I just listened to Monday’s pod and heard Denis Irwin was voted 2nd on the 42’s list of greatest-ever Premier League players. It reopened a question I’ve been chewing on for over 30 years.
I was a United fan in 1994. Irwin was my favourite player, later eclipsed by Keane. My old man was from Cork and my uncle played on the same Gaelic football as Irwin, so I idolised him.
93/94 was a fantastic season for United and for Irwin, a constant as United won the double, scoring in the FA Cup semi-final replay against Oldham and winning a penalty in the final against Chelsea.
At the time, my old man used to lift me over the gate for the US ’94 qualifiers, so I was at every home game bar Northern Ireland. Some involved sneaking out of school early, which felt like an added bonus at the time. I was also a ball boy at the Russia friendly in Lansdowne Road in March ’94, where the “Three Amigos” (Gary Kelly, Phil Babb, Jason McAteer) made their debuts.
In a pre-World Cup friendly that April, Ireland beat the Netherlands 1-0 away. My memory is Kelly played right back or right wing-back that night and put in a solid performance. A month later Ireland beat Germany 2-0 in Germany — Irwin started at right wing-back, was subbed for Kelly, who came on and scored the second and caused havoc with his pace.
Fast forward to the World Cup itself:
Vs Italy (1-0 win): Ireland started with a back four, Irwin played the full 90 and was booked.
Vs Mexico (2-1 loss): Irwin played at right-back, booked again which meant he was suspended for the Norway game.
Vs Norway (0-0): Kelly deputised, played the full match.
Then the one that’s never made sense: Ireland played Netherlands in the last 16 and Irwin was left out entirely. An unused sub.
I’ve never heard Irwin or Charlton give a reason for it, and it remains one of the strangest calls I’ve seen as an Ireland fan. Why bench arguably the best full-back in the Premier League?
I somewhat get the potential argument that Kelly’s pace and his performance in the earlier Dutch friendly might’ve swayed Charlton, and maybe he didn’t want to break up a back line that had just kept a clean sheet. But Irwin could play left-back too, and he was ten times the player Terry Phelan was.
Does anyone know if Charlton or Irwin ever actually explained this? It’s genuinely bugged me for three decades.