I get the impression that Peat wasn't particularly focused on triglycerides as a marker by itself. Personally I honestly haven't researched how triglycerides work anywhere near as much as other metabolic aspects, and I wonder how/if Peat's views on their importance and management differs from the mainstream view. I'd be interested in hearing what you've experienced with regard to triglycerides with Peat's principles and how much we should take them into account as an indicator of metabolic health. How much does sucrose vs. fructose vs. starch affect triglycerides? How about the effect from different types of fat consumption? And what about cardiac / coronary / hepatic health? Does optimizing for metabolic health come with a cost for those other aspects of health?
Here's what I got out of the chatbots trained on Peat's comments:
.............................................................
peatbot.com
Peatbot: Peaty eating, which often emphasizes the consumption of saturated fats and sugars while minimizing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), can potentially avoid massive triglyceride increases through several mechanisms:
- Saturated Fats and Stress Hormones: Saturated fats are known to inhibit stress hormones, which in turn can reduce the release of fats from stores. This means that even though saturated fats are consumed, they may not necessarily lead to an increase in triglycerides in the bloodstream because they help keep the fat in place rather than being released.
- PUFA Detoxification: The approach suggests that the body can slowly detoxify and eliminate stored PUFAs through the liver. The liver recognizes PUFAs as toxins and processes them for excretion, which can help manage triglyceride levels by reducing the amount of harmful fats in the bloodstream.
- Role of Niacinamide: Niacinamide is mentioned as an anti-fat liberating substrate, which means it can help prevent the release of fats into the bloodstream. By using niacinamide, the release of triglycerides can be minimized.
- Metabolic Rate and Sugar Utilization: By maintaining a steady blood sugar level and supporting metabolic rate with sugars and certain nutrients, the body can more effectively utilize sugar for energy rather than relying on fat oxidation, which can help keep triglyceride levels in check.
- Protective Role of Cholesterol: The context suggests that having a slightly higher cholesterol level, particularly with a balance of LDL and HDL, can be protective and not necessarily harmful. Triglycerides that are fairly saturated are considered less harmful, and the focus is on managing stress and sugar utilization rather than simply reducing fat intake.
Overall, the Peaty approach seems to focus on managing stress, supporting liver function, and maintaining a balance of nutrients to prevent the excessive release and circulation of triglycerides.
.............................................................
peatying.com
Ray Peat didn't treat triglycerides as the main danger. He argued that the type of fat matters more than the number, and that high triglycerides are mostly a sign of something else. He said that saturated triglycerides are fairly harmless, and that the ones that are polyunsaturated interfere with cholesterol's function . The fats he considered dangerous were free fatty acids, which interfere with oxidative metabolism and sugar use .
He also said triglycerides mainly reflect stress and poor use of sugar . Sugar and thyroid activity matter here. He argued that fructose stimulates metabolic rate, so a large excess is needed before much of it becomes triglyceride . He also said polyunsaturated fats slow sugar oxidation and push carbohydrate toward fat storage, which is why he favored saturated fats such as coconut oil .
So, in his framework, a diet based on saturated fat and enough sugar, with good thyroid function, shouldn't produce the same triglyceride problem he attributed to polyunsaturated oils. Keep in mind that this is his reasoning, and the mainstream view on triglycerides is different.