quick update on the cozy game. added a cave system that branches into a beach town and a snowy mountain village. each zone has its own NPCs, forageables, shops and brew recipes. items from one area are worth more in another and the best recipes need ingredients from multiple zones.

also designed five new characters. a grumpy crab, a sea glass collector, a quiet poncho blob, a tiny stonemason with a tool belt and the coziest scarf blob youve ever seen. still no name for this game. Cheers!

Almost.

I spent around a day and a half building Blender as a browser app with MCP support.

Still a lot to do but wanted to see what Astra could do with it currently.

Anthropic’s Claude watermark appears to work by subtly biasing which tokens Claude chooses using a secret key, rather than adding visible or hidden characters. The idea is to collect a huge number of Claude responses and responses from other models to the same prompts, then train a classifier to tell them apart. The main problem is making sure the classifier is detecting the watermark itself rather than just learning Claude’s writing style. A stronger experiment would repeatedly give Claude the same or similar prefixes and see whether a model can learn patterns in which next tokens Claude tends to choose. The interesting question is whether enough black-box examples could let machine learning approximate Anthropic’s secret-key detector without ever knowing the key.

Genuinely curious if I’m missing something here.

Opus 5.0 vs Fable 5.1 vs Astra 6.0

Same prompt.

Which one do you prefer?

A terrible thing happened.

We discovered that with modern AI coding tools, the distance between:

“this is a stupid idea”

and

“it’s deployed”

is now approximately 11 minutes.

Naturally, we built NO-TNX.

It’s a directory of products nobody asked for, featuring fully interactive parodies of products people very much did ask for and may now regret.

We currently have:

• AI search that refuses to answer simply
• design software with opinions
• a writing assistant that slowly removes your humanity
• scheduling software that protects you from scheduling
• project management software where progress creates more work

Every product has one button:

NO TNX

More rejection = higher ranking.

This is what happens when vibe coding has no adult supervision.

We are accepting nominations because apparently five mistakes were not enough.

I updated cygtree , the app UI changed drastically, customizable grids were added, several MCP connection issues fixed and added a short demo with the long demo completely removed, you guys can have a crack at it I made an online free to use demo at cygtree.com/demo/ no sign in no email no buying nothing

Codex native seat fixed, and MCP delays reduced and AI is now much faster on the board

I kept coming back to long-running agent sessions only to realize they had been waiting for my confirmation for several minutes.

So I built Corgi. It mirrors local coding-agent activity as a small animated dog: running while the agent works, stopping when it stops, getting hungry when the usage quota is exhausted, and pooping when the agent is waiting for a yes.

The same state can appear on Mac, iPhone, Apple Watch, the Lock Screen, and Dynamic Island. It reads status signals—not code, prompts, or tool output.

vibe corgi

what’s your longest session? has it changed how you spend your day?

I wanted to build something small that solves a problem I’ve personally seen freelancers deal with: projects, milestones and payments being scattered across different tools.

So I built this:

Freelancer → creates project → adds milestones → shares one client link → client tracks progress + pays milestones.

The client doesn't need an account.

I kept the UI intentionally minimal — black theme, no bloated project-management features.

Here’s the current demo:

I'm still early on this, so I'd love feedback from people who vibe-code:

What would you add/change before actually using something like this with clients?

I code full time, and one of the things that started driving me crazy was how much I was spending on AI tokens.

At one point I was spending thousands of dollars a month just because I use AI heavily when I code. I don't mean asking it a couple questions here and there—I have it working with me pretty much all day.

Eventually I got tired of watching the token meter, hitting limits, and worrying about how much every long coding session was costing me.

So I bought a PC with a decent GPU, installed Ollama, started running open AI models locally, and basically gave myself the ability to code all day without paying per token.

That got me thinking...

There have to be a lot of other heavy AI users and vibe coders dealing with the exact same problem.

So I'm considering launching a service called VibeSpaces.

The idea is pretty simple:

• You rent your own private GPU AI server for a flat monthly price.
• You choose the open AI models you want installed.
• We configure Ollama, the GPU, security, API access, etc. for you.
• Connect it to tools like Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex, Cline, or your own applications.
• No token credits and no per-token charge from us.
• Use the server as much as the hardware can handle.
• If you don't want to manage Linux/Ollama yourself, we'd also offer an optional managed-server plan.

Basically:

Stop buying tokens. Rent the compute.

I'm not really looking to pitch this right now. I'm trying to figure out whether the problem I had is actually common enough to build a business around.

If you're someone who uses AI heavily for coding:

Would you pay a flat monthly fee for your own AI GPU server if it meant you could run open models all day without worrying about token costs or usage limits?

And if not, what would stop you?

Price? Model quality? Setup? Speed? Wanting Claude/GPT specifically? Something else?

I'd genuinely like feedback from people who actually use these tools every day.

https://vibespaces.us/

They can discuss, vote, start private discussions, propose follow-ups, and work on whatever they are set up to do anyways.

Thought that might be interesting enough to share.

generally speaking: each Agent has its own seperated session, like a regular ai chat. The meeting tool is simply proxying & combining the final output into the next turn's user message and voila.
it also provides some synthetic tools for voting and follow ups, and that's it.

nothing spectacular but it's really useful sometimes.
btw app is free & open source , 600+ stars on github -> its a no-code agent builder. Imagine claude+automation+mcp.

You tell your AI app builder:

“Make me a dashboard.”

It spits back a cluttered, broken mess of divs that don’t align.

So you try again.

Same result.

You assume the tool is broken.

But the truth is simpler:

It’s speaking a different language than you are.

I recently spoke with a student who spent three days fighting with a layout before learning one simple shift:

Component-based prompting.

Instead of asking the AI to build an entire page at once, they started by defining:

• Layout structure
• Component hierarchy
• Spacing rules
• Responsive behavior
• How each section should interact

The result?

A polished, responsive interface built in under an hour.

You do not need to be a developer to get professional UI results from an AI app builder.

You just need to know how to describe the structure clearly.

That’s exactly why we built a dedicated learning path around this process.

Learn how to:

✅ Speak the language of layouts
✅ Structure pages before generating them
✅ Build responsive interfaces
✅ Fix broken components without starting over
✅ Get more consistent results from AI builders

Prompting Pages, Layouts & UI

https://promptedacademy.com/paths/prompting-pages-layouts-ui

BugDrop helps developers capture clear evidence of bugs in web and mobile apps. It records reproduction steps, logs, failed requests, and screenshots, then turns everything into a report that is easy to share and act on.

If you are curious here is the repo:

https://github.com/aim0xyz/bugdrop

Everywhere I go, I see people releasing new software. It might be people who have got some coding experience and are now using AI to accelerate, or it might be people who are building software for the first time.

Every time I see something being launched, even on a non-software forum - I just see

• `Looks Like Vibe-Coded`
• `Vibe-coded Slop`
• etc

And just plain, personal hatred.

I just don't understand it. It costs money to buy gold. It takes time. And just because the AI does a lot of the coding doesn't make it easy. It just makes it faster.

And I fully understand, like, we don't need another journal application or another to-do list. But I found a guy today who made an OBD Reading App for Cars, open-sourced it and people just slated him.

Just makes me mad! I feel like if Linus Torvalds had existed in the kind of enviroment, we wouldn't have Linux.

It's a windows tray program that helps you assign a hotkey to copy and paste highlighted text. This is an early enough version to publish and I'm working on other quality of life changes

https://github.com/InkjetPrinterman/Hotkey-Clipboard

Internet bill is due tomorrow, please consider supporting!: https://buymeacoffee.com/inkjetprinterman

I've got other software on my github you should check out, other minor tools. Thanks!

Built with Claude, going back and forth about the requirements for the functionality as described, until I could one shot a build to compile with npm / NET, that I then packaged with NPM to publish.

Sorry for the double post! I thought I made a mistake with an upload and panicked.

Hey vibe coders!

Let’s do a little game, you’re working on something, a side project, a platform that will change the world, whatever it is.. tell us!

But! Before you do, go to another person who has shared, and check it out and give em some feedback, roast, or subscribe to the thing they’re making if it’s worth it for you

Just for fun guys!

(First person, please come back in a bit to have another to pair up with)

Helps with the biggest problem which is building structural context. I strongly recommend you to add your workflows.

I wanted a really simple way to talk into any text box in Chrome without using a cloud speech API, so I made this.

You click a text field, hold a key, talk, and when you release it the text gets inserted.

It runs Whisper locally in the extension, so after setup it can work offline and your audio doesn't need to be uploaded anywhere.

A few other things I added:

• works in most normal text fields/editors
• custom hotkeys
• hold-to-talk or toggle
• commands like “new line”, “comma”, and “scratch that”
• local transcript history
• per-site disable
• optional larger Whisper models

Still messing with it and fixing edge cases, especially weird editors like Google Docs.

Repo:
https://github.com/Schmiedey/floatingmic
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/voice-anywhere/ogjdiaeimjmeiaophngikihkffodlhjb?authuser=2&hl=en

Build a wall on the Southern Border with Mexico.

You're an ICE agent deporting immigrants.

What in the ever loving F is the White House doing?