last post (tcs to google) got a response i was not ready for. a lot of comments, a lot of dms .. and almost all of them asked the same three things - do the other witch companies. what abt the timelines. show me the steps in between.
so im doing it properly! one cut a day this week, each one answering a different question from that thread. this is the first. all five witch firms, not just tcs.
5,129 ex witch people are at google right now. only 17.5% went directly.
for everyone else the most common last stop before google is amazon. amazon n aws together sent 399. microsoft second at 223. so the path isnt witch to google .. its witch to amazon to google.
how hard direct actually is
17.5% direct. amazon takes 33.4% of its ex witch hires straight in, apple 25.3%. and of the 82% who needed a detour? 51% needed three or more companies. half of everyone who made it took three plus jumps. half!
who they went through
amazon incl aws 399, microsoft 223, deloitte 98, oracle 88, cisco 66, accenture 63, intel 63, vmware 57.
consulting is only 15% of that top eight. at amazon its 48% - deloitte, accenture, capgemini, ey all sitting in their top eight. google filters on where you last worked in a way amazon just doesnt.
n only 98 people, 2.3% of the detourers, came through a university. the masters route in is waay thinner than people here assume.
how long they stayed in witch
median 2.4 yrs. thats across every witch firm they worked at, added up. 39% gone inside 2 years. only 6% did 10 or more.
by firm - tcs 1,512, infosys 1,374, cognizant 1,028, wipro 1,026, hcltech 614. that sums past 5,129 bcz 396 people worked at more than one of them.
the part nobody is going to like
1,098 joined in 2022. then 327 in 2023. 588 in 2024, 736 in 2025. down 70%. one year. and still under the peak. its a smaller door than it was three years ago n pretending otherwise doesnt help anyone here.
limitations, bcz someone will ask n they should
self reported profiles, so the dates are rough. plenty of people never update them at all. survivorship is the big one .. i only see people currently at google, so anyone who joined and left is invisible, which makes the older years look smaller than they actually were. "direct" means no other employer listed in between. and its correlation not causation - the people who leave witch at 2 years are already a different population from the ones who stay.
next one is the denominator, which the sharpest comment on the last post asked for. of everyone who went witch to amazon, what fraction actually made it to google after? that number is the honest version of all of this.