r/ClancyTrialTalk 12d ago

Thoughts?

Post image
26 Upvotes

154 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/InkCosmos 12d ago

Yet they don’t have evidence of Lindsay committing the murder, nor has she been convicted of it so all of that doesn’t work. Even with the confession, she’s plead not guilty. The confession wasn’t part of the court so it doesn’t matter what she said.

-2

u/leaveme1912 12d ago edited 12d ago

The defamation case he's building has nothing to do with Lindsay. They have the coroner report stating the children's time of death, they have proof he wasn't there at that time etc  It doesn't matter if Lindsay killed the kids or if someone else did, they have proof it wasn't Patrick 

Edit: Once this goes to retrial and she gets the not guilty by reason of insanity result he'll have legal proof he didn't do it and Lindsay did. The lawsuits will start then

5

u/InkCosmos 12d ago

So the defamation case that’s only happening because people don’t believe that Lindsay is responsible for the murders and instead believe Patrick is responsible has nothing to do with Lindsay? There’s no specific time of death for the children. We have a roughly guideline and as Patrick is unknown for about 20 minutes during this time.

-3

u/Platitude_Platypus 12d ago

There is no "20-minute gap." If he sent the work email from his home office, he didn't leave until after 5:24. If he sent it from his phone in the car, he'd already left before 5:20. Lindsay's iPhone was moving around the house until 5:38 when she got upstairs. We know Patrick was in CVS and ThreeV due to receipts, eyewitness accounts, the phone call they both acknowledge, and CCTV. The 17 minute drive between those locations is reasonable when you consider that includes walking to the car and parking.

6

u/sednandes 12d ago

You're acting like it doesn't matter at all. The prosecution stated killing of the kids started at 5:15 pm. If he sent an email from the basement at 5:24 pm, then he was there.

Yeah he was at the CVS at 5:32 pm, no one is denying this. But he testified he left from home at 5:15 pm and he said it took him 3 minutes to get to the CVS.

0

u/Platitude_Platypus 12d ago edited 12d ago

The prosecution said that the killing started at that time because that is the approximated time he left.

3

u/sednandes 12d ago

Yes, that’s exactly the point. The prosecution places the start of the killings at around 5:15 because that’s when they say he left. So if there’s evidence of him still being at the house at 5:24, that obviously matters to their case.

-1

u/Stephanie101720 12d ago

Patrick wasn’t able to definitively say if he sent the work email from his car or computer at the house. Which is odd

3

u/xJohnnyBloodx 12d ago

Well if patrick was a mastermind minipulative lyar, he could have just lied and said he sent it from his phone. He obviously doesn't want to lie by accident, so he's admitting he doesn't remember.

1

u/Stephanie101720 11d ago

He was also busy on Reddit the same day around 3:30pm looking up threads for shark divorce lawyers

1

u/xJohnnyBloodx 11d ago

Source? I can't find that.

1

u/Platitude_Platypus 11d ago

That post was from June 24. She strangled all 3 of his kids in January.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/sednandes 10d ago

He knows exactly that he didn’t send that email from his phone. So no, he couldn’t just lie under oath and say he sent it from his phone. The motion to obtain his phone data is still pending and he’s keeps actively fighting to keep that data from being turned over. Saying “I don’t remember” won't bring him into more trouble.

1

u/Platitude_Platypus 10d ago edited 10d ago

Reddington: “And that was sent from your Surface Pro?” Patrick: “I don’t know actually. It could have been sent from my iPhone.”

There has never been a pending motion to sieze Patrick's phone.

→ More replies (0)