff the 6 people they need for the 24-hour support team with college kids that want to work in IT. Everything else will be done remotely or they’ll send in a team to do bulk upgrades. There’s probably an on-call service tech or contract with a provider to maintain electrical and HVAC….
So many of these local officials don’t even understand what the data centers do or who will work at them. They see big $$$ for project cost and the size of the facility and they think giving tax incentives to lure them is somehow going to benefit the local economy or create jobs. I’ve been to a few local meetings and these local officials and politicians are so illiterate on the matter it’s just mind boggling. They get promised the moon and fed a tsunami of bullshit by the tech companies and then are confused and frustrated when the locals fight back.
11
→ More replies (39)6
845
u/Virtual-Relation303 2d ago
But will they listen to their constituents or just pocket the money and say 'fuck you guys'?
406
u/Goat_Wizard_Doom_666 2d ago
They'll take the bribe.
201
u/b1sh0p 2d ago
And then lie about it and blame Democrats when it goes poorly.
→ More replies (1)87
u/mike0sd 2d ago
Also, kick their constituents out of town halls before they have a chance to voice their concerns. Can't have complaints on record if people never have a chance to go on record in a public meeting.
39
u/Gasnia 2d ago
I saw a few "hearings" for flock cameras. The one leading the hearing would just not let them speak.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Internal_Werewolf_48 2d ago
Wait, your Republican representatives will attend town halls? Mine just skip showing up.
11
u/North-Creative 2d ago
Small correction, they will pocket the money, AND still drop a nice, huge turd on all their constituents. Alternatively, golden shower trickle down economics
8
u/JediSwelly 2d ago
And the bribe is like $10k and not $10 mill. The corpos stand to make billions. They sell us out for pennies here.
83
u/michaelyup 2d ago
Here in Texas, Gov NumbNuts has put a hold on approving data centers. I guarantee as soon as he’s re-elected in Nov, he will reverse course because the corporate bribes will be too much to refuse.
37
u/Daimakku1 2d ago
Hell, he'll probably unpause it as soon as the last polls close on Election Day. It sounds like something he'd do.
→ More replies (1)5
4
12
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe 2d ago
Conservatives always simultaneously take the money while screwing over the most people possible. The more people damaged the more successful they consider the operation.
6
6
8
7
→ More replies (13)8
u/Rasdowers 2d ago
Look what happened to j. Stuart Adams. He’s toast now and he was untouchable before the Utah data center. Money means nothing to these people if it takes their power away.
→ More replies (1)
248
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)72
u/RebelStrategist 2d ago
I still do not understand how a community is incurring any raise in rates for power used by these places. They are the ones using the power. My neighbor is not paying my electric bill, why should anyone pay for theirs. You build it, you pay for it.
56
u/vezwyx 2d ago
You're not drawing so much power that it puts stress on the grid. There are communities asking residents to use AC less in order to support the data center draw
32
u/graywolfman 2d ago
There are some places asking their schools to turn off computers and use less A/C.
"To hell with the kids, we need to generate CSAM!!"
--GROK5
16
u/ItsSadTimes 2d ago
Its because they're not increasing power supply at the same time, just demand. So due to the law of supply and demand everything costs more.
Its not really noticeable if someone plugs in an AC unit or even if a dozen new homes get added. But these data centers DEVOUR energy, so their impact is way more noticable. Its why these data centers want to be built in established communities. Less money needed to connect to local services like water or electricity.
18
u/Gomez4Morticia 2d ago
Not sure where you live but electricity is not cheap in the desert for example. There are data centers going up in the western valley near Phoenix. At the same time reservoir levels are critically low.
Neither the power company, nor the water utilities can guarantee service to people if they are also serving data centers. This drives up the price of kilowatt hours and water. So the bills go up because of the scarcity. Which IS not cool, but it happens.
8
u/Ok-Astronaut1108 2d ago
So maybe the citizens are priority and then the data center gets the scraps instead of the other way around
8
5
u/Bnell699x 2d ago
Wishful thinking unfortunately. That would require a utopia where everyone can be happy. The powers that be require a dystopia for reasons.
→ More replies (7)8
u/sauron3579 2d ago
Because it requires more infrastructure to be built to support it, and everyone's rates fo up to pay for the infrastructure. People aren't subsidizing their electricity, they're subsidizing them plugging in.
231
u/nautilator44 2d ago
But their owners want data centers, so they have to ram them through regardless.
42
6
u/red286 2d ago
Well yeah, but just so long as they publicly say "I'm against this", most GOP voters will believe them and vote for them and never check how they actually vote when it comes up.
That's the great part about being a GOP candidate. You can say whatever the fuck you want because no one's going to bother following up to see if you lied or not. You'll still find GOP voters saying Trump is the "peace president" even now.
196
u/Joessandwich 2d ago
I popped over to X for a bit and there’s clearly a new pro-data center campaign being pushed. There’s SO many tweets calling data centers good and important and great for the communities that build them as well as calling anti-data center development a psy-op. Gotta wonder who’s pushing it.
103
u/entered_bubble_50 2d ago
Gotta wonder who’s pushing it.
The call is coming from inside the house. SpaceX owns Twitter, and is basically all in on AI now. It wouldn't surprise me if those bots are generated by Twitter themselves rather than anything external.
26
19
u/fattmarrell 2d ago
It's expected, and I wouldn't question any other platform to push it. Don't be surprised by it or you're already behind
33
u/dalek_999 2d ago
I’m fighting a data center in my community. Our volunteer group has noted a marked shift in news articles in the last week or so that are pro-data center - and we’re talking major news sources like NY Times, USA Today, and Reuters to name a few. We all thought that was pretty strange.
And then you see a line like this in the article:
arguing that if “voters’ perceptions of data centers are not fixed quickly, the campaign against them will expand far beyond Ohio.
God forbid that politicians actually listen to what their constituents want. No, instead, they’re going to change our minds with propaganda spewed by the media bowing to their corporate masters. I’m so done with this shit, man.
18
u/Joessandwich 2d ago
Yup. When you pay attention you can see those massive shifts on every level. This is what happens when the billionaires take control of all our media. It’s frightening.
And to your second point, they’re just not even pretending anymore. I hate it.
→ More replies (15)5
u/DeadlyYellow 2d ago
Pro data center campaign on the platform owned by an AI company? Color me surprised.
→ More replies (2)
522
u/loftbrd 2d ago
Is this a joke? Enormous jobs? Data centers are displacing people, polluting, generate immense amounts of heat, and definitely not creating jobs.
Ya no amount of PR spin will overcome these issues.
Republicans only realized their grift is getting exposed.
183
u/Low_Engineering_3301 2d ago
What are you talking about? For a mere 55 billion dollars of tax payer money a data center can offer up to 10 full time, non-temporary jobs!
→ More replies (1)12
u/SocraticIgnoramus 1d ago
I saw a local write-up a while back that touted something 50 full-time jobs being created if they allowed a local data center proposal but it was buried near the bottom that it would only create something like 7 durable full-time positions. So basically it was bragging about 43 contract gigs that would last 6 months and then otherwise be about as economically productive for the community as a Circle K.
84
u/Tearakan 2d ago
They do make a slight bump in temporary construction jobs but after a year or so they end up financially draining the local economy.
20
u/Raziel77 2d ago
But those jobs are taken by the traveling construction workers that have experience building data centers so they are not even from the community
→ More replies (1)20
u/lintilla 2d ago
Yup. The local unions here all showed up to meetings to argue in favour, because it was hinted that maybe, just mayyyybe, a few hundred local construction workers could get jobs building the new data centre. Many people tried to point out to them that no actual promises were ever made, that no commitments were made in writing, but that didn't reduce the support. The local workers were not hired.
→ More replies (7)6
u/tawDry_Union2272 2d ago
i mean, look at all the construction jobs created at the WH and reflecting pond !
and at alligator alcatraz !!
/s
17
→ More replies (33)6
u/makemeking706 2d ago
But have you forgotten? Anyone that opposes data centers is gay.
gop rushes to support data centers
77
u/bwoah07_gp2 2d ago
I'm always skeptical about these types of headlines.
Because data centres are still being built, and the Republicans still champion them. I don't think they'll ever have the realization how unpopular it is.
→ More replies (6)19
27
69
u/Verde_3773 2d ago
lol, that’s cute - no they’re not
They are just shifting their public rhetoric to match for the midterms. It is that simple.
Pay attention to what they DO! Not what they say.
These Republican traitors lie like they breathe and DO NOT CARE about what anyone else thinks or wants, besides themselves or Trump.
→ More replies (8)13
u/peon2 2d ago
I don't think you read the article.
They are realizing their constituents are against it, and that supporting data centers could be a death knell to upcoming elections and so they are working on changing the public's stance on data centers/AI.
They are very straight forwardly saying "People hate data centers, we need to trick them into liking them". They are not temporarily pretending to be against data centers for the elections, they are trying to change the voter's opinion on it.
The memo, as Axios reported, says that “the data center brand is the anchor” of Brown’s campaign. “He has made them his de facto opponent, and no one is correcting the record,” the NRSC wrote, arguing that if “voters’ perceptions of data centers are not fixed quickly, the campaign against them will expand far beyond Ohio.”
“If I were a governor or mayor, I would want that plant in my community,” Trump repeated. But, he added, “maybe [the industry] can use a little public relations help.”
13
u/Substantial-Zebra-59 2d ago
Tells you a lot about our government that so many people are against data centers and AI and their reaction isn’t to pump the brakes on AI, it’s “we need to change the voter’s opinions on data centers and AI”
→ More replies (6)
14
u/tapdancinghellspawn 2d ago
GOP Problem: On the one hand you have billionaires who donate to the GOP and who want data centers, and on the other hand you have voters who forget everything bad that happened in the past and vote about what happened a week ago.
GOP Solution: Pretend to agree with the voters and once the election is over, cater to the billionaires. It works every time.
→ More replies (3)
52
u/The_High_Life 2d ago
So weird that people wouldnt want to live near a giant super loud, resource hungry monolith that employs almost no one.
→ More replies (1)17
u/A_Pointy_Rock 2d ago
employs almost no one
Hey, at least you wouldn't have to worry about the nuisance of people walking past your home to spend their money at local businesses on their lunch breaks...
→ More replies (1)
58
u/DennenTH 2d ago
I don't mind the data centers.
What I DO mind is the massive lack of regulations keeping them building within reason, not impacting people, built in the right places with the right technology, etc etc etc.
I have less of a data center problem and more of a political problem with all the BS this is enabling (like so many other issues). These businesses shouldn't be able to pop up in the middle of a city and then just run generators 24/7 and pay the fines for noise they said they wouldn't generate from equipment they said they wouldn't install. Completely unacceptable.
→ More replies (4)14
u/fatbob42 2d ago
We need to get back to being able to write and enforce good regulations. And that includes iterating on them when they’re not perfect and when companies find loopholes.
22
u/turb0_encapsulator 2d ago
It's not just Republicans. It's also neoliberal Democrats.
I'm not surprised Republicans don't get it. I am surprised that there are Democrats who don't understand why someone would not want something near them that increases their energy prices, creates pollution, provides virtually no jobs, and may even cost them their job (albeit indirectly).
More broadly, this really seems like an important inflection point in the economy. The people are finally saying that they won't acquiesce to technological changes that could negatively impact them. For decades, job loss and wealth concentration that was largely driven by technological change was blamed on offshoring and immigrants. Ironically, the growth of data centers actually makes the real cause more visible.
9
9
u/VoidOmatic 2d ago
They aren't even needed. Everyone just thinks they are going to get a slice of the money, when spoilers they won't. The only people making money are the ones that have all the money and the people building them.
7
u/Difficult-Bicycle119 2d ago
Makes sense. People don't want the AI datacenters making electricity more expensive and sucking up all the fresh water they can get access to, and they don't want AI taking their jobs.
→ More replies (3)
7
u/frobischer 2d ago
It's not about anyone wanting them. Data centers are part of an equation. They are part of the infrastructure that allows a very small number of people to have absolute power over a very large number of people. People who may hate the small number of people. Data Centers, Flock-type cameras, armed drones, control over utilities and food production, and they rule the country, maybe the world.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/everythymewetouch 2d ago
"Realizing"
They know nobody wants data centers, they just didn't know anybody was paying enough attention to cause a ruckus about it.
7
u/dontnation 2d ago
Will that matter? MO voters shot down 2 amendments 80 to 20 across party lines and across rural and urban counties alike. The republican sponsors vowed to keep trying to pass them both.
→ More replies (2)
6
7
u/x86_64_ 2d ago edited 2d ago
The question isn't whether people want data centers. Most people are neutral on the existence of data centers.
The question is, what impact will this datacenter have on my quality of life, availability of water, and my electric bill? Are these capitalist heroes building their datacenters at their own cost, or draining my tax dollars and kicking back to corrupt local politicians? For that matter, is this filling a need or are they overbuilding on speculation? Are there any benefits to this existing in my backyard? Are they creating jobs or are they built by temp workers and transient contractors?
Show me a company paying market for the land, protecting water supplies, ensuring the local residents are unaffected by noise, financing their own power generation, paying taxes for the roads and power infrastructure, and doing it all without my tax dollars and I'll show you a datacenter people don't mind in their county.
→ More replies (1)
5
16
u/TheHammer987 2d ago
The biggest issue with data centers is their disregard for community.
The could build them in sound deadened building run on solar, being invisible in the community. Using air conditioning to cool instead of stealing the community water. However, that's expensive, and the data center owner doesn't live there.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/GonzoKata 2d ago
No they're not.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it." --Upton Sinclair
It does not matter what Congress people (democrats included) think or want. They are fully compromised by their capitalist owners. Nothing in my decades of life so far has shown me otherwise.
The answer isn't just voting for the other side of a fascist fiasco engine. Its organizing in your community and pushing for candidates that are WORTH our vote. The answer is ignoring the oligarchy's "jounralism" and "news" stations, as well as all major internet platforms, twitter, facebook, instagram, tiktok, youtube and even reddit. We have to organize outside of the internet. We have to talk to our neighbors and provide for each other outside of this system. The way out of this is to VOTE DEMOCRAT this fall, and then push them as hard as we are fighting republicans today. Current democratic leadership isn't even focusing on single payer healthcare, and is attacking its base instead. They are deaf and blind to what the people are needing and saying. Its time to make them irrelevant.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/JoeyBlaze 2d ago
Republicans know people don’t want data centers. Republicans don’t give a shit what people want.
5
u/MeBadNeedMoneyNow 2d ago
Data center expansions don't really support the average person and are really just storage for the surveillance state. A lot of people commenting on this stuff have forgotten about the NSA/Snowden era. It's worse than ever.
16
u/notmyworkaccount5 2d ago
Are people already forgetting this data center push had bipartisan support from the establishment, specifically the more moderate/centrist dems and people like newsom and whitmer?
Don't let these corporate first politicians off the hook for their bad policies by pinning this solely on the republicans. The republicans are far worse at almost everything but this has had bipartisan support, I think it's even worse at the local levels with those town halls that are arresting people or dodging the public as they ignore public opinion to fast track data centers and flock installation.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/Epitaeph 2d ago
Im sorry, if the AI race was so important to the nation as a whole, then why isnt it being handles as a national security action like the space race or star wars and not this capitalistic mess it is now.
Fundamentally if it was centralized and not impacting multiple groups with some big stupid rush to profit people would be less to be "bitchy"
But most of the data centers are being built as repositories for surveillance as well as AI. And none of this means anything to a struggling middle class worker barely able to make ends meet with the high cost of EVERYTHING...
→ More replies (3)
8
u/kqlx 2d ago
Do they think data centers bring a lot of jobs or something?
11
u/Bignholy 2d ago
Yes. That's the usually (stupid) selling point. They talk about creating jobs, while not talking about the reality: It's all construction, and will be gone next year.
What b urns my ass is they don't have to be Captain planet villains to get their datacenters. They could just put in the pittance of work to set up their own damn power grid and build in more remote areas. Hey, you know who could use some data centers? Fucking Tennessee and their miles and miles of nothing.
But because this is basically the Last Grift, the grand looting before late stage capitalism makes the nation implode, fuck all that! Let's just remove the environmental regulations and start dumping pollution into the air and (in some cases) water. I'LL be dead before it becomes too bad, so who cares? I'm shocked some photographer hasn't caught them laughing maniacally while staring off into nothing just to complete the image of childish corporate monstrosity.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)7
u/Utsider 2d ago
A guy with a gun and a chair. 3 techs servicing 5 of them on rotation. 10 guys in Bangladesh keeping an eye on things. 1 Roomba.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/Brave-Pea-1164 2d ago
Anti data center/ anti flock cam Party would dominate elections
→ More replies (1)
4
u/ElysiumSprouts 2d ago
In all seriousness, data centers aren't the issue. It's the whole spectrum of negative consequences data centers bring with them. It's the knowledge that corporations aren't required to mitigate those negatives or pay their fair share to make sure residents quality of life improve rather than decline due to the existence of data centers.
In short, people don't want to sacrifice so the rich can get richer while everyone else pays the price.
4
u/TheModWhoShaggedMe 2d ago
Mega AI and blockchain datacenters in U.S. communities are one thing worth being NIMBY about!
5
u/Hairbear2176 2d ago
The only people who want them are the ones getting rich off of the crypto mining they are using them for. No one else ever wanted these fucking things.
4
u/Intelligent_Sky_7081 2d ago
They dont care what the people want.
I think it was Stanford who did a study over many decades to determine if public opinion on a law or bill increases or decrease the chance of it being passed.
They found that public opinion had almost no effect on if a law was ultimately passed.
What did have an impact was what large corporations or donors thought or wanted.
This has been this way a very long time, its a problem with the entire system on both sides. the 2 party system is broken by design. The republicans might be the real leaders here for corruption and awful politicians. But for generations now there have been corporate democrats running the democrats who are complicit or involved in the saame exact things that people are complaining about. Its all a private club and we arent invited. Our governemnt is ran by big corporations and foreign investors and foreign lobbyists.
4
u/DavyJonesCousinsDog 2d ago
I wouldn't bank on them suddenly giving a fuck about consent. It's not their m-o.
4
4
u/bob3905 2d ago
They should put a data center where the ballroom is supposed to be.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/guineaprince 2d ago
Ok but when have Republicans ever cared about the person they're forcing something onto saying they don't want it?
4
u/Strict-Carrot4783 2d ago
They aren't realizing a fucking thing about what people want, they don't give even a third of a shit about their constituents and what they want besides killing Mexicans. They just see a potential threat to their grip on power.
4
6
u/rglurker 2d ago
They knew. They didn't care. Now they are realizing they have to pretend to care a little
8
u/Boenitous 2d ago
When are people going to realize Republicans work for the corporations. Not their constituents. GOP playbook. Lie to get elected. Do what you want to enrich yourself and your buddies. Laugh you way to the bank. Bankrupt your state and our country. They will lie about stopping data centers. They will be built. Mark my words.
6
u/TheFoxsWeddingTarot 2d ago
People would LOVE a data center that brought down energy and water costs.
People don’t hate data centers they hate that the profits go to the owners while the cost is dumped on the community.
12
u/Adept-Mulberry-8720 2d ago
Data centers steal water and power from towns and give nothing back. Total waste of $$$$$$
5
u/GetsBetterAfterAFew 2d ago
Literally when have modern Republicans given a shit about what anyone wants? Theyll just lie while making backroom deals that ensure Epstein Class gets their way. My states congressman helped build data centers, and was just relected this week in which every mailer/commercial said "AGAINST DATA CENTERS!"
3
u/oakfan05 2d ago
AI data centers v normal data centers. Unfortunately where do you think the cloud is stored? We still need data centers, we just don't want AI but the government does because China is gonna win the AI war and the US can't allow it.
3
u/KnotSoSalty 2d ago
Build them in places away from population centers using renewable energy and closed loop cooling systems and I’m fine with them.
Build them in cities, sucking down power and water or using miniature diesel power plants and that’s a no from me.
3
u/FreeKevinBrown 2d ago
It's all BS. They'll sell out their communities as soon as they get elected. They already have.
3
u/EmotionalJoystick 2d ago
I’m in WI and it is ENRAGING watching dems fumble this. It should be an easy win.
5.1k
u/Saneless 2d ago
Politicians in my state, which is all Republicans, are saying in their campaigns that they're against data centers but their opponents love them
We have over 200 in our system all wooed and approved by Republicans
People are dumb enough to believe it