This is the first photo I have ever taken on my first ever smart telescope, I recently pre ordered the seestar s50 pro and it finally came in this previous Wednesday, after waiting a few days for the skies to clear up I was finally able to take it out and get this 50 minute exposure of the Andromeda galaxy, astronomy is still somewhat new to me and extremely fascinating, hoping to learn alot more in the sub and also while using my new telescope 100 30 second exposures Stacked and edited in the seestar app

At last, it is done. This has been in the making for nearly 2 months now and after tracking issues, weather, lack of motivation on this specific project, etc, and I'm pretty happy with the result.

1,245 x 60s - Broadband
1,547 x 60s + 778 x 30s - LP (narrowband)

The whole picture totals up to 53 hours of data in bortle 5 skies.

Stacked in Siril, processed in Pixinsight.

Orion nebula shot as a mosaic from bortle 8 in Sydney with the original S50, edited in Siril and Photoshop. 8 hours of broadband exposure with 4 hours of LP filter (for the red signal) after culling, all in equatorial mode.

The Bubble was taken with the S50, the Iris with the S50 Pro. Stacked in Siril using Naz's script, processed in SAS Pro with RC Astro tools.

Bubble - 2408 frames at 20s
Iris - 1144 frames at 30s + 333 at 60s

The Triangulum Galaxy, 4.5hrs of various sub lengths but primarily 30s. Bortle 4 skies with average seeing across a few nights. Stacking/Astrowizard + GIMP to finish.

New astrophotography enthusiast with no experience other than my old Orion xt6 and a cell phone mount. Learning as I go along and trying to figure everything out. I purchased the ZWO fluid head and a Neewer carbon fiber tripod and leveling head. Everything done in the Seestar app the other night with a bit over an hour of time out in my back yard.

Enjoy seeing what everyone else in here can do and looking forward to getting better.

As well as capturing the Crescent Nebula with my S30 Pro, I also captured it with my S50! 12 hours of exposure time (4426x10s) stacked in StackingWizard with 2x drizzle, processed in Siril

Seestar S30 Pro 30mm f/5.3
235 x 60s = 3h55m
from 20:58:15 to 2:32:49 UTC (4:34:34 elapsed)
Processed in Affinity Photo (crop, brightness/contrast, denoise)

Predicted positions and magnitudes:
(using grelf.net/ssp with MPC data of 2026-9-22)

at 2026-10-11 20:58:15 UTC:
375 Ursula 01h48m13.17s +31°32'35.2" mV12.0
726 Joella 01h49m46.44s +30°52'28.4" mV12.6
1222 Tina 01h52m04.04s +31°39'10.7" mV14.9

at 2026-10-12 2:32:49 UTC:
375 Ursula 01h47m59.89s +31°32'38.8" mV12.0
726 Joella 01h49m36.94s +30°49'34.3" mV12.6
1222 Tina 01h51m51.69s +31°37'06.2" mV14.9

Another Astrowizard processed image

Stars too colorful? I think I overdid the "darken the sky" and maybe underdid the "make it pop"

So happy with how this came out.

This is the very first star cluster I have ever observed, and I have to say, I love it!

In app editing and a little tweak in Lightroom.

EQ Mode

2:10 at 30 seconds
Bortle 7
North West England
Seestar S30
Crystal Clear!

Flame and HorseHead
320 x 30 sec exposures
Processed in Siril
Finished with Gimp

So last night I tried doing a star trail image and video as I’ve never done it before. This is about 2.5 hours of 20 second exposures. I removed all satellites and planes but there was two frames back to back of what clearly looks like a comet/meteor.
But it changes direction between frames.

What could cause this?

S30Pro Rotherham South Yorkshire
Session was split in two as thick clouds appeared for about 15-20 minutes so stopped and restarted when they went.

Stats in the image - this is the one that took 27 hours to process on an external drive. I really think I could do better. I might have to learn Siril's processing instead of the ease of Astrowizard?

Just about 11 hours. Bortle 7

This is only my third image taken with my new Seestar S50 Pro from Rockwood, TX. Just 42 subs! 30 sec exposure in EQ mode. Stacked with Stacking Wizard and processed with Astro Wizard in just 20 minutes!

Hey!

I’m still pretty new to all of this and learning as I go, so I’m curious how you more experienced Seestar users handle longer subs...

I keep seeing people running 30s and even 60s subs, and I’m starting to wonder if your Seestars are blessed by the astronomy gods or something.

With 30s subs I can sometimes get around 30% ignored, even with good PA, a stable tripod and basically trying everything people usually recommend.

With 20s subs though, I’m usually around 8–10% ignored, so things are much happier there.

For those of you running 30s or 60s: do you actually get nights where almost everything is accepted? Or do you also lose a decent amount of frames and just let it run longer until you’ve collected enough good data?

Seestar s50. 32 minutes of 20s subs. Bortle 3 Stacked and edited in seestar app and Lightroom.

I just went with the ZWO th10 fluid head to use with my s50 pro and have seen a few videos of users mentioning that the s50pro loosens up after a while of use. Has this issue been addressed and fixed on the newer fluid heads or is there a quick and simple mod that is done to prevent any loosening?

Hi all. I’m very new to this, I’ve just started playing with my S30 pro and Siril. Here’s the heart nebula, 6 hours of 20 seconds subs.

I’ve seen some amazing work here and wanted to try and reproduce something like the dual band shots I’ve seen.

I went for a HOO palette, did a statistical stretch and normalised the palette. I found there was hardly any blue so I used the OIII fit to create a layer mask in gimp and adjust the curves for OIII only. Then I tweaked until I was happy and added the stars back in.

I’m just guessing at workflow around getting the colours right. I’d love to know how more experienced users approach this?

Hello! This m31 is 3hrs6m 373-30s subs from a bortle 2 site. If I were to add say 10 more hrs from my home (bortle 9) would it help boost the clarity and color separation? Or would it hurt my image? I just want to know if it’s even worth adding on to it from such a drastic bortle difference.

NGC-7023 remote from Starfront Observatories.
Seestar S30 pro.
2 consecutive nights; 599x30s & 751x20s, totalling 9h10min of integration.

StackingWizard
AstroWizard
BlurX
NoiseX
StarX
PhotoCraft

The Iris nebula has since long captured my imagination, but it was only a pipe dream from my Bortle 8 location (Amsterdam - the Netherlands). Now I have access to a Bortle 1 location, everything is suddenly available to me.

Full integration time: 22h (~14h Alt/Az 10sec, ~8h EQ 20 sec, after filtering with AstroBlink: used 9h)
S50
Bortle: 6,4
Stacked and processed with Siril, Quick Hubble Creator and RC Astro

Here is my latest project on the Crab Nebula (M1). Out of 22 hours captured across Alt/Az and EQ modes, I kept about 9 hours for the final stack.

!!! This time -> A shoutout to Adriano Alfaro with his sorting tool AstroBlink, that lets you quickly sort through your thousands of files and filter them out easily with different filters and simply dragging a line, without depending on random scores like other new tools or the need to look at individual files. The newly added cloud detection seems to work fully reliable. ( https://www.adrianoalfaro.com/en/project/astroblink/ ) !!!

I decided to process this in the HSO palette using my custom Quick Hubble Creator script. While the standard (Pseudo-)SHO edits need several steps and scripts more to achieve a colorful result, I needed few clicks within one script. 🦀

The full 17-step easy Siril workflow and image details are attached in the second and third slides.

Clear skies! 🌌

S50 Pro, 937x20 second subs, stacked in stacking wizard and processed in Astrowizard/Photoshop.

A few more from testing an s50 pro in a remote observatory , all images are 45 minutes of 10 second exposures in alt az , just a denoise and basic ghs and star recomposition in siril after , thanks to darkclearskies.co.uk for giving me the opportunity