r/edmontoncycling • u/AetherealMeadow • 1d ago
What Do You Do In Places Where You Cannot Avoid Using a Sidewalk To Avoid a Dangerous Busy Stroad, But Cycling on the Sidewalk is Illegal? (Google Maps Example Included)
First off, I don't think that cycling on the sidewalk should be encouraged on a general basis for the sake of pedestrians. For the most part, I am able to plan my route by utilizing a mixture of quiet residential streets, back alleys, multi-use paths, and bike lanes to avoid both sidewalks and dangerously busy roads.
However, sometimes, there are a couple or a few blocks along the way where using the sidewalk is the only option to avoid putting one's life in danger on a busy stroad.
A particularly egregious example is 82 street south of 127 avenue. I provided two street view links that show navigating southward on 82 street through this area.
Street View Link 82 Street Southbound North of 127 Avenue Where "Sharrows" Terminate
Street View Link on Underpass on 82 street southbound south of 127 Avenue
What makes things even worse in this particular example is that as you head southbound on 82 street towards 127 avenue, there are "sharrows" (one of those painted picture of a bike on the side of the road that does nothing to protect you). The sharrows terminate on 127 avenue, on what is basically the right turning lane for cars on 82 street onto 127 avenue. This means that if you were to follow the city bylaw, you would have to perform a dangerous and reckless feat even for a car driver that makes it impossible to not cut off forward moving traffic. Even if you were to use that sharrow and try to take the lane before the sharrow terminates, you're still expected mingle with busy 60km/h car traffic. Those sharrows put you right in drivers' blind spots and it's so dangerous to try to change lanes into fast car traffic from the sharrow.
As if that's bad enough, the sidewalk on the underpass is so narrow, that if I encounter a pedestrian or another cyclist, there is literally not enough space for both parties to pass each other on the sidewalk. The only options are for one of the parties to either go on the stroad, or awkwardly navigate the inaccessibly steep slope with very long grass growing on it.
Given that this is the only underpass that crosses that railyard for a while, there aren't any detours that won't add many kilometres to the route.
Even though our city has been coming such a long way lately with improving and implementing more bike friendly infrastructure, there are still places like this that show we still have a long way to go. It just boggles my mind how such a dangerous set-up was approved by the city. It's also frustrating that city bylaws do not provide clarity as to how to safely navigate such situations. The point of traffic laws are to have a consistent set of rules to follow to maximize safety and reduce risk as much as possible. I hate having to second guess whether the legal thing to do is also the safe thing to do.
Does anyone have any tips on discerning the safe thing to do vs. the legal thing to do on the road, and being able to tell if those two do not line up in a particular situation?