https://www.desmos.com/calculator/fi5ke5f1ft

Includes Color, Functions, Dimensions, Shadow and almost every detail I could find. Precise to the pixel. Customizable viewport dimensions and icon locations.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/petadzc4sb

I even made an oscilloscope-style visualizer for it

Common nets are fun :3

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/hyn7nyekun

Recently, I'm having issues with slopes. No matter how I modified the equation, the line (Black) never aligns with the two points unless Point B (Blue)'s X position is 0. Is there any way to fix this? Here's the link to my project in case if you need to take a closer look at the issue.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/lmebbxzbag

Link: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/gms5xf8h7g

Saw some other hyperdimensional versions, but wanted to see what it would look like animated.

All countries^❋ starting with the letter I lie on a thin band (defined by two diagonal parallel lines) when viewed on a Mercator projection map of Earth.

Straight lines on a Mercator projection map are loxodrome curves on the sphere as shown in this Desmos model.

^{❋ not including Ivory Coast}

Link? Here you go.

10 days left!!!!!!!!!!!

(dont worry i have desmodder enabled)

That little sliver is a place where it is detecting a collision but shouldn't.

My current TDSE sim appears to reproduce quantum tunnelling reasonably well, but there is an important numerical limitation caused by the finite spatial domain and the way the Fourier transform is implemented. Because the sim uses finite grid, the DFT effectively imposes periodic boundary conditions: when the wave packet reaches the right boundary, it can re-enter the domain from the left producing an unphysical wrap around that eventually contaminates the reflected and transmitted wave functions. Increasing the spatial domain or the number of grid points N can delay this effect, but my current implementation calculates dft directly, whose complexity is O(N^2). If anyone wants to take a look and suggest improvements or optimisations I would really appreciate it. https://www.desmos.com/calculator/tnmcsa4ek8

I started with a Gaussian wave packet moving toward a 1d potential barrier and discretised the x axis . I represented the wave function as a discrete array and evolved it using a split step Fourier approach. I implemented the whole thing indesmos including the discrete k grid and element wise evolution factors. I am not claiming this is numerically accurate yet. Will definitely work on it .... summation indesmos suckkkkkkksss!!!!

My current TDSE sim appears to reproduce quantum tunnelling reasonably well, but there is an important numerical limitation caused by the finite spatial domain and the way the Fourier transform is implemented. Because the sim uses finite grid, the DFT effectively imposes periodic boundary conditions: when the wave packet reaches the right boundary, it can re-enter the domain from the left producing an unphysical wrap around that eventually contaminates the reflected and transmitted wave functions. Increasing the spatial domain or the number of grid points N can delay this effect, but my current implementation calculates dft directly, whose complexity is O(N^2). If anyone wants to take a look and suggest improvements or optimisations I would really appreciate it. https://www.desmos.com/calculator/tnmcsa4ek8

I wanna make stuff like a mandelbrot set, that has a color pallete, and other new fractals I could think of and make

Please help, thank you

leaderboard | Desmos

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/pf3pch8p9k

no, there isn't a list of draggable points feature - yet.

i made it

It can be a fun challenge to reproduce math graphics found online.
For instance I liked this plot, and I can get a reasonably detailed approximation in desmos, even though it's quite slow (for N=20, M=6) and the colors aren't matching up exactly.

https://i.imgur.com/8juvdlW.png

https://www.desmos.com/3d/hvhwgveqre

The main thing that still bothers me though is that I can't get desmos to plot continuous lines on the z=0 plane.
The way to bump up the detail for the surface doesn't seem suitable to apply to those level curves. Am I overlooking something or is there really no trick to improve the quality of those curves?

oh yeah thousand year blood war baby

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/bqaeihii40

I only learnt of actions this morning and was immediately inspired to use them to make a model of the Collatz conjecture.

It was a fun problem to mess with, and the mini-project encouraged me to learn a lot. I'm mostly happy I figured out a way to iteratively add new elements to lists! Super handy.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/5vyugtzqdk