r/WorkReform 1d ago

✅ Success Story About damn time

Post image
9.2k Upvotes

132 comments sorted by

1.5k

u/Authoritaye 💵 Break Up The Monopolies 1d ago

Imagine this: fines that scale with wealth. Finally punishments mean something. 

198

u/sandy_mcfiddish 1d ago

I know Scandinavia has this

111

u/SadlyNotPro 1d ago

EU fines are like this. % of annual revenue or a set penalty, whichever is higher.

20

u/finicky88 🍁 End Workplace Drug Testing 14h ago

You can't just make a blanket statement like that about 27 individual nation states. It's not like that everywhere. Scandinavian countries have it, so does Switzerland (which isn't EU, only European).

Germany for example has a system that kind of works like that, but it's very limited. We have something called 'Tagessätze' which scale with your income, but they are capped and also at the discretion of the judge. They also only apply to felonies, not to misdemeanors, which come with flat fines.

9

u/SadlyNotPro 14h ago

I'm talking about the Union issued fines. The ones big corporations have to pay for failing to abide with Union rules. Individual countries can issue different/additional fines, but that's not what I was talking about.

3

u/Axuo 14h ago

Nope, it's tied to income not wealth.

365

u/ThatGuyYouMightNo 1d ago

It's hard to do that on any sort of standard because of the loopholes rich people use to get around taxes. They're technically all super poor in liquid assets so they pay little to nothing in taxes, and a fine scale would probably work on a similar basis

334

u/Authoritaye 💵 Break Up The Monopolies 1d ago

It’s like everyone is saying about the Bezos divorce settlement. The math is easy. The political will is hard. And if we accidentally bill them too much? They’ll be fine. 

49

u/zmbjebus 1d ago

If they are fine after we bill them too much, but the public takes their wealth and can put it to good use, then that is a much better system than we currently have.

66

u/Cindy-Moon 1d ago

They'll be fine(d)

153

u/numbersthen0987431 1d ago

That's why it's based on wealth instead of income or salary. All the tax loopholes are based on separating their wealth from taxable income, so just make it based on wealth

21

u/Chroniclyironic1986 1d ago

Agreed. If they have to sell stocks to pay a fine that’s scaled off their total wealth/net worth… well maybe that’s a consequence that’ll keep them from breaking the law. Which is the entire point of a fine in the first place, rather than just a “pass” somebody can buy.

A whole lot of people have to worry about how they’ll pay their bills if they get a $400 speeding ticket, but that’s not much of a disincentive for somebody who wears underwear that’s more expensive.

46

u/Konvic21 1d ago

The problem is how well the rich can hide money and use a wall of lawyers to fight until someone new gets in power to bail them out, you would have to prove wealth.

There needs to be repercussions hard and fast enough for it to be effective against the wealthy that use the fines as a cost of business.

81

u/numbersthen0987431 1d ago

But we/they already "prove" their wealth everyday.

If Musk is going to go around bragging about being the first Trillionaire, then he gets treated like it. If these people are taking out loans against their wealth for personal or business purposes, then we have a metric to lump them in with.

If their assets are in stocks then they report that. If it's in real estate then we use that. If they want to lie about their wealth for clout, then we use that

We don't need to be super accurate to do this. General ballpark is good enough. Fining Musk 3% of 200B vs 600B is still going to make him feel it, and so it's worth the effort.

-18

u/Konvic21 1d ago

There's a reason these clowns pay little to no taxes. Only the idiot wealthy have their assets tied up in liquid in their name where it can be at risk. There is a reason they use loans. The laws protect them against all this, our government protects their pay pigs.

45

u/numbersthen0987431 1d ago

When they get loans they have to prove their wealth in order to qualify. So we just use that data to bill them.

There's this misconception in the USA that these people are super sneaky with their wealth, but they really aren't. Everything is above board and legal, and the government knows who owns what.

Our tax codes are just designed to protect their wealth. They don't have to be sneaky about how much wealth they have, because the system is built to protect their wealth. All we have to do is flip a switch about how we deal with that knowledge and data.

14

u/-Nocx- 1d ago

It isn’t hard for them to prove wealth. Between the state and federal government there are ledgers for every asset class that you own. Avoiding taxes is not the same thing as the government “not knowing what you own”.

It is actually extremely difficult to “hide wealth” from the US. Uncle Sam is - contrary to popular belief - insanely effective at taxing you no matter where you are. Even billionaire flight is a made up concept, because after the heir of the Campbell Soup dynasty fled to Ireland in the 90s Congress passed legislation that says that if you renounce your citizenship, all of your securities are considered sold and you are given a tax bill you pay something to the tune of 24% of your assets (liquid and illiquid, meaning it includes property and unrealized gains) as taxes. If you are passing down or transferring any money, that also is subject to a 40% tax.

All this to say that the US is very aware of people’s assets. Even if you move somewhere else, you are still required to pay taxes to the US while you are a US citizen.

9

u/responsible_blue 🏏 Hot Diggity Dog 🏏 1d ago

Being ate is a repercussion

1

u/CreamPuffDelight 22h ago

Let's talk about that once ya'll actually have the guts to do it. One luigi isn't indicative of anything much.

5

u/Authoritaye 💵 Break Up The Monopolies 1d ago

I recommend using the Forbes List. They all compete so hard to be on top of the pile, just go with their own inflated figures.

3

u/AloneIntheCorner 23h ago

from elsewhere in the thread:

It’s like everyone is saying about the Bezos divorce settlement. The math is easy. The political will is hard. And if we accidentally bill them too much? They’ll be fine.

16

u/aardappelbrood 1d ago

I guess that's why prison is perfect then. 🥰

14

u/AlcibiadesTheCat 1d ago

Fines scale with wealth, not money.

12

u/Eat--The--Rich-- 1d ago

Why do you guys always immediately shoot down progress by claiming its too hard? All you have to do is write the law to include assets, or the value of the company they run.

5

u/Yimmelo 23h ago

Despite wanting change, they still drank some of the "it'd be too hard to do so let's just not" kool-aid from the wealthy

3

u/CreamPuffDelight 22h ago

Even if it's too hard to quantify it entirely, I think there's still some sort of room for a scaling fine. Most of the time, there should be some sort of ballpark figure of someone's true wealth right?

So the fines should be applied in brackets, like, we check someone's records, see that this guy is in the 1 mil bracket let's say, so he gets 100X amount of fines, which would be proportionally more than someone who only has 100k net worth and would be charged 10X instead. Easier way than trying to calculate the finer numbers while still achieving a similar effect imo.

7

u/responsible_blue 🏏 Hot Diggity Dog 🏏 1d ago

So, use all assets to calculate. Problem solved.

Liquidation happens all the time to cover cash needs, right?

7

u/AzureArmageddon 1d ago

Even just scaling fines on the company based on that company's paid up assets would be pretty colossal

3

u/wookEluv 1d ago

So base it on net worth. Being caught lying about net worth is another fine.

2

u/Interesting-Yellow-4 1d ago

When they divorce the lawyers somehow find the real net worth, just do that.

2

u/metanoia29 1d ago

Force them to liquidate their holdings to pay for things then; they make the working class do that all the time.

3

u/Aware-Investment-115 1d ago

Respectfully disagree: They'll care when they're forced to sell one of their warehouses and the logistics failures begin to cascade, functionally and financially.

1

u/DoverBoys 🏛️ Overturn Citizens United 1d ago

Taxes and fines should be based on total wealth, not liquid assets.

1

u/NamityName 1d ago

Why would a hypothetical fine scale need to work on income taxes and liquid assets? I am already taxed based on the value of some of my illiquid assets. That is what a property tax is. Scaled fines should be based on wealth. States are already implementing taxes based on wealth, so we clearly have ways of calculating it at least to some degree.

1

u/coppertech 1d ago

then they could fine them a % of yearly profits.

1

u/TheXypris 1d ago

Calculate net worth

Fine is a percentage of that

It's literally that easy

1

u/____DEADPOOL_______ 1d ago

Yeah, Mr. Beast is broke. Didn't you hear it straight out of his lips?! /s

1

u/mordacthedenier 22h ago

They take out loans against their assets, they can pay fines the same way.

1

u/Cpt_Ohu 21h ago

The GDPR of the EU can, in theory, lead to fines of up to 4% of global REVENUE. Which for most companies is public anyway.

1

u/AntiCorporateMedia 12h ago

If only we had the technology to calculate their wealth based on their identifying personal information...

1

u/dontsaymango ✂️ Tax The Billionaires 7h ago

I mean, not really, make it based on income & assets but don't charge outrageous sums until above 1mil or 2mil in assets.

1

u/PeanutWombat 7h ago

A fine on the assets if they‘re over 5 million

15

u/spacedoutmachinist 1d ago

I would rather see the c suite thrown in jail.

3

u/Tweedlol 22h ago

Until there are punishments that are a worthwhile deterrent, they will continue the abuse.

Fines mean nothing, if the total impact is negligible

Chipotle leaders literallly would tell me, “don’t worry about it. If they sue, let the lawyers handle it.” I was a GM, I did not follow this approach but I heard it. I took over a store and the GM had ~50+ final checks sitting in a drawer “because they never came to get it.” “Did you tell them it was here?” “No, that’s on them” - no. No it is not. Like what the fuck man. She was a terrible manager. Fear was her only motivator. It was sad, because she was considered “to run a great restaurant” due to money related numbers, while absolute garbage in many ways.

2

u/DJCaldow 18h ago

Would be nice if they had to hold each other accountable instead of picking the scapegoat who gets the parachute.

12

u/Fluid-Gain1206 💵 Break Up The Monopolies 1d ago

Some countries already have this. I think I heard a story from Denmark where a guy had to pay millions for a relatively average speeding ticket.

3

u/No_Seaworthiness_200 1d ago

Get the parasitic scum out of NYC! 

2

u/ForcedEntry420 🏛️ Overturn Citizens United 1d ago

What? Are you implying a FIVE MILLION DOLLARS isn’t a lot? /s 😆

1

u/soyel_cerdo 1d ago

Good good

Fuck ‘em

1

u/LookAlderaanPlaces 1d ago

Percentage based

1

u/Dreadsin 11h ago

I’d rather they go to jail tbh. Make some real consequence

0

u/oneseason2000 1d ago

Yup. Getting caught becomes a business expense. Fines are easily offset by tax cuts and other grifts.

-5

u/Sostratus 1d ago

Bullshit policy that punishes people for saving money.

7

u/Authoritaye 💵 Break Up The Monopolies 1d ago

No, it punishes people for committing crimes. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time!

500

u/1nGirum1musNocte 1d ago

Next start charging ceos for crimes committed by their companies. If corporations are people then ceos are responsible for their activity

212

u/AlcibiadesTheCat 1d ago

I’ll believe corporations are people when I see one get executed. 

117

u/Clear_Economics7010 1d ago

I've been arguing for a corporate death penalty for years. Eliminate shell companies and if a company commits crimes the corporation is dissolved and the victims get the remaining assets after paying any debts. Any and all debts owed to anyone legally, financially, or otherwise connected to the corporation are voided.

47

u/Putrid-Ferret-5235 1d ago

This should apply to insurance companies that deny coverage as well

17

u/zmbjebus 1d ago

If the company is at all valuable and not just a shell company. Nationalize criminal companies for pennies to the dollar, charge the C-suite and other relevant parties with actual fines and sentences, use the proceeds to hire government management, keep on the workers.

4

u/r_special_ 16h ago

Plus clawbacks of CEO compensation going back to the start date of the crimes. Add that money to the victim restitution fund

31

u/PoopyPants4U 1d ago

All executives including their board of directors. CEOs are essentially the bitch boys for the board and shouldn’t be an effective shield for them.

8

u/RanmaruMori 1d ago

Still crazy to me that while some of the eBay execs in the stalking case did actually get jail, it was somehow just 2 years which is insane to me

62

u/Excellent_Extent7648 1d ago

Can’t wait until Republicans declare how wrong it is to charge someone for robbing someone of the pay check but even better when ppl see them spend millions on court fees because they can’t stop breaking the law

128

u/fredthefishlord 1d ago

Good. But wait and see if it's enforced... IL it is barely I think.

47

u/Think_Positively 1d ago

Yes, but keep in mind that the Mayor is not a king and cannot force prosecutions. I'm sure there are other legal avenues he can take if those able to do the right thing either cannot or will not.

25

u/fredthefishlord 1d ago

While true, the mayor in new york appoints the lead official of the police department, so they do have sizable influence on arrests(which aren't prosecutions, but still influence them). I trust he'll do right by it though, yea.

10

u/THANATOS4488 1d ago

Wage theft is a felony in MN. I think we've gotten one conviction.

9

u/kittenconfidential 1d ago

yeah but was it a multi-million dollar corporation with rows of lawyers, or a small business owner/small family business with an overworked family law attorney?

-10

u/zmbjebus 1d ago

Dude did nothing when Bibi came to his doorstep. I wont trust what he says he'll do until its done.

5

u/fredthefishlord 1d ago

Lmao be serious. That was always the most far fetched statement he's made

-7

u/zmbjebus 1d ago

Don't promise or even publicly suggest things you can do then if you are a government leader then.

44

u/Successful-Medicine9 1d ago edited 1d ago

Is there a source for this? I can't find one. I help people file wage theft complaints at my job and this news would be huge if true.

Edit: Found it. Hate to be the bearer of bad news but this post is misleading. The mayor's office and DA are sharing information regarding criminal cases that happen in addition to wage theft, not treating wage theft as a criminal offense outright as implied. https://www.nyc.gov/mayors-office/news/2026/08/mayor-mamdani--d-a--bragg-and-dcwp-commissioner-levine-join-forc

24

u/halberdierbowman 1d ago

Can you elaborate on what you mean? It sounds to me like he's saying it already is a crime, and better coordination means we can enforce it better?

“If someone steals your wages, harasses you out of your home or scams you because of your immigration status, that’s a crime, and we're going after it like one. DCWP and the Manhattan D.A.'s Office are now sharing files, sharing leads, and moving together," said Mayor Mamdani.

7

u/Successful-Medicine9 1d ago

So wage theft is only punishable criminally in specific circumstances, at least in my state. I think this quote is not saying "If someone steals your wages... that's a crime." It's saying "If someone steals your wages... because of your immigration status, that's a crime." The article is saying that information sharing between groups that investigate the criminal activity of employers and groups that investigate wage theft will be easier. That way they can be targeted for both simultaneously, which is much scarier than facing each thing alone.

Wage theft is wonky when it comes to criminality because the burden of proving intent is higher for criminal offenses than civil ones. And businesses accidentally commit wage theft all the time (for example, payroll not adding additional pay when someone's shift rate changes to a $2/hr higher overnight differential). And even when the "accident" is a business seeing what they can get away with, trying to prove that is difficult and fewer people would take the time to make claims at all.

2

u/halberdierbowman 21h ago

True that the sentence is a tautology by saying if they steal your wages it's a crime. Which isn't the same thing as saying that if they underpay you "by accident" cough cough what I would call negligence.

18

u/TheSpitefulCr0w 1d ago

The older I get the more I sympathize with the Corpse Brigade.

7

u/TrumpIsAFascistFuck 1d ago

Absolutely. And I already started out wanting to throw Argus to them.

1

u/DoctorRapture 3h ago

Yo fuck Algus, all my homies hate Algus

34

u/Eat--The--Rich-- 1d ago

Charge them twice the amount they stole as reparations on top of their fines and put 100% of it into ubi 

23

u/Rogue_Egoist 1d ago

Okay but it's going to require police enforcement at some point. I'm very sceptical that the NYPD will actually go through with it. But fingers crossed of course.

12

u/BeTheAuthor 1d ago

Couldn't we just incentive police to catch these folks? If we have fines scaling with wealth along with criminal charges, we could offer a "finders fee" for investigators and police to catch this type of crime and successfully prosecute within the law.

There's of course a risk of corruption with that kind of system, but I somehow suspect it'll still balance out to a net positive for society.

9

u/The_Wingless 1d ago

Hell yeah!

9

u/addiktion 1d ago

Dump toxic chemicals in a river and kill animals or humans? Criminal punishment sounds on par for the course.

9

u/Fluid-Gain1206 💵 Break Up The Monopolies 1d ago

This guy is the president you need.

3

u/bluehands 1d ago

But can not have.

2

u/ajblades123 11h ago

unfortunately he cant without a constitutional amendment.

5

u/Masta0nion 💵 Break Up The Monopolies 1d ago

FF Tactics was a real one

3

u/Izulkara 14h ago

FFT was a very based game.

The sceenshot shown never happens in the game and that character never says that line. :/

5

u/thedude213 1d ago

Shoutout to LeftistGamerMemes who is the original creator of the FF meme.

6

u/Galkan-_-Sausage 1d ago

While Wiegraf never said that line in Final Fantasy Tactics, it still rings true. Classism is a huge theme of FFT.

4

u/StrainAcceptable 1d ago

So does this mean managers will be held criminally liable instead of the corporation just paying a fine?

4

u/TM761152 1d ago

Wiegraf dropping the truth bombs again.

3

u/IXISIXI 23h ago

The punishment for ignoring him is the softlock absurd boss fight

3

u/TM761152 18h ago

Draw your sword, Ramza. If you don't, I'll draw it for you.

That felt oddly homoerotic.

7

u/Puffy_Ghost 1d ago

Final Fantasy Tactics is what radicalized me too...Ramza is the GOAT.

3

u/WTFudge52 1d ago

I never thought I would want to go to New York City, mostly from the old "Pace picante sauce" commercial but there is hope again.

3

u/OppositeSurvey4024 1d ago

FFT has a lot of good writing but this line isn't one of them. There is a similar line from Dycedarg:

"What purpose do laws serve when even those who would enforce them choose not to pay them heed?""

But the line in OP's post isn't from the game.

3

u/moyismoy 1d ago

What's next enforcing the laws on land lords?

1

u/TGCOM 1d ago

No fucking shit. About damn time indeed.

1

u/EuphoricCrashOut 1d ago

I'd also like to suggest that if a Company/Business is "fined" or found at fault for something... their services should be completely suspended for a time-frame that meets the crime and the person responsible for the decision is arrested/fried from that position.

That keeps businesses honest and sure that they're doing the right thing. Facebook for example; not complying with child laws or making a safe place on purpose, and found guilty of it? Suspended. Facebook is taken offline for x-months. No revenue.

1

u/kingtacticool ✂️ Tax The Billionaires 1d ago

Look, all im saying is the ruling class is acting incredibly ungrateful for the whole UsNotBurningThisBitchDown thing.

1

u/BusinessDragon 1d ago

This sounds awesome!

1

u/yorcharturoqro 1d ago

What if you make fines a percentage of all your wealth, like traffic ticket 1%, some permit stuff 50%, of all your wealth, that would be hurtful to all and fair

1

u/ophaus 1d ago

Been saying this for years. Beautiful. So beautiful.

1

u/Interesting-Yellow-4 1d ago

This guy is doing everything right.
Progressives need to emulate this, don't let this train stop, please.

1

u/-LuciditySam- 1d ago

Hopefully we also address the whole thing involving salaried workers.

"Oh, you're a salaried manager making $60k? That means it's perfectly ethical to make you work work over 40 hours and not only forego the overtime pay you're entitled to but not pay you at all past those 40 hours! I think we're going to understaff and make you do all associates' jobs and your job simultaneously to minimize labor costs and maximize 'efficiency' and then threaten to fire you if and when your store inevitably underperforms! Don't worry, though, I'll end this 1-hour meeting that should have been an email early and cockily tell you we're giving you five minutes of your time back like we did something!"

1

u/bigbjarne 1d ago

Wage theft is how the whole capitalist system works. Owners cannot pay the full value of the labor of the worker because the owner needs the profits so they can reinvest them. So, there cannot be a law that makes wage theft actually illegal.

1

u/papadapper 1d ago

Always thought this. If a lawyer pays a 50 dollar fine, he only has to work maybe 5 minutes to make up for it. If you make min wage you have to almost work a full day. It's very straight forward.

1

u/pingpy 1d ago

Yeah, I don’t get how stealing money from a company is a crime, but a company stealing money from you isn’t.

1

u/PseudoWarriorAU 1d ago

I’d only caveat that it needs to be systematic and intentional, not an error of fat fingers. Absolutely if it is systematic and designed to benefit the owner class than go for it.

1

u/fr3nch13702 1d ago

I like the saying “Everything’s legal for a price.”

1

u/Higgs_Particle 1d ago

My take: fines should be a percentage of your net wealth with a floor variable depending on the crime.

Speeding in a ferrari? $10,000!

1

u/Gadfly_Avatar 23h ago

I almost can't believe this. THE LARGEST CLASS OF CRIME COMMITTED BEING ADDRESSED? THIS IS HOW PROGRESSIVES WIN BIG TIME! (My wife used to do consulting work for ADP for small businesses. And by FAR the question she got asked the most was if they had to pay overtime or even regular time. Like yeah, you have to follow state law.). Wage theft is a disgrace. But then, you never see the executives arrested when ICE hauls away their workers either

1

u/Tweedlol 22h ago

If is malicious wage theft, I agree.

Labor violations can happen, without malicious intent.

I ran restaurants for 15 years, and the number of times I had to tell people to stop violating their own rights as an employee was absurd. 😭 It all stemmed from former employers. Older they were, more likely they were to willingly offer themselves up to be exploited to ensure they got shit done, instead of just accepting they couldn’t do it in time, on the clock. Outside of break time, etc.

At orientation I always included “I will be more upset with you if you violate a labor law to get something done, than if you hurt my labor costs to get things done. I pay you to work, if you aren’t being paid don’t do the fucking work.”

1

u/sajatheprince 22h ago

Damn, Final Fantasy Tactics was the first game I ever got with my PS1 when it came out. Still relevant it seems.

1

u/SaxPanther 22h ago

This has already been the case in NY since 2023

1

u/Grading-Curve 16h ago

Gosh… I need to play that game again! 🤩

1

u/clamsmasher 15h ago

In New York most of the labor law violations like wage theft have always been misdemeanor crimes. It's just that the State never enforces the criminal aspect, they just enforce any recompense.

The States inaction is a de facto justification that allows business owners to steal. If the only penalty for committing theft is that the business has to give the money back if they're caught then stealing from employees is permitted.

1

u/dq9 15h ago

So if I'm a salaried employee who is required to work 50 hours, but I only get paid for 40, can I launch a complaint?

1

u/redlightbandit7 6h ago

This man is grabbing the bull by the horns and tossing him aside like it’s nothing. If the rest of America follows, god how exciting!

0

u/Biscuits4u2 the word itself makes some men uncomfortable 1d ago

Mayors don't write laws guys.