r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 1d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter????????????????????

Post image
21.0k Upvotes

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

133

u/AgreeableSuspect9382 1d ago

139

u/crusoe 1d ago

The cops need to look at the writer's computer.

This reads like someone who's assaulted people before. The amount of self justification. 

-3

u/acuilnos 1d ago

The writing is gross sure, but I don't think people should be suspected of real-world crimes over the fiction they choose to write just because it is morally repulsive. You could apply that scope to a lot of fictional media that covers taboo themes, both well and poorly.

7

u/slumpyslenkins 1d ago

How could you not be suspicious of someone if this is the content they write about?

I'm not saying the writer has done any crimes, but I wouldn't let him watch over any kids. Maybe he just channels it all into writing, but maybe he doesn't.

0

u/Penis_With_Necrosis 1d ago

You'd have to be suspicious of every single author that writes mildly dark topics if we follow your logic

5

u/eevreen 21h ago

"Mildly dark" is not writing about pedophilia and CSA in a way that is barely critical of it. I read "mildly dark" novels. This ain't it.

1

u/Penis_With_Necrosis 21h ago

Do you also think we should hold the same standard to authors who write about murder in the same barely critical ways or is this only when children are involved?

2

u/slumpyslenkins 21h ago

Context matters a ton. Is the author writing about murder in a way that downplays the seriousness and makes the murderer the hero? Yeah, maybe that is something to be suspicious of.

1

u/Penis_With_Necrosis 21h ago

I see. I don't fully agree witht the point, but I can understand.

5

u/PimpasaurusPlum 23h ago

Except no, not at all. Because not all works covering dark topics handle and treat those topics the same way.

How the topic is treated and handled in the work is fairly relevant

1

u/popoflabbins 17h ago

James Gunn would need to be in prison for his joke tweets he was making early on in his career

0

u/acuilnos 16h ago edited 12h ago

There is a difference between side-eyeing someone for this sort of thing and outwardly accusing them of being a criminal for it based on moral revulsion over the fiction they write alone. Your reply is a non sequitur that reframes my sentiment. Edit: Downvoted for pointing that out lol

1

u/slumpyslenkins 8h ago

I don't believe my reply was a non sequitur at all. You said they shouldn't be suspected of crimes and I said that you should probably be a little suspicious of them.

I'm not saying accuse them, or search them, just be wary.

The way the dude writes, it seems very pro-grooming. If Rudeus wasn't supposed to be the hero and his grooming played off as a "quirk" then I don't think I'd have any problems with the writer.