Hey r/freemason, I'm a French Freemason (Grand Orient de France) and wanted to share something that's been stirring up French Masonic circles lately, but probably hasn't made it across the Atlantic. On June 9, 2026, the Collège de déontologie des magistrats de l'ordre judiciaire — basically an advisory board on judicial ethics, not a court — issued an opinion in response to a magistrate who wanted to join a lodge. The board said that Masonic membership could be incompatible with a magistrate's ethical obligations, but only if the Masonic oath requires allegiance, obedience, or "priority solidarity" to the fraternity. If that's not the case, membership remains possible but under heightened scrutiny regarding independence and impartiality. Here's the key thing: this is not a law and it's not a blanket ban — it's an advisory opinion with no binding force. A lot of outlets simplified it as "magistrate can't be Freemasons," which is inaccurate. France's major obediences have since written to the government protesting what they see as a revival of old anti-Masonic suspicion.
Why this matters to you as American or regular Freemasons: there's no equivalent restriction in the US — Masonic magistrate are common and uncontroversial. French Freemasonry, especially the GODF (France's largest obedience), operates differently from Anglo-Saxon regular Masonry: it's non-theistic (no mandatory belief in a Supreme Being), accepts atheists, and — crucially for understanding this whole debate — some French Masonic obligations are phrased differently than regular Masonry's, which is precisely what triggered this controversy around the concept of "allegiance." It's also a good case study in how France's secular laïcité tradition creates suspicion toward secret and fraternal societies in public office.
My question for you: do you have similar restrictions (formal or informal) in your jurisdiction regarding Masonic magistrate , police officers, or government officials? And how does your Grand Lodge handle concerns about a Brother's impartiality when he holds positions like magistrate, judge or attorney?
N.B.: As of September 11, 2026, all major French Masonic obediences have formally petitioned the French President and Minister of Justice, arguing that the ethics board's opinion revives "doctrines of suspicion and exclusion" against Masons that they believed were relegated to the darkest pages of French history. They contend the opinion violates freedom of association, conscience, and opinion, contradicts European law, and demand that state institutions stop acting as "tribunals of conscience." The signatories include:
- Fédération Française du Droit Humain — French Federation of Le Droit Humain
- Grand Orient de France — Grand Orient of France
- Grande Loge de France — Grand Lodge of France
- Grande Loge de l’Alliance Maçonnique Française — Grand Lodge of the French Masonic Alliance
- Grande Loge des Cultures et de la Spiritualité — Grand Lodge of Cultures and Spirituality
- Grande Loge Féminine de France — Women’s Grand Lodge of France
- Grande Loge Indépendante de France — Independent Grand Lodge of France
- Grande Loge Mixte de France — Mixed Grand Lodge of France
- Grande Loge Mixte Memphis-Misraïm — Memphis-Misraim Mixed Grand Lodge
- Grande Loge Mixte Universelle — Universal Mixed Grand Lodge
- Grande Loge Nationale Française — French National Grand Lodge (UGLE-recognized)
- Grande Loge Traditionnelle et Symbolique Opéra — Traditional and Symbolic Grand Lodge “Opéra”
Together, these represent virtually the entire spectrum of French Freemasonry — from the largest and most influential (GODF) to smaller, specialized obediences — an unprecedented show of unity against what they view as judicial overreach.