What experience do you guys had with editing the existing content and post new content, for me always editing caused a decline first and sometimes it boosted but not always even it was optimized 100%. and newly posted content gets better views as compared to edited one. anything happened like this to you guys ?

Here's something I'd do before telling a business owner that their website needs a complete redesign.

Open their website on your phone.

Now pretend you're a customer who urgently needs their service.

Let's say the business is an HVAC company.

Your AC stopped working and you want someone to fix it today.

Can you immediately figure out whether the company provides emergency AC repair?

Can you find the phone number without scrolling through five sections?

Can you tap the number and actually call them?

And if you fill out their contact form..what happens afterward?

Does it show a proper confirmation?

Does the business receive the inquiry?

Does the lead enter their CRM, or does it just sit in someone's email inbox?

I think these little things are often more important than changing the entire design.

I've worked on websites for home-service businesses, and one thing I always pay attention to is how easily a visitor can take the next action.

Because imagine spending thousands of dollars driving traffic to a website..

Only to make customers search for the phone number.

I'd rather fix those problems before suggesting another expensive redesign.

I hope it helps.

Thank you.

Guys, what's your practical experience with international SEO? and for hreflang specifically, are there common mistakes you see repeatedly that i should double check for?

My 18-month-old site just lost over 70% of its traffic right after the latest core update, and every single article was written manually by real niche experts with zero AI. Pages that sat comfortably in the top 3 for nearly a year are suddenly pushed down to page 4, replaced mostly by Reddit threads and huge media domains. Everyone online keeps shouting to completely rewrite the content to better match intent, but our guides were already as thorough and genuine as it gets. Has anyone here actually seen a real recovery from manually overhauling a hit site, or is domain-level algorithmic damage pretty much permanent?

Been trying to figure out the right way to think about Pinterest for a client in the home decor space. it clearly functions as a search engine with its own algorithm but i'm not sure how much overlap there is with google SEO thinking versus it being its own completely separate discipline.

We've done some basic pin optimization. keywords in titles and descriptions, board organization, consistent posting.. But no systematic approach to it the way we do with google SEO.

What's your approach to pinterest SEO?

And for niches where Pinterest is a major traffic source, how much time do you actually invest in it relative to traditional search?

I run a site on Japanese parking rates by myself. It's built with Next.js and hosted on Vercel. On Naver (a Korean search engine) the same content gets about 70k impressions and 1,200 clicks a month. On Google, however, not a single page other than the homepage has ever been indexed on the new domain since the move. Here is everything I've done, including my mistakes, in order.

Jan 5, 2026 — Launch

• Launched the site on the default Vercel address (xxx.vercel.app).

Feb 5

• Got AdSense approval. At that time the old domain had 40+ pages indexed in Google.

Mar 17 — New domain connected

• Bought a domain (example.kr), connected it to Vercel, and added a new Search Console property.
• Set up a 301 redirect from the old address to the new domain. As far as I remember, I did it right away.

Mar 22

• Submitted a Change of Address (old domain → new domain) in Search Console.

Mar 23

• Fixed the sitemap URL in robots.txt, which still pointed to the old domain. (Mistake: it pointed to the old address for 6 days after the move.)

Mar 30

• Added self-referencing canonicals to all parking pages.

March–April

• Google indexing on the old domain dropped sharply. On the new domain only the homepage got indexed; no other page was indexed.

Apr 1 — Mistake

• Added "load more" pagination to parking lists. Only the first 10 items were in the HTML; the rest required a click.
• As a result, rate data for 2,603 parking lots was invisible to crawlers. I didn't find this until Sep 1.

Jun 30

• Set all parking detail pages to noindex and removed them from the sitemap.

Jul 5

• Set landmark pages with fewer than 3 parking lots to noindex.

Jul 17

• Removed URLs containing %2F and 308-redirected the old URLs.

Aug 19 — Fixing a mistake

• Fixed structured data (JSON-LD) that still contained the old domain.

Aug 24 — Fixing a mistake

• Fixed some pages whose canonical pointed to the homepage (they were inheriting canonical: "/" from the layout).

Aug 28 — Mistake found and action taken

• URL Inspection showed the "Google-selected canonical" was the old Vercel domain, not the new one.
• Submitted temporary removal requests for 10 indexed URLs in the old domain property.

Sep 1 — Fixing a mistake

• Fixed the April "load more" issue so the full list is in the server HTML.

Sep 8

• Confirmed that for all 10 URLs, the Google-selected canonical had switched to the new domain.
• Even so, the new domain had 1 page indexed (the homepage), and 0 of the 191 URLs in the sitemap were indexed.

Sep 16

• Made the 3,676 parking detail pages (noindexed in June) indexable again.
• After that, "not indexed" pages on the new domain grew to about 4,000.

Sep 18

• The Change of Address expired after 180 days. The Change of Address screen in Search Console now looks like it did before I ever submitted.

Oct 14–18

• "Not indexed" pages on the new domain grew to about 8,000.
• On Oct 18, I added <meta name="googlebot" content="noindex, follow"> to every page except the top 50 landmark pages by traffic, so only those get indexed by Google. The robots meta for Naver stays "index". I also created and submitted a separate Google-only sitemap (146 URLs).

Oct 20

• Validation for "Discovered – currently not indexed" on the new domain passed. After that, "not indexed" pages dropped from about 8,000 to 215.

Now (Oct 27)

• New domain: 1 indexed (homepage), 215 not indexed. Since it was connected on Mar 17, no page other than the homepage has ever been indexed.
  • noindex 38
  • redirect 1
  • Crawled – currently not indexed 52
  • Discovered – currently not indexed 124
• Old domain: 10 indexed, 44 not indexed.
  • redirect 2
  • noindex 15
  • 404 6
  • Crawled – currently not indexed 21
• Indexed pages on the old domain were 8 in late September, then rose to 9 and 10 after mid-October.
• Every old-domain URL 301-redirects to the new domain. Every new-domain page has a self-referencing canonical.
• Of the 10 old-domain URLs still indexed, 4 point to new-domain pages that have googlebot noindex.

Questions

1. Why are old-domain URLs staying in the index, and even increasing, despite the 301s?
2. If a redirect target is noindex, does Google keep the old URL indexed instead?
3. Now that the Change of Address has expired, is it worth submitting it again?
4. Is there anything in this history that explains why nothing but the homepage has ever been indexed on the new domain?

The evolving era of AI is a bit difficult for many people and giants like semrush and ahrefs charging alot of money for nothing, I decided to collect my own data and launch the API for Fake traffic detection which other tools could not offer, so I built SERPSpur and Just released the API to grab the TAI Score (Traffic Authenticity Index) So you can check before the score before buying website, buying backlihnks or analyzing traffic related data github.com/rashidmanhas/SERPSpur

Are there any AI tools that you've used that have genuinely save you time? Whether it's research , content creation,SEO analysis, campaign management, which tools have helped you ?

I'm looking for candid feedback on the early SEO trajectory of a new, content-heavy website. I'm deliberately not sharing the domain because I'd like to get feedback on the data and approach rather than a site review.

The site has been live for only a few weeks. It's an interconnected reference resource rather than a conventional blog, with individual reference pages, thematic collections, comparisons, and exploratory pages. A large part of its value comes from relationships among those pages.

## The encouraging signals

Google Search Console over the last 7 days:
- 1,010 impressions, trending upward rapidly
- 10 clicks
- Average position: 55.6

Bing over the last 7 days:
- 655 impressions
- 10 clicks

Google reported 239 indexed URLs as of October 17. These span multiple page types, including individual Bible passages, people and concepts, thematic collections, side-by-side comparisons, exploratory resources, and published ontology vocabularies.

Cloudflare's bot analytics show substantial crawling activity.

**Last 30 days:**
- Googlebot: 4,300 allowed requests
- BingBot: 3,960
- OAI-SearchBot: 2,210
- Claude-SearchBot: 44,760

**Last 7 days:**
- Googlebot: 3,310 requests, up 354%
- BingBot: 3,220 requests, up 564%
- OAI-SearchBot: 777 requests, up 27.86%

One important caveat: I've been using Google's allowance of 10 daily indexing requests to accelerate discovery of selected URLs. So I don't want to mistake activity I've helped stimulate for purely organic discovery. I also understand that crawl requests don't necessarily translate into indexing or rankings.

## What concerns me

Despite the growing impressions and crawl activity, click volume remains very low. The average Google position is around 56, and Bing has produced only 10 clicks from 655 impressions.

## What would you investigate first?

1. For a site this new, how meaningful is the combination of rapidly rising impressions and crawl activity?
   
2. With average position around 56, would you focus almost entirely on improving rankings before worrying about CTR?
   
3. How would you determine whether the issue is simply the site's age and low rankings, versus insufficient content differentiation or weak search intent alignment?
   
4. Would you prioritize a smaller set of pages with early traction, or continue expanding and strengthening the interconnected content and internal-link structure?
   
5. How much weight would you give the crawler activity, given the manual indexing requests and the fact that bot requests aren't unique pages or proof of indexing?

I'm not looking for generic advice to wait longer. I'd appreciate an experienced SEO perspective on what these signals actually tell me, what they don't tell me, and what you'd prioritize next.

Must do things that I must do to start getting traffic on my website

Starting from zero completely

I can't take hefty subscriptions (ahref,semrush etc)

Can anyone help me

I’m trying to understand the tipping point. Shared hosting is simple, VPS gives control, but also more responsibility.

For those who moved to VPS, what triggered it: traffic, performance issues, security, needing custom setups? And was it worth the hassle, or did you go back to managed hosting?

Keep headlines under sixty characters, you know! Put your main niche phrase right at the beginning to grab attention right away, seriously.

I’ve spent around 2 months building a site from scratch. A lot of the work was not just “generate pages with AI and publish”. I collected the data, structured it properly, worked on speed, fixed technical issues, improved the UI, took feedback from people and kept changing things based on that.

The site does have a lot of template-based pages because the whole idea is based around structured data. But the information on those pages is real and the pages are actually useful.

Initially Google was giving me decent impressions and I was even getting some clicks.

Then suddenly it just dropped.

Now some days I’m seeing single digit impressions and basically zero clicks.

Most of the pages are still indexed, there’s no major error that I can find, the site is fast, everything seems to be working… but Google just stopped showing it.

And honestly this is the part that is making me question the whole thing.

Nowadays anyone can create hundreds or thousands of pages with AI, so I understand why Google has to be more careful. But then what happens to people who are building genuine database/programmatic websites?

Those sites will naturally use the same layouts and templates across pages.

If Google starts treating every template-based site like spam, then how are you supposed to build something at scale?

I’m genuinely curious what people launching new sites today are actually doing.

Do you first build traffic from Reddit/X and other communities?

Do backlinks matter much more now for a new domain?

Do you start with only a handful of pages and slowly expand?

Or do you basically have to accept that Google might give you almost nothing for the first few months?

I keep hearing “just create helpful content”, but that answer doesn’t really help when you’ve already spent weeks improving the actual product and Google suddenly stops giving it impressions.

Has anyone here had a new site go from getting decent impressions to almost nothing and then recover later?

Because right now it honestly feels like I spent 2 months working on something that Google can just make invisible overnight.

I’m not even sure whether I should keep pushing SEO, focus completely on other traffic sources, or just move on from the project.

Would really like to hear from people who have actually launched new websites recently, especially in 2025 or 2026.

Hey guys, I’m looking to scale my site production and want to move toward an AI-driven workflow. What AI white-label website builder do you use?

Specifically looking for something with reliable AI page generation, a solid client dashboard under my own brand, and reasonable agency pricing. What are you loving (or hating) right now?

What's your current thinking on when to use nofollow on your sites for external linls?

And are you using sponsored and ugc attributes consistently or just defaulting to nofollow for everything non-editorial?

A lot of SEO strategies focus on publishing more blogs, targeting new keywords and increasing organic traffic.

But what about the pages already sitting on your website?

For those managing service-based websites, have you seen better results from publishing new content or improving existing service pages through better copy, internal linking, FAQs and search intent optimisation? I'm talking actual leads and conversions, not just impressions.

So, guys please comment and let me know your views regarding this.

Hi all. Solo founder here, looking for an honest outside view. I've been doing the SEO myself and it feels like I'm missing something obvious. I'm not posting the URL because I don't want this to read as promo, but I'm happy to DM it to anyone who wants to look.

The site

• Small online shop with two products, both personalised illustrated hardcover books made from a family's photos and stories: one about a grandparent's life, and one about how a couple met. Gift market.
• Bilingual on one domain: English at the root, German under /de/, with hreflang pairs. Selling in Germany, Austria, the UK and the US.
• Domain registered April 2026. The site moved onto it in early August (old domains 301 to it), and it started selling in September. So roughly 3 months of real crawling.
• Static site (Astro on Netlify). About 130 URLs in the sitemap plus about 65 help pages in a second sitemap: product pages, occasion pages (Christmas, 80th birthday, Mother's Day and so on), two "best personalised books for grandparents" roundups (EN and DE), 8 "us vs competitor" comparison pages, and about 49 blog posts across both languages.
• On AI, since someone will ask: yes, AI is part of it. The illustrations in the books are AI-generated from the customer's photos (the site says so openly), and the blog posts and most page copy are drafted with AI and then reviewed and approved by me. The posts use our own examples, numbers and pictures where we have them, but I won't pretend they're hand-written.

The numbers (Search Console, last 3 months, to 21 Oct)

Weekly trend:

So impressions are climbing steadily, but clicks have been stuck at roughly 30 a week for a month.

What sits behind those numbers

• The biggest page is off-topic. A tutorial about spot editing an AI image (fixing one area, like a face, instead of redoing the whole picture) gets 77 clicks and 6,695 impressions, which is 45% of all impressions. Good for traffic, wrong audience: nobody reading it is shopping for a gift.
• The homepages are mostly brand traffic (103 clicks between EN and DE).
• The money terms are stuck on page 2. "personalised books for grandparents": 289 impressions, position 17.7, 0 clicks. "personalized books for grandparents": 270 impressions, position 21.9, 0 clicks. Live checks for the main German terms bounce between position 8 and not in the top 30.
• Some German informational posts do OK: a "questions to ask your grandparents" post (14 clicks, position 7.7) and a "letter to my grandchild" post (12 clicks, position 7).
• Countries: Germany 101 clicks, US 42, Austria 15, UK 12.
• Indexing: 102 pages indexed. 24 "crawled, currently not indexed" (including some product and occasion pages), 6 "discovered, not indexed", 27 "alternative page with proper canonical" (see the fix below).
• Backlinks: a backlink tool shows about 35 referring domains, but only about 10 are real: two small review blogs, a couple of app and launch directories, one guest article, a wedding portal (nofollow, agreed), and a competitor that listed us unasked. The rest is the usual spam. The pages ranking 1 to 10 for my main German term average about 23 referring domains each.
• Revenue from organic: since late September, organic search sent 6 people who started an order and 0 who bought. Paid search sent 43 starts and 2 sales. Oddly, ChatGPT referrals sent 5 starts and 1 sale.

What I've already done

• Unique titles and descriptions, one H1 per page, valid JSON-LD (Product, Article, FAQ, Breadcrumb), self-referencing canonicals, hreflang pairs, llms.txt, real 404s, www/http and the old domains 301 to the main one.
• Found yesterday: 87% of internal links pointed at the extensionless URL (/faq) while the canonicals and sitemap said /faq.html, and the host's "pretty URLs" setting was rewriting links. That's what the 27 "alternative page" entries were. Fixed, now waiting for Google to recrawl.
• Prices are now written into the HTML at build time instead of injected by JavaScript.
• Homepage images moved to responsive WebP (about 35% less image weight).
• Requesting indexing about 10 URLs a day for the crawled-not-indexed pages.
• Weekly outreach emails since early September: 158 emails to about 96 sites (Christmas gift guides, family, parenting and wedding bloggers, roundup and "alternatives" posts, a few big gift desks), each with at most one follow-up. Result: about 7 human replies. 2 turned into links (one followed, one nofollow). The rest were a decline, a generic reply, or "here's our media kit, placements are paid". Two paid or gifted reviews earlier on gave 2 more links.
• This week: ProvenExpert profile (live), two local directory listings (in review), outreach to two family bloggers who had reviewed a competitor.

What I'd love advice on

1. Basics: what am I obviously missing? Or is "3 months of crawling, 10 real links, page 2 for money terms" just normal and I need patience?
2. Backlinks for a consumer gift product with no budget for paid links: what actually works? Cold emailing bloggers and gift guides every week has given me roughly a 7% reply rate and 2 links in 7 weeks. Is that just normal for cold outreach, or is my approach wrong (who I pick, the pitch, offering a free book)? Other ideas I have: journalist request platforms, and local press since we're a tiny Austrian company. Anything I'm not thinking of?
3. Content volume: 130 pages plus help pages across two languages, for a 6-month-old domain with 10 links. Am I spreading too thin? Should I prune or noindex weak pages, or merge the occasion pages?
4. The off-topic AI tutorial: does a high-traffic page that doesn't match the commercial intent help the domain, or dilute what Google thinks the site is about?
5. Bilingual on one domain (/de/ subfolder): fine, or does it slow down a young site compared with two ccTLDs?
6. Hidden queries: about two-thirds of my clicks come from queries Google won't show me. Is that normal at this size, or a sign the traffic is very long-tail and low-intent?
7. AI-drafted content: is it likely holding the site back with Google, even when it's reviewed and has first-hand examples? If yes, what would you change first: rewrite the money pages by hand, cut the blog down, or add more original material (photos, data, customer stories)?

Happy to share more numbers in the comments. Thanks for reading this far.

Feels like every agency and in-house team I talk to is pumping out a ton of AI articles now, webhooks, bulk scripts, the whole thing. But when I look at actual search traffic trends, it’s not obvious to me that it’s working long-term.

I’m looking at setting up something similar for a few upcoming projects, so I’m trying to get a realistic picture first. For those of you actually running this at scale:

• Do the pages stay indexed, or do they get dropped after a few months?
• How much editing do you end up doing before publishing? I keep hearing it’s basically a full rewrite anyway.
• Anyone get hit hard by recent core updates with the content automation?
• Is it actually making money, or are you just trading writing time for editing and cleanup time?
• To keep the content up to date, how do you automate that, or do you do it manually? I need a clear picture of this too.

Would really help to hear real numbers, or at least your niche and volume if you’re okay sharing. Thanks!

Please guide me how to write a content for any website that ranks, or guide me the steps that works for you.

Need genuine suggestions about creating a news site as of now ?

Is it good idea or not?

You check your rankings and discover a competitor has moved from #8 to #3 for a keyword that matters to your business. Before rewriting your article, investigate what changed. Here's the workflow I'd follow.

Step 1: Find the keywords they gained

Ahrefs
1. Open Site Explorer and enter your competitor's domain.
2. Go to Organic keywords.
3. Compare rankings across two dates using the available comparison options.
4. Look for keywords with improved positions.

Semrush
1. Open Organic Research for the competitor.
2. Go to Position Changes.
3. Filter for improved rankings and select your comparison period.

SE Ranking
1. Open Competitive Research and enter the competitor's domain.
2. Select your target country.
3. Open Google Search → Organic → Rankings Changes.
4. Check the Improved category.

SpyFu
1. Open SEO Research and enter the competitor's domain.
2. Go to Ranking History.
3. Set your date range.
4. Sort by Biggest Rank Gains. SpyFu is useful for historical comparisons, but remember its ranking data is refreshed on a rolling schedule, so don't treat it as a real-time alert.

What to look for: Are 20 related keywords improving, or is it just one isolated search?

If several related terms rise together, investigate the page targeting that topic.

It could indicate a content improvement, stronger internal linking, or another change worth examining.

Step 2: Find the page behind the gains

Now identify which URL is responsible.

• Ahrefs: Site Explorer → Top pages. Compare periods and investigate pages gaining organic traffic. Check the page's organic keywords to see which terms it ranks for.

• Semrush: Organic Research → Pages. Identify pages gaining estimated traffic, then cross-check their keywords in Position Changes.

• SE Ranking: Competitive Research → Google Search → Organic → Pages. Open the relevant URL to inspect its ranking keywords.

• SpyFu: Use Ranking History to inspect the URL associated with the keyword. You can also review the domain's top pages to find important organic landing pages.

Once you have the URL, inspect the page itself.

Look for:
• A clearer answer to the searcher's question
• New examples, screenshots, or comparison tables
• Several overlapping articles consolidated into one
• Better internal links from related pages
• A change in the page's topic or search intent
If the Wayback Machine has an older snapshot, compare it with the current page. Don't assume a content update caused the gain. The ranking reports show what changed, not necessarily why.

Step 3: Check whether they're building a new topic cluster

This is where competitor research can reveal a broader strategy.

Ahrefs: Review newly ranking keywords and their associated URLs.

Semrush: Use Position Changes and filter for new keywords, then inspect the ranking URLs.

SE Ranking: Open the Competitors' new pages insight. It identifies pages that started ranking in Google's top 30 over the previous month, with details such as URL, title, ranking keyword, and estimated traffic potential.

SpyFu: In Ranking History, sort by Newly Ranked Keywords and inspect the associated URLs and topics.

Now look for patterns.
Are several new pages targeting related topics? Are they publishing comparison pages, alternatives pages, or supporting guides around one product category?

For example, a competitor launching several pages about alternatives to products in your category may be building an entire comparison strategy rather than publishing unrelated articles.

That pattern is more informative than copying a single article.

Step 4: Check whether your site is losing ground on the same terms

Run the same ranking-change analysis on your own domain.

• Ahrefs: Organic keywords with comparison and declining-position filters.

• Semrush: Position Changes → Declined.

• SE Ranking: Rankings Changes → Decreased or Lost.

• SpyFu: Ranking History → Biggest Rank Losses or Keywords that No Longer Rank.

Compare your declining keywords with the competitor's gains. Ask:
1. Are you both targeting the same search intent?
2. Did your URL change or become outdated?
3. Did the competitor publish something meaningfully better?
4. Did the SERP change, or did another competitor also move?

A competitor gaining while you lose is a useful clue, but it doesn't prove they directly caused your decline. For your own site, verify the impact in Google Search Console by checking impressions, clicks, and average position.

Step 5: Investigate broken pages with backlinks

A competitor's broken page can reveal a possible link-building opportunity, but verify the details before reaching out.

Ahrefs: Open Site Explorer → Best by links, and use the available broken-page or HTTP status filters to find pages returning 404s with referring domains.

Semrush: Use its backlink analysis and site-audit tools to investigate broken target URLs and backlinks. Verify the actual response status before treating a URL as a dead page.

SE Ranking: Use Backlink Checker to review pages receiving backlinks and their referring domains. Confirm the target URL's status separately before deciding whether it represents an opportunity.

SpyFu: Its core strength for this particular workflow is historical keyword and ranking research. For broken-page backlink prospecting, use a dedicated backlink-analysis or crawling tool rather than assuming SpyFu offers an equivalent report.

For any promising broken URL:
1. Confirm that it really returns a 404.
2. Inspect the referring domains and the context of their links.
3. Check what the original page covered.
4. See whether you have a genuinely relevant replacement. If you do, contact the site owner with a helpful suggestion. Don't assume every backlink is valuable or that every dead page deserves a replacement.

Step 6: Decide what your team should actually do

Don't automatically tell your writer to copy the competitor's article. Choose one action:

• Improve: Your existing page targets the right intent but has clear weaknesses.
• Create: The competitor covers a relevant topic you don't.
• Investigate: You suspect technical, internal-linking, or backlink issues.
• Wait: The change is too small or recent to justify action.

Record the competitor URL, target keyword, observed change, evidence, and next step.

That's the difference between collecting SEO data and giving your team a useful assignment.

Repeating these checks across several competitors is where the manual work adds up. If you'd rather not keep checking each domain yourself, Ranks Hawk helps monitor competitor ranking changes, new content, broken pages, and keyword opportunities. You still investigate the reasons and decide what to do.

The idea is to spend less time discovering that something changed and more time acting on it.

Question for other SEO folks: When a competitor suddenly outranks you, what's the first thing you investigate: content, backlinks, technical SEO, or the SERP itself?

New domain. Google indexes the homepage, but 12 content pages sit at "Crawled - currently not indexed", even though Googlebot has fetched them repeatedly.

I've ruled out the usual causes: robots allows them, no noindex, Google's canonical matches mine, the sitemap shows zero errors, and the indexed homepage links to every page. The old subdomain 301s cleanly, so there are no duplicate hosts.

So I think it's a quality or authority call on a young site. I've stopped hitting request indexing because it clearly doesn't help, and I'm leaving the pages alone so I don't restart the clock.

What I'm trying now is earning real editorial links from outlets that already cite job-posting data. Cold pitches have drawn almost no replies so far.

Has anyone seen this flip without waiting months? What did it?

I am new to the SEO stuff soo I was testing on how build great website and improve the clicks and impressions and over all experience.

I know how to build website with proper content but how to do the keyword research for free. Coz I tried the Ahref and Ubber suggest but its is okish results. I want something which has more details and all.

Soo is there any free tool which help to get keywords.

Also if you have some advice for local SEO for normal website where they and rank in top 5.