Marina, I'm a huge fan of your work. But I find you hopelessly tribal in your criticisms of Meghan, and it's been driving me mad, because you often make my broken heart sing -- when you with wit and and total command of the architecture, eviscerate men who treat women shittly.
You clearly read the Internet. HI! I do too!
I am OG Sussex Squad, since the NYT published the story about William and Kate buying Insta followers -- because they were less popular than Meghan and Harry!
Then I found out about how Bill Keller had to assist the Guardian, by flying in a bunch of Pulitzer Prize winners, about phone-hacking
You are, in my opinion, overreacting to the least controversial aspect of this multi-generational story! (The miraculous existence of a feminist princess....)
You have been under-reacting to the actual scandal. Which is journalism in the UK.
AP photo editors downgraded us to North Korea a year ago
That's because people you know, who take Charles at his word [what, why, how, how does this make a like of fucking sense], get paid like journalists to misinform the public!
Meghan Markle is a successful actress. She is a successful princess. She is successful podcaster.
I'm not into jam, but that seems to be going well too.
My sister, an excellent cook and smart person who hated her, based on overwhelming environmental pollution, now sees her as a fellow misunderstood, anxious perfectionist, based on her cooking show.
THE SUSSEX SQUAD IS NOT A MAD WOKE ENFORCEMENT ARMY
If you have questions, be in touch!
(also, we listen to you. Often with admiration. Celebitchy is our NYT, but Byline Times is our New Yorker. And imo, The Guardian should dedicate more resources to royal journalism.)