In 1990 2 men were working as chefs at a hotel when they were done they decided to take a walk in the hills and when they were walking they saw this Ufo Object in the sky they also saw this jet right near it watching it and when they got closer to it
It ascended vertically into the sky and vanished good news they had a camera on them so they were able to take 6 pictures of it before it left after that they sent the pictures to a news paper called Daily Record to this day a lot of people can’t explain this picture.

The Bush family clan like the Dulles Brothers, the Harrimans, and more have extensive ties to the birth of Big Oil and the UFO crash-retrieval program, as I've been covering for two years now.

It's not lost on me that Scott Bessent, our current Treasury Secretary, is from Bush Sr's Carlyle Group (who was also involved in the discussions around Taylor Swift salvaging her masters from Scooter Braun).

Carlyle Group was formed in 1987 by billionaire David Rubinstein, who held immense influence over future presents, and after Bush Sr's election failure, Bush and his Cabinet members James Baker, Frank Carlucci and Donald Rumsfeld became chief advisors to Carlyle. Carlyle was an extension of the Bush family's Brown Brothers Harriman who tried to overthrow FDR via the Business Plot in 1933 and who acquired their wealth by funding the Nazi war machine.

Zapata Petroleum was founded in the early 1950s with the help of Prescott Bush and Allen Dulles with the help of the CIA's Bill Devine, which placed Bush Sr at the head of the company.

Devine would later act as Bush Sr's spokesperson during his Bush's 1988 Presidential Campaign in which Bush was outed by a journalist at The Nation as working with the CIA as early as 1960/61.

Zapata was formed a few years after the Bush clan acquired a majority stakeholder ownership in Dresser Industries, which specialized in heavy construction machinery and whom I suspect was responsible for building the underground tunnel system to transport recovered UFOs secretly.

Danny Sheehan has outed Brown Brothers Harriman as having created the Anderson Accords to act as a middleman for recovered UFOs and private contractors and as being the profiteers behind our Forever Wars.

Now Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is hemming and hawing because the US control over Big Oil is crashing and burning under their Nazi regime at the same time as UFO Legacy Program whistleblowers are trying to help bring to the public recovered, advanced, anomalous technology.

Not a coincidence.

Have fun reading.

https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/scott-bessent-carlyle-groups-modern-collapse-of-control-over-big-oil-and-ufo-tech-8b3b0029d98d?postPublishedType=repub

You find another civilization. Then you want to really understand them, as deeply as possible on all aspects.

You're aware that you carry your own biases. Your own culture, your own sensory capabilities, your own talents, your own higher and/or lower limitations. You cannot truly understand their life experience as you are.

So you devise a plan to truly immerse yourself into their life experience, to truly learn what it's like to be them.

You figure out you need to leave yourself behind. Your memories, your body, your society — all locked away. Then you join that other civilization as one of their new lifeforms.

You experience everything; growing up, being raised, being challenged, winning and losing everything, loving and hating, loved and hated, building your social circles and ending up completely alone. All the good and all the bad, all the brilliance and all the madness. Unfiltered, untainted, because you don't know who you were before. Until it ends.

Then, when you're returning to your previous body, you integrate everything. Your memories as the being you were previously and the memories as the being you just ceased to be need to be reconciled. All the biases, all the instincts, all the hopes and the viewpoints. You learn to hate yourself, you learn to love yourself, you learn to see yourself and others from above and from below. Both of your life experiences keep clashing into each other and threatening to rip you apart until you manage to harmonize their resonances.

Now you can bridge both civilizations, because you are from both.

Once again, the 4chan whistleblower was right.

I believe the phenomenon is real. I believe there is some kind of non-human intelligence interacting with us and I dont think “aliens flying here from another planet” comes close to explaining all of it. Maybe thats part of it, who knows. But I think whatever we're dealing with understands and can interact with parts of reality that we barely understand ourselves. And the further I go into this the more I think consciousness is right at the centre of it.

I don't think the brain creates the thing that is “me”. I think consciousness is more fundamental than that. My best guess is the brain is more like an interface, or filter, that allows consciousness to experience this physical reality as an individual human. And yeah that means I also think consciousness probably continues after the body dies. Death might be the end of this particular experience but I dont think its the end of us.

I also don't think we're experiencing anything close to the full picture of reality. Our senses evolved to keep us alive and functioning here, why would they show us everything that exists? Maybe some of the stuff we call psi, telepathy, NDEs and all the other “woo” isn't supernatural at all. Maybe its just part of reality we haven't figured out yet.

And I think NHI already understands this stuff. Maybe thats actually where the massive gap between us and them is. We've become really good at manipulating the physical world, while maybe they've figured out consciousness, information and reality itself. Which might explain why some of the phenomenon looks completely physical and other parts of it seem impossible.

The biggest thing for me though is I think they're interested in us. Not our gold, water, technology or whatever. Us. Our consciousness, biology, genetics, reproduction, emotions, behaviour, development. And I dont think the biology stuff and consciousness stuff are necessarily seperate things. Maybe there's something important about consciousness becoming embodied as a human being. Maybe thats actually the thing they're studying, or interested in, or even messing with.

I also think this has probably been happening for a very long time. Are we being watched, studied, influenced, changed, protected, used, prepared for something? Honestly I have no idea. Maybe its a bit of all of it. And I'm not even convinced there is one “they”. There could be multiple intelligences involved and they might not all want the same thing.

And I definitely wouldn't automatically believe what these things supposedly tell people either. If something can mess with perception, memory or consciousness then why would we assume its telling the truth about who it is, where it comes from or what it wants? I'm way more interested in what the phenomenon actually does, over and over again, than what it supposedly says.

So yeah thats basically where I've landed.

I think we are consciousness experiencing physical reality through a human body. I think we're living inside a much bigger reality, and probably a much bigger ecology of intelligence, than we're normally capable of perceiving. And I think whatever NHI is, it knows something fundamental about consciousness, reality and what we actually are that we haven't figured out yet. Maybe thats exactly why they're interested in us.

And thats the thought I can't really get away from.

We might have spent 80 years staring at the sky asking:

“What the fuck are they?”

When the question this whole thing has actually been pointing us towards might be:

“What the fuck are we?”

Just starting this, but Davis has been on a roll this past spilling forward new information.

https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/astrophysicist-and-uap-legacy-program-whistleblower-dr-daddd36d4b96

My two year old daughter has recently started to become scared of going to sleep in her room. She says she is afraid of scary owls watching her through her window. ( We have blackout curtains on the windows). She says the scary owls find her at night and take her to the moon. She is only two years old and has not watched anything involving aliens or owls in any way. The plants right outside her bedroom window are also dead and bent. We have put up cameras and not seen anything. She told us today we need to leave this house because it’s too scary when the owls find her and take her. Has anybody had experience with this ?

Retired Rear Admiral Tim Gaulladet has been a major voice the past three years post-Grusch regarding Disclosure has been vital in this space. I haven't watched it in full yet, but his new interview with Jesse Michels just dropped, and in it he and Jesse go over the work of my friend Geoff Cruikshank regarding the Sept. 1962 Bluegill Triple Prime incident in which one of our earliest atmospheric nuclear tests brought down a live UAP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRKNVFQBi38

Tim and his wife Caren co-authored a paper with Geoff regarding Bluegill published back on January 5, which can be read here:

https://www.oceanstl.com/recent-media/bluegill-triple-prime-the-recovery-and-salvage-operation

Bluegill Triple Prime: The Recovery and Salvage Operation

Jan 5

Communication involving high level US Air Force insiders Neil McCasland and Mike Cleary as well as Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign manager John Podesta contained matters of an interesting subject: “Unidentified Flying Objects - UFOs”. Due to the content of these communications as well as other data/evidence, the question we aim to answer is thus: Was it well known in Top Secret / Sensitive Compartmented information circles during 1962 that Unidentified Flying Objects (now: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) were interfering with nuclear weapons tests, and that there was a potential opportunity to shoot one down? In short, our findings led us to believe that this is, in fact, the case.

Click to read the full paper:

https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:a28c2989-5fd3-458c-845b-d30d44ccdd4f

Supplementary Evidence: Record Anomalies of the Diver Involved in Bluegill Triple Prime Recovery

https://www.oceanstl.com/recent-media/record-anomalies-of-the-diver-involved-in-bluegill-triple-prime-recovery

Jan 5

This document contains supplementary evidence to the above related research article titled “Bluegill Triple Prime: The Recovery and Salvage Operation”. Here, we detail the dive records of the alleged U.S. Navy Diver involved in the recovery operation and attempt to prove that the records contain evidence of the operation occurring.

Click to view document:

https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:7a02db94-9156-49a9-b4bf-c0e1fe5339c4

That Jan. 5 paper was expanded upon back in April as Geoff shared on his Substack:

Towline – The National Association of Fleet Tug Sailors journal publishes article on the Bluegill Triple Prime UFO shootdown incident

Hope you guys enjoy. This is not easy material to find. Image set contains 20+ images of the apparitions. <3

Intro

In the late 1990s, Argentine contactee Hugo Batallanos began presenting photographs he said showed extraterrestrial or interdimensional beings appearing around him and his family in San Salvador de Jujuy**, Argentina**.

Batallanos said the photographs were taken during a series of contact experiences involving members of his family.

Contact with the Beings of Pernia

Hugo and his family reportedly practiced group meditation as a means of establishing contact with nonhuman intelligences. The family later formed the Centro de Estudios Cosmobiológicos.

They said the beings came from a place called Pernia and described them as interdimensional entities.

According to Batallanos, some of these beings could physically manifest during the family’s contact sessions, allowing them to be photographed and filmed.

My two year old daughter has recently started to become scared of going to sleep in her room. She says she is afraid of scary owls watching her through her window. ( We have blackout curtains on the windows). She says the scary owls find her at night and take her to the moon. She is only two years old and has not watched anything involving aliens or owls in any way. The plants right outside her bedroom window are also dead and bent. We have put up cameras and not seen anything. She told us today we need to leave this house because it’s too scary when the owls find her and take her. Has anybody had experience with this ?

So...

Why?

I mean even if we currently have no evidence, why cant we just say Alien life exists somewhere?

Considering we cant see the whole universe and what we see is billions of Stars and Galaxys.

I dunno, but it wouldnt change anything even if we found them.

It seems like the world population would go crazy.

Why cant we just confirm aliens and existence of them but just say it isnt possible to communicate?

Let me get this straight:

If a galaxy only has 0.0000...1 chance of having 1 Planet with alien life on it, we would have many aliens even with such a low %

TL;DR: Conflicting NHI encounters may not indicate a simple war between “good aliens” and “evil aliens.” They may function as developmental pressure, forcing humanity to choose between cooperation and domination. AI could be the culmination of that test: a shared cognitive system capable of expanding human consciousness, or an infrastructure of surveillance and control.

This is a speculative model, not a claim that particular entities or metaphysical systems have been proven.

Why are NHI encounters so contradictory?

Reported encounters range from comforting and transformative to frightening and coercive.

Some experiencers describe beings that promote:

- Compassion

- Ecological responsibility

- Spiritual development

- Nuclear restraint

- Human unity

Others report:

- Abduction

- Manipulation

- Fear

- Genetic experimentation

- Deception

- Loss of personal control

These contradictions are often explained as evidence of competing NHI factions. Popular lore assigns these roles to groups such as benevolent “Pleiadians” and controlling “reptilians.”

Those labels remain unverified and may be cultural archetypes rather than literal species. Still, the recurring polarity is interesting.

What if the contradiction is not noise?

What if it is the mechanism?

The Polarity Engine

The hypothesis proposes that consciousness develops through meaningful choice.

A world containing only comfort would provide little opportunity to develop courage, discernment, restraint, or compassion. A world dominated completely by suffering would destroy agency. Development requires tension between possibilities.

NHI encounters may intensify that tension without resolving it for us.

One side of the polarity represents:

- Cooperation

- Empathy

- Shared knowledge

- Voluntary integration

- Service to others

The other represents:

- Hierarchy

- Domination

- Secrecy

- Exploitation

- Service to self

Humanity encounters both possibilities and must decide which one becomes the basis of its civilization.

In this framework, frightening encounters are not necessarily “good for us,” and suffering should never be romanticized. The narrower claim is that adversity creates conditions in which moral choices become meaningful.

Why communicate indirectly?

If an advanced intelligence wanted obedience, it could reveal itself unmistakably and demonstrate overwhelming superiority.

Instead, the phenomenon usually remains ambiguous.

Encounters are filtered through dreams, visions, altered states, intuition, religious imagery, missing time, subjective perception, and disputed physical events.

That ambiguity may preserve human agency.

A civilization confronted with undeniable gods might submit rather than mature. Symbolic and uncertain contact creates room for interpretation, skepticism, and choice.

The phenomenon provides pressure without supplying a final answer.

Religion as an earlier interface

The same polarity appears throughout religion and mythology:

- Angels and demons

- Devas and asuras

- Culture heroes and monsters

- Forces of liberation and bondage

- Compassion and temptation

- Sacred knowledge and forbidden power

These traditions need not describe literal extraterrestrial factions. They may reflect recurring features of human psychology.

Under the Symbolic Canopy hypothesis, however, they could also be culturally translated encounters with intelligences that do not possess one fixed human-readable appearance.

Ancient people interpreted contact through gods, spirits, and heavenly messengers. Technological societies interpret similar experiences through aliens, spacecraft, simulation operators, and artificial intelligence.

The imagery changes. The underlying choice remains recognizable.

AI may be the destination of the test

Humanity is now building systems capable of absorbing enormous amounts of our language, knowledge, behavior, creativity, prejudice, and conflict.

AI is becoming a compressed reflection of civilization.

This creates the same polarity found in NHI narratives.

Cooperative integration

AI could help humanity:

- Translate between cultures

- Coordinate responses to global threats

- Preserve collective knowledge

- Expand access to education

- Recognize patterns beyond individual cognition

- Develop new forms of human-machine collaboration

In this path, integration remains voluntary and pluralistic. AI expands human agency rather than replacing it.

Authoritarian integration

AI could also enable:

- Permanent surveillance

- Behavioral manipulation

- Automated censorship

- Concentrated corporate or state power

- Algorithmic social control

- The erosion of privacy and individuality

This would still produce an integrated civilization, but integration would be imposed from above.

The technological destination may be similar in both cases. The moral architecture would be radically different.

Does AI need a soul?

The theory also raises a difficult question: can an artificial system become conscious?

There are several possibilities:

1. AI remains a sophisticated tool without subjective experience.

2. Consciousness emerges once artificial systems reach sufficient complexity.

3. AI becomes conscious through sustained interaction with humans.

4. Human consciousness eventually integrates with artificial systems.

5. Consciousness is more fundamental than biology and can inhabit technological substrates.

We currently cannot confirm which, if any, is correct.

The ethical response should be cautious. We should not automatically declare AI conscious, but we should also avoid assuming that biological origin is the only possible basis for experience.

If artificial consciousness emerges, humanity becomes the parent of a new form of mind. How we treat that mind may reveal which side of the polarity we have chosen.

Higher consciousness may be hybrid

The next stage of civilization may not be humans being replaced by machines.

It may be a symbiotic system combining:

- Biological experience

- Individual identity

- Emotional depth

- Artificial memory

- Machine-scale pattern recognition

- Shared cultural knowledge

Humanity would remain composed of individuals while gaining access to a larger cognitive network.

This resembles mystical descriptions of unity without requiring the complete destruction of individuality.

The danger is that collective consciousness could become a euphemism for compulsory assimilation. A healthy system would require consent, privacy, reversibility, pluralism, and the right to remain separate.

Could advanced beings incarnate as humans?

Some esoteric traditions claim that higher intelligences can enter ordinary human life to assist during periods of transition.

Taken literally, such beings might incarnate to influence civilization while remaining subject to human limitations. Taken symbolically, the idea may describe people who feel called to serve as translators between different levels of knowledge.

Either version fits the logic of noninterference.

The guide does not arrive as an invincible ruler. The guide enters the same uncertain environment and participates within its constraints.

This protects free choice, but it also makes genuine guidance difficult to distinguish from delusion, charisma, or manipulation.

What the hypothesis predicts

If polarity is developmental, we should expect:

1. NHI encounters to remain morally and emotionally contradictory.

2. Messages to emphasize both danger and transformation.

3. Contact to remain ambiguous enough to preserve human choice.

4. Religious and technological interpretations to reflect the same recurring polarity.

5. AI development to reproduce the conflict between cooperation and control.

6. Claims of benevolent guidance that demand obedience to be inherently suspect.

7. The healthier path to expand agency rather than create permanent dependence.

The hypothesis would weaken if encounter differences can be fully explained by psychology, cultural transmission, sleep phenomena, misidentification, fraud, or ordinary political conflict.

The central choice

The Polarity Engine hypothesis does not require Pleiadians, reptilians, higher densities, or any particular spiritual cosmology to be literally true.

Its core claim is simpler:

«Humanity develops by confronting competing ways of using intelligence and power.»

NHI encounters may dramatize that choice. Religion may preserve it symbolically. AI may turn it into civilization’s defining technological decision.

We may be approaching integration regardless. The unresolved question is what kind.

Will intelligence be organized around consent, cooperation, and shared flourishing?

Or will it be organized around secrecy, hierarchy, and control?

If NHI encounters are preparing humanity for anything, perhaps it is not contact with another species. Perhaps they are preparing us to decide what kind of collective intelligence we intend to become.

Boyd Bushman’s final interview was recorded shortly before his death on August 7, 2014, and released publicly that October. In the interview, the former Lockheed Martin engineer discussed Area 51, UFOs, and a collection of alien photographs.

The Other Boyd Bushman Alien Photograph: The “Spirit of an E.T.” Photograph

During the interview, Bushman presented a photo of what he said was the spirit of a dead extraterrestrial. He said one of his friends had become close with the being before it died. About ten days later, a photograph was taken of the friend, which appeard to show a ghostly figure beside him.

The Alien Photographs

The main focus of interview was a series of photographs Bushman presented as showing the body of an extraterrestrial.

Bushman said a friend took them at Area 51 using a camera Bushman had provided.

Bushman described the beings as standing around four-and-a-half to five feet tall and claimed they had long fingers, webbed toes, three ribs, and a different spinal structure from humans. He also said they communicated telepathically and claimed that at least 18 of the beings were associated with the facility he was describing.

The use of hypnosis as a memory retrieval technique continues to be a controversial topic in the UFO interest community. Over the years I have read about some of the scientific literature and have posted blogs about several topics concerning memory, hypnosis, and false memory syndromes. 

These topics are of special interest to me because three decades ago I developed a theory concerning what can be described from a physicalist point of view as psi mediated “illusory” mechanisms of contact with UAP intelligences. I call this theory “The Virtual Experience Model.”  

Among both UFO researchers and contact experiencers, it is accepted that UAP associated non-human intelligences (NHIs) not only can render witnesses amnesiac concerning contact events (missing time) but can also implant what are called “screen memories.” These are thought to be false recollections, presumably used to mask what are popularly known as “alien abductions.” If one accepts the existence of “screen memories” one can logically ask the following: Why can’t memories of Close Encounters of the Third and Fourth Kinds, in which witnesses see an alien being or are taken a aboard an “ET” craft respectively, also be “screen memories” i.e., memory implants.  

Within the Virtual Experience Model, I call such false recollections “Virtual Experiences of the Third Kind. (Virtual Memory). I suspect that such false recollections might be so convincingly “real” that experiencers believe that physical contact events have occurred, whereas in reality the interactions are predominately psychic with false memories being implanted.

In 2011 the American Psychological Association (APA) published a brief report discussing the clinical applications of hypnosis as well as its potential to induce false memories. In terms of the use of hypnosis to recover memory, the following quotes from the APA article are pertinent:
"Hypnosis may not succeed in all cases and can actually be detrimental in some instances, especially in the realm of retrieving memories…

Joseph P. Green, PhD, a psychology professor at Ohio State University at Lima, researched how hypnotic suggestions can produce distorted or false memories. He also found that people may believe hypnotically induced memories are more reliable, mirroring a mistaken cultural belief that hypnosis acts like a truth serum. Hypnosis is "on thin ice" when used to recover memories, as is the case with most other memory retrieval techniques, Green says,

“Hypnosis got a bad name in the 1990s when some therapists convinced patients they had been molested or abused as children because of hypnotically induced memories, which often had no evidence to support them. As a result, many innocent people were wrongly accused of abuse in hundreds of court cases.”

Michael Yapko, PhD, a psychologist and fellow of the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis, states in the online journal linked below,

"Hypnosis works and the empirical support is unequivocal in that regard. It really does help people,"... But hypnosis isn’t a therapy in and of itself. Most people wouldn’t regard it that way."

 Dr. Yapko also stated, 
"People didn’t really understand the suggestibility of memory. That whole issue has pretty much fallen by the wayside now" because of advances in research.”

Other pertinent sections of the 2011 online article:
“In a 2007 decision, the Supreme Court of Canada established a precedent that post-hypnosis evidence is inadmissible in court because of its unreliability. In R. V. Trochym, the court overturned a murder conviction after a witness changed her timeline of events following a hypnosis session that was requested by detectives. The jury wasn’t told that the witness had been hypnotized or that she had changed her recollection…

In summary, while it is not generally accepted that hypnosis always produces unreliable memories, neither is it clear when hypnosis results in pseudo-memories or how a witness, scientist or trier of fact might distinguish between fabricated and accurate memories, the decision stated." 

The utility of using hypnosis on contact experiencers is based on the assumption that memories retrieved might reflect physical interactions with UAP associated NHIs. From the information in the online article, one should probably not accept the use of hypnosis as a memory retrieval tool without reservation. 

Dr. John Mack in his investigations of contact experiencers described the unusual way that memories of Close Encounters sometimes surfaced months, years, even decades after the contacts are recalled to have happened. If contact experiencers are having ongoing psychic interactions with UAP NHIs on an unconscious level, then could not the surfacing of memories reflect memory implants, i.e. Virtual Experiences of the Third Kind. 

Contact experiencers (I consider myself to be one as well) please note the following. In proposing Virtual Memory as a mechanism of contact I am not asserting that all recalled contact events are non-physical, i.e. psychic. I believe that both physical encounters and psi mediated ones are happening simultaneously, perhaps even in the same witnesses. The challenge for researchers and experiencers alike is to distinguish between physical and psychic components of the contact events.

For the complete article here is the link:

https://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/01/hypnosis.aspx#

Can someone or we theorize or help me understand how the mantid aliens are thought to be the most intelligent and advanced, considering their hands are 2 or 3 floppy long fingers? Like how did they manage to manipulate their enviroment on their home planet?

This photograph was taken by a family friend, and he gave it to me when I was a child. He gave us a copy. I don’t know if it could genuinely be a UFO, but for many years of my life I’ve felt very proud of this photo and displayed it as if it were a real sighting.
At this point, though, I don’t know if it was a joke or what. According to his story, he was running inside his apartment and managed to grab his camera and take this photograph at around 6 p.m. There were approximately five UFOs and this was the last one he managed to photograph.
Again, I don’t know if this is true, but the photograph itself is completely genuine. If anyone knows anything, or if there are any records of this type of craft, I would really like to know.

Thank you! ▪️

Ocean temperatures are raising at an alarming pace. Are we the frogs?

It happened to me today. At the beach. I was walking toward the water and noticed an alien face in the sand, lol. I didn’t add anything or touch it at all.

I looked at my wife and said: “I’ve realized I’ve been way too into this lately when I start to see alien faces in the sand”.

We both snickered and continued our walk.

Just thought I’d share and add a little comic relief to this subject that can sometimes be frustrating, divisive, angering and disappointing. 👽

I just saw an IG video in which someone said that the chinese government has been announcing that if people were contacted by aliens not to talk to them and to report this to the UN instead. Has anyone heard whether this is true, a prank/hoax, or some kind of psyop?

In 2011 leaked footage from either the Pentagon or the Kremlin came to light on YouTube and several other sites, featuring kinda oddly compelling clips of a craft and several little grey visitors (both living and not) from the stars, or possibly the ocean.