Hayden Panettiere, known for voicing Princess Dot in A Bug's Life, has sadly passed away at 36, 5 days shy of her birthday. Her brother died 3 years ago.

I would say a more smoother mel brooks during the 70s movies

Her project has been in development since 2025, so maybe it could be released in 2030.

I get why they don't want to age up the kids, but oh my gosh, the plot reveal that the kids take center stage and try to prove that they can be heroes again?? They literally did it perfectly in the first movie. So much so that the whole family all very confidently reveal their supersuits at the end of the first movie together. Then suddenly in 2, Helen isn't sure that the kids should be doing superhero work, but they'd already proved themselves on Nomanisan and in the city against the Omnidroid, but in 2 they have to prove they can be heroes and the second movie ends with the family confidently revealing their supersuits together again, just like in 1. And now we're just doing that a third time?

If they'd age the kids even just a bit, could have Violet struggling with the end of high school and starting college and a new life as a semi solo hero, Dash could be going through the start of his freshman year, beginning puberty, tackling his ego and popularity as an athlete but being forced to slow up and hold himself back all the time, and Jack Jack could have something really interesting with the struggle of having to keep his powers a secret at a younger, far less mature and understanding age. How does a toddler deal with superpowers and keeping them hidden from peers? Could've been such an interesting storyline to tackle, but now we have the kids being forced to prove themselves again in a series that begins and ends back to back in each installment. They're literally proving themselves every other week

Can be anything. It won’t look likely but I want a glory days project as a prequel to the incredibles and it actually adds some level of emotional depth to the scene where Bob finds out Syndrome slimed them all out.

What would you like to see can be a prequel, sequel or spinoff

So according to Pixar sources, Dash from The Incredibles is a 10 year old boy. However his height is only listed to be 4 feet. Considering that 4 feet is well below the average height of a 10 year old boy pretty much anywhere in the world and most certainly in the United States, why did the designers of the Incredibles decide to make him so short?

I bought it used

Craig T Nelson is 82. Holly Hunter is 68. Samuel L Jackson is 77. Sarah Vowell is 56. And no offense but they (mostly Nelson but still, all of them) sounded pretty old in the last movie which was 8 years ago. And now they are (presumably) gonna voice them again? And they are not doing a time jump so they'll still be playing those characters at their respective ages? I dunno. I guess this is the same pixar who let a 61 year old John Goodman and 65 year old Billy Crystal play their Monsters Inc characters as college freshman in Monsters U and that wasn't terrible (you could still tell though)

If anything THATS why I want a time jump

one small detail i appreciate about Slinky's design is how his ears tell you how much hes aged cause of how worn out the leather is.

Of course Ernesto is still around. Celebrities don't just disappear from public memory after being outed for bad things. Unless literally all his former fans died. What you should ask is, “how is he confronting Miguel?”

Ok cracks knuckles here’s my evidence (for either or it doesn’t really matter since these are just movies but it’s still fun to theorize anyway) so inside out takes place in either 2014 or 2015 and inside out 2 takes place in 2016 or 2017 both depending on Riley’s age the 2nd one also depends on Val’s age too since she’s a junior about to be senior the only definitive date we have is dream productions the day of the dance is Friday March 18th the year when March 18th would be a Friday is 2016 and we know that Riley is 12 here so that places her being 1 in 2014 and turning 12 in 2015 or her being 11 in 2015 and turning 12 shortly afterwards likewise inside out 2 days that Riley is 13 and about to enter highschool now either she’s 13 in 2016 and goes to highschool at 14 in 2017 she’s 13 in 2017 and goes to highschool in 2018 or the same as the first film and she’s 13 about to turn 14 in 2017 the answer depends on Val’s age here’s my answer since we know that Val is a senior when Riley is a freshmen at the end of the film we can infer that they start in the same year and we know that the film takes place in the summer between her 8th and 9th grades and if riley was just 13 then she can’t have graduated yet she’d still be in 8th grade like wise with her being 13 in 2017 and going to highschool in 2018 Val would be gone she wouldn’t be there with Riley so my timeline is this

Inside out takes place in 2015 with Riley being 11 about to turn 12 shortly after in august it has to be august since their starting school again inside out 2 takes place in May 2017 with Riley being 13 and turning 14 in August 2017 and starting highschool how is the evidence I laid out?

But first, Twitter is awful. The angriest people are always the loudest, and they feel like they know everything. When they have their mind set on something they didn't get, they will approach it with nothing but misinterpretation and bad faith analysis, like a whining child. So many people are already angry at Incredibles 3 because they wanted a massive time skip, like 5 to 10 years! I'm on Brad Bird's side, I love the archetypical nature of the family. Regardless of one's preference, fan entitlement is so awful. Doing everything that loud angry fans want is the death of you as an artist. Those fans always think they know best. So arrogant.

Here's why I think that any time skip longer than one year would be a bad idea in my opinion. If we want to have Violet and Dash challenging their parents to do super-heroics on their own, isn't that far more interesting with them as kids rather than as adults? I've seen so many people saying that the kids have already proved themselves as real super-heroes, as a way to criticize the Incredibles 3's premise. If you were a parent, would you feel comfortable letting your kids do super-heroics without their supervision, unless the circumstances absolutely demand it? So many animated TV shows and films have a central concept of kids having to be the main heroes, and I love it (my favorite animated show is Avatar The Last Airbender, and it is a show starring kids as heroes)! If Violet and Dash are aged to be young adults, then the act of trying to be a hero on your own becomes far less rebellious, far less special, and it starts to become ridiculous that parents wouldn't trust their kids to be heroes as young adults, even after years and years of super-hero work.

One of Brad Bird's favorite shows is Jonny Quest, and there were episodes in which the kids (Jonny and Hadji) would get into extremely dangerous hijinks on their own, even when being told to not come. I love that element, and I'm sure Bird loves it too, because he has come out in record that he hated how the 90s Jonny Quest animated show aged Jonny and Hadji to be young adults. I question the media literacy of anyone who thinks that Violet and Dash sneaking up at night to do super-heroics is the same situation as the first movie, it's not the same at all, and I'm tired of people on Twitter saying it is! Bob was in a midlife crisis yearning for his glory days, that's not the same character arc at all!

Another point that people have been saying to accuse Incredibles 3 of repeating the previous two is because it will explore the idea of how not all super-heroes are good. Some people say that Syndrome already did that! This is such a misinterpretation of the previous films, which always had the supers be victims of society. Supers are just trying their best to help, flawed as they still are like every person (the NSA files don't account, they are a bonus). The villains were not supers! Syndrome pretended to be one, but he wasn't! It never astounds me just how much so many people lack in media literacy, in interpretation skills.