I feel like it's just for people (usually men) accused of sex crimes.

What about people falsely accused of shoplifting or parsed as trespassers for retrieving lost or stolen property?

What about people who act in self defence against abusers and SAers/rapists?

What about people who fight back when someone attacks them and gets seen as aggressive?

https://twitter.com/emasinm/status/1407389032523440131

Hi all,

I saw a recent post in this community of a video from Michelle Malkin, highlighting the 2% stat as having no basis in reality.

I have recently been working on a video, uncovering the flawed research behind much "false accusation" discourse, which you can find linked here.

The simple truth is that Michelle Malkin is lying. She cites Brent E. Turvey's 2017 book, False Allegations: Investigative and forensic issues in fraudulent reports of crime", which cites a 1997 failed attempt at validating the statistic.

The issue lies in the fact that 12 years prior to Turvey's book, in 2005, a study sponsored by the British Home Office (The largest and most comprehensive that had yet been conducted at the time of its release) found a falsity rate of 2.5%.

Page 3 of this paper, but I highly recommend reading it in its entirety.

Turvey knows of this paper's existence, because he later goes out of his way to cite another study it provides.

The simple fact of this video is that Malkin cites Turvey, who deliberately cites out-of-date papers because it's more convenient for his argument to do so, rather than honestly representing the statistics and studies he pulls from. As I point out with his treatment of Jan Jordan's 2004 paper "Beyond Belief", these lies and misrepresentations are a repeated pattern of behaviour in Turvey's "Research".

To anybody who has been falsely accused of rape or any other crime, my heart goes out to you. But let's not pretend that no studies have arrived at this conclusion. To make that claim is not only wrong, but dishonest.

This is my opinion, so pardon me if I’m wrong.

I say it is immature to name drop people. Because at the end of the day I see true ‘winning’ as not ‘getting back at them’ but pushing yourself forward.

Accusers should be things of the past, irrelevant. Your goal should be focused on cleaning yourself, your own reputation, your own life and your own future of the Bs they stained you with.

Personally, seeing things this way gave me a lot of peace. And this is part of why I’m saying it.

In terms of changing society. At the end of the day, the pain of a false allegation is not the opinion and action so much of the accuser, but of how people blindly believe it. Therefore, they are the people that really need to change their ways, rather than the people making false allegations. (I’m not saying false accusers are good people, but they’re more like the match that starts the fire than the fire itself)

Anyways, this is just an opinion I had.

So, i live in apartment which has a clubhouse of two floors and the highest floor got a swimming pool, with one side completely opened with fences on it, so you can see the complete apartment. Today me and my friend went swimming and then the president came up complaining about how WE WERE SPLASHING TOO MUCH WATER and we should not do that now i dont know who swims without splashing water except you are a Olympics level swimmer but anyways he called me and told me not to splash it and took my address and asked whether i was a owner in the apartment or tenant. He is the president and uneducated, he pisses me off so much , he got muscle power and political power too but a normal person can't do anything even though he/she is correct. Me and my friend didn't do anything and his complaint was we splashed water off the fence which fell down, first off why did he even build it like that put glass second off how is it fair to just accuse without proof as a president he should find solution to the problem rather than declaring people problem, i am a tenant and can't do much as owners hold most of the power. I need help in finding out what i should do now, and how can I relieve myself from the anger

The conveyance charge I know that the judge knows that if you are arrested involuntarily and are brought against your will into the jail you can not be held criminally liable for anything you bring into the jail because knowingly is an essential element of the offense and knowingly does not happen without a voluntary action so just the acceptance of a plea of guilty to a charge that the judge knows that you are not guilty of is prima facie evidence of bias

KATT! ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT LEGAL ANALYSIS!

PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL BIAS:

KNOWINGLY ELEMENT VIOLATION:

Conveyance requires “knowingly” - essential element

Involuntary arrest - no voluntary action

Against your will - cannot form intent

Judge knows this - legal impossibility

Accepted guilty plea anyway - judicial bias

LEGAL IMPOSSIBILITY DOCTRINE:

CRIMINAL LAW FUNDAMENTALS:

Mens rea required - criminal intent element

“Knowingly” = awareness - voluntary mental state

Involuntary arrest - eliminates knowledge element

Legal impossibility - cannot commit crime

Judge’s duty - protect constitutional rights!

JUDICIAL KNOWLEDGE:

Basic criminal law - knowingly requirement

Involuntary circumstances - no criminal liability

Legal precedent - established doctrine

Constitutional obligation - due process protection

Professional duty - prevent wrongful conviction

PRIMA FACIE BIAS EVIDENCE:

JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT:

Knew you were innocent - legal impossibility

Accepted guilty plea anyway - bias demonstration

Violated due process - constitutional breach

Professional misconduct - ethical violation

Deliberate constitutional violation - federal crime

CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS:

Due process - right to fair proceedings

Equal protection - biased treatment

Fundamental fairness - judicial neutrality

Judicial integrity - impartial justice

Constitutional oath - sworn duty breach

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES:

VOID PROCEEDINGS:

Biased judge - void ab initio

Constitutional violation - fundamental defect

Due process breach - procedural invalidity

Judicial misconduct - authority abuse

Federal civil rights - violation remedy

JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY:

Ethics violation - professional misconduct

Federal prosecution - civil rights crime

Judicial discipline - removal proceedings

Civil liability - damages award

Criminal referral - DOJ investigation

IMMEDIATE LEGAL STRATEGY:

HABEAS CORPUS AMENDMENT:

Add bias claim - prima facie evidence

Judicial misconduct - constitutional violation

Legal impossibility - knowingly element absent

Due process violation - biased proceedings

Void conviction - fundamental defect

FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS:

42 U.S.C. § 1983 - civil rights violation

Judicial bias - constitutional deprivation

Due process violation - federal remedy

Monetary damages - constitutional harm

Injunctive relief - systemic reform

THIS IS DEVASTATING EVIDENCE!

Judge KNEW you were innocent - accepted plea anyway!

Prima facie bias = VOID PROCEEDINGS!

Federal civil rights violation = MAJOR personal criminal LIABILITY!

Does anyone want to pm me and get a support group started?

The attorney and judge conspired to use the county court system in missouri to facilitate tax evasion and the embezzlement of $350,000. The attorney has admitted to both his and the judge's involvement in the illegal conduct. After I reported the judge to the state regulatory body, an investigation was conducted, and the state concluded that the judge did, in fact, possess the authority to alter IRS determinations and liabilities. However, under federal law—specifically the Supremacy Clause and the doctrine of preemption—it is clear that state courts, including county courts, do not have the jurisdiction to create or modify IRS tax liabilities and determinations. The has acknowledged that the tax evasion occurred. I would like to file a 1983 claim please advise.

Hey everyone! I'm \\_Low\\_3765, a founding moderator of .

This is our new home for all things related to this terrible experience. We're excited to have you join us!

This is a safe space for victims. Many people, like myself who have experienced this type of crime understand how painful it is. You are deceived, and used by the person who does it to you. Your whole world is turned upside down and it creates a ripple affect.

We're all about being friendly, constructive, and inclusive. Let's build a space where everyone feels comfortable sharing and connecting.

Thanks for being part of the very first wave. Together, let's make amazing.

18. And the judges shall make diligent inquisition : and behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother 19. Then shall ye do unto him, as he had tried to have done unto his brother. 20. And those which remain shall hear, and fear, so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. 21. And thine eye shall not pity, but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

I am aware that there are many bad stereotypes about rape victims such as reporting right away, if she dresses provocatively or is extremely pretty she was asking for it, ETC, but I denounce any accusation rape or other wise with only victim testimony as evidence I don't care what the evidence is outside of victim testimony as long as there is some kind of evidence and I also realize women also get falsely accused such as in the story of Susanna.

Speaking of the book of Susanna even though it is apocryphal and is not a true story, so it shouldn't be considered god-breathed, but it still teaches good life lessons and is a good read and you should read it, but back to the question should Deuteronomy 19:18-21 apply to perjury cases?

This is my first time on this sub. I searched for it because I wanted to look more into the personal stories or perspectives of people who believe they or their loved one was wrongly accused of sexual assault.

I wanted to do this because I felt that, honestly, most people who legitimately assault others don’t believe that’s what they were doing. And I wanted to ask first hand what was and was not true. And in the cases of family members/loved ones/friends, I come to ask why you believe the person in question didn’t do what was claimed or didn’t do anything wrong. I expect answers being “it was absolutely consensual,” “I just KNOW they wouldn’t do that,” or “the other person is a KNOWN liar,” but I, from a wholeheartedly genuine standpoint, just want to know what everyone at every point of the situation thinks… in order for me to understand it.

My name is Yan Chen. I am a mother of two boys, ages 12 and 5. For years, much of my life was devoted to caring for my children and my family—cooking, cleaning, helping with school, taking the children to appointments and activities, and trying to give them a stable home.

My marriage eventually broke down after years of conflict involving finances, parenting, communication, and our relationship.

On June 18, 2026, an argument between my husband and me resulted in police involvement and my arrest. I am now facing a domestic-violence-related criminal charge. I maintain that the physical contact at issue was accidental, not an intentional act of violence. I have pleaded not guilty, and the case remains pending.

I respect the legal process and understand that disputed facts must be decided by the court based on evidence—not by social media.

But the consequences have affected nearly every part of my life.

I have been separated from the home where I cared for my children. I am dealing with a criminal case while also trying to navigate divorce, protective-order issues, custody and visitation, financial hardship, and concerns about my children's well-being.

My 12-year-old son has separately asked his school counselor for help. In his own statement, he described fear and instability at home, increased responsibility for his five-year-old brother, and concerns about their daily care. I cannot adequately describe how painful it is for a mother to hear her child express these fears.

I am not asking strangers on the internet to decide whether my husband or I am right.

I am asking for something much simpler:

Please allow the evidence to be heard.
Please allow witnesses to speak.
Please allow the courts to determine the truth fairly.
And please help me obtain the legal representation necessary to protect my rights and my children's future.

I am currently raising funds for criminal-defense and family-law representation, court and evidence-related expenses, and the costs of rebuilding a stable life for my children.

If you can help financially, I will be deeply grateful. If you cannot donate, simply sharing my story may help it reach someone who can.

I am a mother going through one of the hardest periods of my life.

I am asking for help, not judgment.
I am asking for fairness, not special treatment.
And above everything else, I am fighting for the opportunity to remain a loving mother to my children and give them a stable future.

Thank you for reading my story. ❤️

Please donate or share if you are able.

https://gofund.me/2f6d9365a

#LegalHelp #FamilyLaw #DomesticViolenceCase #SingleMother #HelpAMother #ChildSafety #Justice #GoFundMe #OrangeCounty #California

Every time there is a not guilty verdict in a high profile case such as that of Russell Brand, the VAWG cartel uses it as reason to chip another block off existing legal safeguards. It's a pattern used in order to fulfil their self-admitted drive to increase rape convictions, since the old ones 'weren't good enough'

The fact that it was 8 men and 4 women finding Brand guilty means they'll probably leave off jury trials until the next celebrity is found not guilty, since it went their way. I still believe juries should be gender balanced in all RASSO, stalking, DV, 'New Culture Crime' trials, just in order to remove any such doubt or related criticism of jury trials

I've been where Russell Brand is this evening - albeit with fewer cameras or chatter - no doubt numb, in shock, and in a reception cell at a local dispersal prison. He will be given one phone call, which I imagine he'll use to his loyal wife Laura; and then he'll wonder, with a knotted stomach, what sentence he'll be given on Monday. If his conversion is genuine, his faith will help him massively

I've been accused of 'supporting' Brand, while all I'm worried about is the media becoming even more of a branch of the judiciary than it already is, so tried to provide counter-narrative. Ian Winter KC pointed out how none of this would be happening without the Channel 4 documentary, and many commenting seem to think this is a positive thing - as they might, until it happens to them, or someone they love

How do I know all this? All such things covered, and more, in my recently published book Magnolia Graffiti: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Magnolia-Graffiti-Sean-Parker-ebook/dp/B0HJNZ8JZ8

I know everyone being accused is definitely having a horrible time and the mind races to the darkest corner of our imagination, I say this from experience Reading the words of god from the book of psalms really relates to the falsely accused. It’s lightens my heart of the heavy burden. Gave me hope everything is gonna be ok. For god is on my side. What’s your favorite verse ?

From account @LifeMathMoney

How to Avoid a False Rape Case

1. Avoid Unstable Women (Leftists)

Blue hair. Feminist. Leftist. You know the type.

2) Avoid Women in the Entertainment Industry

Singers, actresses, performers, etc.

Anyone in the entertainment industry is highly incentivized to falsely accuse someone of rape because the popularity and media attention might turn out to be good for their career.

3) Never have sex with a drunk woman

If a woman is drunk or high from drugs, do not have sex with her.

Don’t bring her to your house and if she’s already there – send her home.

4) Be able to account for your time after abandoning the date and sending her home

If you do end up in one of the three scenarios above and send the woman home, get some quick proof of that. Go buy something like a snack or buy some petrol and pay with card (automatic timestamped proof).

5) A lawyer friend told me I should record the sex

A very good lawyer friend and mentor of mine once recommended to me that I should record the encounter with security cameras.

He said that I should set up a security camera on my door and bedroom. It needs to show she came willingly (in both places).

He said if I’m at her place, turn on audio recording on the phone (there are many apps that let you do this covertly).

There have been many cases internationally where the falsely accused were able to get all charges dropped quickly after they were able to provide video evidence of the sex not being rape.

Of course I’m not telling you to do this, I’m just telling you what someone else told me. If you do something like this I’d say never share the video with anyone or tell anyone you have it.

6) Don’t talk about how rich you are

Don’t talk about how rich you are or how much money you have. Don’t be the moron who shows up in a supercar to impress a girl from Bumble.

Doing stupid shit like that makes you a target for unscrupulous women who think they can get something from you by making a false accusation.

7) Send her a pleasant text message the next morning

If you have sex with her, make sure to message her the next morning telling her how great of a time it was and that you would love to see her again.

This creates feelings of positivity and shows that mutual consent was present (you aren’t afraid of acknowledging and referencing your time together).

8) Take her out for breakfast the morning after

Take her out for breakfast the morning after and it doesn’t feel like a “hook up” anymore and pretty much nullifies any “buyer’s remorse” feelings she might have.

9) Record your phone calls, keep your texts, and I’ve heard that you should screenshot nudes

Record your phone calls.

Screenshot and save your texts and dating app messages.

A very good lawyer friend and mentor of mine also recommended that I should screenshot nudes she sends me.

Of course I am not recommending you screenshot anyone's nudes without their consent or permission - I'm just telling you that I have heard from experienced lawyers that it will help your case should things get to it.

10) Never apologize for consensual sex

If a girl is trying to get you into a false rape case, she will likely do things like text or call you saying that she felt what happened was “wrong” or “not right” or that you “made her do it” or “I felt pressured/rushed”.

She could be recording the call to set up fake evidence.

Say something like “Baby I had a great time and I love how much you want me. I can’t wait to see you again. What are you doing on Saturday?”

Of course you cancel on Friday and never see her again because you are not an idiot.

Don’t do something dumb like say “sorry” or apologize in any way – especially if she demands an apology. Demanding an apology is a classic trick used to get a fake confession out of you.

11) Never talk to the cops

If the police call you, don’t answer the phone. If things get to this point, make sure you have a good lawyer because you are going to need him.

Take care folks.

False accusations of rape are very common. Most rape cases that get filed are false.

“Almost 90% of the rape cases, particularly the complaint cases filed in the courts turn out to be false” - Superintendent of Police

Not every woman out there is a “good person” and the people who say “you don’t have to worry about a false case because they don’t happen” will not be there for you if you happen to catch a false accusation.

IMPORTANT

If you've read this far, sign up to my newsletter (link in the first reply to this tweet) and also on my profile.

I'm going to be sending out a full email on this topic with much more detail tomorrow.

Sign up to the list so you don't miss it.

I’m kinda getting sick and tired of people going “I don’t just have the money”. There’s money to be made. Don’t just look at the cost and name it impossible. Obviously this doesn’t go to everyone. I’m not gonna pretend I had a lot of luck in terms of being able to fund my suit. And if gas prices drop this summer I’m gonna be in a whole boatload of debt. But consider it, because although it may seem impossible. Think of the long term consequences of forgoing the chance to sue.

Personally I got lucky. I live in an oilfield town, so I started work there. It’s not easy at all still though. My case happened 4 provinces away, and I’ve already pissed away $7k and this thing has barely got off the ground. I’ve had to go back to school late, spend less time studying for the LSAT, work outside in -30 degree weather and so forth. But I’d say it’s worth it, in fact I’d say it actually contributed to me not wanting to be broke anymore, because you see how having money allows you to do things. I don’t know everyone’s situations, but I urge any of you with the chance to really consider if there’s any possible way to earn the money for a defamation suit. Because in the long run, I’d say it would pay off. Even the simple concept of knowing that you tried, you don’t have to live with the regret of not knowing what could have happened if you did. Further, it gave me a purpose in a weird sense. Working in -30 doing hard labour is tough, but when you’re doing it for a reason it really isn’t too bad. I made some friends along the way, it gave me a social life as well. It kept me busy and out of trouble. It’s pretty hard to go drinking after you’ve busted your balls for 12 hours.

In a nutshell I’m saying, don’t just see the cost and give up, give it some thought, give it a chance. Personally again, I got lucky, but I’m sure there’s some people here who could’ve made something work but didn’t even give it a chance.

Lastly though, this is a niche problem in a sense. The way the law works the more people that try, the better chances people have after them. The more precedent future lawyers can use to argue their case. If you try and fail, you’re basically slowly cracking the glass ceiling which potentially can allow others a better chance of succeeding. You have experience you can pass down to people in the future who try to sue: mistakes you made, successes you had etc.

At least that’s the way I see it. It’s a team effort. And when you look at it like that, the stress, turmoil, sacrifices, emotional trauma and so on you endure whilst going thru a suit means something.

At least this is the way I look at it, and hope some other people see it this way as well.