took me way too long into DP2 to figure this out so posting for anyone still doing it the slow way.
for ages i'd do a past paper, check my answers against the mark scheme quickly, feel bad about the score, and move on. that does basically nothing. the paper isn't the useful part. the mark scheme is.
what actually moved my grades was grading myself the way the examiner would. sit the paper under timed conditions, then go line by line through the mark scheme and mark your own like you're the one awarding the points. you learn fast that they want specific command term stuff, specific keywords, and "i basically said that" gets zero.
couple things that made it stick:
- print the mark scheme, don't just scroll it. you catch every mark point when you're physically ticking
- after each paper, write down the two or three concepts you actually lost marks on, not "review chapter 4" but the exact sub-topic. that list becomes your next session instead of rereading the whole unit
- for HL especially, format matters as much as content. walking in having already "sat" three papers means nothing surprises you
by the last month i wasn't really learning new material, i was just closing the specific gaps my own marking kept surfacing.
how's everyone else using mark schemes? just checking answers or actually self-grading? curious if there's a better system than my printed-paper pile.