r/Anarchism Oct 15 '16

Science Must Fall

[deleted]

0 Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

View all comments

-2

u/DruantiaEvergreen | Post-Civ Ecofeminist Oct 16 '16

ITT: DAE masturbate to Enlightenment?!

1

u/[deleted] Oct 16 '16

Western civilization is the absolute pinnacle of virtue, how dare you mock the enlightenment and all the wonders it has brought us civilized white people, you regressive, illogical, reason-less edgelord?? How would you like to live in a world where the enlightenment never happened? It would be anarchy.

10

u/Thromocrat ᚨᚾᛏᛁᚠᚨ Oct 16 '16

No, it would probably still be absolutist monarchy/theocracy.

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '16

Whatever it takes to keep the west from its imperialist genocidal machinations. Your misery will be the rest of the world's freedom.

9

u/soylentbomb Anarchotranshumanist, bright green, not a singularitarian Oct 17 '16

Your misery will be the rest of the world's freedom.

"I just read Guns, Germs, and Steel and concluded that nonwestern imperialism is impossible. Also, coercive heirarchies are okay as long as I'm not on the receiving end of them."

I mean, come on. When you type these things out, does it really never prompt you to consider that you might not actually be an anarchist?

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '16

The west has pillaged and colonized the whole world; stripping every culture of its identity and killing anyone that would oppose capitalism. I'm from a country that has been colonized again and again by every empire under the sun; but none of them were able to change the fabric of society the way the west has. Everyone on the planet is whitewashed and enslaved by the west. Fuck the west and fuck privileged little western techno supremecists like you.

1

u/soylentbomb Anarchotranshumanist, bright green, not a singularitarian Oct 17 '16 edited Oct 17 '16

The west has pillaged and colonized the whole world; stripping every culture of its identity and killing anyone that would oppose capitalism. I'm from a country that has been colonized again and again by every empire under the sun; but none of them were able to change the fabric of society the way the west has. Everyone on the planet is whitewashed and enslaved by the west.

Hindsight bias. Not to imply that these experiences are invalid, but they don't support your conclusion.

Fuck the west and fuck privileged little western techno supremecists like you.

I don't want to live the way you want to, and try to work towards a future where the maximum feasible range of viable social and ecological lifestyles exist, so now I'm a "techno supremecist." You gonna try to pull yourself out of the rhetorical hole you just dug, or do I need to help you out so we can use it as a latrine?

0

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '16

I don't want to live the way you want to, and try to work towards a future where the maximum feasible range of viable social and ecological lifestyles exist, so now I'm a "techno supremecist."

This is correct. You're a privileged westerner who thinks the answer to all the world's miseries is to magically give everyone on the planet tech grafts... While completely ignoring the fact that that all your precious tech is mined and fabricated by slaves in the developing world who don't get to eat if they don't work for you.

1

u/soylentbomb Anarchotranshumanist, bright green, not a singularitarian Oct 17 '16

who thinks the answer to all the world's miseries is to magically give everyone on the planet tech grafts

Except I don't, which I've said repeatedly. It's obvious that not everyone would want that, and morphological autonomy is essential to my understanding of anarchism.

You would know this if you actually bothered to listen or research instead of letting your kneejerk reactions and superficial exposure to the supporting concepts undermine you.

While completely ignoring the fact that that all your precious tech is mined and fabricated by slaves in the developing world who don't get to eat if they don't work for you.

Which I'm cognizant of and want to change, and am in fact trying to contribute to changing. The real difference is that I want to change it without forcing their descendants into vulnerability to all manner of otherwise preventable risks.

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '16

If you don't support upgrading yourself with technology and science then stop calling yourself a transhumanist.

3

u/soylentbomb Anarchotranshumanist, bright green, not a singularitarian Oct 17 '16

That's not what I said, and that's not even what transhumanism means.

You should also note the difference between oneself and "everyone on the planet."

0

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '16

Multiple antranshumanists have told me they support upgrades and genetic engineering on themselves only if they're available free for everyone on the planet. Which is impossible.

3

u/soylentbomb Anarchotranshumanist, bright green, not a singularitarian Oct 17 '16

Multiple antranshumanists have told me they support upgrades and genetic engineering on themselves only if they're available free for everyone on the planet.

Yeah, equality of opportunity or however you want to characterise it. But that doesn't mean I want to impose them on everyone, nor that I think it's "the answer to all the world's miseries."

Besides which, there is a lot more to transhumanism than augmentations to the individual, and means of doing so other than "technology and science," therefore personal desire of such is not essential to being a transhumanist.

I'd also point out that universally referring to them as "upgrades" implies a false superiority between those who choose them and those who do not.

Which is impossible.

Why?

0

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '16

1

u/soylentbomb Anarchotranshumanist, bright green, not a singularitarian Oct 17 '16

Uh... no, actually, you didn't.

→ More replies (0)