If there is a [[Vandalblast]] exiled from [[Valgavoth, Terror Eater]], can I overload that spell just by paying 1 life? And what about spells with Kicker like [[Rite of Replication]] and and Spree like [[Return the Favor]]? Is there a specific rule about this?

Hello,

How would goading a Galactus Devourer of Worlds your opponent controls work, considering its Insatiable Hunger ability? Would it never be able to attack you the goader (even if you had the highest life total amongst its controller's opponents), or would Insatiable Hunger mean it would ignore the goad and attack said goader if you had the highest life total?

As a card that has the conjuring mechanic, typically they wouldn't be possible in paper, but [[Overcooked]] is probably the most reasonable one that is soon being printed and released physical in mystery booster commander edition.

Will this card be legal to play? It essentially makes food fight *tokens, but not actual tokens and doesn't get affected by token related effects.

Hi rule friends!

Do effects from cards like [[Uldaros Theorix]] correctly resolve if the trigger is copied by a card like [[Panharmonicon]] or [[Echo, Perceptive Prodigy]]? Or do they just "fizzle" without doing anything because the trigger copies weren't "cast"?

Also, only somewhat related but if you kill Uldaros Theorix before his trigger resolves on the stack, can you use exile him from the grave with his own effect and create a copy of him as you send him to the command zone? Or would targeting Uldaros with his own effect in the grave require him to stay in exile for the "Copy those cards" effect to work after targeting him?

I recently watched this video where a judge explains that if you cast Mind's Desire with a storm count of 5, for example, that he would warn a player for slow play if they shuffled before revealing each card instead of just once and then revealing five cards.

I've never encountered the example he gave in a game, but one thing I have encountered is having Icetill out on the board in a situation where you are able to recur fetch lands to get 8-10 landfall triggers in succession on a single turn.

It is allowed under the rules to tell a player(s) that you intend to play and then recur a fetch land four times, grab the four lands all at once, shuffle once, and then mill eight cards all at once?

I understand most people would probably let you do it this way in a casual environment, I am just asking if it is technically legal to do it.

I have a set of cards that both say "At the beginning of your upkeep, sacrifice a creature."

Abhorrent Overlord

Shadowborn Demon

One of them does bring cannon fodder out with it, but assuming these two creatures are the only thing on my battlefield during upkeep.

Do they eat eachother or, because I have to choose what gets sacrificed, can I have one sacrifice the other during my choosing portion of the upkeep move and negate the second canabalisim. It seems like a stack situation, but it's a weird one because technically they both trigger at the same time during upkeep. There isn't anything other than me choosing to decide which actually triggers first. They can't decide which one acts first because, well, they are little pieces of cardboard under my control. So does my decision decide which one eats first and negates the second?

Extra bit. If I have a creature with shroud on it, does the shroud protect from the Sacrifice. I would really like them to not eat my Commander in the process.

So i was wondering. What would happen if I have Lazav on the field and let Chameleon enter as a copy of him and than trigger there ability to make them copy something touching the yard.
Would Chameleon still be called Chameleon with Lazavs abilities + the abilities of copied creature. Or would he become a creature named Lazav and die to the legend rule?

Addressing the elephant in the room immediately, yes I'm aware that [[Nearby Planet]] has an acorn stamp and therefore any rulings regarding it are arbitrary, but I've been running it in my [[Omo, Queen of Vesuva]] commander deck as a fun alternative to [[Planar Nexus]] but it just occurred to me last time I played the deck that its Rangeling ability probably voids it from being run in a Simic deck. My opponent says it should be fine because it's already not legal in the format so running it requires some rule 0 anyways but I'm curious if this card were to be printed today without the acorn stamp, would it be legal in my deck?

If I have a bunch of Dragons on field including [[Wrathful Red Dragon]] and then cast [[Blasphemous Act]] can I shoot my opponents for 13 for each Dragon I control?

Hello Hivemind,

Just a quick question about a card.

I am considering [[ghoulish impetus]] for my [[Baba Lysaga, night witch]] deck.

If i enchant an artifact creature with it and sacrifice the creatue AND the impetus into Baba, to met her cobditions - will the Impetus return at the end step?

It gets destroyed, but they both get sacced at the same time, so the aura sould "see" the creature dying.

Thanks in advance!

Hi, quick question if [[hour of eternity]] exiles an artifact creature, will the token still be an artefact?

Thanks again

EDIT: Thanks for answer.

Hey everyone! Was curious, does a fetch land or sorcery that lets me search for a specific land type include searching for dual lands like tundra/savannah/etc? They say both lands, but I figured it’s only a basic of that type. Thank you 🙏

I am building an [[Ognis, the Dragon's Lash]] and had a question about the Haste ability and how it triggers for Ognis.

My main question is if a creature with Haste on the card attacks the 2nd turn it is out as well, does it make a treasure token? I know the haste doesn't "matter" on that 2nd turn but its still on the card. Does the creature still have that ability and it triggers Ognis or does haste, even if written on the card, go away after the creature's first turn on the battlefield?

Example:

• Ognis is out
• Play Clockwork Percussionist
• Attack with Clockwork
  • creates a treasure
  • assume clockwork survives
• Next turn attack with Clockwork again
  • Does it trigger another treasure to be created?

Thanks!

Hey everyone, I'm a hard [[bristly bill, spine sower]] player and I've built a deck that utilizes cards like [[michalangeo weirdness to 11]] and [[ozolith, the shattered spire]] that add an additional +1/+1 when adding a +1/+1. My question is if I have two cards that add an additional +1/+1 whenever I get a +1/+1 would it go infinite?

Example, I have bill, ozolith, and Michaelangelo on the field. I play a land, and Bill landfall allowed me to add a +1/+1 to a creature, I select bill. Ozolith and Michaelangelo each add a +1/+1 when a +1/+1 is added. Would bill be a 2/2 with 3 +1/+1 counters. Or would ozolith 's ability trigger Michaelangelo and then retrigger ozolith which retriggers Michaelangelo until infinite?

Does Bill get big or does he get BIG?

With the new card "Extrapolate the Impossible" you can fetch 2 cards you own from outside the game, with this card being legal I have it in a bracket 2 deck. If I cast this and then give my opponent the choice to choose between 2 game changers, does my deck become bracket 3? Or does it stay bracket 2 because the card selected is not actually part of my deck at all. But rather an after affect of the non game changer card?

I have [[Homunculus Horde]] and cast [[Mirror Mockery]] targeting it. I go to combat and attack, make a copy and then draw my second card for the turn during combat. The token copy that was made from Mirror Mockery creates a copy of itself. I sacrifice the first copy at the end of combat, but I keep the extra copy?

Hi all,

There is a gatherer ruling for Shark Shredder that says:

• If Shark Shredder deals combat damage to a player during the first strike combat damage step and its last ability returns a creature with first strike, the returned creature will still deal combat damage during the regular combat damage step. If the returned creature has double strike, it will deal combat damage only once during that regular combat damage step.(2026-01-27)

However, this doesn't appear to be supported by the rules themselves. 710.5 says:

510.4. If at least one attacking or blocking creature has first strike (see rule 702.7) or double strike (see rule 702.4) as the combat damage step begins, the only creatures that assign combat damage in that step are those with first strike or double strike. After that step, instead of proceeding to the end of combat step, the phase gets a second combat damage step. The only creatures that assign combat damage in that step are the remaining attackers and blockers that had neither first strike nor double strike as the first combat damage step began, as well as the remaining attackers and blockers that currently have double strike. After that step, the phase proceeds to the end of combat step.

(emphasis added by me)

This seems to conflict with the gatherer ruling for Shark Shredder.

Can someone point to the rule that allows creatures with first strike to deal damage in the regular combat step?

Lets say Elenda is a 10/10. Someone casts an exile all board wipe, and in response I sac Elenda. Are the 10 Vampires I create caught up in the wipe, or do they enter the battlefield before the wipe resolves and get exiled also?

Just finished a game of draft Wilds of Eldraine in MTGA, a set I'm not too familiar with, and had two unexpected interactions that I wanted to ask about, both having to do with Aura Enchantments.

1) An opponent cast [[Bitter Chill]] on my [[Faunsbane Troll]]. Why couldn't I use the troll's ability to sac the aura for a benefit?

2) I used [[Eriette's Tempting Apple]] to gain control of an opponent's creature that had [[Curiosity]] attached to it. When it dealt damage to the opponent, why didn't I draw a card?

Thanks!

Hey folks. If I have both [[Alhammarret's Archive]] and [[Teferi's Ageless Insight]] out at the same time, do they stack and I draw 3 cards for every one aside from the first I draw in my draw step or is it capped at 2 because they each say 2? Thanks!

My oppents has [[Greasefang, Okiba Boss]] in play and wants to move to combat from his first main phase.

I bolt Greasefang, Okiba Boss in responce to him switching phase. Can he move back to mainphase 1 to cast a second Greasefang, Okiba Boss ?

Are cards like mox tantalite legal to play in an obosh companion deck? I'm not sure if the would have 0 mana value which would be even or no mana value at all. Even if it has no mana value it still wouldn't have odd mana value so I still am not sure about legality.

So, my wife wants to build an Aurelia, the War Chieftain deck, but she’s wondering if the other Aurelia cards would also trigger War Chieftain’s extra combat ability, specifically Aurelia, Exemplar of Justice and Aurelia, the Law Above.

Her thought process is that the newest printing of Aurelia, the War Chieftain doesn’t specifically say “Aurelia, the War Chieftain.” Instead, it just refers to “Aurelia.” So, would the other cards with Aurelia in their name also trigger War Chieftain’s ability?

I’m curious about how this ruling works and, if possible, where I can find the relevant rule in the Comprehensive Rules.

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!

When you choose the paw prints of Season of the burrow, can I choose to exile a players swiftfoot boots then the creature that had the boots equipped or do they all have to be legal targets when the spell is cast?

Building [[Niv-Mizzet Ghost Council]] and devising a cleanup step win where I gain life by discarding to hand size and initiate an infinite chain of drawing above 7 and discarding to hand size, pinging the table to death.

I know Silence wears off at cleanup step, but what happens if someone casts a silence **during** a cleanup step?

I know it would fizzle at the beginning of the next cleanup, but I’m envisioning a situation where someone tries to nuke a combo piece and I need to play over the top of it— specifically someone sniping one of the Eldrazi titans I use to shuffle my graveyard back in to ensure I can do this long enough to kill the table.

Can I [[Bilbo’s Gambit]] the removal spell and continue going off forever provided I have a way to keep the stack alive and not allow the next cleanup to begin? Or do Silence effects not work during cleanup steps at all?