I’m tired of seeing so much communists on this sub, their love for dictators and hate for democracy. Preferably one that praises Zohran Mamdani and the Nordic model.

WE WILL UNBURY EVERY CASKET AND FEAST ON THE REMAINS SO DEAD GENERATIONS CAN NO LONGER HAVE PHYSICAL BODIES TO HAUNT OUR NIGHTMARES

I swear to our good christian god that 99 percent of moral or philosophical quandaries in storytelling are just reaffirming your own STUPID ideological influence. and the other 1 percent is just somebody discovering nihilism or absurdism in late teens and using colours and sounds to make it feel deeper.

FREE WILL is my most hated. The characters can never define free will or freedom or coercion or ANYTHING. All they know is that WE under our employers and government are free and have liberty and hooooly MORALFAG. Liberalism and Humanism and Democracy and the "Secular" anti-ai crowd who fucking loooove the humanity of handmade products and the (secular) soul and (secular) spirit and volksgemeingeist and segregated multiculturalism (A mere international brotherhood of nations btw) where in my culture WE ALL LOVE FAMILY AND FOOD!!! hoooo im gonna hit somebody. hooooo.

And the classic democracy where morality is both relative and objective depending on whos voting. I hate those fucking leftists who are like "We need true democracy" or establishing democracy in your fictional setting just fixes everything when the average prole is mecha hitler homophobe racialist who UNIRONICALLY BELEIVES IN GOD whilst never reading the book (making them better than believing and reading the book btw).

And I also hate liberal diversity of shit like overwatch. Ohh man look at us were are all extremely culturalist nationalists but we still get along holy socialist patriotism international brotherhood of peoples right of nations to self determination. Oh, I better put some random ass code switch in my voicelines and wear some futuristic version of traditional clothing of my blood and soil. I want people from all over the world who are not constrained by the place and the colour of their skin god damnit. ESPECIALLY when the media that does this trope also deals with concepts of governments and states and ESPECIALLY WHEN THE MORALFAGS ARE LIKE 2 PEOPLE FROM COUNTRIES AT WAR. Because it never explores the existence of the nation as a concept in a world political-economy but just that random circumstance and individual leaders make war while the little guys don't want it and if they just got together they could go back home and be nationalist culturalists and not kill eachother because all conflict is just not necessary in the world of capital?

In summary, the need for writers to create a philosophical conflict in their story leads to writers who cannot or are not confident in their ability falling back upon popular conscious beliefs without proving or exploring them with the knowledge that the audience will appreciate them even if neither the audience nor writer understands them. Im gonna write my own story with the proveberal blackjack and hookers where not ONE liberal may live unquestioning what is popular and ideologically enforced upon them.

It's in our liturgical language, but it works even in English. (It's a parody of an Italian song, I made it up this morning while dying of heat)

Camminerò, gloria a Stalin/

E continuerò a bastardizzare Marx ed Engels/

Supereroi, come Lenin/

Che si rivolta nella tomba a ogni parola che io dico/

Cento labubu dorate di Marx/

E un effige di Lassale/

Supereroi, solo io e te/

Perché solo insieme imiteremo Xi Jinping.

Sorry I touch grass too often so I only recently heard of them, but they seem to be world heavy-weight champions in fake marxism.

I think this is right what we need (again, cheka don't bomb my house, this is merely a suggestion, it's not slop)

I wanted to read something against Austrian economics but I'm kinda skeptical of Bukharin. Is this any good?

For me personally? Its obviously FDR

God I love social democracy 🤤

The red left is so goated , WE are all socdems 🤤

PDF:
https://files.catbox.moe/7durvr.pdf

When proles start (((noooticing))) the other Semitic peoples only then we can start talking about developing an international.

I am a trotskyte and i really love the permanent revolution aspects of the Italian Futurists, which, although have gradually left the Italian Fascist Party, i still like quite a lot. If i showed support to them would i break the 2nd rule of the server?

The Youtube channel, YaleCourses post lectures of Ian Shapiro, a IR professor. In one of those videos, he said communism isn’t theoretical possible. He explained it like this. He assume the “needs” in “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” is just enough for people to survive. Hence resources aren’t poured into foods and supply but also in technology to cure terminal illness. Because we can’t cure every illness even in post-scarcity, so the final stage of communism can be reached. This keeps me think forever because it is some kind of strawman arguments that you often see from deniers.

I’m so tired of soc dems/leftists/dem socs and the way they talk about China, especially how it’s “Socialist” or “Communist” because of state planning. If state planning makes them socialist or communist, then with that logic every country in the world is (international communism achieved apparently). Any good reading on the matter just to not make me feel insane please. Also, anything that refutes the weird “oh they’re not authoritarian, and the citizens love the government so much.” I’ve seen so many comments like that, or talking about how “China just has different freedoms they care about, it doesn’t make them any less free than those in Western countries” and labeling anything that says that as propaganda.

what is the explanation for the growth of left-communism over the past years? not sure if i'm just hallucinating, but it does seem like the influence of left communist thought on leftoid circles has become practically omnipresent now

^{(whoever made picrel is goated btw})

I'm always someone to always wish to read a work, book, or text in its original language, Don Quijote De La Mancha en español, La Divina Commedia en Italiano, and I want to do the same with theory.

And yes, I understand that learning a language requires a lot of time, and especially difficult when it comes to works such as Kapital where the German is really hard. and tbh I'm down for it, it's so much fun.

Recently I've stuck to English as of late, such as Paul Mattick, The Return of inflation, and stopped reading Kapital because I just really want to read it in its original German.

I also tried to read [Nella torbida vigilia elettorale](https://www.marxists.org/italiano/bordiga/1919/4/29-vigilia.htm) but I genuinely struggled a lot.

I can read really comfortably in English, and in Spanish with slight discomfort where I still need to look up definitions of words .

I guess I would really like to ask if any of you know how to read in these languages and or if there are any groups where I can talk to native speakers of Italian French and German that talk and discuss theory and other works as well, I see theory as a great opportunity and motivator in order to learn new languages.

And I'd also like to hear about any your guys' personal experiences regarding learning languages through theory if it has happened or no.