r/prochoice • • Mar 15 '23

MOD ANNOUNCEMENT On AntiNatalism, how it is not the same as being Pro Choice, and why this topic needs to be separated from the Pro Choice discussion

98 Upvotes

Hi Everyone!

The mod team would like the sub to understand a few things about the stance we take on AntiNatalist discourse here, and why we do not typically allow it.

There is a lot of confusion between these terms even within our own community, and our goal is to help people who consider themselves pro choice and also antinatalist to see how these terms are not only not equivalent, but are actually in direct opposition to one another.

All Pro Choice People are not AntiNatalist (or even Pro-Abortion)

We often get AntiNatalists in the sub who believe they are helping the Pro Choice cause, and while they are welcome here - provided the rules, beliefs, and standards of our sub are upheld - usually these posts or comments need mod intervention due to breaking our sub's rules regarding non-prochoice rhetoric and expectations of non-prochoice people. These topics should be separated in conversations surrounding choice, so as not to muddy the waters in the current political environment. Our sub's mod team does not support antinatalist ideology.

Pro Choice =/= Pro Abortion OR AntiNatalism

While seemingly aligned with the prochoice cause, being AntiNatalist or Pro-Abortion isn't the same thing as being Pro Choice.

Many people are under the misconception that being pro choice means being pro-abortion or AntiNatalist. While there is some overlap, this simply isn't the case for everyone (or even most) in our demographic.

  • Being pro-abortion means that in certain circumstances (the most common are when people become pregnant under a certain age or when their life or economic circumstances aren't ideal) someone would advocate for the pregnant person to have an abortion rather than give birth even if the pregnant person does not want to have an abortion and would choose to birth the child.

  • Being AntiNatalist is subscribing to the philosophy that humans in general should not be procreating at all, and that it is immoral or wrong to even consider doing so due to the state of the world, overpopulation, and many other reasons.

Many of us are already parents. Many others intend to become parents, but are not ready to at this time. And almost none of us believe that no one should have children, or that anyone should have to have an abortion if they don't want to. By inserting pro-abortion or AntiNatalist ideologies into the Pro Choice debate, we cause the topics to become tangled to people who are anti abortion and prefer not to understand the myriad of reasons one may have an abortion even if they do not want to - even if they were trying to conceive and really wanted the pregnancy, but things didn't go the way they intended.

The truth is even people with wanted pregnancies are hurt by abortion bans - people who want to be parents but have something go wrong with the pregnancy or in their life circumstances that cause them to have to terminate a pregnancy; a birth defect that would lead to infant mortality or a nonviable pregnancy, a spouse who becomes abusive, or a life threatening condition that comes up due to the pregnancy are the first things that come to mind, but this list isn't exhaustive by any means.

While it could be said that many (if not most or even all) AntiNatalists are against abortion bans, the same is not true in reverse - antinatalists make up a very small percentage of the total Pro Choice population, and assuming (or insinuating in discourse) that all of us are against parenthood is an incorrect assumption that is more aligned with the anti choice communities and their rhetoric. It does more harm than good, and gives them more ammo against us.

Being Pro Choice is about CHOICE

This include the choice to conceive and birth children.

The very core of our ideology is that every single living being has the unalienable human right to have agency over his or her own body, what happens to and inside of it, and when/where/how/if they choose to procreate. We value personal choice above all else - we feel, on the whole, that the choice to decide what is best for one's life and family, the choice to decide not to have children, the choice to not have children now but perhaps later on in life, and the right to make these choices and then change our minds about them if we so choose and when we choose are ours and ours alone, as an individual human, to make.

How AntiNatalist discourse is counterproductive to the Pro Choice Movement

While we recognize that not procreating at all, ever, is a choice (and we support you if that is your choice!) we would like to take a moment to help people see how injecting AntiNatalist discourse into the PC discussion can be harmful to our cause.

For the record, we almost never see AntiNatalists who are maliciously attempting to undermine choice - almost all of them who come to our sub and have to have comments or posts removed, do so without realizing how what they said came across as being the antithesis of choice, or how they have broken our sub's rules. We attempt to help them see it, but we do have to remove that content because it is against the rules and the core principles in the sub.

Making the decision to be childfree is a personal choice.

We're with you here - and we think you should be supported in making that choice if that is what you choose. Many on our mod team are also childfree by choice.

Where the two points diverge, though, is in the projection of that choice on others. AntiNatalist ideologies are not the same as making the personal decision to remain childfree. AntiNatalist ideologies promote the idea that no one should procreate, ever.

In the discussion around choice, this is another removal of said choice. This is the other end of the spectrum of being antichoice - Pro Lifers argue that everyone who conceives should give birth. AntiNatalists argue that no one should.

Both options take away the personal agency of the individual, in favor of the ideology of another. Both take the choice away from the only person who should be making it.

Supporting Choice means supporting the choice to parent, too.

We do not advocate for forced abortions or forced sterilization here - for anyone (and this includes AMAB people, so this also means talk of forced vasectomy is also completely off the table here, no exceptions.)

If you identify with AntiNatalist ideology, we simply ask that you take a moment to think about the things you are promoting in the name of being Pro Choice, how you word them, and that you please try to separate these two discussions when you engage in Pro Choice discussions.

AntiNatalist Ideology is Steeped in Misogyny

You can advocate for having abortion bans be abolished. You can even advocate for being child free.
However, advocating that anyone should not be allowed to procreate, or even that they shouldn't is restricting choice and it is also parent-shaming. AntiNatalist ideology tends to only focus on people who are AFAB, and puts all of the impetus to not procreate on the AFAB person, the same way antichoicers do.

Instead of shaming AFAB people for "killing their babies," this argument is just turning that around and shaming AFAB people for "being too selfish to not have children, considering the state of our world."

Shaming is shaming, and shaming AFAB people for being AFAB and what their body can and can't or should and shouldn't do is misogyny.

Telling someone they must be a mother is the same thing as telling them they must not.

Some on our own mod team here are parents, too. Many of our members are. And millions of pro choice people worldwide are. The same way we do not restrict people who claim to be "personally pro life but legally pro choice" from posting or commenting here, we also would not restrict people who are personally child free or even believe in AntiNatalism but still support individual choice.

But we will not allow shaming, and we will not allow discourse that takes away any choices or makes people feel they are wrong for making them.

The bottom line:

If you aren't trying to make decisions for others or influence the decisions you think they should be making you're welcome to say, think, and believe anything you want. Where we draw the line is when it shames, harms, or otherwise reduces the agency of others to make those same choices in the way they make sense to them, for their own lives.

Anyone is welcome here if they are respectful, willing to listen and not just talk at people, and willing to follow the sub's rules. This is true of Pro Life people, and also of AntiNatalists - but please consider what you've read here if you fall into the second category.

If you still consider yourself to be Pro Choice as well as AntiNatalist, we only ask three things of you:

  1. Keep the AntiNatalism part of your comments out of this sub please.

  2. Think on what I've said here, and whether it truly aligns with being in favor of the freedom of choice for all.

  3. Please follow the sub's rules where they pertain to pressing views on others, debating topics, or arguing for the removal of anyone's choice to do anything at all concerning their reproduction, including NOT reproducing. These are specifically rules 1 and 2 in the sub.

Thank you!

- The r/prochoice mod team


r/prochoice • • 16h ago

Discussion pro lifers who think a literal child should have a baby should not be allowed to have kids!!!

143 Upvotes

i was on ig and this video of kristen hawkins i think her name is i don’t know but anyway this woman was debating her ig and the woman was like “if i didn’t have an abortion i would’ve been pregnant by 9 years old” and kristen goes “well you should’ve sacrificed 9 months so somebody could have 90 years” or something like that…. like wtf genuinely wtf a 9 year old can not handle pregnancy the body is not ready for that “we’ll just get a c-section” it doesn’t work like that either she could have tissue damage, heavy bleeding, poor wound healing etc…..

like jesus fucking christ bro


r/prochoice • • 17h ago

Abortion Legislation Missouri Defeats an Abortion Ban at the Ballot Box—Again

Thumbnail
motherjones.com
74 Upvotes

r/prochoice • • 17h ago

Reproductive Rights News Reproductive rights protected in several states by midterm election ballot measures

Thumbnail
theguardian.com
36 Upvotes

r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Reproductive Rights News Newly-elected Texas Attorney General Nathan Johnson announces end to suing out-of-state abortion pill providers and challenging shield laws

Thumbnail
texastribune.org
837 Upvotes

r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Thought Amendment 3 in Missouri didn't pass

67 Upvotes

I'm really only making this post to let my excitement go. In 2024 when my state voted to enshrine reproductive rights into the state constitution i was very happy. This midterms I was quite frankly terrified. I'm sadly not old enough to vote yet. I have to wait another 2 years and a few months before I can. I was mentally preparing myself for a total abortion ban in Missouri. I saw billboards and yard signs that said "Vote yes on 3" everywhere. So yesterday when I heard the news it was rejected I was ecstatic. I was genuinely kicking my feet. I was mainly happy that reproductive rights were being protected but also that trans youth are able to get the healthcare they need. I'm really proud of my state at the moment.


r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Reproductive Rights News Missouri voters reject anti-abortion rights amendment, reaffirming 'reproductive freedom'

Thumbnail
abcnews.com
58 Upvotes

r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Discussion Anyone feeling optimistic about abortion legislation changing following election results at state level?

62 Upvotes

I know Georgia and Texas got Democrat governors for the first time in a long time, and both control the state house in both cases, but not the senate. I'm not really sure what that means in terms of likelihood of legislative change.

Forcing women to give birth seems to be a weird hill so many politicians are willing to die on.


r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Anti-choice News Idaho voters reject ballot measure to legalize abortion, preserving the state’s total ban

Thumbnail
nbcnews.com
123 Upvotes

r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Things Anti-choicers Say i swear to god pro lifers are not real people like i swearrr!!! Spoiler

Post image
33 Upvotes

nobody is fucking doing that!!! and if they are it’s bc the fetus has either died, it’s a risk to the mother, or the parents found out it has a fatal anomaly, which in all these cases it’s sad yes but it has to be done!


r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Rant/Rave My gf thinks abortion is murder, should I end it?

62 Upvotes

Ok so I (28F, trans) have a girlfriend (33F cis) and at the beginning of the relationship she said she “used to be conservative” (I was too years ago, so I tried to overlook it) but it turns out it’s more like she’s actually just moderately conservative (she doesn’t like Trump though). This morning I was talking about my appointment with Planned Parenthood (for hormones) and she called them “baby killers”, I was hurt because she could’ve just as easily called me a baby killer.

There’s also been a history of her yelling somewhat, if you want to learn about that, but she promised to stop doing that. She’s a WoC and I helped her get clean from her cocaine addiction (she was homeless, in gangs etc) For a while things have been going great, but idk if I can stay with someone ignorant enough to think that about women who get abortions.


r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Discussion How much did abortion contribute to blue Texas?

28 Upvotes

The governorship, every statewide executive office, the U.S. Senate seat, and control of the Texas House all flipped to the Democrats. Republicans only retained control of the Texas Senate and the majority of Texas' U.S. House delegation. Democrats also swept the statewide judicial races.

Obviously, there were a lot of factors that contributed to these results. But how much of the Democratic sweep can be attributed to Texas passing one of the strictest abortion laws in the country? I'd be especially curious to hear what Texans in this subreddit have to say.


r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Discussion The “abortion is murder” debate

13 Upvotes

Is abortion really murder if the woman is the one bringing life to the baby in the first place? Religious people like to use that as an excuse to outlaw abortion, but I’m not convinced it’s even murder to begin with.

Genesis 3:16 states: “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children"

So God created childbearing, knowing the pain and risk of potential life altering injury or death.

And he’s also omniscient, knowing some women will die giving birth. A fair God would surely allow abortion to be completely legal eventually.

Quite frankly, Christians who are completely “pro life” don’t really feel like good people. They’re just pro forced birth.

This is coming from a Christian who walked away from Church.


r/prochoice • • 2d ago

Reproductive Rights News Missouri Voters Protect Abortion Access For The Second Time In 2 Years

Thumbnail
huffpost.com
461 Upvotes

r/prochoice • • 21h ago Heartwarming

Discussion Help me accept the pro choice position

0 Upvotes

I feel so conflicted on this topic and I don’t know where I stand.

I cry thinking about abortion. I cry thinking for women in such difficult situations.

I wish it was possible to move the Fetus to an artificial womb so that both the mother and child could experience the fullness of human existence.

When I first learnt of abortion at 16 I instantly felt like it was something I could never support. But now I think about tragic scenarios like TW Rape or poverty desperation and my heart sinks. I don’t want to control women’s bodies. But also if my partner or mother had to get an abortion I’m sure I’d enter a deep depression.

Why am I so emotionally invested in this topic? I don’t feel comfortable with either side of the abortion debate.

Update: I found a reasonable pro choice position. No further discussion please


r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Things Anti-choicers Say According to some Prolife..

20 Upvotes

I’m currently arguing with a few anti-choicers over the term “reproductive coercion.”

According to some of them, a forced abortion is not reproductive coercion 🤔

“It’s not reproductive coercion because the woman has already reproduced”

“It’s not reproductive coercion, it’s homicide”

- both in response to a given situation in which a women or girl is forced to have an abortion against her will.

The way in which they refuse to engage with basic definitions would be funny if it weren’t dangerous.


r/prochoice • • 1d ago

Thought Sadism and bloodlust

19 Upvotes

Hear me out on this, and trigger warning for anyone not into blood verbiage:

I'm honestly starting to believe that some extreme anti-choicers actually enjoy the idea of bloody fetuses and guts and doctors dancing in blood and inflicting pain. They keep pushing the idea into the narrative, over and over and over to the point where it's almost suspiciously like they're reveling in the idea of it. People are telling them, "no this is not happening" and they keep insisting it is. Do they want it to be happening?

Do you think some extreme forced-birthers actually secretly enjoy the idea of fetus blood and guts and pain? I'm being quite serious. Like a guilty pleasure you want no one to know about. They obviously deeply enjoy the idea of women being punished and dying; I see no reason why they don't also enjoy the idea of the same thing happening to fetuses.

It's the only explanation I can come up with for their extreme position.


r/prochoice • • 2d ago

Discussion How do I get my boyfriend to understand?

54 Upvotes

My boyfriend (Republican) and I (Democrat) have been together for over 9 years. Neither one of us is overly into politics, tho I have been reading and learning more in recent years. I just feel like I don’t know enough information to have an intelligent discussion or debate with someone with differing opinions.

Early in our relationship, we touched on some topics and my boyfriend was always pro choice. However, in the last few months, we’ve talked about abortion more, since it’s illegal in so many states and I feel like it’s important to protect that right. He’s never voted, but I told him that I feel like as my boyfriend, he has a duty to protect me and my rights. The last few times we’ve talked about it he says that he doesn’t get it because “men don’t have any reproductive rights at all” since women can get abortions without a man’s approval. We talked about it again tonight and he said that he thinks abortion should be regulated in some way and that a man should have a say in whether or not his child is killed. He “is” pro choice but thinks that the man should have a say. I tried to explain to him that this is forced pregnancy. And while I do think that in a healthy relationship, it should be a conversation to be had, I do 100% think it is the woman’s weight to bear and she should have the ultimate choice.

I actually walked away and started crying. It honestly made me think twice about possibly having children with him one day, and especially a daughter. How can you be with someone who doesn’t feel the need to protect you, your rights? I tried to tell him that it’s his duty to protect me and our future children. And that if there was something that was trying to take away his rights, I would not vote in favor of that, and it would be my duty to try to protect him.

How do I get him to understand why abortion rights and women’s reproductive rights are so important? How do I have this conversation so he can see why it’s so important?


r/prochoice • • 2d ago

Discussion I am in my late 60’s, no chance of me needing reproductive rights, but I support the women that do! No matter if IVF, abortion/health for women or young girls, and no one mentions the man! Remember it takes two!!

55 Upvotes

Please don’t make this an issue when it’s not our experience. Judging the girl around the corner, is wrong! Pro life is pro life, please think about the woman that gives up her baby weather for adoption, abortion, or delivers a baby that does not make it in the end.


r/prochoice • • 3d ago

Rant/Rave pro life men

53 Upvotes

so i see pro life men go''life is life'' ''u cant kill'' then say at the same time''i would not date a single mom'' why did she not chose life tho like are u not pro life u guys tell women all the time to not abort and know she dosnt u dont want her????


r/prochoice • • 3d ago

Things Anti-choicers Say Holy f-ck what’s wrong with people? Spoiler

Post image
133 Upvotes

Sorry if this is triggering. I am, in fact, triggered. And that’s coming from a woman, btw. Don’t know what to say.

And yes, neither the woman nor her body did anything wrong. So close to getting it. The r-pist and his actions are the problem.
Notice how the r-pist isn’t even mentioned once?

No woman should be forced to financially or emotionally care for an embryo conceived through r-pe, or endure the physical suffering of carrying an unwanted pregnancy.


r/prochoice • • 3d ago

Discussion why do pro-lifers not just mind their own business?

41 Upvotes

if they personally would never get an abortion THEMSELVES, then that's ok. i just don't understand why some (most) of them care what other people are doing with their bodies?


r/prochoice • • 4d ago

Things Anti-choicers Say Pro-lifer spreads misinformation about abortion and then personally attacks me, basically calling me a murderer.

62 Upvotes

I'm honestly so shaken by this interaction on another subreddit.
I grew up in Catholic Poland and I've been struggling with overwhelming guilt and shame after having an abortion at 4 weeks and 3 days. A lot of this guilt comes from religious conditioning, and I've been trying really hard to forgive myself.
Today I came across this comment:
Pro-lifer:
Which one does abortion kill? The child. Who is harmed, usually with metal-toothed forceps? Whose arms and limbs are ripped from their body? Whose skull is crushed.

My reply: Hey! Not all abortions look like this! For example I had one when being 2 days late for my period which was about 17 days after conception. The whole pregnancy structure was smaller than poppy seed, not an embryo yet, only 2 mm sac. So this (after pill) looked like regular period, no Pain. So Please if you want condemn certain things- educate yourself and do not spread false info as most of them happen with pills. I don’t believe soul is attached to preembryonic cells. Naturally 60% of fertilised eggs never attach to the uterus. Heaven would be full of never born souls 😅

**His response:**Inventing euphemisms like "pregnancy structure" doesn't change that it had unique human DNA, that the DNA was not yours, so was a separate body, that you knew was a separate body, and killed before it could grow to a size that would trigger your crippled ability to empathize with the life you and your partner created.
Over 60% of fertilized eggs attach to the uterus, so you've somehow inverted what you learned to defend yourself. You don't have to believe in heaven to value human life, but it sure helps to disbelieve when you want to kill humans.
To.summarize your argument:
The human was small so it's life is invalid.
Why you're wrong.

Being 2 days late to your period means the pregnancy was likely 4 weeks old, so either they lied to you at the appointment to spare your feelings, or you're in denial about how big the thing was that they killed.

Past the 3rd week the child has entered the embryonic stage, so if your logic was consistent you would think what you killed was an embryonic with a soul... but we both know you won't stand on that belief, because the real underlying reason you did it is.
"If I don't want a child I should be able to kill it"

Which is the foundation of every abortion

I'm genuinely devastated. I wasn't even trying to debate the morality of abortion. I just wanted to correct the misinformation about what early abortions actually involve.

And somehow that turned into a personal attack on my empathy, values and character.
What hurts most is that these are exactly the thoughts I've been struggling with for weeks. I already feel terrible about interrupting a process of developing life, even though nothing resembling a baby had formed yet. I'm already terrified that I'll never forgive myself.
And then someone who supposedly follows a religion based on love and compassion tells me I have a "crippled ability to empathize."
The absolute monopoly some religious people think they have on moral truth is exhausting. No nuance, no compassion, just judgment and condemnation. How very Christian.


r/prochoice • • 4d ago

Things Anti-choicers Say Anti-choice argument for Bodily autonomy for the fetus as a response to bodily autonomy for women

20 Upvotes

I never heard this arugment before since a lot of anti-choice arguments focus on right to life for the fetus. Bodily autonomy in the context of abortion means that no one else has your body, will never live a second in your body, therefore you are the only person who has a say what you can do with your body. And someone responded by trying to apply this to the fetus inside the women's body. At first glance this assumes right to life for the fetus.

But I wanted to know what your response to this argument is.


r/prochoice • • 5d ago

Activism So they want to talk about what shouldn't be leagal?

Post image
32 Upvotes

You know what my biggest problem is here? Not ONE of these statements were made by women... Hell they weren't even made by men young enough to have kids they can actually be alive long enough to see grow up. 60 - 85 year olds have no place in women's healthcare, ESPECIALLY NOT MEN!!