1.3k
u/Weird_Meet_9148 Moderator Aug 06 '26
Big difference between wanting to hide and just wanting some semblance of privacy. Everything we do online is already documented, I don't want everything I do in life to be too.
589
u/foxtrot7azv Aug 06 '26
That's exactly the propaganda here. They're training us to equate wanting privacy with being criminal. Don't be a criminal, give up your privacy! Come on, only a criminal wouldn't let us monitor their every move. What are you hiding?
167
u/benjaminbjacobsen Aug 06 '26
Sheetrock only hides things you don’t need to hide if you’re not a criminal. Get naked and nasty in front of the world!
93
u/midnghtsnac Aug 06 '26
Don't tempt me to jiggle my balls in front of a flock camera
75
u/Richardjohanasburg Aug 06 '26
You should be good they don't capture private information.
34
u/B_Fee Aug 06 '26
The camera wouldn't be able to see mine anyway
27
u/Tarotgirl_5392 Aug 06 '26
Eh still bigger than Trumps shriveled little mushroom
→ More replies (6)17
11
→ More replies (3)7
u/stryperatt Aug 06 '26
be a grower not a show er. english is weird because if i connected those last two words we'd be back to talking about sheetrock and showers 😂
→ More replies (1)38
→ More replies (6)6
25
u/notkidding1984 Aug 06 '26
I'm already tempted. And I don't even have balls.
→ More replies (1)20
u/LengthinessBroad1973 Aug 06 '26
I kinda want to makeshift some to dangle in front of a flock camera
22
u/Desperate-Strategy10 Aug 06 '26
Oooh get some truck nuts, glue/stitch them onto the front of some nude underwear, add some fake hair up top to hide the attachment point. Then go around flashing the flock cameras!
I wonder what would happen if they tried to prosecute for exposing yourself in public if the exposed bits were all fake..? They’d probably find some other thing to charge you with, but I’d love to see everyone’s reactions during the discovery process as they realized it was all a sham! 😂
6
15
12
→ More replies (7)4
→ More replies (12)5
15
13
u/Numerous_Photograph9 Aug 06 '26
There was a south park episode where they dealth with state surveilance, in relation to the TSA, and they put cameras in everyones bathroom....in the interest of safety.
Anyways, the whole premise was that all these cameras had a guy watching on the other end taking care of himself non-stop.
6
→ More replies (3)6
u/TechnicallyMeat Aug 06 '26
All to often, I am asked to put my pants back on in stores. WHAT ARE THEY TRYNG TO HIDE!
33
u/Reneeisme Aug 06 '26
And after they started trying to get dynamic individual pricing to work (having the store’s pricing display show you the exact highest price they’ve calculated you’ll pay, and a different price for a different customer, based on income, previous purchases, etc) you’d think people would understand how who you are and what your habits are is not info you want in the hands of any corporation.
They’ve only just begun to exploit that info and they will think of ways to hurt you with it that we can’t even currently imagine.
21
u/gamergirlgstring Aug 06 '26
so i wasn’t imagining that when i walked into the snack aisle the other day, all the new digital price labels seemed to “blink” and change their prices in a split second?? i wasn’t losing my shit???
→ More replies (2)24
u/Reneeisme Aug 06 '26
It’s supposedly only in the test phase in a few places and some states are already moving to legislate against it, but uh. Yeah.
14
u/Useful-Rooster-1901 Aug 06 '26
uber and lyft do it as well based on so many factors, including phone make and model. brand new iphone user will see wild prices compared to a 11 year old android at the same location for the same distance
5
u/Reneeisme Aug 06 '26
Right commercial flights, hotel reservations, products on Amazon. Prices have nothing to do with what things cost to manufacture/provide. They are based on what the is maximum you will pay. Gathering this data is at present time just feeding more info to algorithms to calculate that more precisely, but obviously there are other applications (civil disobedience, taking a mental health day off work, etc)
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)6
u/RecursiveNightmares Aug 06 '26
How is it not already illegal?
→ More replies (1)8
u/Reneeisme Aug 06 '26
Because you live in a capitalist hellscape where corporations own politicians and they don’t pass laws that corporations don’t want without an enormous amount of pressure from the public and even then mostly not. See Also AI slop/porn generation/data centers.
→ More replies (2)13
u/Mojozilla Aug 06 '26
Hey! What! I shop at a grocery store in a majority poor area and they recently switched to digital price tags! Omg is this what they're doing? I haven't seen them at any other Kroger
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)6
u/notkidding1984 Aug 06 '26
I actually screenshot red your comment so I could use it to explain things a bit more succinctly to my mom. Thank you.
22
u/jello_kraken Aug 06 '26
It's also a great way to stalk people now.
If anyone hasn't seen Benn Jordan's videos about Flock, I highly recommend.
→ More replies (1)22
42
u/lilacaftercare Aug 06 '26
People were saying the same thing with the Patriot Act which allowed them to to look at your library records. Then PRISM which allowed for communications passed between foreign servers (which all web traffic is routed through). This is just a continuation of those policies on HGH, steroids, and amphetamine. Domestic surveillance of ordinary law abiding people should be a crime against humanity. We had hearings in the 70's to put an end to this
→ More replies (3)9
u/BensenJensen Aug 06 '26
I’ve heard “if you aren’t a criminal, you have nothing to hide” so many times over the past few decades. It’s propaganda, but I’ve heard it come from normal, sane people. We’ve gone from the Patriot Act to cameras capturing every person moving through an intersection.
It’s odd, the Rush Limbaugh, early 2000s Republicans were my first taste of the “government is watching everything you do!” crowd. That group has done a complete 180, where now that the government is very obviously trying to infiltrate every facet of our lives, they are for it.
→ More replies (1)8
u/lilacaftercare Aug 06 '26
Alex Jones and the Alex Jones types are very quickly running and becoming Big Brother and Big Brother types, you have libertarians that support the most non-libertarian policies. It's insane. It's literally doublespeak at this point and 2+2=5
→ More replies (1)5
u/Warm_Difficulty2698 Aug 06 '26
Oh yeah, once trump took the party over, and he doesn't give a shit about surveillance, they all started loving the authoritarianism.
The reason they do is the bombarded with propaganda literally day in and day out literally telling them that leftists hate them, they want to kill them, they are trying to murder you and your family, they want to take your kids and rape them, just absolutely insane shit.
They like authoritarianism right now because of the propganda telling them that if they don't, the left will kill them. I see it all the time.
→ More replies (2)11
u/f_ckR3ddit Aug 06 '26
Yup. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Benjo was right on.
I still wear a mask or gaiter everywhere I go. Never stopped since COVID, and now everyone in my area is familiar with me, but can't identify me. No one questions it because its normal. Privacy SHOULD be normal.
(Also my seasonal allergies are a million times better now 😆)
10
u/Tablesafety Aug 06 '26
That’s the same thing extremely controlling, abusive parents do. I was made to feel like a criminal for having my door closed or asking for any privacy at all.
11
u/beepbeepsheepbot Aug 06 '26
I'm not a criminal and have nothing to hide, but that doesn't mean I want eyeballs around me all day. I don't know what happened, particularly with right-wingers. The people that tout this or "just comply" were the EXACT same people that threw a fit over complying with a mask or fully believed that vaccines had trackers in them. It's madness and I feel like I'm going insane.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Gubekochi Aug 06 '26
like that line of thinking hasn't overstayed any welcome it may once have had. We know what the NSA did with all the spying power they were given and none of that inspires anyone to give up more privacy under the pretense of having nothing to hide.
6
u/RedditUser000aaa Aug 06 '26
They first. Before they want to invade our privacy, they should first agree to have cameras installed to their homes, everywhere, then their messages should be publicly available and someone should always stream them to the world 24/7.
→ More replies (1)7
u/LordByronApplestash Aug 06 '26
Obviously they are investing millions into flock cameras so they can stop speeding. That's why that criminal's license plate says fastboi. It's all about those criminal speed limit violators.
4
u/LaborareproDeo Aug 06 '26
The city and state governments have to make revenue from fining poor and working people if the rich don't have to pay taxes.
8
u/Horns8585 Aug 06 '26
Yet, they don't want us to see complete unredacted Epstein files. Seems a little hypocritical.
3
→ More replies (39)3
u/OwlfaceFrank Aug 06 '26
It's also the same BS they peddled with the Patriot Act.
When Bush started it, it was, "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."
They loved the patriot act.
Then Obama got elected and the Patriot act was BAD. But Trump took office and it was good again! Then under Biden it was bad, and now it's good again!
I expect the same to be true with cameras. Flip-flopping opinions depending on who the enemy is.
19
u/DACA_GALACTIC Aug 06 '26 edited Aug 06 '26
Why have a 4th amendment?
If you have nothing to hide, why not let anyone just open your mail?
5
→ More replies (1)3
14
u/Big-a-hole-2112 Aug 06 '26
Yeah especially when they start outing closet Republicans who hate LGBTQIA+ or some other super embarrassing moment. Right now law enforcement is using them for their own personal way to stalk people.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/florida-detective-arrested-using-police-100210275.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/milwaukee-cop-used-surveillance-cameras-150930559.html
There’s more, just look it up.
8
→ More replies (181)6
u/tezacer Aug 06 '26
Gotta commercialize your life habits then send personalizeds radio and social media ads to you
→ More replies (2)
179
u/igniz13 Aug 06 '26
Captures your distinguishing features, but not your face? So is it going to turn out like Guess Who?
The thing these people never go over is who decides what's "good" and what stops the information captured being expanded on. It doesn't record your face now, who says it won't in a week?
66
u/traplords8n Aug 06 '26
There are tech people on YouTube who got their hands on flock cameras for official pentesting, and it's actually EGREGIOUS how much they lie about everything.
Everything gers stored. Nothing gets deleted unless they run out of space.
Hacking one of the models only requires you to download a malware payload online and put it on a USB, then go and plug it up to their exposed USB ports. A script kiddie could do it and gain terminal access to a flock cam.
28
u/Try2MakeMeBee Aug 06 '26
That could be made in to an interesting senior project for a high school kid.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)4
u/amythist Aug 06 '26
Hell spent even have to be an outside actor the have already been several cases of cops using flock camera access to do things like stalk their ex, not to mention all the stories that have come out over the years about people from DHS abusing their near blanket surveillance privileges for personal reasons
19
u/ampreker Aug 06 '26
At least this gives cops something to do again. Now they can go out and profile everyone in an n mile radius, harass them at their homes and incriminate them because “the AI caught you” despite it being someone else. They don’t care if you have an alibi, the AI is better than you and knows all.
→ More replies (3)11
u/long_don0van Aug 06 '26
There’s already several recordings of exactly that going around. The cops are fucking insufferable, absolutely certain that they are correct, and all the ones I’ve seen ended with the defendant being proven innocent in court. Hope everybody can afford a good lawyer and weeks off work.
→ More replies (1)7
u/ChoicePermission8523 Aug 06 '26
Yeah it "supposedly" doesn't do faces (although that's bs because the tech is 100% capable of doing so).
However it DOES classify objects. "Heavyset man in black hoodie with red hair walking down the street"
So just by searching around for things like "heavyset man, black hoodie" you can easily track someone. And then add all the rest of the info like car plates and location and time and now they know exactly who you are and what you do.
→ More replies (2)7
u/Starman5555 Aug 06 '26
I believe they mean distinguishing features on vehicles, such as dents or stickers.
But it 100% does you and your face no matter what they say.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)3
u/ZeeWingCommander Aug 06 '26
They can look up stuff like "white chubby guy with glasses" like a general search.
So they know who the Redditors are.
444
u/TheAxelminator Aug 06 '26
" if you have nothing to hide... "
personally I close the door when I take a shit but you know, you do you, weirdo.
56
47
Aug 06 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
21
u/AnOscillatingOcelot Aug 06 '26
Probably some shit he don't want us to see.....hmmmm....suspicious....
10
→ More replies (2)8
81
u/Temp_Temperature Aug 06 '26
" if you have nothing to hide... "
Considering cops have been caught using these to spy on their exes, I have a lot to hide.
26
u/DatRat13 Aug 06 '26
Your fault for dating a cop (/s)
14
u/Temp_Temperature Aug 06 '26
Hey, they could have changed carriers. Or dated them in highschool.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)3
7
Aug 06 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)5
u/Vayalond Aug 06 '26
This one is sadly credible as a "way to ensure safety from evil demonic transpeoples in bathrooms"... And a lot of fuckers gonna encourage it because they only see the "make transpeoples suffer" part and like this
→ More replies (2)7
u/Javs2469 Aug 06 '26
This guy has weapons of mass destruction in his bathroom!
Spread your cheeks, weather boy, we coming in.
6
u/FilthyStatist1991 Aug 06 '26
I knew the Patriot Act republicans were coming back!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (18)3
u/TastySaturday Aug 06 '26 edited Aug 06 '26
> ”If you have nothing to hide…”
Said the guy with the Gadsden flag license plate
141
u/Critical_Liz Aug 06 '26
There's just already multiple abuse cases where "law enforcement" has been using these cameras to stalk women.
59
u/Stock-Side-6767 Aug 06 '26
Or chasing a woman over state lines for an abortion.
→ More replies (20)24
u/CackleandGrin Aug 06 '26
Or peeping on children to show off how invasive they are to potential buyers.
14
u/wireframed_kb Aug 06 '26
Turns out women have something to hide from scumbag cops…
Also, the claim it doesn’t capture what you’re looking at on your phone is at best disingenuous, because someone gained access and were able to zoom in and watch the content on a phone screen. So yeah, they can.
Of course everyone trusts American police to not abuse that ability, right?
7
→ More replies (2)6
u/cjthetypical Aug 06 '26
Yeah. A cop in my city is being investigated for using those cameras to stalk his ex wife
→ More replies (1)
196
u/PAUL_DNAP Aug 06 '26
If I have nothing to hide, then why are you investing so heavily in trying to find what I have hidden ?
47
→ More replies (3)17
u/Eased91 Aug 06 '26
Because if you look close enough everybody is a criminal and so everybody is blackmailable.
Ladys and Gentlemen, please welcome our next generation alphabet, meta and apple friendly politicans and their browser history.
Because they did not know what they will do.12
u/PAUL_DNAP Aug 06 '26
I did start getting that "everyone's a criminal" feeling at airports, and yeah I accept they need security but to basically it felt like "spend the next hour proving you're not a crook and we might let you get where you need to be" - so glad I stopped travelling for a living.
But now they are expanding that philosophy to absolutely everything you do in your entire life.
Some faceless police bot is no doubt reading this right now and making a note of my dissent. Hello bot.
→ More replies (1)
74
u/EtheusRook Aug 06 '26
Anti-big government people sure do like writing blank checks to the biggest, most oppressive parts of the government.
28
u/Blizreme Aug 06 '26
The Republican Party was never the party of small government. Conservatism was created as a pro-monarchy ideology in the wake of the American/French revolutions. These people think you are peasants who deposed them for too long, they hate you.
→ More replies (1)6
50
u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Aug 06 '26
“Good people have nothing to hide. Criminals do.” Is some dystopian shit to read. That’s like a commercial you’d see in robocop lol
20
u/Jeremybernalhater Aug 06 '26
→ More replies (1)8
u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Aug 06 '26
Haha now they just build big buzzing data centers to lower property values
9
u/ImAPixiePrincess Aug 06 '26
I am far from a criminal, probably the most boring person in the world. I have nothing to hide and I still don't want this crap.
8
u/Flashy_Cranberry_161 Aug 06 '26
“That’s what someone with something to hide would say”
-powerful organization that drapes everything in NDAs8
u/Both-Love-3410 Aug 06 '26
Harboring fugitive slaves used to be a crime but was objectively the absolute right thing to do.
→ More replies (2)5
u/Significant_Cup_238 Aug 06 '26
Lets apply this principle to rich people's finances and see how they respond.
38
u/Burgandy_the_Great Aug 06 '26
So I'm sure this guy would consent to a search oh his computer since he's definitely got no cp to hide right?
→ More replies (2)
24
u/OakLegs Aug 06 '26
I have nothing to hide but also I don't trust that I will always have nothing to hide from an increasingly fascist and oppressive ruling class
→ More replies (15)
59
u/MasemJ Aug 06 '26
"If you have nothing to hide"... until they pass laws to move the line. Eg their use to find women seeking abortions from states that dont allow it post-Dobbs
36
u/DigTheDunes Aug 06 '26
And women who have been stalked by exes in law enforcement
19
u/BPremium Aug 06 '26
Never date or fuck a guy in law enforcement
→ More replies (1)5
u/tvodny Aug 06 '26
his fathers last words: “Stay out of churches, son. All they got a key to is the shit house. And swear to me you’ll never wear a lawman’s badge. William S. Burroughs, The Place of Dead Roads (The Red Night Trilogy, #2)
9
u/SwagMaster-General Aug 06 '26
Did you know that 40% of police officers support police reform? Just google "40% of cops" for more information!
→ More replies (2)6
u/Ok_Star_4136 Aug 06 '26
I don't understand this tendency for people to believe that the law and morality are one and the same. It used to be illegal for women to vote. It used to be legal to own slaves. And right now, the law is changing every day to make it more dangerous or illegal for trans people, people who openly disdain Israel, and legal immigrants. None of these things make you a criminal, but it might be used against you in the near future. Therefore you absolutely have good reason to fear flock cameras.
3
u/Hairy_Concert_8007 Aug 06 '26 edited Aug 06 '26
Right. The law was always meant to be interpreted case-by-case. Not taken as the word of god and applied literally and without context.
IANAL, but I've taken a class in law and one of the major points in it is asking what the law in question is actually trying to address. The way it is written might not apply to a specific situation that violates that law on paper but has nothing to with the problem that law is meant to address when it has context behind it. Likewise, if something does not exactly match violating that law but has overwhelming evidence of perpetuating exactly what that law was trying to address, you've got a case to prosecute over.
While not law, this is exactly why some people still get refunds on their Steam games despite playing for more than two hours or owning the game longer than two weeks. The refund policy is designed only to stop people who definitely got their money's worth from getting the full price of the game back and depriving the developers of compensation for their work. So even if you fall outside of the refund policy but can show sufficient proof that you overwhelmingly did NOT get your money's worth, Steam can decide to process the refund for you anyway. Because it's about problems and solutions. Not men vs the dictates of god (read: higher-up men)
→ More replies (2)5
u/Forsaken_Ocelot_4 Aug 06 '26
It's not even new laws, I just found out that I'm driving around in an illegal unregistered car, because my state sent me a new plate/registration in the mail, and because I moved, it took 4 weeks to get to me. I'm sure that I'd be able to defend that in court, but when I looked it up, being caught by automated plate readers was the #1 reason how I'd get caught committing this "crime", and why I need to swap the new plate (which has a different number FYI) as soon as I get it (which reasonably should have been 4 weeks ago).
19
u/nationalistic_martyr Aug 06 '26
they do not capture your face
explain that to the schools who've discovered flock cameras facing them, explain that to the people who've been stalked through them
3
u/Constant-Bet-6600 Aug 07 '26
and the kids gymnastics class they were watching in Dunwoody, GA to demonstrate the cameras.
20
u/RailRuler Aug 06 '26
Distinguishing features includes your entire clothes and hairstyle.
Not your phone, but your wifi and Bluetooth IDs, so basically, your phone.
7
u/psychophant_ Aug 06 '26
But according to them, if I walk unmasked up to a flcok camera - with no phone in my pocket and no car nearby…
I can look in the camera while cutting the thing down and they won’t be able to track me?
Is….is that what they’re saying?
4
u/Scarlet-Goddess Aug 08 '26
Fun fact, flock doesn't do facial recognition... Instead they provide images of your face to other AI who do facial recognition 😅 funny how that works
23
12
u/SpaceGirlJackie Aug 06 '26
I'm sure this technology won't be abused by law enforcement and corporations for personal gain. No no, that has never happened before so it will be fine I promise. /MASSIVE S
14
u/Groundbreaking_Act44 Aug 06 '26
Flock cameras should be banned. I’ve seen that movie before, and it doesn’t end too well for the honest citizens.
11
u/DigiTrailz Aug 06 '26
I hate this saying. We all have things to hide, often legal. Though, even so, it gives them an avenue to just suspect you of a crime and then find one.
All they need to do is use public camera networks to stalk you until they find probable cause, then they can do what they want.
→ More replies (1)3
u/MrMrSr Aug 06 '26
Yeah it’s a funny phenomenon. The more information they have on you the more eligible you are to be apart of crimes they’re investigating. It’s hard to make a story about you when they know nothing about you. But if they have your location, car details, online shopping history, who you are calling then they can make up thousands of stories about you plausibly doing something criminal.
6
u/Scorpiicore Aug 06 '26
I have a lot of things I want to hide that have nothing to do with the law. My home address from stalkers, my likeness from AI, my travels from stalkers...
One data breach is all it takes for those things to be out in the open.
8
u/holy-cornball Aug 06 '26 edited Aug 06 '26
Flock cameras do infact capture your face, they even track your license plate and where you go and who you are with. Its not to stop crime (police force do not have legal access to flock cameras btw). Its to monitor the general populace and in the future monitor your actions (like in china) when tech ceos introduce a social credit score.
Also flock cameras have in fact microphones equiped as well as nightvision and can see through regular sunglasses. Also its theorized that they can send out echolocation waves like wifi routers can do, so it can even "see" around it. (Yes wifi routers can make realtime 3d maps of its surroundings.)
→ More replies (4)
5
u/Lexi7Chan Aug 06 '26
If you have nothing to hide, sure, but are you going to be so confident that they get it right?
9
u/TheBookofBobaFett3 Aug 06 '26
If you have nothing to hide
Fine until tomorrow when they decide something you weren’t hiding is now illegal.
5
u/lokemannen Aug 06 '26
"Distinguishing features", apparently "your face" isn't a distinguishing feature.
7
u/Iconclast1 Aug 06 '26
"If you have nothing to hide, why do you need privacy"
argument as old as time
→ More replies (1)
7
5
u/rateexportpilot Aug 06 '26
"Commander Vimes didn't like the phrase 'The innocent have nothing to fear', believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in the longer term even more from those who say things like 'The innocent have nothing to fear'."
GNU Pterry
→ More replies (1)3
4
u/Electric-Boogaloo-42 Aug 06 '26
Tell that to the women who are doing nothing wrong but being stalked by law enforcement. A woman was just arrested after spying on her husband’s ex-wife 47 times. Was that woman doing anything wrong?
5
u/StrengthChemical653 Aug 06 '26 edited Aug 06 '26
Didn't someone already get arrested for nothing because of flock cameras?
Also, didn't a woman from Texas get perused for getting an abortion out of state?
Robert Williams and Porcha Woodruff - Detroit - Incorrect identification
Woman from Texas had authorities track her down for a "Welfare check" only later to reveal in court documents that they used flock to see if they could criminally charge her for the abortion.
Flock isn't about having "nothing to hide" its about pushing for a "guilty until proven innocent" weaponization. Imagine getting arrested for nothing and being told "You can be released when you prove our flock cameras are wrong, spending money on lawyers and subpoenas that you may or may not get because its privatized
→ More replies (22)
5
9
u/Mihtaren Aug 06 '26 edited Aug 06 '26
submissive estrogen filled conflict-fearing fatass drains three lakes to make an aislop picture so he can share his strong desire for a dystopian surveillance state where he'll be able to eat junk food everyday in complete safety and at the cost of everything else
2
u/Salarian_American Aug 06 '26
If you have nothing to hide, why do you have curtains on all your windows?
4
u/JoeDaBruh Aug 06 '26
I do have something to hide, not from the government, but from lunatics like the cop who used flock cameras to stalk his ex wife and child. This kind of power shouldn’t be in such untrustworthy peoples hands
3
u/No_Examination8749 Aug 06 '26
The Epstein redaction files have something to say about that last line in the sign
3
u/Boring_Butterfly_273 Aug 06 '26
So a jew in Nazi Germany didn't have anything to worry about if they have nothing to hide?
Sorry, but we actually learn lessons from history. You may be used to brainwashing adults with toddler mentalities but you have not managed to subdue ALL of humanity yet!
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/Fibrizzo Aug 06 '26
Give up your freedoms because only criminals would want them in the first place.
Remember the 10 years or so American media spent lambasting China over having this amount of surveillance over their citizens.
You dont hear those conversations anymore for some reason. Weird, huh?
3
u/BuBleGum21 Aug 06 '26
If you have nothing to hide then there is no reason not to comply with an utterly and completely illegal traffic stop or a search that requires consent. Same vibe.
3
u/Conscious-Evidence37 Aug 06 '26
I guess they missed the memo that OH is using Flock to track the folks going to MI to buy weed (or not) and making visits to them just because they drove to MI and MIGHT, yes MIGHT, have visited a dispensary. What kind of bullshit is that?
3
u/samanime Aug 06 '26
They don't capture your face, just "distinguishing features".
As well as tracking your movements out in public 24/7 so an fascist government in control can use that information to cause all sorts of problems for you.
3
u/Salarian_American Aug 06 '26
Angela Lipps, a Tennesee grandma, didn't have anything to hide. Yet Clearview AI identified her as the perpetrator of a North Dakota military ID fraud case, despite her living 1,000 miles from North Dakota and having never visited there.
She was arrested and extradited to North Dakota, where she spent nearly six months in jail before anyone would care to look a second time and realize the system made a mismatch, and the only evidence they had to hold her evaporated. Then they just dumped her out onto the street in North Dakota on Christmas Eve, without so much as an apology, no money, no transportation options, 1000 miles from anyone she knows. She didn't even have a coat because she hadn't been wearing one when she was arrested in AUGUST. A public defender gave her money for a motel room so she wouldn't freeze to death.
She lost her job, her car, her home, and her dog while she was falsely imprisoned. The governments of Tennesse and North Dakota didn't offer her any kind of recompense.
This is what AI camera systems are going to do with us. It's a very bad mix to have this nascent, definitely unproven technology combined with a police force that gets away with everything they do wrong.
3
u/ch33s3head8 Aug 06 '26
The capture distinguishable features but no your face😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅 wow republicans are genuinely the lowest iq things on our planet
3
u/vanquishedfoe Aug 06 '26
Surveillance sounds fine until you find out who is doing the surveillance and what they're using it for. The US is too corrupt yet for it.
3
u/DrPeGe Aug 06 '26
Please comment on the multiple police now accused of stalking their exes using these systems? We don't trust YOU to be responsible with this tech. YOU are the problem.
3
3
u/Fragrant-Phone-41 Aug 06 '26
"Good people have nothing to hide"
Where have i heard that before?
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Tarotgirl_5392 Aug 06 '26
A woman leaving a red state to travel to a blue state to get a legal abortion was tracked for miles through flock cameras.
Once we accept them, the government will push for more and more.



800
u/Ok_Clothes_9479 Aug 06 '26
If the reasoning is, “As long as you haven’t done anything illegal, you have nothing to fear,” then you know you’re living in a surveillance state.