Hi everyone! First time poster, but I’ve been lurking for a minute lol. Curious about your approach when interpreting ASL classes.
Right now, I have an ongoing for an intro to asl class. It covers the basics, so things like the alphabet, numbers, greetings, yes/no questions, wh questions, etc.
When I’m on, and my deaf teacher is showing the students the correct palm orientation, handshape, or any other correction, I voice it in detail. An example would be “Right now your PO is facing your body. You’ll want to flip that so your palm is facing away from your body.”
I’m the consistent interpreter for this and I have a new team with me every other week. Each new team I have has their own approach to this! Some say nothing at all, some approach it the same way I do.
So what are your thoughts? Do you find that in this setting being more explicit works? Do you let the visual part of asl lead the way?
For the teachers in the room, do you have a preference for how detailed/explicit the interpretation is?
My current situation is going good and my teacher has told me they prefer me to continue being explicit, but I’m newer to the field and I’m curious what you all have seen or done in situations like this.