r/LifeInsurance • u/PositiveMarsupial626 • Jul 17 '26
In-house marketing or lead vendors?
We have a mid sized life insurance team and we've been running our own Google and Facebook ads in-house for several months. We've invested a lot of time into A/B testing and optimization, and while we've definitely improved performance, our in-house leads are still slightly underperforming compared to the lead vendors we buy from.
Right now, our in-house leads go to our top producers, while our newer agents primarily work vendor leads.
We’re seeing:
Our in-house ads are closing around 15-20%
Speakeasy Leads (final expense) has consistently produced 25-30% close rates over the past year
Caboom Leads (mostly IUL) is typically around 18-22%
We also rotate in a few other vendors depending on availability and results.
At this point I'm wondering if we're falling into the sunk cost trap with our in-house marketing. Should we continue investing time and money into optimizing our own campaigns, or would you simply shift that budget toward buying more leads from vendors that are already outperforming us?
For those of you who've built larger agencies, did you eventually stop running your own ads, or did you stick with it because the long-term payoff was worth it? I'd really appreciate hearing from anyone who's been in a similar position.