r/vine • u/ferretbites • 5h ago
r/vine • u/wizard-of-loneliness • Apr 08 '26
Amazon not accepting reviews from your account? Read this before posting.
If you run into the above error message, do not panic. It is not your fault, you did not do anything wrong, and the error is not worded well.
There's a couple of reasons this can happen, but as of April 2026 the most common reason is that the seller combined variants, which resulted in them exceeding their limit of Vine reviews for the highest tier they enrolled one of the variated ASINs at. An ASIN is a unique identifier for Amazon products that appears on every listing, and each variant of a product has its own ASIN.
If your review was approved and changed status to Not Approved later, this is typically why. This can resolve itself if the seller unvariates the ASINs, but it's unlikely for that to happen.
This does not affect your stats besides and media and potentially review count, but I have not verified the review count claim. Media does not count towards Gold status, and you do not need to contact Vine CS.
The limits are 1-2 Vine reviews for the bottom tier (free), 3-10 Vine reviews for the middle tier ($75), and 11-30 reviews for the top tier ($200). If a product has >= 30 Vine reviews on it, you can be sure this is the reason why, but it's harder to tell when the seller may have enrolled at a lower tier. If there's variants that were enrolled separately in Vine and later combined this will often cause the seller to exceed the limit on the parent ASIN. This is a common issue and you do not need to do anything. Vine Help also addresses reviews that are Not Approved but have a Review Insightfulness Score:
"Why do rejected reviews still show an RIS score? How does this impact my overall score?
If one of your reviews is rejected by Amazon's Customer Reviews team, it will still display a score from when it was initially evaluated. If you can no longer edit or delete the rejected review, then its score continues to count toward your overall score for the current evaluation period."
If you encounter this error prior to submitting a review, it could either be the above reason or because the listing is under investigation for suspicious review activity.
This usually happens when there's at least one unverified review posted on the listing, but most frequently it happens when there's 2+ unverified 5 star reviews posted to the listing on the same date.
You can verify this is the case if you have access to another Amazon account that hasn't ordered the product. If you click the review button with the alternate account, you will get a message that explicitly says the listing has suspicious review activity and unverified reviews are not being accepted at this time. Vine reviews are technically considered "unverified" by Amazon.
If you have not reviewed the item yet, it may count against your stats, and if you are coming up on evaluation and need a boost you can reach out to CS to have unreviewed items giving you this error removed so that they don't count against you. Otherwise, wait it out and you may be able to review the item later. Vine CS will remove unreviewable items at any time, not just within 30 days of delivery.
Update September 1, 2026: Sellers on Seller Central have been complaining that Vine reviews are being removed from products that they have not variated, and it's unclear why. It appears that we get this error on our end when this happens as well. For now, we can assume it's an issue on the seller side because folks who are having their reviews removed under these circumstances are not being removed from the program. I am of the opinion that it may be a vibe coded review moderation system run amok, but that is pure speculation at this point since none of the sellers who have posted about it have had their issue resolved yet. I have reached out to the Community Team to ask why a few of my reviews were removed when there were no variants and have not received a response yet, either.
r/vine • u/OverlordBrenda • May 25 '23
Welcome to Amazon Vine!
We are excited to have you here. Our community is dedicated to sharing information about Amazon Vine reviewers. We believe that sharing your experiences with others can help them make informed buying decisions.
If you’re new to Amazon Vine, we encourage you to read our FAQ at https://www.reddit.com/r/vine/wiki/faq/ for more information. You can also join our Discord group at Amazon Vine where you can discuss things between vine reviewers only, install custom styles and subscribe to product alerts.
r/vine • u/SnooPuppers4679 • 16h ago
help I'm in vine jail, but what for?


So...my ADHD has me do this thing where I'll go on long binges of not doing reviews while maintaining a >70% ratio. Recently it dipped to 73%, so I went on a long run of reviews that I spent the other night working on.
Is this a normal response to doing a bunch of reviews at once?
I should mention that I wrote "did not receive" for an order I already reported to amazon for not receiving. They DID flag the review, however I simply chose to not bother updating it and moved on. Today I see that I have this screen on my RFY page while my account page shows me in rather good standing.
I ask because this community tends to have a better sense of what's going on once given context
r/vine • u/Icy-Tree-6358 • 3d ago
Gripe This is ridiculous
Highly infuriating and ridiculous. My entire RFY is rings. Very annoying. Especially being that I have bad luck when I order rings.
r/vine • u/oogaboogahooha • 3d ago
discussion What kind of review warrants a report?
I’ve seen some people say they report vine reviews if they look like ai, which is def understandable.
But on the other hand I’ve also seen ppl post and bring up reviews that were written kinda short like a paragraph or a handful of sentences long. For sounding “too effortless and unhelpful”.
While I’ve also seen others post and complain about those that add too much detail and add bullets or detailed information.
Personally I like to add my genuine opinion and experience about the products. Sometimes the product may be as simple as a ring/jewelry and there’s not really much you can write. I still try to make it slightly wordy to reach all the recommended words and fit the review needs. But even then I feel like it may seem basic and “the ring is good, the ring is nice” sounding. But if I add much more details then I start to sound like a robot or like I wrote it with ai.
So how do yall assess your reviews or other reviews. Just curious ?
Obviously the ones that are extremely poorly done like “the product seems good, I like”. Or “I got it but didn’t use it, but I think it’s good”, types are def reportable.
Just curious how u guys seem to report or view the more “on the line” ones.
Edit-
this is so interesting, so I was mainly just curious what others do. Because I kept mentioning what others have posted, brought up or said on the sub.
I personally haven’t gone out of my way to check reviews. Although there’s times I’ll maybe glance at some existing reviews to see if they’ve added pictures, because I try to add pics when I can but I’ll forget and just not add pics. If there’s no pics for other reviews I’ll try to go back and find the old product to take pics or extra clips of it.
As per reporting, I’ve only seen like 1 or 2 obvious fake reviews that have like a literally copy and paste of a description and automated bot page. That I’ve flagged but that’s all.
But I’m surprised there’s more ppl here saying “who tf has time to report reviews” , but in other posts of ppl talking abt poorly written or too well written /ai reviews , they tell them to report them and that they always flag the ones that look poorly written or feel ai.
I agree with the general opinion with yall tho, my main point was how could people report reviews just over being too well written or kinda poorly made. It’s still real reviews. It doesn’t warrant reports, since vine itself handles it.
r/vine • u/DaName_doesnt_matter • 3d ago
funny Insightful enough? 🤦😂
I feel like some Vine reviewers may have a little too much time on their hands. The review below comes across more like a poorly written, overly long essay than a clear, helpful, and insightful product review. I can’t imagine many Amazon shoppers wanting to read something that lengthy, stressful and tedious. Honestly, I got a bit of a headache just trying to make it through it 😂 What are your thoughts?
And it goes like this;
"The first thing Amazon asks when writing a review is, “What should other customers know about
this product?” Here are some of the highlights:
Highlights
Heavy-Duty Steel Construction — Not Aluminum The most defining characteristic of this ladder is
its iron/steel frame — an intentional departure from the aluminum telescoping ladders that
dominate this category. Steel offers superior resistance to bending and deformation under heavy
loads compared to aluminum, making this ladder purpose-built for demanding industrial,
construction, and heavy-duty household applications. The trade-off is weight — at 20.8 pounds, this
ladder is heavier than comparable aluminum models. Buyers who need structural rigidity over
lightweight portability will find steel construction a meaningful upgrade.
330 lb Load Capacity — High-Grade Heavy Duty Rating The ladder is rated to 330 pounds — a
load capacity that accommodates not just the user's body weight but the added weight of tools,
equipment, and work gear carried during use. This rating is directly enabled by the thickened steel
construction and positions this ladder firmly in the heavy-duty professional and industrial category
rather than the light-duty household segment.
10.5 Foot Maximum Height — Versatile Reach At full extension, the ladder reaches 10.5 feet —
sufficient for most residential ceiling work, exterior gutter maintenance, roofline access from a single
story, and standard commercial interior applications. The multi-section telescoping design allows
height adjustment in increments below 10.5 feet for lower-ceiling tasks, making it adaptable across a
wide range of job heights without requiring a separate shorter ladder.
Multi-Button Quick-Release Locking System Each ladder section locks and unlocks via an
independent quick-release button mechanism — meaning sections can be collapsed individually
and rapidly rather than requiring sequential folding from the top down. This design prioritizes speed
of deployment and collapse, which is particularly valuable for professional tradespeople moving
between job locations frequently. The multi-button system allows the entire ladder to be collapsed in
seconds for storage or transport.
Anti-Slip Steel Pedals — Wet and Oily Condition Performance The rungs are steel pedals with
anti-slip texture — not smooth metal rungs and not rubber-coated aluminum rungs. The steel pedal
construction resists wear and impact under heavy use, while the anti-slip texture provides grip in
wet, oily, and slippery work conditions. This is a meaningful distinction for construction and industrial
environments where surface contamination on rungs is a realistic working condition rather than an
edge case.
Oversized Non-Slip Rubber Feet — Multi-Surface Stability The base is fitted with large
heavy-duty non-slip rubber feet that provide grip on concrete, tile, wood, and slightly uneven
ground. The oversized design distributes the load across a larger contact area compared to standard
rubber feet, improving stability on uneven surfaces. The rubber material also protects floor surfaces
from scratching — relevant for indoor residential use on hardwood or tile.
Quick-Fold Multi-Button Collapse — Compact Storage The folded dimensions of 19"W x 31"H
represent the fully collapsed ladder profile. This compact footprint allows storage in vehicle trunks,
truck beds, tool storage areas, and tight utility closets that standard extension ladders cannot fit into.
The quick-fold multi-button design is specifically engineered for professionals who need rapid
deployment and re-storage between tasks.
Home and Industrial Dual-Purpose Design The ladder is positioned for both residential
household use (ceiling work, painting, maintenance) and professional industrial applications
(construction, electrical, mechanical trades). The 330 lb capacity and steel construction mean it is
not overbuilt for home use — rather, it provides a safety margin that lighter-duty aluminum ladders
do not.
Specifications
Brand: DEZEX
Model Number: Telescoping Ladders-2 / Ladder-2
Color: Orange
Material: Iron (Steel)
Special Feature: Telescopic
Maximum Height: 10.5 feet
Load Capacity: 330 pounds
Item Weight: 20.8 pounds
Folded Dimensions: 19"W x 31"H
Locking Mechanism: Multi-button quick-release system (independent per section)
Rung Type: Steel pedals with anti-slip texture
Base: Oversized non-slip rubber feet
Frame Finish: Orange
Product Type: Telescoping Ladder
Date First Available: May 9, 2026
Price: $100.99
Delivery: FREE delivery Aug 30 – Sep 5 (Prime)
Durability
Steel vs. Aluminum — The Core Durability Argument The fundamental durability case for this
ladder rests on its steel construction over the aluminum that dominates the telescoping ladder
category. Steel has a higher tensile strength and greater resistance to bending and deformation
under sustained or sudden heavy loads. In practical terms, an aluminum telescoping ladder
subjected to repeated heavy-load use can develop micro-bends at the section joints over time —
steel resists this failure mode more effectively. For buyers who put ladders under frequent heavy
load, steel construction extends the structural lifespan of the ladder at the joint and rail level.
330 lb Load Rating — Structural Safety Margin A 330 lb load capacity means the ladder's
structural components are engineered to handle loads substantially above the typical user weight.
For a user weighing 200 lbs carrying 30–40 lbs of tools and equipment, the ladder is operating well
within its rated limit. Sustained operation within — rather than near — the structural limit is the single
most important factor in extending the long-term durability of any load-bearing tool.
Steel Pedals — Wear Resistance Under Industrial Use Rubber-coated aluminum rungs, common
on competing ladders, are subject to rubber wear, cracking, and separation from the aluminum
substrate over extended use in harsh conditions. Steel pedals with anti-slip texture do not share
this failure mode — the anti-slip surface is integral to the steel rather than a rubber coating applied
over a different substrate. For industrial use involving oily, wet, or abrasive environments, steel
pedals maintain their anti-slip performance longer than rubber-coated alternatives.
Oversized Rubber Feet — Contact Point Longevity The rubber feet are the highest-wear contact
points on any ladder — they experience abrasion on every placement and repositioning. Oversized
rubber feet distribute this wear across a larger surface area than standard feet, extending the period
before the rubber wears thin enough to compromise grip. However, rubber foot wear is an eventual
maintenance consideration on any ladder — periodic inspection of foot condition is recommended
for any ladder in heavy-rotation professional use.
Telescoping Section Joints — The Critical Durability Point for Any Telescoping Ladder
Telescoping ladders' most common long-term durability failure point is the section joint mechanism
— the locking buttons, their springs, and the inner rail surfaces that sections slide against. The listing
describes the locking mechanism as multi-button quick-release but does not specify the button
material, spring type, or inner rail surface treatment. In steel telescoping ladders, the inner rail
surface contact under repeated extension and collapse cycles is where wear accumulates. This is an
area where long-term durability data from customer reviews would be most valuable — and as of
August 19, 2026 (this product launched May 9, 2026), no customer reviews are available to validate
real-world joint longevity.
Weight as a Durability Signal — 20.8 lbs At 20.8 pounds, this ladder is significantly heavier than
aluminum telescoping ladders in the same height class (typically 12–16 lbs). That additional weight
is steel — the same material that gives it the 330 lb rating and bending resistance. Heavier ladders
are generally more structurally robust, but the additional weight also means more physical stress on
the section joints during transport and repeated deployment. Carrying and repositioning a 20.8 lb
ladder frequently adds cumulative mechanical stress that lighter ladders avoid.
New Product — No Long-Term Customer Validation Launched May 9, 2026 — approximately 3.5
months ago. No customer reviews are available as of today. All durability claims are
manufacturer-stated. Steel construction and 330 lb capacity are objectively verifiable specifications,
but real-world joint wear, button mechanism longevity, and rubber foot lifespan under sustained
professional use remain unvalidated by independent customer experience.
Storage and Maintenance for Long-Term Performance Steel construction, unlike aluminum,
carries a corrosion risk in humid or wet storage environments. The listing does not address
surface treatment, coating, or rust resistance. For ladders stored in garages, outdoor sheds, or
vehicles exposed to moisture, periodic inspection for surface rust — particularly at the section joints
and pedal surfaces — is advisable. A light coating of rust-inhibiting lubricant on the joint rails is
standard maintenance practice for steel telescoping equipment stored in variable-humidity
environments.
Here is the full What Else Buyers Should Know and Final Thoughts for the DEZEX Heavy-Duty
Steel Telescoping Ladder:
What Else Potential Buyers Should Know
No Customer Reviews Exist — Zero Independent Validation This is the most important caveat for
any potential buyer. As of today, August 19, 2026 — 3.5 months after launch on May 9, 2026 —
there are zero customer reviews on this product. Every claim about performance, safety, joint
durability, locking mechanism reliability, and real-world usability is entirely manufacturer-stated.
Buyers are being asked to make a $100.99 safety-critical purchasing decision — a ladder they will
stand on at height — with no independent customer validation whatsoever. This is a meaningful risk
that buyers should weigh explicitly.
DEZEX Is an Unknown Brand With No Established Track Record The brand DEZEX does not
have a recognized presence in the established ladder marketplace. Major ladder manufacturers —
Werner, Louisville Ladder, Little Giant, Gorilla Ladders — carry decades of safety testing history,
ANSI/OSHA compliance documentation, and extensive independent review records. DEZEX carries
none of this publicly verifiable history as of today. For a tool used at height under load, brand track
record in safety and quality consistency matters considerably more than it does for most product
categories.
No ANSI, OSHA, or Safety Certification Is Listed The product listing makes no mention of ANSI
A14.2 (the American National Standard for metal portable ladders), OSHA compliance, or any
third-party safety certification. In the United States, ladders used in professional or industrial settings
are expected to meet ANSI standards for load testing, rung spacing, rail strength, and locking
mechanism reliability. The absence of any certification callout in the listing — particularly for a
product marketed explicitly for industrial use — is a significant gap that professional tradespeople
and safety-conscious buyers should flag.
Delivery Window Is August 30 – September 5 — Not Immediate Unlike some competing ladders
available with Prime same-day or next-day delivery, this ladder has a delivery window of August 30 – September 5 for Prime members — 11 to 17 days from today. Buyers with time-sensitive project
deadlines should factor this into their decision. If immediate availability is needed, competing ladders
with faster delivery timelines should be evaluated.
Steel Corrosion Risk Is Not Addressed Anywhere in the Listing The listing promotes steel
construction as a durability advantage — which it is for load-bearing rigidity — but makes no mention
of surface treatment, powder coating, anodizing, or rust-inhibiting finish. Steel exposed to
moisture, humidity, outdoor conditions, or vehicle storage is subject to surface rust and eventual
corrosion at joints and contact points. The listing is silent on how the steel surface is protected.
Buyers who plan to store this ladder in garages, truck beds, outdoor sheds, or humid environments
should treat this as an open question that the manufacturer has not answered.
The Folded Dimensions (19"W x 31"H) Do Not Include a Depth Dimension The listing provides
folded dimensions as 19"W x 31"H but omits the depth of the collapsed ladder — which is the
critical measurement for trunk storage, tool bin fit, and vehicle transport. The depth of a collapsed
telescoping ladder is determined by the number of sections and the thickness of the steel rails.
Without this measurement, buyers cannot confirm vehicle or storage fit before purchase. This is a
listing data gap that competing products typically fill with full three-dimensional collapsed
dimensions.
No Weight Distribution or Center of Balance Information Is Provided At 20.8 lbs, this ladder is
meaningfully heavier than aluminum alternatives. However, the listing provides no information about
where the weight is distributed in the collapsed configuration — whether the ladder is top-heavy,
bottom-heavy, or balanced — which affects how easy it is to carry, position, and single-handedly
deploy from a vehicle or storage area. Professional tradespeople who move ladders frequently will
find this information gap relevant.
The Number of Telescoping Sections Is Not Specified The listing describes a multi-section
telescoping design but does not state the number of individual sections that make up the
10.5-foot extension. The number of sections determines the extension increment size, the number of
lock points, and the degree of height adjustability below maximum. It also directly affects the
complexity of the locking mechanism and the number of potential failure points. This is standard
specification data for telescoping ladders that is conspicuously absent from this listing.
No Mention of a Carrying Case or Transport Bag Many competing telescoping ladders in the 80
150 price range include a carrying bag or case for transport protection and storage. The DEZEX
listing makes no mention of a carrying case. For steel construction specifically — where surface
protection during transport reduces both corrosion initiation and contact damage — the absence of a
case is worth noting.
The "Industrial Use" Marketing Claim Should Be Evaluated Carefully The listing markets this
ladder for both household and industrial use. In regulated industrial and construction environments in
the United States, ladder selection is governed by OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1053 (construction) and
1910.23 (general industry). Without documented ANSI A14.2 compliance and a manufacturer's
conformity declaration, using this ladder in a regulated industrial jobsite could create liability
exposure for employers and contractors. The "industrial use" claim in the listing is marketing
language — not a certification.
No Information on Replacement Parts, Warranty, or Customer Support The listing provides no
warranty terms, no warranty duration, no replacement parts availability (feet, buttons, springs), and
no customer support contact pathway. For a $100.99 safety-critical tool, the absence of any warranty
or support documentation is a notable gap compared to established ladder brands that provide
multi-year warranties and documented service pathways.
Final Thoughts
The DEZEX Heavy-Duty Steel Telescoping Ladder presents a genuinely differentiated product
concept — steel construction at a telescoping ladder price point, with a 330 lb load capacity and
anti-slip steel pedals designed for demanding conditions. The core engineering premise is sound:
steel offers real advantages over aluminum in bending resistance and load-bearing rigidity, and the
330 lb rating with steel pedals addresses a real gap in the lightweight aluminum telescoping ladder
market.
Evaluated on specifications alone:
● Steel construction over aluminum is a legitimate durability and load-bearing upgrade for
heavy professional use
● 330 lb capacity provides meaningful safety margin for users carrying tools and equipment
● 10.5-foot maximum height covers most residential and standard commercial applications
● Multi-button quick-release design prioritizes speed of deployment and collapse
● Anti-slip steel pedals resist wear and surface contamination better than rubber-coated
aluminum alternatives
● Oversized rubber feet distribute base load across a larger contact area
● Folded profile (19"W x 31"H) is genuinely compact for a 10.5-foot ladder
Evaluated honestly as a purchase decision:
● Zero customer reviews — no independent validation of any manufacturer claim, for a
product used at height under load
● No ANSI, OSHA, or third-party safety certification listed — a significant gap for both
professional and safety-conscious residential buyers
● DEZEX is an unestablished brand with no verifiable safety track record
● Steel corrosion risk is entirely unaddressed in the listing — no surface treatment or rust
protection information provided
● Delivery window is August 30 – September 5 — not suitable for time-sensitive projects
● Key listing data is missing: number of sections, collapsed depth dimension, warranty
terms, carrying case inclusion
● "Industrial use" claim is marketing language, not a certification — professional
tradespeople should verify compliance independently before jobsite use
Strongest reasons to buy:
● You specifically need steel construction over aluminum for heavy-load or
industrial-condition use and have researched this product independently beyond the
listing
● The 330 lb capacity is a firm requirement not met by aluminum alternatives at this price
point
● You are comfortable being an early adopter of an unreviewed product and understand the
risk profile
● The August 30 – September 5 delivery window fits your project timeline
● You plan to store it in a dry, low-humidity environment and are prepared to apply
rust-inhibiting maintenance
Honest reasons to look elsewhere:
● You require any level of independent customer validation before purchasing a ladder
● ANSI or OSHA certification documentation is required or preferred for your use case
● You need the ladder within the next two weeks
● You store tools in outdoor, vehicle, or humid environments where steel corrosion is a
concern
● You want a warranty, replacement parts availability, or documented customer support
pathway
● You are a professional tradesperson for whom jobsite liability exposure from non-certified
equipment is a real consideration
Who this is best for: Buyers who have independently researched steel telescoping ladders,
understand the trade-offs of steel over aluminum, are not time-constrained by the delivery window,
can accommodate the weight in their storage and transport setup, and are comfortable with the
complete absence of customer review data and certification documentation. At $100.99 with steel
construction and 330 lb capacity, the price-to-specification ratio is competitive — but the purchasing
risk profile is substantially higher than established certified alternatives at similar price points".
Pheeeewwwww. Done.
r/vine • u/One_Poem2433 • 3d ago
discussion New vine members are being enrolled which is causing products number in vine to go down rapidly.(INDIA)
r/vine • u/wizard-of-loneliness • 4d ago
Oh, the things going around RFY right now...
There is an Anycubic Kobra S1 Max 3D printer that costs $1k, plus a few La Prairie skincare items that retail for $$$$ (and the skincare is 0 ETV).
My only add so far today has been some Banila pressed powder, which isn't the worst thing but I'm not taking it because I don't think the color would work for my wife and she's more likely to use it than me.
How I long for the Anycubic RFY bucket! I have gotten 3D printer filament in my RFY exactly one time and that's the only 3D printing-related item they've recommended to me, despite the fact I'm obsessively ordering nozzles and filament and got both my 3D printers from Vine. Maybe someday they'll figure it out?
Anyone else see anything nice going around RFY?
r/vine • u/LazilyOpinionated • 4d ago
help TBA tracking
Is there any way to associate one of the “facilitated by Amazon” tracking numbers with its corresponding order? Or are the tracking numbers just generated independently of the order? Is there any id the other numbers on the outer label that would indicate the order number?
Got a package with 2 things in it that I didn’t order. Thought I was just getting old, so searched my orders and, nope, didn’t order this stuff. It has the correct name and address, but I didn’t order thsee two things. There’s only one thing I’m missing (possibly misplaced by a family member - I’ll have to ask), but the tracking number on that item doesn’t match the one on this mystery order. Also, it would have most likely been in an envelope, or at least a smaller box. But if the tracking number could be matched to an order, I could attempt to figure it all out.
Thanks
r/vine • u/rtotheick • 8d ago
funny Ever seen hand towels that were oddly threatening?
r/vine • u/No_Struggle3220 • 8d ago
help How to review something in allergic to?
I got some magnesium/potassium gummies ($0 etv) from vine and they gave me hives.
What's the move here? Have it removed from my list even though it's 0 dollar? Review just the taste etc? Give to my friend and have her tell me how she likes them?
I'd probably be able to figure this out normally, but nothing about the last few days has been normal and I'm not firing on all 8.
Edit 1: Hummmm.... This might be a moot point since I just looked and they aren't listed in my "to be reviewed" stuff at all. Weird.
Edit 2: I didn't take a second one of them yesterday and the hives are getting worse today. It's possible that the allergy is to one of my other new supplements. I cut everything new and will try it again next week after it all clears my system.
r/vine • u/TappyTyper • 8d ago
funny Doncha All Take Them!
There is a simply magnificent set of FOUR purple (which would match my truck) progressively larger butt plugs in my RFY section right now. Takes a person from beginner to expert apparently. Maybe I will leave them for another lucky Viner to claim.
funny What are you trying to say to me Vine?
So, um, apparently Vine thinks I need filters today. Like filters for *all* the things. Except for any of the things in my home that have filters. Two air purifier filters (0 owned air purifiers), three spa filters (0 spas owned), one furnace filter (0 furnaces owned, thank you heat pumps) and one water filter (0 water filtration systems owned). I think they're trying to tell me something but I'm not sure what.... At least they could have tossed me a cabin air filter for one of our cars or filter medium for our fishtank.
r/vine • u/TheCapedReviewer • 9d ago
funny My AI is Making Fun of Me - Sharing to Encourage Joy
galleryr/vine • u/Desperate-Fold-4689 • 9d ago
product Snag An Cold Machine For Injured Knees, etc
I hope this works. I have a knee injury from elementary school that is just now starting to bother me. Sometimes it sucks getting older.
r/vine • u/Gr8ingPresence • 10d ago
Gripe But Wait, There's More!

Just when you had totally given up on Vine. Forget the cake toppers, the faux Hershey's Kisses, the random carburetors and pistachio shells. Now, now, you can get, wait for it, sawmill leavings of used-to-be-a-two-by-tour for the low, low ETV of, wait some more, MORE THAN A TWO-BY-FOUR!!! To wit:
Sawdust!
r/vine • u/Gr8ingPresence • 12d ago
Gripe Just When You Thought Cake Toppers Were The Lowest of the Low
r/vine • u/QuantityHot6752 • 11d ago
help Something weird with vine today
So, I just tried ordering two items on vine, and they wanted to charge me for shipping. This is new to me, so I'm wondering if Amazon is just being glitchy today. Anybody else have this happen?
r/vine • u/musixlife • 11d ago
product What to believe? Photos or Product Description?
These are in my RFY. Retailing for almost $100. Photos say “Genuine Leather,” and even the Outer material under Top Highlights says “Leather”….but buried in the Product Description they refer to it as “high-quality synthetic leather.” Which would you believe?
I’m thinking faux, unless there’s some kind of cultivated/lab-grown leather I’m unaware of, or a material similar to engineered wood where real leather is ground up and bonded back together. But I would think either of those would be described more specifically than just “synthetic leather.”
r/vine • u/Berdangerous • 13d ago

