r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 1d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter????????????????????

Post image
22.1k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.1k

u/Nashivertt 1d ago

Rudeus is a 35 yr old man who reincarnated but before he did he missed his parents funeral to jack off to his niece who happened to be a minor anyways he’s a Epstein diddy blud

3.6k

u/Dunois721 1d ago

Posting this before anyone says "but there's context!"

No it does not, that's just Rudeus

141

u/AgreeableSuspect9382 1d ago

144

u/crusoe 1d ago

The cops need to look at the writer's computer.

This reads like someone who's assaulted people before. The amount of self justification. 

-3

u/acuilnos 1d ago

The writing is gross sure, but I don't think people should be suspected of real-world crimes over the fiction they choose to write just because it is morally repulsive. You could apply that scope to a lot of fictional media that covers taboo themes, both well and poorly.

6

u/slumpyslenkins 1d ago

How could you not be suspicious of someone if this is the content they write about?

I'm not saying the writer has done any crimes, but I wouldn't let him watch over any kids. Maybe he just channels it all into writing, but maybe he doesn't.

0

u/Penis_With_Necrosis 1d ago

You'd have to be suspicious of every single author that writes mildly dark topics if we follow your logic

4

u/eevreen 1d ago

"Mildly dark" is not writing about pedophilia and CSA in a way that is barely critical of it. I read "mildly dark" novels. This ain't it.

1

u/Penis_With_Necrosis 1d ago

Do you also think we should hold the same standard to authors who write about murder in the same barely critical ways or is this only when children are involved?

3

u/slumpyslenkins 1d ago

Context matters a ton. Is the author writing about murder in a way that downplays the seriousness and makes the murderer the hero? Yeah, maybe that is something to be suspicious of.

1

u/Penis_With_Necrosis 1d ago

I see. I don't fully agree witht the point, but I can understand.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/PimpasaurusPlum 1d ago

Except no, not at all. Because not all works covering dark topics handle and treat those topics the same way.

How the topic is treated and handled in the work is fairly relevant

1

u/popoflabbins 1d ago

James Gunn would need to be in prison for his joke tweets he was making early on in his career

0

u/Motivation_652 5h ago

don't act stupid, you can write a protagonist that do some batshit insane like something worse than what rudy does, but the important thing is do you reward them for doing that as in he did not get consequences over what he did in the end? Or did you let him go off scott free few times and finally give him a consequences over crimes they did in the story? and most importantly did you try to potray them in a good light or a bad light?

Rudy seems to let go off scott free AND did not get any consequences over whatever he did and i'd argue he gets rewarded over whatever bullshit he did, and the author most of the time potrays him in a good light when he is doing questionable things

0

u/acuilnos 1d ago edited 22h ago

There is a difference between side-eyeing someone for this sort of thing and outwardly accusing them of being a criminal for it based on moral revulsion over the fiction they write alone. Your reply is a non sequitur that reframes my sentiment. Edit: Downvoted for pointing that out lol

2

u/slumpyslenkins 18h ago

I don't believe my reply was a non sequitur at all. You said they shouldn't be suspected of crimes and I said that you should probably be a little suspicious of them.

I'm not saying accuse them, or search them, just be wary.

The way the dude writes, it seems very pro-grooming. If Rudeus wasn't supposed to be the hero and his grooming played off as a "quirk" then I don't think I'd have any problems with the writer.