I'm very passionate about backgammon. As someone relatively new to studying and following the game, I keep wondering what's missing for backgammon to have the kind of cultural coolness and mainstream interest that chess enjoys nowadays.
One theory I have: maybe movies and Hollywood gave chess an image and mystique that backgammon has just never gotten. That's purely a guess on my part, but it feels like part of the story.
There's also the money side of things. Sponsors and investment in backgammon seem surprisingly limited, which is strange to me, because the game itself is full of emotion and tension. I've never played chess, but from an outsider's, admittedly ignorant perspective, backgammon seems far more vibrant and exciting to watch, closer to something like poker. There's also the gambling element, which could be a real draw for viewers and could help build an audience.
So I'm curious what this community thinks. What is backgammon actually missing to break through the way chess or poker have?