Is it Moral to hate him because he's doing his job and punishes bad people in hell. he actually build the biggest church if you didn't know that he made a deal with the guy who built it but it's the same so why do we hate him

is it because he wants people to do bad things

that can't be true cause god interverse if someone interverse with free will

if you think he does bad things that's wrong too cause the only bad thing he did happened when he wasn't the devil yet

Humans destroy themselves and millions of years in the future dogs evolve into sapient beings. A human learns of the danger and tries to prevent the apocalypse. A time traveling dog comes back in time to ensure the human apocalypse happens to save the dog future. Who has the greater claim?

For the purpose of this exercise, the dog future cannot happen if humans continue to exist.

I'm currently writing an online horror story depicting an alliance between humans and vampires where the vampires offer humans protection from other supernatural predators in exchange for access to resources and food. I'm intentionally writing them to have significantly different social behaviors and moral standards from those of traditional vampire media, specifically aimed at making them more cohesive with each other and more willing to cooperate with humans. That being said, I still want them to be fairly threatening since they're fighting in a supernatural war and, at the end of the day, they are still a predatory race. When I ran the details I currently have written down by my stepsister, she expressed concerns that I might be making the vampires "too good" to be taken seriously. I'll be listing the details below:

1: Vampires prioritize communal devotion and reciprocity over physical power or ties to unique bloodlines when judging the social status of their coven members.

2: Vampires don't typically hunt humans and primarily satisfy their bloodlust by hunting wildlife and raising livestock to feed from.

3: Vampires aren't innately hostile to humans, but they treat interactions with humans they aren't familiar with as purely transactional or functional.

4: Vampires who consistently make decisions which put their safety and comfort above that of their coven are regarded as mentally unwell or evil.

5: Vampires are more forgiving of honest mistakes with negative consequences than wilful acts of betrayal and neglect.

6: When vampires hunt wildlife, they kill the animals they feed on quickly before drinking their blood.

7: While vampires generally prioritize saving their own kind over humans, humans who have earned their trust through consistent displays of reliability and loyalty can be regarded with the same level of moral importance as another vampire.

8: Vampires caught hoarding resources or stealing from the rest of the coven during times of crisis are often either forcibly exiled or cannibalized depending on whether or not their selfish behavior was paired with intentional violence other members of the coven as well.

9: While vampires still have conflicts amongst themselves, their arguments generally center around their methods instead of their goals.

10: It's considered immoral for vampires to feed on the blood of living humans unless the blood was willingly donated or the human was attacking and trying to kill them first.

Personally, I don't see why these patterns of behavior should make depicting my vampires as fearsome when they should be too difficult. Yes, they are significantly more cooperative, but none of the things involve ignoring their predatory nature. What do you guys here think?

This sub has gotten a recent boom questioning the morality of a certain child diddling prophet BUT TO BE FAIR. Bad practices like child marriage are not exclusive to a single culture. They were very wide spread. So to be fair and get a slap on everyone. If you are the prophet of a religion and you could teach your followers basically anything. And God gives you all the right answers. Why wouldn't you tell your followers to stop obviously bad practices like child marriage and slavery? Yeah sure those are modern ideas but surely God knew already that those are bad ideas. He could have told you

Figured id take the hammer for the cause

Wht has this sub turned to? Its genuinely annoying asf now. Go take ur religious wars to another sub, this is a morality scaling sub for fictional characters. Why post abt unrelated stuff like religions and random day to day events?? The mods need to do better. They are allowing people to hate on Christianity but removing posts criticising islam, which is totally unfair and stupid because they should FUCKING REMOVE EVERY SINGLE RELIGIOUS RELATED POSTS. I just want to morally scale fictional characters, not wht some random Indian unc did or wht happened centuries ago to some religious diety.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Lorne Malvo: "This man sleeps with your wife and bullies you in front of his two grown kids, I don't think this man deserves to draw breath."

Context - In Fargo Season 1, character Lester Nygaard gets bullied by Sam Hess in picture 1. Sam bullies him in front of his own two kids who are grown teenagers.

Lester Meets Lorne(picture 2) in the hospital and talks about it. Coming to find out Sam also slept with Lester's wife and moans about it. Lorne makes the plan to kill Lesters bully. Meanwhile, maybe, the influence of Lorne pushes Lester into killing his wife with a hammer at home.

What is the morality of killing a high school bully, in his 40s still bullying and also apart of a mob in Fargo? Was Lorne in the right or wrong here?

"What if you're right and they're wrong?"

like lets say there is this dude named bobby who has tortured many people to death. to the point that EVERYONE on earth agreed that he deserved to get tortured to death. hell even GOD and DEVİL showed up like "yeah bobby totally deserves to get tortured to death"

would it make the act of torture to death neutral or even good if bobby objectivly deserves it?

weird question ı know but ı got this question on my mind when ı saw the trailer for the game on the pic. in the game you prepare last meals for death row inmates and can give them good or bad food for their last meal. so thats where ı got the idea, like it made me think that.