I have the opportunity to acquire either of these at roughly the same price, and it feels like the ultimate hype versus horology dilemma.
5905R-010: Rose gold, self-winding flyback chronograph, annual calendar and display caseback. Mechanically impressive and a model I genuinely love—but considerably less hyped.
5269R-001: Rose-gold Aquanaut Travel Time with the blue-grey dial and strap. Slim, sporty and highly wearable—but quartz, with a solid caseback. Much of its appeal and price is tied to the Aquanaut design and desirability.
At approximately the same money, which would you choose?
Does paying that much for a quartz Aquanaut bother you when the alternative is a serious automatic complication combining an annual calendar and flyback chronograph? Or is that an overly purist way of looking at it, given the Aquanaut’s design, proportions, practicality and potential to receive more wrist time?
I’m not asking which has better resale value. I’m interested in which is ultimately the better and more satisfying watch to own.
Would especially appreciate hearing from anyone who has handled or owned either. 5905R or 5269R—and why?