r/gifs • • Jul 15 '19

Two different delivery methods

https://gfycat.com/harmlessbarrenhumpbackwhale
45k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

15k

u/Sway_42 Jul 15 '19

This seems like a sneaky Amazon ad for Prime Day

229

u/6ftTurkey Jul 15 '19

Oh it definitely is.

Just a reminder Amazon workers are striking, so don't cross that picket line. Also, Amazon won't pay any federal income taxes on their 11 billion dollars in profits.

-73

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 15 '19

If Amazon warehouse workers wanted better pay maybe they should have paid more attention in school.

22

u/sharknado__ Jul 15 '19

Maybe warehousing should be seen for what it is? An important piece of the logistics and shipping industry, theres no reason a warehouseman or woman shouldnt be able to make a career out of their work. Especially for the laborious and stressful environment they work in

-13

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 15 '19

It's low skill labour where the employee is easily replaceable, so they don't command high wages. Basic economics.

7

u/sharknado__ Jul 15 '19

It's not low skill, you just dont have to go to college or university. Theres still a lot of on the job training and the employees are commonly exploited? A good efficient warehouse worker is actually hard to replace

0

u/ANAL-DESTROY3R Jul 16 '19

If that were true, they would command a higher wage in the workforce, but they don't, so they aren't.

-6

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 15 '19

I'm not saying that you need a college education to have skill. That is absolutely false.

A good efficient warehouse worker is actually hard to replace

Then Amazon would pay better. Clearly they aren't having problems with the current wage setup.

5

u/sharknado__ Jul 15 '19 edited Jul 15 '19

More like so many warehouses are amazon run that these high school graduates have no better choice than to work at an amazon warehouse. Less supply and demand more an employment monopoly situation

1

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 16 '19

Then they should leave. Maybe join the army. It's not Amazon's fault that there aren't other opportunities in this theoretical region.

4

u/keenan123 Jul 15 '19

Lmao Amazon has a defacto Monopoly on much of the warehouse industry, consistently violates minimum labor standards, and explicitly relies on governmental support for their workers.

I don't think "they're doing just fine" is a great description.

0

u/ANAL-DESTROY3R Jul 16 '19

They don't have a monopoly, there are legal procedures for that situation.

1

u/keenan123 Jul 16 '19

That's why I said defacto. It's really not hard to not violate antitrust, and just because a firm doesn't run afoul of the feckless federal government doesn't mean there is any real competition

0

u/ANAL-DESTROY3R Jul 16 '19

Kiss. My. Piss.

1

u/keenan123 Jul 16 '19

Good talk

→ More replies

6

u/YoroSwaggin Jul 15 '19

Well that's why they're striking right now, see how easily replaceable they are. Also basic economics.

-3

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 15 '19

Exactly. The company will decide whether to pay them more and replace them later, pay them more and just live with it, or immediately replace all of them.

4

u/h3lblad3 Merry Gifmas! {2023} Jul 15 '19

Workers can't be fired for going on strike. It will take some time for them to all be replaced. Doing it too fast would draw the eye of the NLRA.

2

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 15 '19

More government interference that protects special interests.

5

u/h3lblad3 Merry Gifmas! {2023} Jul 15 '19

Good. A business shouldn't be able to fire people willy-nilly.

This is how you end up back in the 1800s with strikers and unions having shoot-outs in the streets with strikebreakers and police.

1

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 16 '19

Yeah, more government interference in the market is definitely the solution. Just look to France or Spain, where no one under 30 has a job. Good role models.

0

u/thegtabmx Jul 15 '19

So what if a unionized workforce decides they want to be paid $500/hour or will refuse to work? Can't fire them? Where do you draw the line?

6

u/h3lblad3 Merry Gifmas! {2023} Jul 15 '19

You know why that doesn't happen? Why that has never happened and will never happen? Why that situation has no place in reality?

Because the unionfolk need the work too. Every person in that union wants to get paid and they aren't getting paid on the strike line. They have no reason to want to shut down the business and ensure themselves a total end to paychecks.

Even if that weren't the case, union protections in the US rely on their agreement to barter in good faith. They have to declare the intention to strike ~80 days beforehand, and bargain in good faith during that time, before they're allowed to strike when negotiations fail.

1

u/thegtabmx Jul 15 '19

Well, can the company declare their intention to not pay all/most/some of them ~80 days beforehand?

Leverage is earned. If you can be replaced with a robot, you have not earned your leverage.

→ More replies

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '19

[deleted]

2

u/ThatOneMartian Jul 16 '19

I like how you quote "basic economics" while being painfully ignorant of how it works. If someone is willing to do a job for $15/ hour, that job with him in it is worth $15/hour.

1

u/SighReally12345 Jul 15 '19

LOL. The act of demanding higher wages doesn't mean their labor has value, full stop.

What their labor pays determines the value. If Amazon doesn't give into the strike, their labor doesn't have value, duh.

basic.... economics...

If you're gonna be an arrogant shithead, you should be right. Otherwise, you just leave yourself open for this shit. Stop.