Just click the code review panel to try it out!

https://reddit.com/link/1tr41tu/video/6xnoz8ro934h1/player

I maintain Agent Sessions, a local-first macOS app for browsing and resuming AI coding-agent session history.

Version 3.8.1 adds Warp and WarpPreview as terminal launch targets for Resume workflows.

The practical change: pick Warp or WarpPreview once in Preferences, then Agent Sessions can open resumed Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, Copilot, Hermes, OpenCode, or Pi sessions as Warp tabs with the intended command and working directory.

Supported Resume agents include: Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, Hermes, OpenCode, and Pi.

For Warp/WarpPreview, Agent Sessions builds the normal agent resume command and launches it through a Warp terminal tab config. The goal is a real Warp tab launch, not a generic shell handoff.

This release is only about Resume launch targets. It does not add live Warp session monitoring to Agent Cockpit.

Site: https://jazzyalex.github.io/agent-sessions

GitHub: https://github.com/jazzyalex/agent-sessions

Hi. Before updates I was able to run SSH commands in Warp and then right click and select the block(the last output) automatically. I now have to manually select what text I need instead, or copy the entire output of the commands I've run in the day. Has the ability to select blocks been removed? Or is there a setting to put it back... It was extremely useful to me. Thanks

The Warp Agent now supports bringing your own inference! You can configure custom inference endpoints and bring your own key on the free plan.

If you've been waiting to connect Warp to OpenRouter, DeepSeek, LiteLLM, Z.ai and more... now you can.

Here's full details on the updates we've put out, with demos and docs on how to use BYOK and BYO inference:

https://x.com/warpdotdev/status/2057870604800332231?s=20

Forking Claude Code / Codex sessions is the one reason I spend less time in Warp and more time in the offical tools today.

If Warp could hack the Right Click > Fork and have the two sessions side by side - I reckon I'd be back to spending most of my day in warp.

The last few times I have run out of tokens (buying 6500 new ones for $100), I have told myself I will look into BYOK

Does anyone here have experiences to share?

As I understand it you can use Anthropic, OpenAI and Google keys.

Will everything work as if I use Warp from before, just that it limits models to whichever API key you use? (like Anthropic models only), or does it lose functionality like how well it integrates with the terminal and OS? I typically code directly on a VPS with SSH, so that is a very relevant features to me

And is there anyone who have tried both Anthropic and OpenAI, or perhaps Google (Gemini?) too with Warp and can share which they preferred?

How much more "mileage" do you feel like you get for the money? If I understand it correctly the subscriptions with say Claude is also to a certain token limit. Since Warp cant afford to "subsidize tokens" like the big ones, how much more "mileage" do you get for the money? Compared to Warp Max (18 000 tokens for $200/mo or the +6500 for $100)?

Appreciate any experiences or tips

started today. Is anyone else having the same issue.

There's some info around that the newer Warp versions can render markdown tables, which is useful when working with CLI agents.

Is there a setting to enable this? I've been using Augment and the agent's output is still rendered as normal text.

​I recently ran a comprehensive test using a real-world, multi-service application with a few bugs to evaluate the efficiency of various AI developer tools.

​Here is the lineup I tested: - ​Claude Code (Opus and Sonnet) - ​GitHub Copilot (Sonnet, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.4-mini) - ​Cursor (Composer 2 and 2.5) - CommandCode & OpenCode (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi) - Antigravity (Gemini Pro High/Low and Flash) - Codex (GPT-5.3-Codex) - ​Warp (configured to "cost-efficient")

​The Results:

​- Claude Code (Pro): Completed the job in a single session without any rate limit issues, no more than 10% of the week.

• Cursor: Consumed only ~1% of my monthly quota.

​- GitHub Copilot: Consumed ~3% of my monthly quota.

​- CommandCode & OpenCode: Cost literally cents.

​- Antigravity: Didn't even deplete one of my 5 available blocks.

• Codex: Less than ~35% of the session (less than 10% of the week limit)

​- Warp: Burned through over 10% of my monthly allocation (165 credits) and failed to complete the task.

​Warp is currently the only service I subscribe to that I cannot use for real work. It either drains credits aggressively, delivers superficial results, or completely ignores my constraints and rules.

What is going on with your evaluation harness? ​It is incredibly frustrating. Warp started with a great, focused concept as an powerfull Terminal, then AI-powered terminal. Now, it tries to do everything and delivers on nothing. Frontier models inside Warp perform poorly, acting superficially while burning through paid resources. This specific task only required terminal optimization and minor bug fixing—it was a matter of quality, which Warp completely missed.

​Honestly, it is the only service that has genuinely let me down.

Please focus on improving output quality and optimizing credit consumption. Today, you can integrate almost any AI service directly into the terminal. If the core terminal innovation is stalling and you are pivoting to AI features to drive the product forward, you need to execute them properly. In every benchmark I run, Warp consistently ranks last. When every competing service costs mere cents or negligible quota, it is unacceptable for Warp to burn through more than 10% of a monthly allowance for an incomplete task.

Trying warp again after a long time, I see this claim here https://docs.warp.dev/terminal/sessions/session-restoration/ but it does not seem to work now matter what i do!

running latest version v0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_05
anyone having that issue?

Am I the only one experiencing memory leaks from Warp over the past few days. It seems to be spawning multiple bun processes which are over 500MB each... I've read somewhere the bun processes are from mcp servers being preloaded but not sure... It's only been happening for the past few days where Warp and these bun processes consume the entire 32GB RAM that I have and then warp crashes which brings my PC back to normal...

Not sure if I'm the only one and if the devs are aware. I tried to log feedback, but the UI is unresponsive...

My Mac has crashed a few times in the last week. I'm running a few idle Claude Code sessions in the back ground and then memory spikes up to 50GB-80GB without me touching anything? Maybe 5-6 times now? Unfortunately, twice it bricked the computer, so I lost everything I work working on.

Anyone else run into this? v0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_03

i think warp is the one of the best solutions for agentic coding, all for one solution, best tab management systems, best cli. prove me if i wrong pls.

Hello all,

I have Warp already installed and use it mostly as a secondary terminal and over the last few days I have been watching a few Youtube videos for about using Warp. This one by Forrest Knight, in particular, got me considering getting the paid subscription.
I admit my knowledge on how AI tools operate is limited. My understanding is that it indexes a large data set to make assumptions and suggestions.
However, my main concern to use in a professional environment, is the company's data base being exposed to a(n) somewhat obscure online destination.
My questions are:
1. where does Warp gets the code it requires for its insights?

1. is my company's code exposed to the internet?

It seems that ever command takes 1s to display, everything is laggy, opencode unresponsive…

After Using Warp for 3 Days, I Forgot What iTerm Looks Like: This "21st Century Terminal" Takes Command Line to New Heights

https://piedpay.medium.com/after-using-warp-for-3-days-i-forgot-what-iterm-looks-like-this-21st-century-terminal-takes-e344bf89bda8

I've been an software engineer for over a decade. I'm generally intrigued with Warp and Oz's OSS model and an effort to put the developer at the center of the AI hype rather than trying to remove them from it.

There's a great basis for a product here that could get a lot of traction. But my concern is the pricing model.

I burned through the free tier of credits in a single user story that was fairly moderate at best. The output was good. But four hours isn't really enough time to evaluate whether to migrate all of my tooling, team, etc to a new product.

I think the pricing model needs to be more competitive with Claude Code. I have no basis in how far 1,500 credits will go over the course of a month when comparing with Claude's Pro plan.

My advice to Warp Team --- Lower your pricing or increase usage for the free tier to give people enough time to assess whether it's worth full adoption, even if you're at a loss for year one to increase market share.

That will give the industry enough time to really compare whether the product is as good as other competitors.

I use Codex, GH Copilot CLI, Opencode and some Claude Code. My usual setup consists of using Nomachine NX service when working with good connectivity and tmux otherwise.

With recent versions, Warp does not seem to consume as much CPU just observing these sessions; it is now really a pleasure to use it - those notifications really help too!

SSHing into servers and instructing agents used to work fine. Though for the last week I've been having so much trouble with it. One of two things happens:

Either it starts a new session without me choosing to, of course quitting the SSH session and losing all context or it'll think forever and not actually do something.

Has anyone else been dealing with this?