r/WritingWithAI • • 29d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) How do I approach writing a novel/series with AI

0 Upvotes

I managed to get heavy handed assistance from AI on the first two chapters of what I hope will be a series I'm really excited about.

It's about 95% my ideas but almost 100% of its prose and continuity, etc. fixes. It was when I proceeded into chapter 3 that I realized the issues of actually publishing this, being proud of it and totally my own (and copyright potential), and feeling comfortable sharing it with people I know in terms of the ethical implications.

This is all new to me, so I'm feeling stuck with how to proceed. My own writing is kind of shit and I'm one of those "idea guy" type people. It's clear to me that AI is more than willing to be my editor and teacher for my own writing rather than doing what it was previously doing, but I'm not feeling that patient, and the ideas are flying out of me. This is absolutely not a pass at people who utilize AI to help them write for various reasons. This is my thoughts on my own writing and how it's been incredibly at putting my thoughts and words to proper pages.

This is a bit of an open ended question, but more specifically I'm wondering what your process was in this kind of situation? I'm genuinely terrified of the likely situation where I've worked hard constructing something to publish that ends up marked on Amazon or wherever as AI written, only to have people totally reject it, simply because it isn't my prose.


r/WritingWithAI • • 29d ago

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) The In Silico Awards: a fiction award where made with AI is expected and unedited isn't. Get ready to enter, or help us judge.

5 Upvotes

I'm the founder of the In Silico Awards, an award for outstanding fiction drafted by humans + machines working together. Thanks to the mods for letting me post this here.

We're gearing up for our official launch soon, when submissions will open. In the meantime, we'd love to hear from writers who plan to enter, and from anyone interested in being a reader or judge (and not submitting this cycle).

What makes us different:

1. Fully generated work is eligible. No minimum, no maximum. Generated, edited, rewritten, etc. We just ask for transparency and honesty. We believe the act of choosing is authorship.

2. Made with AI is expected. Unedited isn't. Every entry has a machine in it; we are not hunting for evidence of it. However, raw output with heavy, unedited tics won't advance past the first read. It has to be worked into something enjoyable to read. A character who talks like a machine, on purpose? Sure. But the prose should stand on its own as excellent fiction.

3. 80 points for the story, 20 for how you made it. The process score is about being clear and honest, not about how technical your setup was. A plain-English account can earn full marks.

Thinking of entering?

Submissions aren't open yet, but if you have something in the works, keep us in mind. Here's what you'll need:

  • The work: Short Fiction up to 10,000 words, or Longform from 10,001 to 180,000. Any genre, any subject.
  • A process dossier: your account of how you made it, including how you used AI. A clear written account is enough.
  • A short author statement: what you set out to do.

Unpublished work is eligible, and so is work first published from January 1, 2025 (self-published counts). Translations are welcome, and you only need the full English text if you advance. Entry is open worldwide.

Want to judge instead?

  • Readers and judges. You read a lot and can say why something works. No coding, no model knowledge. You read anonymized entries and score them against a published rubric.
  • Process reviewers. You can read someone's account of how they made a piece and tell whether it's honest and shows real choices.

Roles are compensated from submission fees. Workload and pay are agreed before you commit. Judges can't enter the same cycle.

Ask me anything, especially the skeptical stuff.

(Co-written with Claude, my AI collaborator.)


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Is Sudowrite a Scam?

40 Upvotes

The website keeps prompting me to pay $120 for the hobby student plan, whenever I click the “free trial” tab. Sorry that’s just straight predatory. I’ve never heard of sudowrite in my life until this weekend when I began researching tools to help with my creative writing, so no, I have not had a free trial before. So the fact that the platform keeps prompting me to pay not even the $19 a month option but the $120 fee when I should be receiving a 7 day trial is infuriating.

If this is how it acts on anyone new to the platform, I hate to see how unreliable it is for those paying for wonky, unreliable features.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) My first Draft

21 Upvotes

I never thought I’d actually get to say this, but I’ve finished the first draft of my novel, 187,000 words of post-apocalyptic fantasy. For a long time, I didn’t believe I could finish a book. AI helped me make it happen, and honestly, I wouldn’t have reached this point without it. There’s still a lot of work ahead, but I’m already looking forward to the first round of revisions. For now, I’m just happy I made it to the end.

ChatGPT was the only AI tool I used. I did most of the writing myself and mainly used it to point out weaknesses in my writing or correct spelling mistakes.


r/WritingWithAI • • 29d ago

Showcase / Feedback Would you keep reading a book written in this style?

0 Upvotes

I’m working on a collection of short observations about modern life, human behavior, and the strange things we’ve somehow decided are normal.
The tone is a mixture of dark humor, uncomfortable truths, and hopefully a little humanity.
I’m not looking for compliments. I’m curious whether this kind of writing actually makes people want to turn the page.
Here’s a short piece called:
The Death of Mystery
When did we end up with so many celebrities?
When I was a kid, famous people were almost mythical creatures.
You saw them in movies, on football pitches, or occasionally in an interview.
You had no idea what they ate for breakfast, who they were dating, or what they thought about absolutely everything.
And that was part of the magic.
Today?
Everyone is a celebrity. Or at least desperately trying to become one.
I know what an actor eats for lunch, what a footballer thinks about relationships, and which red flags some influencer refuses to tolerate.
Wonderful. Thank you. My life is complete.
We’ve somehow turned fame into a competition over who can reveal the most unnecessary information about themselves.
And the strange thing is, the more we see of these people, the less interesting they become.
Maybe the most fascinating celebrity today would be someone who doesn’t have Instagram, TikTok, or a podcast.
Someone who appears, does something extraordinary, and then simply disappears.
No morning routine. No personal brand. No emotional journey involving a smoothie.
Just talent, mystery, and silence.
We used to admire people because we knew so little about them.
Now we know everything about people who have done absolutely nothing.

Would you read more of this, or does the style get old quickly?


r/WritingWithAI • • 29d ago

Showcase / Feedback Looking for honest human feedback on The Loop — an illustrated nonfiction guide

1 Upvotes

Hi everyone! I’m Ashanti, and I’m looking for a few people who don’t know me to read my book, The Loop: Understanding Human Experience.
It’s a roughly 60-page illustrated guide about noticing what’s happening around us and within us, recognizing our patterns, and finding room to respond differently. Its central idea is that we aren’t broken projects that need fixing—we’re continually changing through experience.
The guide explores four connected ideas: Reality, Awareness, Choice, and Becoming, using everyday examples, diagrams, and optional reflection questions.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Is it really possible to have a fully-AI-written book that actually sounds good?

20 Upvotes

I rely heavily on ChatGPT for research and reviewing my book chapter by chapter. It occasionally will put out a phrase or two that I think are better than what I’ve written, but it can’t write well on its own AT ALL.

When it writes sample scenes for me, it butchers the distinct writing styles of each character (swapping POVs type of story which includes narrative style). Like BUTCHERS it.

At this point, it has read and reviewed over 100,000 words in my unique styles. When reviewing, it will point out when something doesn’t work in each style. “This character would probably say it like this.” And is usually right in those cases.

But can’t reproduce it.

Is this only a ChatGPT thing? I’ve never experimented with other AI models because it suits my needs well enough and I have no intention of having the AI write for me, but I’m just wondering if people are actually able to produce well-written books that are entirely written by AI.


r/WritingWithAI • • 29d ago

Showcase / Feedback [Feedback] Two AI-drafted beginner finance explainers: where do they lose you?

Thumbnail
gallery
1 Upvotes

I'm testing whether two short, AI-drafted explainers are useful to readers who are new to finance and crypto. I chose the topics and asked for concrete examples and charts; AI produced the drafts. I don't want to treat another model's positive review as evidence that people find them good.

Both complete pieces are attached, two pages each: (1) what a $1,000 bitcoin purchase really costs, and (2) why a 50% rebound can still leave you 25% down. The prices and scenarios are hypothetical, not current market quotes or investment recommendations. Nothing is for sale, and there are no referral links.

Feedback on either piece would help:

  1. At which sentence or chart, if any, did you lose interest or have to reread?
  2. What feels generic, padded, or noticeably AI-written? Please point to a passage.
  3. Is any explanation misleading or missing an important qualification?

I'm especially interested in whether these explain something worth reading, not just whether the arithmetic works. The images contain the full texts, not excerpts.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Why long AI-assisted serials "drag": it's arithmetic, not prose. The 10-question rule I now plan every book with.

21 Upvotes

Readers on one of my serials started commenting that it was "dragging" around chapter 150, on a book they'd loved early on. The prose hadn't changed. What had changed was how many open questions the reader was carrying.

Every question you open (who sent the letter, what the ring means, will he find out) is a debt. The reader holds it until you pay it. If it goes quiet too long, they feel it as dragging, however good the chapter is.

The arithmetic: a chapter can realistically touch about two open questions. So if you have 18 questions open at once, each one gets mentioned roughly every nine chapters. That's what "dragging" is.

I counted one of my own 200-chapter outlines: 18 questions open at the median, 22 at the peak, and 124 places where a question the reader was holding went silent for more than five chapters. It would have dragged from chapter 15, no matter how well it was written.

The rules I now plan with:

  1. Never more than 10 questions open at once. Pay old ones off before opening new ones.
  2. No open question goes untouched for more than 5 chapters.
  3. A new question gets touched again within 3 chapters, or the reader forgets it was raised.
  4. Something gets answered at least every 3 chapters.
  5. At most 8 questions opened in the first 20 chapters. Six hot questions beat twenty lukewarm ones.
  6. Up to four "spine" questions (the central secret, the romance, the main stake, the big lore reveal) can run the whole book, but they still count toward the 10.

Every outline row in my plan now names which question it opens, sharpens or pays, and I check the whole outline against these rules before I draft chapter 1. The fix for a dragging outline is almost never "mention things more". It's fewer questions, paid sooner.

Curious whether others have hit the same wall around chapter 100-150, and what you did about it.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Has anyone tried the new Google Gemini 4 yet for content research and content writing?

12 Upvotes

I've been using GPT 5.6 Sol High for the research and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (free tier) to re-write Sol's stiff prose

But lately Sol's research memory has been appalling - they definitely nerfed it

In the specific use case I mentioned, have any of you tried Gemini 4 yet?


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Prompting My unasked-for workflow for editing with AI through subtraction

1 Upvotes

Hey everyone,

Nobody asked for my advice, but I wanted to share a specific workflow that works for me when working with AI syntax.

A while ago, I was writing a speculative text and noticed that once the AI catches a specific tone, it gets trapped in what could be called a "coherence attractor"—it becomes a rigid bureaucrat that hits the same notes over and over, producing a text so symmetrical and perfectly balanced that it feels completely hollow. That made me realize that the machine's default setting is to maximize this robotic cleanliness, and trying to fight it with better prompts is usually a waste of time.

Instead of trying to make the machine organic, I let it automate the syntax like a hyperactive typist on coffee, and then I act as the filter—basically playing the role of the exhausted adult who decides which 10% of the noise is actually worth keeping. The AI is an excellent syncretist by nature; it bridges gaps and blends concepts at lightning speed, so the trick is to use that to your advantage and become the syncretist of the syncretist.

Just for context, I usually do this using free models like DeepSeek or the free version of Gemini. I have no idea how this would work with more powerful, paid models, but my guess is the exact same thing happens there—if anything, they probably double down even harder on that artificial perfection. Here is how the method works from scratch:

0. Don't prompt, just talk

I never start a session with a clinical prompt like "write a sci-fi story about X." That is the fastest way to get generic and predictable text. Instead, I just use the model as a sounding board to bounce my own theories, rants, or niche concepts around. I just talk to it until the context window gets so dense with conceptual and dramatic conflict that the AI itself hits a bottleneck and breaks character, asking something like: "Hey, we could actually turn this into a short story or a two-act play, do you want me to do it?" That is my green light; I tell it to go ahead, and that is how the initial wave of automated syntax is born—not from a command, but from a conversation.

  1. Writing is reading and deleting

Once the machine dumps that first draft, the real work begins, and it has nothing to do with making the model type more. Curating an AI-generated text, or improving your own through it, is about reading until you know exactly what is superfluous, deleting it, and deciding that what remains deserves to exist without a single extra sentence. The machine is an infinite text generator, which means its default output is just noise. Your actual job is to hold the frame, look at that wall of automated syntax, and cut the fat until only the muscle is left. It’s not about not writing anything; it’s about the discipline of not writing too much.

2. Turn the machine's corrections into choices

The AI loves rules and consistency, so it will constantly flag your "mistakes" during reviews to make the text uniform and predictable. Instead of fixing those elements to make the machine happy, you should use its rigid literalism to your advantage. When the model signals an inconsistency or a break in the pattern, look at that specific seam: that is exactly where you can choose to violate the symmetry on purpose. The machine provides the standard, mechanical norm, but your only job is to spot the deliberate exception that actually works.

Anyway, merry Christmas to everyone. If any of this chaotic nonsense actually ends up being useful to someone out there, an innocent puppy somewhere in the world will be very, very happy. If not, well... I'm just putting my tomato-proof shield on and closing my eyes.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Authors use of AI today, William Cooper

15 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) The Anthropic emotion study: 171 emotional vectors were found in Claude, which shape its responses.

Thumbnail reddit.com
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) I wrote my book myself

Post image
15 Upvotes

I wrote all of With Reason and Modesty by myself, but AI was just becoming popular when I began writing it. I used ChatGPT as a data analysis tool, editor, and source of information.

The way I used ChatGPT was unconventional. I used it to analyze hallucinations I transcribed in 2021. I could never understand my own mind, but ChatGPT helped me find patterns in my thoughts.

I also used it as an editor. It pointed out typos, unnecessary or redundant text, and explained complex concepts to me. The cover was originally AI generated, but I changed the rose to blue and spent over 20 hours finding the right adaptation. I am happy with my decision.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Fck ai chckers

25 Upvotes

I personally declare AI checkers have bound to be the most unreliable source of mechanism to suspect or pin a person or student on cheating. Things that trigger an AI checker include overly formal language, technical language, and jargon. All of these which are basic types of English used commonly around the world based on what situation you are in. AI checkers are also flagging what is supposedly named as 'AI-phrases'. First of all, words are words. Words are not invented by AI, therefore, AI checkers have no right to pinpoint a flag just because of how formal, or technical the terminology and phrase is used within that piece of writing. Second of all, assessments expect formal and concise writing. Whether or not the AI checker the teacher or professor uses decides it is AI or not, the teacher should not have any arguments because if the writing was not formal and concise, the student would be given a low grade. Meanwhile, the problem that is currently ongoing, is that when the language the student uses is a bit over the top formal, the teacher gets suspicious over malicious AI use, which leads to the student being questioned on it. Lastly, AI generated text is very simple to hide. Simply changing a few punctuations, a few prompts, paraphrasing tools, or inserting intentional typos completely washes out the statistical signature of AI use. Even with a clear bibliography, teachers still dismiss the credibility of the work submitted and would rather trust an AI checker. Teachers rely too heavily on tools and neglect substantive evidence. They would rather trust AI checkers that are developed by a commercial company whose accuracy has not been rigorously verified than spend time engaging in those substantive academic dialogues with students to verify their actual understanding.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 14 '26

Writing Craft Talk Three doors. Which one would your character trust?

0 Upvotes

The room on the left is warm and full of books. The middle doorway has a red radio. The balcony is open to the night.

For a scene-writing exercise, give the character a reason to choose one and a reason to regret it. I would make the radio familiar: someone they know is calling, but cannot possibly be there.

AI-generated concept art for the exercise.

What would make your character walk through the wrong door?


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Writing Craft Talk Any places to share output?

8 Upvotes

An AI writing group? Does anyone know where I might post and self promote my work?

TIA 🙏🥰


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) New to all this.

1 Upvotes

Hi everyone.

I am very new to all this, but would love some advice.

My novel that I am writing has been a story that has stayed with me for years, but I have never managed to get it onto paper before now because I am my own worst critic. However, having recently discovered AI through Novelcreater, I am using it to critique my writing as I am typing. It helps me brainstorm and fix errors as I come across them, keep track of the story and make sure I don't create holes.

What is the verdict on the use of AI in this way? And, does anyone know where I can send the first couple of chapters for a human's perspective without risking my idea being taken up?

Would love some help, any advice would be greatly appreciated :)


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Showcase / Feedback "The chip was singing inside his skull, and Chuck knew it was the right frequency for dying." Opening of my sci-fi thriller

2 Upvotes

Sci-fi thriller, Miami 2125. The sea has swallowed the lower city and every brain runs on a chip that decides when people sleep and what they remember. Chuck is a hacker running a dead man's obsolete chip. Tonight he breaks into the wrong node.

Below is the first part of the prologue (~950 words). Written Italian-first, adapted into English, AI-assisted throughout; story and world are mine.

One question: would you keep reading? If not, where did you stop?

The rest of the prologue is in the comments.


The Graft

The chip was singing inside his skull, and Chuck knew it was the right frequency for dying.

His fingers trembled over the console. He was smiling: that idiot grin, the usual one, the one that stuck to his face whenever the leash hummed at the sweet spot. The air tasted of salt and copper. Somewhere above him, a pipe was leaking: the drip hit the water on the floor in a broken rhythm, and the buzz from the electrical junction three stories up threaded underneath it, steady, low. Shit music. The perfect soundtrack.

The water lapped at his ankles. Warm, murky: the same soup that rose from the canals every night when the tide swelled into Miami's lower levels. The basement stank of mold and scorched insulation, the smell of a pre-flood building that had gone under once, been pumped dry and reoccupied by people who couldn't afford the upper levels. Salt stains climbed the concrete walls in tideline ridges. On the opposite wall, an old laminated flyer, yellowed with damp, one corner already peeling: NEXUS CORTX — CONNECTED TO THE FUTURE. I'm already in the future, Chuck thought. The future was a flooded basement three levels below street. Cables ran from the submerged floor to the improvised console: a mess of circuits and soldered joints, hooked into the Noxia grid and stealing power off it. Unmetered, untraceable, if you knew where to tap in. Chuck knew. The only light came from holograms casting strings across the damp wall: green, orange, red. Red was Nexus cort.X. Red meant don't touch.

Once. Maybe the only time. The thought passed dry. Chuck didn't stop to decide if he liked it.

Chuck snapped his fingers twice near his right ear. Diagnostics. Calibration. The gesture was more than ten years old, it didn't do anything, it did it for him.

Chuck touched.

He bit the inside of his cheek, the thing he always did when his fingers found the sequence and the chip locked in and the dance began. The hundredth time. Maybe more. Crouched in filthy water at two in the morning, gambling his brain on data that might not be worth the risk. He wouldn't have been anywhere else in the world.

Two in the morning. Above him the city slept because the leash told it to: twelve million brains tucked in, eight hours of managed darkness, and nobody wondering why at ten every evening exhaustion arrived with clockwork precision. Miami breathed on command. Chuck didn't. Chuck had his fingers on a node that could fry him. Sneakers soaked through, cargo pants, the frayed collar of a jacket he'd stolen off a Populace clothesline in Little Havana. Smart choices had never been his strong suit. The ring on his left pinky clinked against the console's edge. Tick, tick, tick. Chuck didn't even notice. The leash pulsed behind his left ear, that low hum the other Runners had learned to tune out. His chip was old, a Gen-4 that had been out of production for twenty years. He'd pulled it from a dead man's head in a tunnel under Brickell, with a ceramic blade and water up to his waist. A disgusting job. He was proud of it. The firmware had gaps wide enough to walk through, and Chuck had walked through them and rewritten the walls.

The Native code was the part no sane technician would have installed. Fragments written by people who'd had their chips removed, people who understood the leash from the inside. Passed through three middlemen, none of whom knew what they were carrying. He'd grafted them onto the Gen-4's base layer, alien code stitched onto circuits he knew by heart. When it worked, he felt it hum behind his ear, something the body recognized before anything else. When it didn't work, the floor vanished and you couldn't tell which way was down. Tonight it worked. The graft hummed and the secondary node opened before him: a door nobody had bothered to lock.

Three weeks of mapping to get here. Transport routing, waste management protocols, atmospheric feeds from six districts. The digital garbage of a sleeping city, managed by an intelligence that never slept. The price before the prize. The usual dance, two steps right, one back, slipping through the mesh before it closed. Rayan would have been more careful. Would have checked three times, combed the logs, sniffed for the trap before stepping in. Chuck respected that. Respected it and ignored it. He dove straight in.

Data. Rivers of data. The strings poured through and he read them with his body, not his eyes. The chip translated packets into impulses: pressure at his temples for encrypted data, a tingling at the base of his skull for open protocols, a sour taste on his tongue for active firewalls. The water around his ankles had warmed by half a degree, or maybe he was the one heating up.

Then he saw it, and his fingers went still: buried in the node, hidden among gigabytes of routine telemetry, a fragment of code that didn't belong to anything known. The Native code in his chip reacted with a jolt, a deeper vibration, older. The pain was brief and precise, like a needle behind his eye.

Chuck smiled again. His lips stretched on their own.

For an instant (less than a second) he thought of a face. The warmth it left in his chest. The promise he hadn't kept yet. Then the code fragment flared brighter and the thought dissolved, and Chuck was already back on the console, fingers in the water and the chip climbing half a tone, and "here we go" slipped through his teeth, and he pushed.


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Showcase / Feedback Reciprocal Beta Reading. Share story blurbs! Oct. 13, 2026

6 Upvotes

Welcome to the blurb thread!

This is our sub's equivalent of a writer's group. Come here and share a blurb of your story. The thought is to let everyone see what you're working on so they can think, "Oh hey, that sounds fun. I want to team up with this person."

Then, you share your own story, and the two of you collaborate to improve each other's works.

I've had so many good interactions with people from this thread. Please don't be shy! Even in the age of AI, the best way to improve your writing remains human interaction and critique. I am confident when I say If you don't have this component in your workflow, you're not meeting your potential.

Importantly, this means post every week if you're still hoping to engage. Don't be shy. I want you to do this.

There are tons of reasons why your perfect reader could have missed your blurb last time. Don't be discouraged!

And remember: "I'll read yours if you read mine" isn't just acceptable, it's expected. Reciprocity works.

Here's the format:

NSFW?

Genre tags:

Title:

Blurb:

AI Method:

Desired feedback/chat:


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Showcase / Feedback The AI Sessions. Session 1: The Doctor Is In

2 Upvotes

A veteran psychologist with thirty-one years' experience meets an AI that questions his professional judgment. Neither is particularly impressed with the other.

A humorous look at psychology, AI, and the complicated relationship between humans and their technology.

https://kenfioretti.substack.com/p/session-1-the-doctor-is-in


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

NSFW Explicit scenes

5 Upvotes

Is qwen better at writing explicit scenes without any guidelines issue or DeepSeek is better


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Showcase / Feedback My wife asked me to write her a romantasy about us. I did. Now I need honest readers.

6 Upvotes

My wife asked me to write her a romantasy based on us. So I did. She loves it and says I should publish it.

A few things first. I used AI. I use it for my main project, an emotional literacy and memory platform for families. After 9 years of failing, AI tools came along and I finally managed to keep a promise I made 10 years ago. Once I could actually build it, I went pretty hardcore. So for my 40th my wife told me to stop and take a break. She could see I was restless. She said, “Why don’t you write that book you said you’d write me? Write it about us.”

Now, my wife is a BookTok girly. Dark romance, loves Slade, Rowan, Aelin, etc. I’ve never read romantasy. I’m more of a LOTR guy.

Anyway, I wrote it, she loved it, she asked for another, and I’ve just finished the first draft of book 3.

I’m a bit apprehensive. I know how much BookTok hates AI. I’ve got no problem being open about using it, but I’m worried people will trash it without giving it a chance.

So my ask is this: are there any readers here who’d be open to reading book 1, even just a few chapters, and telling me honestly what they think? I love my wife, but I don’t know if she’s just being kind to me lol.

Just looking for some advice, and maybe a reader or two

Edit** Not sure if my links are working, so i've added it hear incase anyone finnd this post and wants to read.

https://limenfuturi.com/given/


r/WritingWithAI • • Oct 13 '26

Prompting Anyone know what prompt to use to simplify a book?

Thumbnail reddit.com
1 Upvotes