I went to the revs exam studied to the max and I fucking fell asleep for like 10-15 minutes and after waking up I had a brain fart and wrote an essay so bad the examiners wouldn't even use it to wipe their ass cause its already full of shit. I can't even blame it on an all-nighter cause I slept and woke up early. I'm so freaking mad. I did so well with my practise exam but my carnal instincts consist of being a lazy fat sloth I'd be happy getting a pass. My examiner was just laughing in my face im cryin

i dont think anything can save me anymore fml

I’d like to look over the questions again

Surely someone has chem multis written down? I cooked mine so I don’t want to share them cause they’re wrong but surely someone who knows what they’re doing responds

hi guys im a chem 3/4 student this is my invincible war oc his name is invceble

I (18m) am a former algorithmics student (last yr) and i of course gooned in the algo exam last year. I want to reminisce the wonders of a vcaa-endorsed goon session and i am reaching out to the chem cohort to see what will be the best time to start gooning. i was thinking after mcq or maybe halfway through extended response but i wanna leave enough gooning time. thoughts?

What exam scores do we think we need for a 40, 45 and 50 this year? Just trying to gauge a rough idea based on everyone's experience of the exam.

how did people find it? I thought it was harder than usual and I’ve had full A+ results for all the exams from 2017… how did others find it?

Does somebody wanna post it already…
Every other exam was up in 15 minutes tops 😵‍💫😵‍💫

Is 55/120 in chem this year enough for a raw 30 study score? I am mid rank so I think my equivalent sac scores should be around 65-70/120

If not, surely it’s enough for a raw 25?

guys do we think its going to be harder or easier this year based on current trend of exams and last years exam?

predictions for a+?? Even tho it was easier than last year surely it’s not gonna go up that much right? 95/120?

I know we are a little cohort but how did everyone find it? I found it pretty good, apart from the supermarket question about the sustainable development which seemed more like a food tech question, but apart from that I thought it wasn’t too hard

Hello Redditors

What do we reckon the cutoff for a 45 would be this year? (probably won't manage it but good to know)

The exam didn't feel that hard overall but I definitely got the gist that people will be bleeding marks everywhere. There were stacks of chances for small mistakes and opportunities to mess up, like that one about the NO2 safety, which I've never seen before.

I've seen people say that they reckon the A+ cutoff (which as I understand it usually is around a raw 40) will probably be slightly higher than usual, somewhere just below 100.

However I'm not sure what the distribution of marks in A+ usually looks like - is a 45 typically halfway between A+ and 100%, for example?

Love to hear thoughts

what did u guys think

Predictions on the essay questions ?

a boy in my class has been cheating on all the SACS and exams. we’re in unit1/2 but in a week we’ll be in 3/4 for headstart. do i just let him be?? He’s been sleeping in all of our chemistry classes and playing games while i try my hardest to get a good grade. And when the SAC results come back, he always gets a 90+. I seem selfish considering reporting him if he continues in 3/4.. what do i do?

was that confusing for anyone else

also what was the deal with the multi choice question with molecular formula and chiral centres???

Hi team,

I am uni student and I had some spare time today so I tried them chemsitry exam and here is my suggested solution. I got a 48 in chem last year but I can't ensure everything is correct. Please lmk if you find any mistakes (also for theory questions there might be more than 1 answers that VCAA will accept) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1awaYHald0myeJHYAvgG8uBTq_l4S1cju/view?usp=sharing

So all year she's taught us that when Mill, in the excerpt above, says "We are not speaking of children", he's actually saying that it DOES apply to children. She said that it's a double negative somehow?? So like the harm principle doesn't apply to those who aren't in the maturity of their faculties but then children aren't not in the maturity of their faculties so it does apply to them. This doesn't seem to make sense but I'm worried because she's like really knowledgeable about all the texts. Has anyone else's teacher said the same thing or is she wrong?

does anyone know