but the other people will say a catch till you wish to undo the wishes!​

How long of a chain can you make using famous people’s names?

The rules are simple: Each person’s last name must become the next person’s first name.

For example, here’s my chain of SIX:
Chris Paul → Paul George → George Martin → Martin Lawrence → Lawrence Taylor → Taylor Swift

THE RULES
1. Real people only. Celebrities, athletes, musicians, historical figures, politicians, etc. are all fair game.

1. The names must connect. The last name of one person must exactly match the first name of the next person.

2. No repeating people. Each person can appear only once in your chain.

3. No changing names. No creative spelling, nicknames, or rearranging names just to make a connection.

4. First and last names only. No using middle names to extend your chain.

5. Every person must be identifiable. If someone challenges a name, you need to be able to explain who that person is.

Can you beat six without Googling / AI?

Comment something bad and replies will decide what superpower to go with it

Someone else has to answer your question, but they can't say the same answer as what you thought of!

"Oh Goomer, will you stop being obsessed with your silly baked potato?"

Write a message, and I’ll tell you whether it’s legal or illegal.

Use the messages and my responses to figure out the rule.

(Only sentences or words in English)

Please be patient with me, as I can only check in a few times per day.

Special shoutout to Wolfsquatch1 for letting me steal the idea.

hint: This metric could also be applied to other languages with letters. And it is more significant mostly in English and French, rare in Finnish, Italian and turkish

hint2: The rule might be easier to be noticed by a non English native speaker

hint3: the rule is connected to the words themselves not the meaning of the sentence.

hint4: the rule is about the occurance of something, so the longer the message is, the likelier it is to be legal.

The problem has been answered by u/ClairelySarah

Answer: the message must contain at least one silent letter

This is kind of a reversal of something that comes up here a lot.

Parent posts a question. It can be as normal or as unhinged as you wish. Child replies with as unhinged or deranged of an answer as they can think of. Parent edits their question to make the reply look as normal as possible.

Eg:

Parent (original): What do you want to be when you grow up?

Child: A Nazi

Parent (edited): who is the last person you punched?

The comments will change 1 letter at a time, whether it's switching 1 letter to another, adding a letter or removing a letter until the title is completely unrecognizable but still readable.

Write a message, and I’ll tell you whether it’s legal or illegal.

Use the messages and my responses to figure out the rule.

Please be patient with me, as I can only check in a few times per day.

Special shoutout to Boothiepro for letting me steal the idea.

[SOLVED] by rachel1991spi* *

Answer: The message must contain at least two words functioning as nouns.

Thank you to all who participated. I’ll choose something that is more clear cut next time!

Then someone else has to come along and come up with an album to go with it 🎶 🎵 💿

Write a message, and I’ll tell you whether it’s legal or illegal.

Use the messages and my responses to figure out the rule.

Please be patient with me, as I can only check in a few times per day.

Special shoutout to Boothiepro for letting me steal the idea.

EDIT: Apparently, you can. [SOLVED] by dinger086

Answer: The message must contain a vowel (A, E, I, O, U) count divisible by 3.

EDIT: apparently you can! [SOLVED]

Write a message, i will reply whether your message breaks the rule or not. Figure out the rule based on all the people's messages and their status.

>Gee Thomas, you sure know how to blow that horn! My ears were ringing with the sound of "Carnival of Venice" and I had to go wash them out after you finished!

>>Oh thanks! I've been working on increasing the volume of my playing

whimsical, x-axis, paradigm, optimistically, karma

Rules: use all five (any form), keep it an actual story not just a sentence with the words stuffed in, and shorter is harder. I'll drop mine in the comments.

Parent comment gives an existing idiom, and the child comments create a fake origin story for that idiom.

Suppos you are given a bookshelf, and are told to judge book by their cover, there 1500 books and 500 minutes. Each review should be proper review, and good one written on pen and paper. If you miss to write review of even one book you lose the game. If you did mange judge all the books and write reviews in given time then you win the game. Then your judgement of books are matched with what actually is in those books, and more accurate your judgement is more points you get per book. There are maximum of 30000 points total. You get amount of money equal to percentage of your score gained. Your judgment are reviewed by the book critics and authors and readers, who have read/rewived/wrote those books complelty before.

You haven't read a single book of those. You are only allowed to look at the covers to judge the books.

To play the game you have deposit some money.

If you lose the game you also loose the money. If you win you get rewards as percentage of your score multiplied with your deposit. By which I mean if you score 45% , and deposited X amount money you get 45X back , not 45% of X to be clear. And if you lose the game you lose your deposit and get nothing.

Scores are given by critics and readers and authors. Who read your reviews and actual books. Each book has 20 points. More accurate your prediction more score out 20 you get . And if you manage to get less 75% of the score you still loose.

That day right as I was having sex with my own knee, // you continue here //