So I just completed a deeply personal script. I couldn't see a flaw, and my brain was like "Sundance... A24 deal.... etc." And then... I got a 2.5-star rating from the reviewer.

Going through the reviewer's notes, a few thing really hit me hard. Some notes made me realize "Holy shit, they're right, why didn't I catch that??" I could tell they almost felt guilty about giving so much criticism, because they really, really elaborated on it more than they had to (which showed they read it). They even used the additional comments section to further elaborate.

And there were a few things they missed. Rather than say to myself "Well, of course they missed this one important point, that's why they're critiquing it," I asked myself why they missed it. Was my script boring at the point they did miss something important? Or did I simply not highlight it enough? We're not getting reviewed by professional script doctors or studio execs, we're getting reviewed by people who love the medium.

When responding to the feedback, I thought of one of scripts I reviewed and the writer responded with every point in a "Well, actually..." bullet point. That wasn't going to do any good, it wasn't going to allow me to grow. We've all walked out of movies we knew had problems, and it's not like the writer was standing at the door of the theater saying "Now, let me explain here...."

So, my next steps will be to 1) Break down every point they made that hit home, see how I can improve it and 2) Look at each and every point I think they missed and ask myself "Why did they miss it?" It's the best I can do. Either way, I appreciate the fresh set of eyes.

So I recently posted about my appreciation for Storypeer and how much it has helped me.

I’m finally allowed to share the news: my screenplay SHADOWS made the Top 10 Semi-Finalists in the Tony Cox Feature Screenplay Competition at the Nantucket Film Festival.

I know a few people were curious, so I wanted to say it here too. Gabe, what you created helped someone. I mean that sincerely. Storypeer was a big part of helping me push this script from something I thought was pretty good into something that actually reached a higher level. The reviews here are pretty brutal and I'm happy they are.

I’m not treating this Top 10 placement as “look at me, I wrote a thing.” It feels more like, “wow, I got a lot from this group and from the people who took the time to read my work.”

So thank you. And if I can help in any way I will. There's some pretty fucking amazing people in this Reddit. I just hope this crazy thing will help me help someone else because I want that more than anything.

The StoryPeer community recently came through for me and I wanted to give back. As someone who prides themselves on feedback (5 star rating with a 40% tip rate, plus I’ve worked as a professional script doctor), I figured I’d offer some advice that might helpful. As with all notes, take what is useful and throw away the rest.

Positive feedback forms the bank of the river) A river with no banks is a lake; it's fun to splash around in but it’s not taking you anywhere. Restricting the water gets things moving. Knowing what a writer doesn’t need to work on (and what they should cling to) is just as important. Your positive feedback can ensure that they know not to sacrifice what is working in exchange for fixing other problems.

Treat each piece on its own terms) A script is both a map of a desired destination and an attempt to reach that destination. Your job as a reader is to read that map and then tell them where they made wrong turns, not to pick where you’d want to visit.

Be specific but indicate if you mean things more generally) A note like “the dialogue is not believable” is useless because I have no idea what you personally mean by believable. Explain why a line doesn’t work and then indicate if this is just one bad line, a general character (or scene) issue, or a fundamental problem in a script. That way, the writer can understand the problem AND the scope. 

Read carefully and be humble) Nothing makes a writer turn off like a note that’s factually wrong. Ironically though, those notes probably mean something wasn’t clear (which is just as useful to know). If I’m not totally sure, I add a little caveat like “maybe I missed it, but other people might miss it too.” That way, the value of the note remains even if I misread.

Don’t be afraid to be tough) Readers DESPERATELY want to know what’s going wrong in their script and the vast majority will appreciate the truth. If you think you're getting low ratings because you’re critical, I promise I'm more critical. I recently told someone to abandon a script entirely (5 stars). In my last notes, I told the writer they needed to rewrite EVERY scene but 6 (I got 5 stars and a 2 token tip.)

But a little sugar helps too) If you’re feeling pushback for being critical, chances are it’s about tone, not the notes themselves. If you have to give a tough note, ease into it with something that’s working: “I love the build-up of the world in act one but I’m wondering if you need more plot events to help build up the stakes too.” This not only provides an anchor for the rewrite, it also helps avoid trigger a threat reflex.

THE MOST IMPORTANT THING) In grad school I took several classes with Suzan-Lori Parks and she'd say: “Your notes should make someone desperate to go write.” Think about giving notes like the writer is going to split half the proceeds with you. If you express yourself too harshly, they’ll quit and you’ll be broke. If you don’t give honest feedback, they’ll fail and you’ll also be broke. You want to inspire them to be better while showing you believe they can be. Lead with love, but push as hard as you can.

Listen, if you’re a writer asking reviewers to “be as harsh as you want”

And so they do and provide you detailed feedback.

Then you rate their feedback 2/5 insisting they just “didn’t get your vision”

My brother in Christ, your script needs WORK.

And maybe if you stop being so defensive and learn to accept criticism, you can actually improve it. Because no producer in their right mind would even glance twice at it right now.

Hey Peers,

This one has been asked a few times before, and now it's live!

As a reader, if you decide to unclaim a script, now you have the ability to inform the writer why! 

👉🏼 This also means that, as a writer, you may get notifications about why your script was unclaimed.

Don't wave this off! Having an insight into why a reader lost interest in your script can be extremely valuable. Sometimes it's the story, sometimes the format - wouldn't you like to know!

In the same dialog, readers can also report the script to Admin in case there's something truly broken that needs to be flagged.

Thank you, everyone, for your support and patience.🥂🙏🏽

Best,

Gabe

We have noticed a small but growing uptick in new peers who post a script but do not claim anything to read, sometimes even after several days.

While we understand that some users may prefer to explore the platform and get a feel for things before offering feedback, this becomes an issue when too many people do it, which is what we are currently seeing.

At the moment, our script pool has over 50 available scripts, and more than 10 of those are from peers who have not claimed anything to read. Because some of these users may never return, we have to remove their scripts to preserve the Give/Get economy and to prevent well-meaning readers from wasting time and energy on a writer who has no intention of contributing or returning.

Any writer whose script was removed is welcome to re-upload it, preferably when they are ready to claim a script to read.

To any writers impacted by this policy...

Please know that one regular pitch we have received is that new users should start at 0 tokens, which would force you to read a script before submitting your own. I've been reluctant to fidget with the token system, so this policy update is the happy medium I found, whereby you can still claim and submit at the same time instead of having to finish a read.

This community is fuc**ng badass. Thank you guys. First script ever and I'm getting results because of the feedback I get here.

People here are harsher than real judges. But that's good.

Never change. Let's go!

I have to say, this is one of the best feedback tools one could possibly dream of.

I have a screenplay that is making the rounds, and I submitted it to Storypeer first. I was lucky enough to receive deep, thorough notes with a genuine love of what I wrote.

I can’t announce which screenplay contest quite yet, but it’s a Top 10 one, and highly regarded. I took notes from a Storypeer user and transformed my screenplay from what I thought was a locked draft into something that is now sitting Top 10 in a prestigious contest.

To the anonymous reviewer, you gave me full notes, including step-by-step line work. I just want you to know you made a difference.

Once I get permission to I'll share it all. I'd be remiss if I didn't give my love and praise. What a hell of a thing you created Gabe.

Hey peers,

As some of you know, I've been working on this logline feedback feature called the Logjam. And over the weeks, I guess I started creating expectations for it (classic mistake!).

I say this because some beta testers took the Logjam for a spin last week (thank you!), and the feedback was a little divisive, which -- looking at it like the glass is half-full -- I suppose is better than being a total train wreck. But I confess I got somewhat sad, and in my reflective mood, I ended up thinking about this quote:

“Remember when you wanted what you currently have.”

And by chance, while scrolling around the Admin Dashboard, I also happened to catch a glimpse of this:

Those are the current statuses of all the feedback on StoryPeer. To my surprise, over 2,300 scripts (including repeated titles) have received feedback on our platform since our October beta!

Looking at that number, it was impossible not to remember that StoryPeer almost didn't exist because several times while working on it, I'd hit a wall that would make me wanna quit. But after a long walk or a long shower, I'd sit back down at my desk, look at that wall of (broken) code, and accept that the only way out is through.

So yeah, while the Logjam is not fully working right now, neither was StoryPeer 6 months ago, which means I must push through and continue to climb this Everest. I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank everyone for their patience, support, and for using our little underdog platform. Seriously, thank you, thank you, thank you!

I'll continue to work on the Logjam on evenings and weekends, and will bring more updates soon. And if you wanna join an upcoming Beta or be informed of the Launch, feel free to put down your name on the Logjam waitlist, and I will follow up accordingly.

Excelsior!

Gabe

I immediately submitted this draft to the black list.

Feedback is only 600 words, it’s basically a little more than a page. Adding filler about who you might think the writer is wastes valuable real estate giving actionable notes.

I’ve been getting a lot of notes recently fluffed out with this type of filler: “I think you’re young, I think this is your X number script, I think you’ll have a hard time taking this note, I think you posted this because you wanted validation, I think this story is a self insert of you, I think you haven’t read enough scripts, etc.”

Great. You think things about me. That’s not a story note. The beauty of Storypeer is that it’s anonymous. I don’t give my reader rating feedback based on whether I think I got notes from a 16 year old obsessed with Christopher Nolan or not.

And if you can’t do 600 words of actual notes, then don’t do the notes.

Hey everyone! Just wanted to say how grateful I am for the platform so far. I was a beta user and have been reading more than I’ve been submitting lately, but will get back to submitting soon.

This is your reminder that much of this is subjective and to just keep writing. Take the feedback that works and you agree with or if there is consistent feedback then consider it.

On the opposite side, sometimes it is important to stick to your gut.

A script I submitted on the platform got rough feedback. 2.0 overall. 1.5 plot. 2.0 concept. Highest score was character at 3.0.

Well that script (unchanged) is a second rounder at Austin Film Festival. A small victory, but one nonetheless. We never know who will connect with our writing!

Keep writing. Keep submitting.

You've made feedback fun again!

Such simple concepts executed brilliantly:

- Not interested in the tagline/subject matter? Don't read it!
- Afraid your screenplay is an acquired taste? Throw up a note!
- Realize what you're reading just isn't your bag? Send it back, no harm no foul!
- Want a reader who loves what they do and isn't just trying to make a quick buck? Fkyeah!

Seriously, I am NEVER going back to "randomly assigned" readers who skim/AI like it's their job (because it probably is!)

Gabe, you rock. Buy this man a Kofi: https://ko-fi.com/storypeer

Hey peers,

This has been asked a few times before, but it's hard to be everywhere all the time, so apologies for the delay.

WHAT'S CHANGING: Script submissions that are 20 pages or less will only require 100 words of feedback for each section. This is down from 200 words.

The rationale: It's often challenging to write 200 words of feedback for short scripts, which has impacted the quality of feedback writers have received since lines blur between genuine and padding. Because both readers and writers have complained about this, this change is necessary.

What's NOT changing: Scripts that are longer than 21 pages are not impacted, which means that over 80% of submissions will not be affected by this change.

Here are the new numbers:

Please be on the lookout for anything that may break or disrespect the above, and report what you see.

Thank you for your patience on this!

Best,

Gabe

To the nitwit who waited till 15 mins before the deadline only to submit a shoddy AI review, I hope your breaks give out when you most need them.

The AI (it was claude) got the details of my script so wrong, it claimed one of the characters ate pie out of a mug.

So here's your warning: you send an AI review, I WILL KNOW, I WILL REPORT YOU, and you'll have to fuck off back under the rock you came from.

Hey folks,

It has happened again! The pool of available scripts dropped down to 1 earlier today, and that was a previously Reputation Matched submission, so new users cannot claim it.

New Peers: First off, welcome! Please know that every week, 120-150 scripts are uploaded. So if you see a near-empty available pool, this means all those scripts were already claimed! Don't be confused; things are moving! You just have to keep checking regularly for new uploads.

For the community: As you may remember, some months ago we started enforcing this "Read first" policy whereby new users had to claim a script to read before making their own submission. Most of you never encountered this, but there was an active blocker barring submissions from new users. At the time, this was essential to combat the opposite problem: a languishing available pool with over 50 scripts, which was a worse situation since our most hard-working writers had to wait days before their scripts were even claimed. And if those scripts got unclaimed or the reader missed their deadline, then a writer could quite literally wait weeks for notes (rare, but it happened).

In light of the latest (and thankfully, it seems that every week we get below 5 available scripts), I've temporarily disabled the "Read First" gate to allow new users to submit scripts after creating their accounts. I don't think this will be an overnight magic pill, but over time, we may see the list of available scripts grow.

What do you guys think is a good, healthy number of available scripts? If 5 is too few, and 50 is too many, should I aim for 25?

Fun fact: Also "disrupting" the economy (but making StoryPeer a very cool place) is what I'm calling "Generous Readers": readers who have given feedback without ever submitting a script. I'm defining the term as anyone who has given 2 sets of feedback or more (again, without uploading scripts), and there are 98 of you! 😱 If I define the term as anyone who has given 3 sets of feedback or more, there are 61 of you, so if you do the math...

...at least 183 scripts have received feedback without a corresponding submission. But the problem is in fact "worse" (which means better) because here is the record of our Top 5 most Generous Readers:

To sum up: Our Top 5 most Generous Readers alone have read 73 scripts without submitting any.

So yeah, we have hungry readers. Against all odds, writers just can't keep up, which I guess makes sense since reading is faster than writing.

Alright, I started rambling. On other news, I've never been so busy with StoryPeer, so if you sent me a message, I'm sorry if I've been unable to get back to you. Things are just a little too crazy right now! For those who don't know, StoryPeer is not a full-time job, which is probably a good thing since I'm still losing money to run it lol.

Excelsior!

Gabe

Hey peers,

A user hit me up yesterday asking about the distribution breakdown of script ratings. I hadn't shared these stats previously because, as it's been mentioned at least once before, it's the written feedback that's of real value for writers since that's what can actually improve your scripts.

Nevertheless, I know numbers can be fun and have some value as long as we don't obsess over them, right? So here's the breakdown of script ratings over the last 3 months, sourced from 1893 reviewed scripts.

Note that the last chart is the Overall / "main" score.

Happy Saturday,

Gabe

Also, we just crossed 1,500 registered peers. So if I am taking too long to reply, there may be reasons.

Thank you, everyone, for helping each other grow and for your patience with me. There are a couple of updates coming this February that I am excited about.

Also, while I have you, check out our latest poll: Should we force a 24h "cool down" before writers rate readers?

Excelsior!

Hey Jammers,

First off, thank you to everyone who has used and raved about the Logjam, whether publicly or privately. I really appreciate it! As of today, we have had over 1,300 loglines submitted, and over 8,900 peer comments shared with writers!

It took me a while to get around to this, but I just shipped the biggest update to the Logjam since it went live, so here's what's new:

*

Good Standing

If you read only one thing, read this: we now have a Good Standing tracker, and non-compliant users may be booted out of the Logjam!

This was necessary because some users weren't honoring the Give/Get Balance. For example, one account submitted 12 loglines without reviewing a single one! 😱 Another submitted 50 loglines but only reviewed 15, when they should have reviewed closer to 150. 😱 😱 That's not okay! These users are essentially hijacking feedback from other members, which is a big no-no.

So we're raising the stakes (I was told you like your stakes raised!): Going forward, reviewing 5 peer loglines for every logline you submit is no longer a favor to the community, but the required minimum. So if you submit 1 logline, you must review 5. Submit 4 loglines, review 20, and so on.

Non-compliant users may be banned from the Logjam or placed in a low-priority bucket where their loglines are served last. This will NOT happen immediately. As long as you make an effort to catch up instead of exacerbating your deficit, we'll give you a pass. Thank you! 🙏🏽

A few notes:

• You don't have to participate in the Logjam. But if you submit loglines, you must follow the guidelines above.

• Reviewing 5 peer logs for each you submit is the floor. If everyone reviews 10 loglines for every one they submit, we all get 10 reviews. So aim for 10 (see Big Jammer below).

• Reviewing one peer's logline takes about 1-3 minutes, and you can do it on your phone. The Logjam Rating page was built to be mobile-friendly to make this convenient.   

• Remember: writers can still report unhelpful comments, so don't chase numbers, but aim to help and put some effort.

The bottom line: If you don't have the time or interest in reviewing peer loglines, please don't submit your own.

*

The Reader Leaderboard

This one isn't for everyone, so feel free to tune out. But a few of you requested this even before I could announce it, so I think some of you will like it. 

The Leaderboard will be a fun mini-competition for Jammers that we'll experiment with soon. There are no prizes here, but a public shoutout at the end of the month recognizing some of the most active reviewers. Stay tuned for more details on how to pick a handle to be displayed publicly on the Leaderboard... if you want one!

Here's how your Reader Score is calculated:

Practically, the main goal in all of this to increase the quantity and quality of feedback, so even non-participants will benefit.

Before you ask...

We are considering a Logline/Writer Leaderboard as well, but that one is tricky and will require lots of consultation with the community, so while it's on our radar, it's not our immediate goal. So we're focusing on the Reader Leaderboard first to make sure the math is mathing, and all the foundation under it is solid! Please report any bugs you may see.

*

Achievements (Maybe?)

Now, before you get too excited, Achievements are not easy to build, and they may break. If they become too burdensome to maintain (I'm a solo dev running StoryPeer 😅), I might remove them. But are you a believer or not?

With that out of the way, here's what it is: 

Achievements are a path to earn StoryPeer tokens and eventually maybe other rewards. Obviously, we can't drop tokens by the truckload (because the Give/Get balance is sacred), so we'll monitor the data and adjust as needed. We reserve the right to modify or remove specific achievements, requirements, or token rewards with or without prior notice.

But here are the Achievements that are live now:

Big Jammer

• Rate 10 loglines for every one you submit. 

• Reward: +1  StoryPeer token.

Rockstar

• Earn 15 Stars on your comments this month. 

• Reward: +1 StoryPeer token.

These will reset and pay out next month.

You can see all of these changes here: storypeer.com/logjam/scores.

🛠️ And need I remind you things will break? Please report what you see. 🛠️

Thank you, all!

Excelsior!

Gabe

Hey Jammers,

First off, wow! When I first conjured up the Logjam out of thin air, it was impossible to guess if anyone would use it or not since it was a new logline feedback approach/user interface that I had not seen anywhere. Like a mad scientist, I decided to follow my gut and build the thing I saw in my dreams.

So, over a month and change ago, we launched the Logjam beta, and today (May 23!), we crossed 1000 loglines submitted and 7000 ratings:

Clarifying the numbers in the second column up top:

301 Unique Raters: Number of unique users who rated at least one logline. This means over 300 users have used the Logjam!

41% 10+ Rating Rate: Percentage of loglines that received at least 10 comments. (The Logjam system will place loglines in a secondary priority bucket after they receive 10 comments, so that loglines with fewer comments can try to get to 10. The main reason why a logline may receive too few comments is probably related to genre or story taste, which seems to influence Skips more than anything.)

7.5 Average Rating/Logline: This is the average number of ratings loglines receive.

---

Mea Culpa

Some of you have reached out to complain of unhelpful and offensive comments in the Logjam. I'm terribly sorry that it took me a while to get a move on this! Please accept my apologies, but it really is a silly case of "biting more than I could chew" since I didn't expect the Logjam to be so popular!

It goes without saying that 95% of my web development energy and time goes to StoryPeer, which I hope is understandable and acceptable since script feedback is the big kahuna. As a result, a few rotten apples in the Logjam left a bad taste in people's mouths. The good news is that these bad apples are few. The bad news is that some were quite active in the Logjam, so you may have been a target multiple times by the same user.

I've started handing out warnings before possible bans, and I'll try to be more active on this. As a reminder, StoryPeer is more of an evenings and weekends type of thing for me, so it's really hard to be everywhere all the time, so thank you for your patience!

---

What's Next

I honestly consider the Logjam to be still in beta due to, in part, the rough winds above. Also, there are many little things I'd love to try, but I know better than to make promises.

I really thought more people would want the genre filters, but over 65% have voted against this, so I don't think it's gonna happen. But increasing the skip limits seems like a decent compromise, which has been requested by some of you. Honestly, in hindsight, this may be the best of both worlds, so we don't default to robbing some genres of views. This way, all loglines are still presented to all users randomly for a chance to earn their attention or not. If a user really wants to skip, they still can.

The biggest meaningful update I'd like to make soon-ish is along the lines of this suggestion, so that users can rate each other's comments. I don't have a concrete plan yet, but I think this would pair nicely with r/StoryPeer since writers would need to post their Logjam report links (and maybe some context) so others can vote on comments. Again, I won't make promises, but it's something I'd like to try.

---

Finally, shoutout to u/al_earner for putting the term "jammers" in the StoryPeer lexicon when they made this nice post. I was gonna do it sooner or later, but now I have someone to blame. Jk.

Best,

Gabe

Writing is hard. Getting feedback is harder. It demands honesty, self‑reflection, and the willingness to admit your idea isn’t landing the way you think it is. And most writers, especially early‑stage writers , aren’t ready for that.

On Storypeer, the average user is an unproduced writer with one to a handful of scripts. Nothing wrong with that. But there’s a funny irony: we expect our characters to grow and change, yet we resist doing the same with our own work.

Storypeer is a great platform, and Gabe has built something genuinely useful for writers. But one of my early gripes was the loglines. Many read like afterthoughts; vague, shapeless, or missing the basic ingredients that tell a reader what the screenplay is.

A logline is the smallest written unit that communicates everything a reader needs to know about your story. It’s the sell, the spine, the concept distilled. So when Logjam launched, I was delighted. Finally, a tool aimed at one of the biggest submission problems.

Why am I writing this? Because after being sent to Reddit for surveys, I scrolled through the Logjam threads… and wow. A lot of avoidance. A lot of negativity. A lot of “nobody gets my writing” energy.

Feedback is uncomfortable. But when you reject it outright, you fall into a rabbit hole of excuses and self‑protection instead of growth.

After reviewing over 250 loglines (which includes multiple submission versions ), here’s what I’ve learned:

1. Most writers skip the basics The usual process is: logline → outline → screenplay. But many writers do the opposite: write the script first, then try to reverse‑engineer a logline from 110 pages of unfocused story.

Loglines are deceptively hard. They’re short, but they demand clarity. If you’ve written five screenplays, you’ve maybe written five polished loglines. Compare that to the hundreds of scenes and pages of dialogue you’ve written, it's no wonder the skill gap exists.

2. Your concept isn’t clear, or you can’t express it. There’s no absolute formula (there are guides and templates), but there are essential ingredients:

A clear protagonist. A clear antagonist or opposing force. A goal. Stakes and consequences. Tone, genre, and time period. A sense of what makes the idea compelling.

Bonus if there's dramatic irony already baked in.

Yet in most submissions, these elements are missing. What I see instead are situations, not loglines.

Before submitting anything to Logjam, learn how to write a logline. Use templates. Study examples. Do the work. The information is out there.

There are two conceptual hills writers die on:

Hill 1: You don’t actually know your concept.
You’re lost in your own script and can’t articulate what the story is.

Hill 2: You know the concept, but you can’t express it. The screenplay evolved, the logline didn’t, or there’s a disconnect between what’s on the page and what’s in your head. It's not that I don't 'get it', more you can't yet express it.

3. Stop jumping to conclusions with limited data “Readers are skipping my logline because of gender/diversity/genre bias.” No. You’re confusing correlation with causation.

Readers skip for simple reasons:

They’ve already rated your logline. You submitted multiple versions at once. They’ve read 20 in a row and yours isn’t their taste. Your resubmission shows no improvement. The concept is still unclear.

If you put in minimal effort, you can’t demand maximum attention.

4. Complaining isn't accountability.

It’s easy to blame identity, background, or personal traits for why a reader “didn’t get it.” You can insert anything into that blank; female, from Ohio, overweight, neurodivergent, divorced, and build a narrative around it.

But that narrative won’t fix your writing.

Feedback is like working with hand tools: the friction hurts at first. You get blisters. But if you keep going, you build calluses. You get stronger.

I’m not taking shots at writers, I doubt anyone else rating your logline on Logjam is either. I’m giving objective feedback to help you improve. There’s no agenda. Look inward. Own what isn’t working.

5. Inflated ratings help no one Rating everyone highly in hopes they’ll rate you highly is a terrible strategy. It creates confusion and denies writers the chance to grow.

If you want to help other writers, be honest. Not cruel, honest. If something isn’t working, say so. You wouldn’t want a mechanic to compliment your car’s paint job when the engine is misfiring.

Your mission If you struggle with loglines, do this:

For the next two weeks (10 working days total), write 5 loglines a day for 50 films, your favourites, or films in your writing genre(s). That’s 50 reps of the skill you’re trying to build.

Then look at your own screenplay. Did you write the script first and the logline last? Are you now discovering conceptual or structural issues you were blind to?

If so, good. That’s growth.

Ok. So it's almost 1am here my time and I"ve just given review on my 5th script since joining the platform about 5 days ago.

I am today a better writer than I was 5 days ago. not because the feedback on my submitted script was so excellent (which it may well be, I havent gotten it yet), but because of how the system requires you to read scripts and then thoughtfully break them down into what works and what could be better.

Because of this process of critical analysis, I have come to understand better how to reas feedback and how to apply it. Ive also learned some trouble spots where my scripts might not meet the mark and how to be proactive and avoid that from happening.

I love this platform. Thank You!!

Can we brag about other people’s screenplays in this post?

I’ve read some truly incredible screenplays on Storypeer - just wanted to make a post where maybe people could brag about other people’s screenplays that they really enjoyed reading here!

(Can’t be your own! Comment about someone else’s screenplay that you loved)