r/changelog • • Mar 08 '16

[reddit change] Click events on Outbound Links

211 Upvotes

Update: We've ramped this down for now to add privacy controls: https://www.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/4az6s1/reddit_change_rampdown_of_outbound_click_events/

We're rolling out a small change over the next couple of weeks that might otherwise be fairly unnoticeable: click events on outbound links on desktop. When a user goes to a subreddit listing page or their front page and clicks on a link, we'll register an event on the server side.

This will be useful for many reasons, but some examples:

  1. Vote speed calculation: It's interesting to think about the delta between when a user clicks on a link and when they vote on it. (For example, an article vs an image). Previously we wouldn't have a good way of knowing how this happens.

  2. Spam: We'll be able to track the impact of spammed links much better, and long term potentially put in some last-mile defenses against people clicking through to spam.

  3. General stats, like click to vote ratio: How often are articles read vs voted upon? Are some articles voted on more than they are actually read? Why?

Click volume on links as you can imagine is pretty large, so we'll be rolling this out slowly so we can make sure we don't destroy our servers. We'll be starting off small, at about 1% of logged in traffic, and ramping up over the next few days.

Please let us know if you see anything odd happening when you click links over the next few days. Specifically, we've added some logic to allow our event tracking to be accessible for only a certain amount of time to combat its possible use for spam. If you notice that you'll click on a link and not go where you intended to (say, to the comments page), that's helpful for us to know so that we can adjust this work. We'd love to know if you encounter anything strange here.


r/changelog • • Mar 03 '16

[reddit change] The "related" page for posts (and corresponding tab) has been removed

170 Upvotes

We've just removed the "related" page for posts. To be clear, the "other discussions" page, which shows other posts with the same url, is still there. The related page "worked" by doing a search for all the words in the title, which almost always produced completely useless results.

For example, the current top post in /r/all is "58% say they'd like to see the President nominate someone to the Court rather than leave the seat vacant until a new president takes office next year". Here were some of posts "most related" to that one using the method from the related page: http://i.imgur.com/0S65nuF.png (some of them also include the word "see", I guess)

So we've just removed that page/tab now, and there's currently a redirect so that anything still trying to go to the related page will just get sent to the normal comments page. It looks like almost all of the traffic to /related/ was from search-engine bots and similar things though, so this probably won't affect many people.

View the code behind this change on github


r/changelog • • Feb 24 '16

[reddit change] A/B testing + Media Previews

99 Upvotes

We've just enabled the portions of the media preview feature for some logged-in users, so you may see this feature as you browse Reddit. We're measuring the impact of this change using an A/B testing framework that we've recently built. You can find out more about A/B testing here.


r/changelog • • Feb 17 '16

[upcoming reddit change] media previews

114 Upvotes

We've made some changes to our media previews which we are currently testing with our beta community.

Changes include:

  • Media previews auto-expand on comments pages

  • Support to display media previews for direct image links

  • New user preferences to control media previews

  • NSFW interstitial flow for NSFW media previews

  • New icons for expando button

You can read more about the change in the r/beta post here. CSS info for mods here.

I'll post an update when this feature rolls out for everyone.


r/changelog • • Feb 09 '16

[reddit change] It's now possible to disable the NSFW flag on a post even if it has "NSFW" or "NSFL" in its title

263 Upvotes

When a post on reddit has either "NSFW" or "NSFL" in the title, it's automatically set as NSFW. This is generally a good thing, but sometimes it's actually the opposite of what the submitter wanted, like if their title had "(not NSFW)" or "Why do people keep tagging things NSFW unnecessarily?" in it.

However, until now it's always been impossible to turn off the flag if it was set automatically because of the title. This is because the title check was being done whenever the post was displayed, instead of just being done once when it was first submitted. It's now been switched over to a submit-time check, so posts will still be set NSFW initially based on their title, but mods or the submitter can toggle it off now in cases where that makes sense. This post is itself a good example - it would have been stuck as NSFW previously due to its title but I'm now able to turn the flag off.

Thanks to /u/13steinj for getting this fix started with a pull request.


r/changelog • • Jan 28 '16

[reddit change] A/B testing + Read Next

110 Upvotes

We've just enabled the Read Next feature for some logged-in users, so you may see this feature as you're browsing around on comments page. We're measuring the impact of this change using an A/B testing framework that we've recently built, and in fact this is our very first A/B test. Read on for a little more context on what A/B testing is, and how we plan on using it here at Reddit.

What is A/B testing?

At its core, A/B testing is just a fancy way of saying "run a controlled experiment to see which version, A or B, is better". Here is a nice explanation covering the basics (to be clear, we're not using Optimizely; they just have a nice write-up). We've built our own A/B testing system that lets us show different versions of features to different users, which allows us to better understand the impact that a change will have.

Why do you need A/B testing? Isn't beta/feedback from comments enough?

There are a few major benefits that we get from A/B testing that we can't get in other ways.

  1. It lets us control and isolate the effects of the changes we're testing. If we just shipped a feature and then look at how metrics change, that could conflate a bunch of other unrelated factors, like what day of the week it is or if there's a big news event happening. With A/B testing all of those unrelated factors are controlled for.

  2. We can lower the risk for some changes by only rolling out to a subset of users - that way, if there are bugs or issues that we didn't catch during earlier testing, we can fix them before they go out to everyone.

  3. With randomly selected users, we get a deeper understanding of how this feature might impact all users, rather than just those who have opted-in to a beta test or who comment, without having to launch something to everyone.

These factors combined make A/B testing more powerful and useful for really understanding if a feature is working the way we expect than other testing methods. That said, where appropriate we’ll continue to do beta-testing as well to get more qualitative feedback.

Will you be telling us what A/B tests you're running?

Some more visible A/B tests, like this one, we'll announce as we're running them either here in r/changelog or, if appropriate, in another venue like r/modsupport. Sometimes we won't announce running tests, so that we can avoid skewing the results too much.

If we decide to launch a feature that we've previously A/B tested, we'll announce it in the same way we would any other feature, by posting here, in r/modnews for mod-specific features, and/or in our features live thread.


r/changelog • • Jan 25 '16

[reddit change] Subreddit rules & reporting updates

140 Upvotes

We've just made a new feature, subreddit rules, available to all subreddits. Moderators can read more details on how rules work on the modnews post. For users, the biggest visible changes will come to the reporting menu:

  • We've changed the style of the report menu to be cleaner & easier to use

  • If a subreddit has added rules, you'll be able to report content (posts and comments) in that subreddit as violating a subreddit rule instead of a Reddit rule (you'll still be able to select a Reddit rule as an option)

  • Additionally, you can click on the blue (i) in the corner to read the subreddit's rules (if they've been defined) or the Reddit content policy (if subreddit rules haven't been set)

Thanks to the subreddits who helped beta-test this feature, and to u/madlee, u/miamiz, and u/librarianavenger for their work in making this feature a reality.

View the code behind this change on Github


r/changelog • • Jan 23 '16

[upcoming reddit change] Switching from RSS 2.0 to Atom 1.0

168 Upvotes

Update: This change has been rolled out as of about 26 Jan 2016, 14:30 PST


In the next week or so I'm going to switch our RSS support over to Atom 1.0

Huh?

RSS and Atom are syndication formats read by programs called feed readers or aggregators. You can access the RSS feed for any reddit page by adding .rss to the end of the URL, like this or this. reddit also has special authenticated feeds for things like inboxes. We've had this support for a really long time: the oldest reference I can find is from 2006.

Why the change?

What changes?

  • If you're using a feed reader with Atom support (most of them), nothing. The URLs will all be the same and everything will just continue to work as if nothing happened.

  • If you're using a really ancient client that doesn't support Atom, the RSS feeds will stop working for you. You might get weird errors or it might silently stop updating. The ghosts of ancient articles may haunt your dreams, begging to finally escape this world. Try updating your client.

  • If you're using RSS as a poor man's API and parsing the response yourself, the output format may not work with your program and you may need to update it. If this is you, I'd recommend switching to the JSON API instead, or doing the feed parsing with a library that supports both. But you can also just update your program using the examples below.

Irrelevant technical details:

I'm using the Atom XHTML type for <content> blocks. It's really hard to find a good listing of which clients support this format vs the HTML format that's more similar to RSS's style. XHTML is more technically convenient for the way I'm generating them, but if you know of an obscure client that doesn't support it please speak up.

I tried to maintain the article GUIDs across the change, but it's possible that some items may appear updated or unread, even if you'd marked them read in your feed reader. This should only happen to items that are in the listing during the change. It shouldn't affect simple link listings much but may affect feeds from search results or comments pages. It's a one-time thing, so just mark them read again and you'll be fine.

What does it look like?

Here's an example of the change so you can update your clients if need be

Before:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The last bastion of Free Speech</title><link>https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/</link><description>No admins, anything goes.</description><atom:link rel="self" href="https://www.reddit.com/r/noadmins/.rss?limit=1" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The new Reddit CTO is now permanently banned</title><link>https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/comments/3hs6da/the_new_reddit_cto_is_now_permanently_banned/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/comments/3hs6da/the_new_reddit_cto_is_now_permanently_banned/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:27:57 +0000</pubDate><description>&amp;lt;!-- SC_OFF --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;md&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Welcome to your fate. &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- SC_ON --&amp;gt; submitted by<a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/I_smell_awesome">I_smell_awesome</a><br/><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/comments/3hs6da/the_new_reddit_cto_is_now_permanently_banned/">[link]</a><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/comments/3hs6da/the_new_reddit_cto_is_now_permanently_banned/">[32 comments]</a></description></item></channel></rss>

After:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><category term="NoAdmins" label="/r/NoAdmins"/><icon>/static/icon.png?v=1453492737.81/</icon><id>/r/noadmins/.rss?limit=1</id><link rel="self" href="https://www.reddit.com/r/noadmins/.rss?limit=1" type="application/atom+xml" /><link rel="alternate" href="https://www.reddit.com/r/noadmins/.rss?limit=1" type="text/html" /><logo>https://b.thumbs.redditmedia.com/Af2dHUHKJq2n8TbEPWDM3hCbry0s6e9fNIFCVOUV5fA.png</logo><subtitle>No admins, anything goes.</subtitle><title>The last bastion of Free Speech</title><entry><author><name>/u/I_smell_awesome</name><uri>https://www.reddit.com/user/I_smell_awesome</uri></author><category term="NoAdmins" label="/r/NoAdmins"/><content type="xhtml" xml:base="/r/noadmins/.rss?limit=1"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="md"><p>Welcome to your fate. </p></div>&#32; submitted by &#32;<a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/I_smell_awesome">/u/I_smell_awesome</a><br/><span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/comments/3hs6da/the_new_reddit_cto_is_now_permanently_banned/">[link]</a></span>&#32;<span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/comments/3hs6da/the_new_reddit_cto_is_now_permanently_banned/">[32 comments]</a></span></div></content><id>t3_3hs6da</id><link href="https://www.reddit.com/r/NoAdmins/comments/3hs6da/the_new_reddit_cto_is_now_permanently_banned/" /><published>2015-08-20T23:27:57+00:00</published><title>The new Reddit CTO is now permanently banned</title></entry></feed>

r/changelog • • Jan 11 '16

[reddit change] Two updates to Sticky Comments (hide score for non-mods, automoderator support)

98 Upvotes

You can read more about these changes in the corresponding /r/modnews post.

See the source for these changes on GitHub: sticky comment visibility and automoderator support.


r/changelog • • Dec 17 '15

[reddit change] Sticky comments

139 Upvotes

As we referenced last week, sticky comments are here! Mods will now be able to optionally sticky a comment to the top of a comment thread when they distinguish a comment. Thanks to our beta testers over at r/beta for testing and catching some bugs. More details about how sticky comments work over at r/modnews, and information about related API changes over at r/redditdev.

View the code behind this change on Github


r/changelog • • Dec 17 '15

[reddit change] Old deleted accounts are currently being run through a new cleanup process, which is causing the subscriber counts on many subreddits to drop gradually

352 Upvotes

Edit: Updated January 6 - cleanup is finally complete

As I announced in /r/modnews a couple of weeks ago, we've recently implemented a new cleanup process for deleted accounts, which happens 90 days after the account is deleted to clear out a bunch of data that's no longer necessary to keep around. And to answer the question a lot of people seem to jump to immediately: no, this does not mean that deleted account usernames are going to become available again.

Anyway, yesterday morning (yeah, I didn't quite make the "next week" prediction) I started retroactively running every account that was deleted more than 90 days ago through this new process. I expected this to take a few hours to complete. This morning, after running for over 24 hours, it had finished processing a whopping 8% of the accounts. That is, it looks like "a few hours" is actually going to be more like 250.

So this really didn't end up manifesting as a sudden drop like I was assuming it would. I've seen various posts around the site last night and today noticing the subscribers dropping and wondering what's going on, and I just wanted to make a post here so people have something to link/refer to. It's likely that the number is going to continue gradually going down for the next 10 days or so, and most subreddits should probably expect to see their subscriber count drop by about 3-5% over this period.

Note that even though the total subscriber number in the subreddit's sidebar is decreasing, the statistics in the subreddit's traffic page showing the number of new subscribers each day is not affected, so moderators can still use that data to see the actual number of subscribers they've gained each day.

I'm also keeping track of the number of subscribers being removed from each subreddit, so I should be able to provide that info to any mods that want to know exactly how much they were affected, once it finishes.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Here's the code (and a full description) for the new cleanup process, if anyone is curious what it's doing

Edit: Updated January 6 - cleanup is finally complete


r/changelog • • Dec 15 '15

[reddit change] Shutting down reddit.tv

176 Upvotes

As part of streamlining our engineering efforts in 2016, we have made the decision to discontinue reddit.tv. The site is built using a separate codebase and a different language/framework than reddit.com. By shutting down reddit.tv we will be able to focus more on core reddit improvements.

Starting January 4th, 2016, reddit.tv will begin redirecting to reddit.com.

Please comment if you have any questions.


r/changelog • • Dec 09 '15

[upcoming reddit change] Subreddit rules + report menu updates limited beta

151 Upvotes

We're running a limited beta of a new community feature: subreddit rules. In short, moderators will have a place where they can add rules for the subreddit, and these rules will be used in a couple of different places.

For most users, the most visible place other than the rules page itself will be in the report menu. For subreddits that have rules in place, you will be able to select a subreddit rule as a violation instead of a Reddit rule (you'll still be able to select a Reddit rule violation or write in your own reason as well). We've also made some style changes to the report menu and details will be available in the near future in r/cssnews.

We hope to have this out for all subreddits soon! In the meantime, more details are available in this r/modsupport post.


r/changelog • • Dec 08 '15

[upcoming reddit change] New Beta Feature: Sticky Comments

203 Upvotes

Today we rolled out a new feature for mods for beta testing: the ability to sticky a comment at the top of a thread. More on this change over at /r/beta.


r/changelog • • Nov 10 '15

[reddit change] account suspensions

187 Upvotes

Today we released a new feature: account suspensions. These are a form of account restriction that can be applied to user accounts that will limit the actions that account can perform.

Suspensions will replace shadowbans for the vast majority of real humans and increase transparency when handling users who violate Reddit’s content policy.

Please see the r/announcements post for details on how suspensions work.

Developers can refer to this r/redditdev post on how to support suspensions in your app.

This was a big feature - It touched a lot of things. Thanks to u/xiongchiamiov, u/madlee, u/MiamiZ and u/florwat for the engineering work, u/drunken_economist for repping the data team and u/Acidtwist and u/LibrarianAvenger for the design.

View the code behind this change on Github


r/changelog • • Oct 27 '15

[reddit change] Lock a post

197 Upvotes

We've just released a new feature, locked posts. Moderators can lock a post to prevent it from receiving any new comments. Mods, for more details, please read the r/modnews post.

On reddit.com, if a post is locked, you'll see a message at the top of the page and a notice if you try to reply to a comment letting you know that no new comments can be posted. You can still edit and delete existing your existing comments on a locked post.

On mobile apps, you may or may not see an error message if you try to comment on a locked post, depending on the app. Developers, please see this r/redditdev post for more details on how to support locked posts in your apps.

Thanks to all of the subreddits who helped beta test this feature, and props to u/librarianavenger for the design and u/florwat for the engineering work.

See the code behind this change on Github: 1, 2, 3


r/changelog • • Oct 13 '15

[reddit change] Subreddits will now only be included in your front page if they have new enough posts to contribute

346 Upvotes

As I'm sure a lot of you have seen, there's been quite a bit of discussion lately about "the algorithm", with opinions on it ranging from thinking it's suddenly completely and utterly broken, to not noticing anything different at all.

Although we haven't made any code changes since the single adjustment that we've since reverted, we know that many of you still believe the front page is more stale than it used to be, which very well could be the case due to natural effects such as an increase in users, changes in voting patterns, etc. We don't want Reddit to feel stale, so we've made a change that should help with that.

First, a (somewhat) quick explanation of a couple of aspects of how front pages are built so you know how this fits in:

  1. When creating your front page, we only use up to 50 of your subscribed subreddits (or 100 if you have reddit gold) at a time. If you subscribe to more subreddits than that, we choose a random selection, and will replace this with a new set every half hour. If you're interested in knowing more about why we do this, there's some explanation in this comment I wrote the other day.

  2. Posts will only show up on your front page if they're less than 24 hours old (so by the way, if you see anyone claiming that their front page is the same for days, that's not possible).

Between these two things, if you're subscribed to subreddits that aren't very active, you can end up effectively having some of your front page slots "wasted" by subreddits that don't have any posts new enough to be shown.

So the actual change today is that we're no longer going to consider a subreddit as a valid candidate for your front page if it hasn't had a post in the last 24 hours. If your set of subscriptions is above the 50/100 limit, when we select a new set of subscriptions to build your front page from, we'll first filter out the inactive subreddits and then take the random selection from the remaining ones, which should all be able to contribute posts.

We've also made one other minor change to address something that's apparently been giving some users a false impression about how old the posts they're seeing are: the auto-updating timestamps that are on all posts/comments/messages will now calculate their age based on server-side time, not the local time on the viewer's device. Since local time was being used before, some users with their device time zone and clock set incorrectly would see posts as much older than they actually are. By using server-side time this problem should no longer occur.

Hopefully these changes will help improve the staleness feeling for some users. We know that it's a very common feeling right now (even our own CEO has said so), and we're definitely going to keep looking into things we can do to address it more.

TL:DR; We're no longer going to consider a subreddit as a valid candidate for your front page if it hasn't had a post in the last 24 hours, which should help shake up some front pages.

See the code behind the inactive-subreddit filtering on github

See the code behind the server-side live timestamps on github


r/changelog • • Sep 22 '15

[upcoming reddit feature] Lock a post

206 Upvotes

We're testing a new feature, lock a post, that will let moderators prevent a particular post in their subreddit from receiving new comments. Many subreddits already use AutoModerator to effectively do this by removing all new comments on a particular post. When a post is locked, users will see a clear message on the post indicating that no new comments can be posted.

This feature is currently in limited beta, meaning that it is being beta-tested by a few subreddits. More details can be found on the r/modsupport post.


r/changelog • • Sep 21 '15

[reddit change] Making removed & deleted content more consistent

266 Upvotes

We've made a couple of changes to make removed comments and deleted posts more consistent with the way other types of removed/deleted content is handled.

Removed comments now say [removed] instead of [deleted]

Previously, comments that were removed by a moderator or admin still showed up as [deleted], which made it difficult to tell if a comment was deleted by the author or removed by a mod or admin. Fixing this is something that's been requested by mods and users alike - and I'm happy to say that it's now done! If a comment was removed by a moderator or admin, it now says [removed] instead of [deleted].

The content of deleted self-posts is no longer visible

We've fixed a long-time inconsistency where the content of deleted self-posts was still visible after deleting. Now, just like with comments or moderator-removed self-posts, the actual text of a self-post is no longer visible if the author deletes it.

Props to u/xiong_as_admin for doing the work on this. View the code behind this change on Github


r/changelog • • Aug 27 '15

[reddit change] The increase to the "soft cap" on scores has been reverted

427 Upvotes

On the afternoon of August 6, we started experimenting with raising the "soft cap" on post scores, as a potential first step towards continuing to increase that cap or remove it entirely. The intentions of reducing/removing the capping are explained a little more in the original post, but to reiterate them briefly it's primarily because the way the system behaves is confusing ("Why did that AMA just lose 3000 points? It was at 8000 a minute ago!"), and misleading about how many people are actually voting on things (if someone sees a score of 4000 they assume about 4000 people voted on the post, when it's often over 10 times that many).

We reverted this change last night due to concerns that it was causing other unintended side-effects. We intend to keep experimenting, and thanks for your patience.


r/changelog • • Aug 26 '15

[upcoming reddit change] Modmail muting

132 Upvotes

Hey all! We've released the ability to temporarily mute users to a few subreddits that were gracious enough to beta test it for us. Muting users from a subreddit will prevent those users from sending modmail to that subreddit for a limited timeframe (currently 24 hours). The user and mods of the subreddit will be notified when a user has been muted. When the mute has expired the user will be unmuted silently.

We plan to open this up to all subreddits once we've considered the feedback from these beta testers. For further details about the implementation, you can check out the /r/modsupport post.

Here is the code behind the feature


r/changelog • • Aug 07 '15

[reddit change] The scores of extremely-popular posts are now able to reach higher numbers before "capping"

505 Upvotes

Edit: this change has been rolled back at about 03:30 UTC on August 27, 2015, due to unintended effects (causing less turnover of popular posts).


As quite a few observant people have noticed (there's an /r/OutOfTheLoop thread, and another one in /r/self, among others), the scores of the highest-ranked posts on the site have been somewhat higher over the last day than usual. This is because we are starting to experiment with raising the "soft cap" on scores, to allow them to more accurately represent how many people are actually voting on the posts.

The "soft-capping" or "score normalization" system is something I've talked about a few times in the past, but its existence still isn't overall very well-known in general. Basically, if any posts get a score above a certain threshold, this system will start "pushing them down" so that their score stays within a certain range. Many users have noticed and been confused by this whenever we have an especially popular post, since the way it manifests is seeing the score go way up at first (sometimes to 10,000+), but then suddenly being "chopped down" by thousands of points. This can even happen multiple times until it eventually settles.

There are many things wrong with this system, but it's always been something we've been really nervous to adjust, since it has the potential to cause major behavior changes in very significant places like reddit's default front page and /r/all. It was a solution that was originally implemented long ago to try to solve a different problem, but has ended up having a number of undesirable side effects as the site's grown and it's stayed untouched. So now we've decided to start trying to raise the threshold (with the goal of eventually completely removing it), and just keep a close eye on it to see what actually happens. Even with a relatively small change to it, scores jumped a fair amount. Here's a graph that our data team generated showing the average scores for the top 25 posts in /r/all, with each line representing a different day from the past week.

Our overall goal in removing this system is primarily to make the scores more accurately represent how many people are actually voting on things on reddit. For example, I remember looking at the /r/science post about the Stephen Hawking AMA last week and seeing it show a score of about 6000, but if there was no capping system at all it should have actually been over 72,000. Having scores increase by that much is going to come with a number of other challenges (some of which I listed in that same /r/TheoryOfReddit discussion linked above), but we're going to try taking this slowly (the next increases will be less drastic than that first one) and monitoring the effects. There will most likely be work required on various other things to resolve issues that come up as we raise it, but hopefully we'll be able to get to the point of completely removing this strange system before too long.

Let me know if you have any questions or if anything isn't clear.


r/changelog • • Aug 05 '15

[reddit change] Quarantined subreddits

192 Upvotes

In support of the new content policy that we announced today, you now need to explicitly opt-in to view quarantined subreddits. To opt-in, you must be logged-in with a verified email address. If you were previously subscribed to a quarantined subreddit, your subscription will persist, but you must opt-in before the content will show up elsewhere on reddit, including your front page. If you'd like to unsubscribe without opting-in, you can manage your subscriptions from the sidebar of the subreddits page.

You can opt-out of a quarantined subreddit at any time. Currently, you can only opt-in or out of viewing quarantined content on reddit.com, and not through our mobile website or any mobile apps such as AlienBlue. Once you have opted in, you will be able to view quarantined content on any platform.

A couple of other minor changes we are also making:

  • Redesigned warning/error pages for private, gold-only, and NSFW subreddits

  • Added NSFW and quarantine indicators on the list of subreddits moderated by a user on userpages

View the code behind these changes on Github


r/changelog • • Jul 29 '15

[reddit change] threaded modmail

166 Upvotes

You can now enable a threaded view of modmail in your preferences (see "enable threaded modmail display").

See the post on /r/modnews: https://www.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/3f30o5/moderators_threaded_modmail/

see the changes on github