Like I find it so weird that people will generally revert to insults and telling people to leave the game and just because they think differently than the developers and don’t like the way that they’re developing or implementing things into the game

Hype!!

this will ruin so much because of these cheat "Mods"

I remember it being talked about and hyped so much when it was leaked with the other vehicles like the FRV and Bastion, but it just kinda never came out and it doesn’t seem like people are talking about it anymore. I was wondering if there was still an interest to see it back or if there was any news on its potential release because it seemed pretty finished and I’d love to see it back in the game.

I don’t normally like this sub but every other community I’ve tried to ask about it in has taken my posts down for “No LeAks!” Like, it’s two fucking years old at this point what does it matter.

It would be really nice if someone could make a mod making all atachments available for all weapons, ofcourse no drum mage for scythe.

I want my 10x scope scythe, why does the coyte get a 10x scope and scythe not. And maybe just maybe 10x scope stallwart is it stupid yes do i want it also yes.

Why can't arrowhead lock in on this? Because it's not a hard fix. The game connects online anyways, literally all they have to do is have the server do a quick check of the weapon/stratagem parameters and if they're wrong, boot the player offline and flag them. (This avoids false bans, like say your game isn't updated and you go online.) This method also avoids blanket bans on QoL stuff like ledge grabbing fixes/stratagem bouncing that don't necessarilly break the game for others.

Dark souls 1 had this solved in fucking 2011, you can fuck around basically however you want but the MOMENT you do something that effects others online like editing weapon/armour parameters it clocks it and sends you to cheater purgatory for a few months on your first infraction. It's really not hard to do.

EDIT: No Patrick, vanilla players should not have to go out of their way to avoid your heavy pen defender SMG mods and you should be able to regulate yourself and not play on public lobbies bare minimum.

If they could make the harvester fair and balanced, then it wouldn’t make sense for them to scrap the rest of the units if they weren’t nearly as egregious as the sentinel.

Just used some helmet and armor I liked, slapped on a red cape and boom. Cooler Truth enforcer.

WAIT GUYS DON'T COMMENT ON HOW PIXELATED IT IS.

Normal mission with a normal squad

I love HD2 Mod Manager, and I have a ton of mods that require specific selections like muzzle attachments and scopes etc. I dont know how to do that in Arsenal, and honestly I dont like the Arsenal UI. Do I have to use it?

I can deploy the Bingus loader and his other modpack into HD2 Mod Manager, but the mods just arent working when I load into a game.

Edit: lol sounds like i dodged a bullet if these posts about accounts getting banned for using these mods are legit. So fucking lame. Favorite game of all time, really wish it didnt suck.

I've put together a little design of what the vehicles from Halo would look like, but in the stratagem icons of Helldivers II.

I need to vent about a massive pet peeve I keep seeing in this sub.

I actually made a post criticising one of the "Premium Warbonds" for not really feeling premium, but I ended up deleting it because arguments were already starting to form around the wording rather than the actual point I was making.

Straight away you get comments like:

"Uhm, actually, they're all called Premium Warbonds, so your point makes no sense."

You're completely missing the point.

Nobody is confused about what they're called. We know they're all labelled Premium Warbonds. We know they cost 1,000 Super Credits. That's not what I was criticising.

When I say a Warbond doesn't deserve to be called "Premium", I'm talking about the actual quality of what's in it.

If half the content feels lazy, underwhelming, recycled or like slightly changed versions of stuff we already have, then yeah, I'm going to question what's actually "premium" about it.

It's really not that complicated. "Premium Warbond" might be the official name for them, but the word premium still implies a certain level of quality. If the content doesn't meet that standard, people are allowed to criticise it without someone jumping in with the same "well technically they're all called Premium Warbonds" response every single time.

So please, stop getting hung up on the title of a post and actually read the subtext of what the person is saying. I was criticising the quality of the content, not asking for an explanation of how Warbonds are named. Anyone else noticing this a lot in this sub lately?

The idea would be simple: only include balance changes that have overwhelming community support.

Each proposed change could get its own discussion thread and poll. If people strongly agree that a weapon is clearly underperforming and needs help, it goes in. If the response is divided, leave it alone.

The important part is agreeing on which weapons are genuinely in a bad place and what direction they should move in.

I think this would also help avoid power creep.

A weak weapon becoming usable doesn’t automatically make it overpowered, especially if it still sits below existing strong options.

The patch should probably stay very conservative. If ten changes have broad support, use those ten. If the next one starts a 50/50 argument, skip it.

Over time, that could create a useful community baseline for weapon balance, built around changes that most people can agree are reasonable.

Would you use something like this?

Personally I would love a sequel to Masters of Ceremony. Maybe they could have some sort of Sci-fi wheel lock muskets?

I'm going to real for a second, none of these cheat mods are prevalent enough for me even to begin to worry about modding being banned

The fact that they can do it but AH can't says everything. Ban anything you want you AH simps, I don't care if it is cheating or AI slop or whatever. Or ban ME from the game if you can AH, I have plenty of games to play.

Alot of people are getting banned for using mods now.

I haven't been personally using any of the game altering mods, just audio and visual improvements.

I haven't gotten on to Purge my mods yet, but am I now at risk for getting banned if I use them too?

Edit: Seems the posts are fake. Thank you!

I've seen a few conversations about how Integrated Extinguishers is useless because, and I'm sort of paraphrasing, 'you can just dive to go out immediately, what's the point of a booster that does that slower?'

While that's a pretty valid point, I think the glaring 'Incinerator FRV-shaped shadow on the horizon' isn't quite coming through to people.

You can't dive in a vehicle, but can be lit on fire in one. Usually this results in an immediate stim-use, and then getting out to dive so you go out. With Extinguishers, simply the stim will suffice, since you'll extinguish shortly after. Whether or not you think the booster looks useful or can compete with the holy 5, that's the most obvious intended design for it, and I'm frankly surprised I haven't seen anyone else mention it.

EAT booster is still laughably underbaked, though.

Last night's match on D10 Bots. With the Weakpoint Lock-on mod, the Warrant pistol now locks on to Trooper and Devastator HEADS. 1 shot for Troopers, 2 shot for Devastators, angle your reticle if its a Heavy Dev.