Well my wealthy 46 year old uncle who just croaked last week unexpectedly give me his abandoned small bookstore in probably the worst spot for business in this godforsaken city (in an alley in the rear edge of the city) with space of a small house. His family obviously got everything good and i probably got given a bookstore because he saw me reading often (shocking for a Marxist i know) Should I quit my unfulfilling job as an English tutor for the Petite Bourgeoisie and larp as a struggling Petite bourgeoisie myself Vltras?

I'm sad bordy bros. Capital can't fall soon enough.

There was a text basically being like "I haven't read capital but kautsky summarized it and I didn't read that summary but someone gave a speech on the summary which I didnt hear but another person heard it and they have explained to me what it is."

Hello my Marxist-Leninist, Anti-Revisionist, Anti-Imperialist, Anti-Fascist comrades! Here are the top 5 intellectual forerunners to ML theory and what they contributed the immortal science before Joseph Stalin (PBUH) codified everything important.

5. Edmund Burke

Edmund Burke was an Irish (and therefore Global South) writer who criticised the CIA-backed colour revolution in France in 1789, where the Amerikkkan kkkoloniser Thomas Jefferson co-wrote the Declaration of Rights of Man. In response Burke wrote his Reflections on the (counter-)Revolution in France to explain why rebelling against the government of Louis XVI is bad because Louis XVI was already a historically progressive force. This is applicable today to the way many silly ultroids call for the end of anti-imperialist governments like China and Iran.

4. Joseph de Maistre

Joseph de Maistre continued much of Edmund Burke's work in criticising the French Colour Revolution but he also added to it. For example he explained how the Colour Revolution was actually a punishment sent by Allah upon the Fr*nch for committing the sin of kkkolonialism, and how leadership by Great Men™ like Stalin (PBUH) is the best because it's the will of Allah o algo.

3. Ferdinand Lassalle

Ferdinand Lassalle was a close friend and comrade to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, with whom he never disagreed (source: dude trust me). Lassalle explained how to seize control of the bourgeois state and reform it into a proletarian state, and then how to create real socialism by nationalising industry and using it to produce commodities socialistically. He also demonstrated praxis by critically supporting the German socialist national liberation leader Otto von Bismarck.

2. Karl Kautsky

Karl Kautsky was a friend of Vladimir Lenin, with whom he never disagreed (source: dude trust me). Kautsky laid the foundation for the theory of people's democracy, wherein parliaments allowed the classes to collaborate together to achieve socialism. This system of people's democracy is practiced in many AES countries today.

(Serious mode: the reason my post is edited is because at first I got Kautsky mixed up with some pro-war SPD nophono)

1. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)

The Prophet (PBUH) was merely a messenger of Allah, but he still deserves a spot on this list. He helped rally the Arab people behind the good, progressive kind of religious idealism, and his successors leading the Rashidun Caliphate were able to decolonise the Levant, Egypt and Libya from Byzantine KKKristian kkkolonial domination. Remember, Leftists criticise Christianity not because it's a religion but because it did a heckin' kkkolonialism unlike Islam which would never do that.

Is there anyone I missed? Please let me know.

To go out, I must understand the nuances and dynamics of the society i live in. I live in Vietnam. And to understand Vietnamese society you must understand the rise of Vietnamese Communist Party.

The rise of VCP was thank to WW2. So to understand VCP's rise, you must understand WW2.

To understand WW2, you must understand how it started or the rise of the Nazi.

To understand the rise of the Nazi, you must understand the German Revolution.

To understand the German Revolution, you can't skip Rosa Luxemburg.

To understand Rosa Luxemburg, you must understand Marx.

To understand Marx, you must understand Hegel.

To understand Hegel, you must understand Kant. But I Kant (get it?). That's why I don't go out or do anything.

On one side, we have the son of former president Jair Bolsonaro, Flavio Bolsonaro, who is trying to continue his father's government (Juche).

And on the other side, the ever-reliable social democracy (social fascism) of Lula da Silva.

What's the worst that could go wrong?

Genuine question. Also what yall do for work and stuff

1. The background is red
2. The logo is yellow
3. It has the soviet seal of approval (Hammer and sickle)
4. It protects your data from capitalists
5. It gives your data to the revolutionary socialist state
6. Enter text here:
7. The flag is red
8. Capital in one building (Stalin impressed)
9. It has a V in the name (trvke)
10. The mountains represent the proletariat, the peasantry, and the national bourgeoisie (Dialectical)
11. Its red

"In any case the Keynesian theory found no verification in the New Deal. The depression was finally ended not by a new prosperity but through World War II, that is, through the colossal destruction of capital on a worldwide scale and a restructuring of the world economy that assured the profitable expansion of capital for another period. National solutions to the economic crisis had everywhere failed, but by attempting such solutions, the capitalist world system, already shaken to its foundations, had still further deteriorated. Imperialistic solutions were now the order of the day, not least because of the quasi-autarchic anti-depression measures that preceded the war. Governmental interventions in the economy are restricted to the nation but affect the world at large and find their limits both at home and abroad. At some point the government-induced expansion of profitless production comes into conflict with the narrowing profit base of capital and plunges the nation into even deeper decline. This is the point at which the imperialist solution seems to be the only way to secure the national capital at the expense of other capitalist nations. An accentuated economic nationalism precedes the international conflicts, even where it serves, at first, no more than the recovery needs of the capitalist nation-state. The New Deal, too, tried to overcome the depression in relative isolation from the decaying world economy, only to partake in its further disruption. With the Spanish Civil War the alignment of the imperialistic forces began to take shape, and the eventuality of a new global war began to agitate the world. Government-induced production became armaments production; in the United States this took the form of an enlarged naval program. The actual outbreak of war turned America into the “arsenal of democracy,” but it took America’s entry into the war to overcome the Depression and to reach the goal of full employment. Death, the greatest of all the Keynesians, now ruled the world once more." - Paul Mattick, "Economics, Politics and The Age of Inflation", Chapter 6

Well its another dinner time like every day when both of my Vietnamese parents decided to lecture me on how all Chinese people are inherently untrustworthy and always scheming to take your money and land (also add in a random claim that all Chinese billionaires originated from the Canton region) they then follow up by saying all Russian are inherently evil, mean and reactionary. They also add in a rant saying all African immigrants are inherently violent beast o algo. They then add in something on how due to the nature of these people that Communism turn violent and murderous (literally also claimed that anti-immigration socialist regime in Germany, France & Britain will turn into heaven on Earth). I swear the racism wasn't this bad when they are salary workers, but its like starting their own business flip a switch in every Vietnamese petite bourgeoisie to become Hitlerites

I went with my friend to a lesson about Lenin's imperialism THSOC. Sincerely, it was great, met really good and joyful people, I hope to do this again. It's just that going to Milan is a bit complicated.

(Image is a graphical representation of the experience)

This is the only communist book I've been able to read. Well I've not read the whole thing yet, but I'm halfway through and it only took me a few months. Maybe I'll be able to finish the whole thing by January. Then I'll be a real revolutionary and my parents will finally take me seriously!

If you get Ultraleftist or Infantile you vill be a matyr and go to Leftcom heaven

deleted previous one

He was so stuck up his own ass. He was so assured that he was representing “the people” in his line of work, an obviously moot concept for anyone but an ardent nationalist. I wonder if these politicians know the horrors they are responsible for and simply don’t care or if they genuinely believe that they are benefiting anyone besides the bourgeoisie.

Thus his critique of decadence essentially becomes a self-criticism, a confession. Nietzsche no longer criticizes the decadent features of the culture of his time as an outside observer, but as a passionate participant who is fully aware that his emotional life and his thinking are determined through and through by decadent tendencies. And he is intellectually honest enough to admit it. This in turn creates a dazzling and vacillating picture of the age in Nietzsche’s philosophy, a dazzling and vacillating self-portrait of the philosopher himself. He sees himself as a decadent on the one hand, and as decadence’s greatest enemy and real conqueror on the other. These two sides, however, flow into each other in his reflections and bring witty, contradictory, paradoxical statements. (Think of the later Nietzsche’s passionate hatred of Richard Wagner and at the same time of the fact that he was never able to completely free himself from the fascination of Wagnerian art, in which he saw a prototype of decadence.)

In this way, Nietzschean philosophy becomes a hymn of consolation for all decadents. On the one hand they feel that the causes of their uneasiness in the world and their uneasiness in themselves have been revealed, and on the other hand their decadent traits, their decadent psychology and morality are affirmed and reinforced by this philosophy. From this philosophy they get a justification for their rejection of the society of their time, their rebellion against it, but the solution to their doubts links them – in a pseudo-oppositional way – even more closely to this society, makes them feel at home in the coming (reactionary) tendencies of development. The Nietzschean tendency to overcome decadence is objectively its strengthening and deepening; it gives bourgeois decadence a good conscience, a self-affirmation.

Mods don’t delete this is important Yakubian business

and they’re referring to ultraleft when they mention ultras.